stacked house ? Trump got twenty tickets ?

[Care4all]

Trump Gets Booed at Debate

Good for him! As he pointed out, the audience was not made up of run-of-the-mill NH voters but the ones who gave $$$$ to certain candidates or the GOP. (FactCheck.org says only 75 RNC donors were in the audience of 1000 and all candidates received an equal number of tickets)(And TheGateWayPundit reports that the Trump campaign only received 20 tickets!)

As for eminent domain – which should count – individual rights or the good of the whole? Without this legal move, a lot of things we take for granted would not exist. Do you drive to work on an Internet? It's probably there because some private property was taken in order to build it. Our country expanded due to the railroads and many of them were only built because they co-opted private holdings.

And how many of those who booed benefited from eminent domain? If you want the full story of the property referred to, go to Vera Coking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And here's a question nobody posed – how many times did Florida use eminent domain during Gov Bush's term of office?

And how many people who don't live in New Hampshire are going to be bused in to vote there?

most of us have no problem with eminent domain instituted by our govt for the use of public roads or highways, even public State Parks, or most things that are for Public use where the public benefits.

HOWEVER, eminent domain used by our govt to take a private citizen's land to give it to another private citizen or corporation for their PROFIT, is highly unethical.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Trump Gets Booed at Debate

Good for him! As he pointed out, the audience was not made up of run-of-the-mill NH voters but the ones who gave $$$$ to certain candidates or the GOP. (FactCheck.org says only 75 RNC donors were in the audience of 1000 and all candidates received an equal number of tickets)(And TheGateWayPundit reports that the Trump campaign only received 20 tickets!)

As for eminent domain – which should count – individual rights or the good of the whole? Without this legal move, a lot of things we take for granted would not exist. Do you drive to work on an Internet? It's probably there because some private property was taken in order to build it. Our country expanded due to the railroads and many of them were only built because they co-opted private holdings.

And how many of those who booed benefited from eminent domain? If you want the full story of the property referred to, go to Vera Coking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And here's a question nobody posed – how many times did Florida use eminent domain during Gov Bush's term of office?

And how many people who don't live in New Hampshire are going to be bused in to vote there?

Individual rights all day long.

 

[longknife]

Trump Gets Booed at Debate

Good for him! As he pointed out, the audience was not made up of run-of-the-mill NH voters but the ones who gave $$$$ to certain candidates or the GOP. (FactCheck.org says only 75 RNC donors were in the audience of 1000 and all candidates received an equal number of tickets)(And TheGateWayPundit reports that the Trump campaign only received 20 tickets!)

As for eminent domain – which should count – individual rights or the good of the whole? Without this legal move, a lot of things we take for granted would not exist. Do you drive to work on an Internet? It's probably there because some private property was taken in order to build it. Our country expanded due to the railroads and many of them were only built because they co-opted private holdings.

And how many of those who booed benefited from eminent domain? If you want the full story of the property referred to, go to Vera Coking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And here's a question nobody posed – how many times did Florida use eminent domain during Gov Bush's term of office?

And how many people who don't live in New Hampshire are going to be bused in to vote there?

most of us have no problem with eminent domain instituted by our govt for the use of public roads or highways, even public State Parks, or most things that are for Public use where the public benefits.

HOWEVER, eminent domain used by our govt to take a private citizen's land to give it to another private citizen or corporation for their PROFIT, is highly unethical.

If you would READ the link you will discover the woman DID NOT LOSE HER HOUSE. When she refused to accept the offer, Trump backed down.

Did you bother to read who ended up with the property?

 

[longknife]

Let me add to this eminent domain debate.

I don't have specifics but it is a frequent matter here in Las Vegas when private property was taken from private citizens - and transferred to private companies who claimed to build things for the benefit of the general population.

When the Treasure Island Hotel and Casino was in the works, there were some private homes and a couple of businesses on the land they wanted to build it on. I clearly remember the debate on the company trying to force them to quit their properties "for the greater good." Most of them sold - at pretty good prices. But, there was one hold out!!! If you want to see it, go to Google Maps

 

[Care4all]

Trump Gets Booed at Debate

Good for him! As he pointed out, the audience was not made up of run-of-the-mill NH voters but the ones who gave $$$$ to certain candidates or the GOP. (FactCheck.org says only 75 RNC donors were in the audience of 1000 and all candidates received an equal number of tickets)(And TheGateWayPundit reports that the Trump campaign only received 20 tickets!)

As for eminent domain – which should count – individual rights or the good of the whole? Without this legal move, a lot of things we take for granted would not exist. Do you drive to work on an Internet? It's probably there because some private property was taken in order to build it. Our country expanded due to the railroads and many of them were only built because they co-opted private holdings.

And how many of those who booed benefited from eminent domain? If you want the full story of the property referred to, go to Vera Coking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And here's a question nobody posed – how many times did Florida use eminent domain during Gov Bush's term of office?

