Spooks Covering Butt

[Billy_Kinetta]

Old Jiffy-Pop found in the fallout shelter.

Clapper: Brennan's rhetoric is becoming an issue

 

[saveliberty]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

 

[OldLady]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

 

[toobfreak]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Not necessarily. It is still left to be seen whether RINOs like McCain, Graham and others will rush to side with Brennan threatening to pass a bill trying to threaten or block Trump. Never underestimate a RINO.

 

[toobfreak]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

 

[bullwinkle]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

So you justify Trump removing security clearance as punishment for a personal gripe by saying the Obama 'could have' done it too. Yep, Obama could have....but he, and nobody before him...didn't!

But that's what happens when a President thinks He IS The State. And he couldn't think so without you.

 

[Rambunctious]

Send Obama's goons to prison...including Clapper....I wonder if this is the first bite in the feeding frenzy the goons will do to each other as the truth is exposed....never trust a spook....ever...

 

[BluesLegend]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

Brennan himself revoked the security clearance of several Benghazi hero's who were critical of Obama and Hillary, the press responded with CRICKETS.

 

[Rambunctious]

Guilty liars like Brennan always scream the loudest....he will be silenced....when he is rotting in a prison cell....

 

[OldLady]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to.

 

[Rambunctious]

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to

The former CIA chief is openly lying and calling for the president to be prosecuted for treason and you think that its okay?...do you think Obama would have stood for that?...of course you don't and of course he wouldn't...put your Obama colored glasses away...
Brennan looks like he is unstable and that is not a good mix with the security clearance he had...who knows what his unhinged anger towards Trump would have led him to do with his security access...
I actually think no one should leave their job and be allowed to take their clearance with them...they should leave it at their former desk and go home....

 

[toobfreak]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

So you justify Trump removing security clearance as punishment for a personal gripe by saying the Obama 'could have' done it too. Yep, Obama could have....but he, and nobody before him...didn't!

But that's what happens when a President thinks He IS The State. And he couldn't think so without you.

I'm not justifying anything.... I don't need to.
YOU say its punishment.
YOU say its a personal gripe.
No president I can think of has faced so much abhorrent behavior and claims as the Left do now, right up to and including the former president Obama both actively obstructing his administration before leaving office and bad-mouthing it on the road since. The Left have totally LEFT THE PLANET. You've burned all your bridges. The entire party hinges on traitors aiding our enemies. AFAIC, Trump ought to take Brennan before a firing squad at this point. Maybe that will come after Brennan's trial. Execution by musket.

 

[toobfreak]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.

Trumpetina, its can't be an abuse of power if the constitution gives him the power to do it. Brennan . . . . OUT OF THE LOOP! Hope many more are to come.

 

[BluesLegend]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to.

Says who, you??? He's the POTUS with an army of advisors and intelligence agencies, he has information you don't have and you sit there armchair quarterbacking a POTUS? Lib please

 

[imawhosure]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to.

I would like to know what you are going to do, when it is proven that this whole collusion/delusion was a hoax, and Brennan, along with others in the Obama administration, will be shown to be the ones who pulled this off. And when that happens, it will also be proven, that the DNC was complicit in trying to keep the truth from you, and the rest of the American people!

 

[JWBooth]

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to

The former CIA chief is openly lying and calling for the president to be prosecuted for treason and you think that its okay?...do you think Obama would have stood for that?...of course you don't and of course he wouldn't...put your Obama colored glasses away...
Brennan looks like he is unstable and that is not a good mix with the security clearance he had...who knows what his unhinged anger towards Trump would have led him to do with his security access...
I actually think no one should leave their job and be allowed to take their clearance with them...they should leave it at their former desk and go home....

Moon of Alabama blog sums it up nicely -
“Abu Jihad Brennan was the CIA's station chief in Saudi Arabia. Some assert he went native, i.e. converted to Wahhabism. Brennan was in Riyadh when the Khobar Towers were bombed. Al-Qaeda did it, but Brennan was helpful in blaming the attack on Hizbullah and Iran. He was deputy executive director of the CIA on 9/11. That 9/11 happened was an intelligence failure or, as some have it, an incident arranged by the deep state. Brennan was CIA chief of staff while the agency concocted false stories about Iraqi WMD. He was within the line of command that ran the CIA torture program. It was Brennan who conspired with the Gulf dictators to hire Jihadis to destroy Libya and to attempt the same in Syria. In short - the man was always ruthless, incompetent and dishonest.

When Obama became president he wanted to make Brennan Director of the CIA. The Democrats in Congress were opposed to that. Obama then made him his high priest of targeted killings. After Obama's reelection, Brennan finally became director. He ordered the CIA to spy on the Congress committee investigating CIA torture. He lied to Congress under oath when he denied that it had happened. When it was proven that the CIA did what it did, he had to apologize.”

 

[imawhosure]

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to

The former CIA chief is openly lying and calling for the president to be prosecuted for treason and you think that its okay?...do you think Obama would have stood for that?...of course you don't and of course he wouldn't...put your Obama colored glasses away...
Brennan looks like he is unstable and that is not a good mix with the security clearance he had...who knows what his unhinged anger towards Trump would have led him to do with his security access...
I actually think no one should leave their job and be allowed to take their clearance with them...they should leave it at their former desk and go home....

Moon of Alabama blog sums it up nicely -
“Abu Jihad Brennan was the CIA's station chief in Saudi Arabia. Some assert he went native, i.e. converted to Wahhabism. Brennan was in Riyadh when the Khobar Towers were bombed. Al-Qaeda did it, but Brennan was helpful in blaming the attack on Hizbullah and Iran. He was deputy executive director of the CIA on 9/11. That 9/11 happened was an intelligence failure or, as some have it, an incident arranged by the deep state. Brennan was CIA chief of staff while the agency concocted false stories about Iraqi WMD. He was within the line of command that ran the CIA torture program. It was Brennan who conspired with the Gulf dictators to hire Jihadis to destroy Libya and to attempt the same in Syria. In short - the man was always ruthless, incompetent and dishonest.

When Obama became president he wanted to make Brennan Director of the CIA. The Democrats in Congress were opposed to that. Obama then made him his high priest of targeted killings. After Obama's reelection, Brennan finally became director. He ordered the CIA to spy on the Congress committee investigating CIA torture. He lied to Congress under oath when he denied that it had happened. When it was proven that the CIA did what it did, he had to apologize.”

Despite Jake the Snakes phony protestations, listen to these!

 

[westwall]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to.

Trump HASN'T abused his power. It was brennan who did. First he pulled the security clearances of the hero's who fought to save the Ambassador in Benghazi, and brennan did that to SAVE HIS OWN WORTHLESS POS ASS. He has further PROVABLY lied to Congress ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS. Brennan is a despicable swine who needs to be in prison.

 

[saveliberty]

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to.

How is it an abuse of power?

 

[Rustic]

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for "purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power."

“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said.

Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”

Either way you are in trouble Brennan.

Trump has the “full authority” to rescind security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
The fact is, Trump has the "full authority" to rescind security clearance. Period. The reason why is ridiculous and has nothing to do with valid reasons that the intelligence agencies revoke security clearances.

Trump doesn't need a reason. These people all serve at his pleasure. If Obama was ending someone's security clearance you'd be all up in their face for even questioning it.

Don't underestimate me. I am concerned because Trump had no valid reason for his abuse of power.
That is what concerns me, not so much what he did or who he did it to.

Trump is harmless, There would be no trump that there was no Obama. We had to live with that fucker that is Obama for eight years… Karma is a bitch