And how many people who don't live in New Hampshire are going to be bused in to vote there?

most of us have no problem with eminent domain instituted by our govt for the use of public roads or highways, even public State Parks, or most things that are for Public use where the public benefits.

HOWEVER, eminent domain used by our govt to take a private citizen's land to give it to another private citizen or corporation for their PROFIT, is highly unethical.

If you would READ the link you will discover the woman DID NOT LOSE HER HOUSE. When she refused to accept the offer, Trump backed down.

Did you bother to read who ended up with the property?

yes, i read the article...and yes, eventually she was paid a half a million for it decades after the initial pursuit of it and after she moved to California...

That's not an issue with me...she won her eminent domain case and got to keep her property....till she wanted to sell it.

 

[Zander]

The next dirty trick will be a series of "match up polls" that show how only Rubio, Kasich. Bush, or Christie, can beat hiLIARy or the Crackpot. Nobody else has a chance, especially not Trump!

I don't think it will work this cycle.....Republican voters are pissed.

Those polls have already existed for MONTHS. Trump has consistently been the loser vs Hillary

Of course they have. The national polls are designed to shape your opinion. They did the exact same thing in 2008 with McCain- the polls showed that he was the only candidate that could be hiLIARy in the general. Once he was the nominee those polls miraculously showed him losing. Here is a graphic representation of those polls. Look closely at Jan and February 2008. They shaped a lot of voters opinions.

Now here is a graph of Guliani versus hiLIARy. After being a major contender for the better part of 2 years, he suddenly dropped like a stone in January.

Get ready for a BARRAGE of new polls that show only an establishment candidate can beat hiLIARy after New Hampshire. Especially if Trump wins by double digits.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The next dirty trick will be a series of "match up polls" that show how only Rubio, Kasich. Bush, or Christie, can beat hiLIARy or the Crackpot. Nobody else has a chance, especially not Trump!

I don't think it will work this cycle.....Republican voters are pissed.

Those polls have already existed for MONTHS. Trump has consistently been the loser vs Hillary

Of course they have. The national polls are designed to shape your opinion. They did the exact same thing in 2008 with McCain- the polls showed that he was the only candidate that could be hiLIARy in the general. Once he was the nominee those polls miraculously showed him losing. Here is a graphic representation of those polls. Look closely at Jan and February 2008. They shaped a lot of voters opinions.

Now here is a graph of Guliani versus hiLIARy. After being a major contender for the better part of 2 years, he suddenly dropped like a stone in January.

Get ready for a BARRAGE of new polls that show only an establishment candidate can beat hiLIARy after New Hampshire. Especially if Trump wins by double digits.

Like I said those polls already exist. We don't have to wait for them.

 

[Zander]

The next dirty trick will be a series of "match up polls" that show how only Rubio, Kasich. Bush, or Christie, can beat hiLIARy or the Crackpot. Nobody else has a chance, especially not Trump!

I don't think it will work this cycle.....Republican voters are pissed.

Those polls have already existed for MONTHS. Trump has consistently been the loser vs Hillary

Of course they have. The national polls are designed to shape your opinion. They did the exact same thing in 2008 with McCain- the polls showed that he was the only candidate that could be hiLIARy in the general. Once he was the nominee those polls miraculously showed him losing. Here is a graphic representation of those polls. Look closely at Jan and February 2008. They shaped a lot of voters opinions.

Now here is a graph of Guliani versus hiLIARy. After being a major contender for the better part of 2 years, he suddenly dropped like a stone in January.

Get ready for a BARRAGE of new polls that show only an establishment candidate can beat hiLIARy after New Hampshire. Especially if Trump wins by double digits.

Like I said those polls already exist. We don't have to wait for them.

But so far there are only a handful......I expect to see a boatload between now and Super Tuesday.

 

[washamericom]

Personally, I don't care about the audience. The show is about what the candidates are saying. Needing an audience is like needing a laugh track.

it would be great to have both.

 

[washamericom]

I am not a Trump for President supporter, but I am against the RNC or the DNC picking our candidates for us by allowing dirty tricks or creating the tricks themselves in our elections.

And the Cruz campaign dirty tricks in Iowa, telling Carson supporters he was leaving the race, when he wasn't, in order for Cruz to get Carson supporters, to beat Trump, infuriated me....that was not right and just.

and if the RNC packed the audience with supporters of the establishment candidates that they wanted to be in the Presidential race as speculated in this thread, that is NOT right and just either!

I am not going to vote for Trump, butttttttt GO TRUMP!

donald's really a nice guy, people don't see that side of him. he's all business when he's on tv. look at his kids, they are awesome. he will delegate authority well, and will really cut through the dc bullshit. he's outspoken, and generous to a fault.