So…whos fault is it?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Mr. P, Dec 14, 2006.

  1. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +618
    What is a victim? I’m having a knockdown drag out on another site about ‘victims’. Even thought I might be banned.

    The thread title is ‘When or is it ever the victims fault’.

    My position is sometimes it is the ‘victims’ fault, sometimes fault is shared and sometimes they’re not at fault at all.

    Pretty well covers it IMO..The opposition claims the ‘victim’ is never at fault.

    What do you folks think?
     
  2. 5stringJeff
    Offline

    5stringJeff Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,990
    Thanks Received:
    536
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
    Ratings:
    +540
    I think you're right on. Some victims of crimes put themselves in bad circumstances, so the blame is at least partially theirs.
     
  3. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64
    Maybe we could have a hint here on what you are driving at?
    Because it might not be fault more than pure ignorance and not knowing any better
     
  4. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +618
    Is pure ignorance and excuse? Maybe, it depends on age? IMO, That would fall into 'sometimes they’re not at fault at all'.
     
  5. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64
    Rape vitim for example. She was wearing a very short mini, fishnets and pumps and cleavage showing. She was very friendly and wasn't being over flirty, but got raped? Did she understand wearing that clothing made her a target of harassment? and because of the location she became open season. So was she just stupid or innocent playing the field because of the attention she was given? One sided here from a males perspective. But I'd say she was a victim, but here ignorance of her surroundings and how to dress made her a victim. My take. If it happened twice then I'd have to wonder WTF over!
     
  6. Hobbit
    Offline

    Hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,099
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Near Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +421
    I think it can go all three ways. Continuing with the rape example:

    Victim's Fault:

    She goes to a club wearing next to nothing. She lets herself be picked up by a guy who's obviously horny. After some conversation and dancing, he suggests going back to his place...and leaves no guesses as to what they'll be doing there. When they get there, the foreplay begins and she's enjoying every second of it. Then, when they're only seconds away from the actual 'act,' she backs out. Guy goes ahead anyway. She doesn't really put up a fight. In this case, she basically said she wanted sex about 1000 times, and only said no once, and then at a point in time when the guy was too overrun with hormones to really comprehend. Yeah, the guy should have stopped, but who can honestly say with absolute certainty that they have the willpower to do so in said situation. If she didn't want sex, she should have said so instead of screaming 'screw my brains out' with every action she took.

    Partial Victim's Fault:

    Same scenario, except she says no during the initial necking. The guy clearly could have stopped, but she set herself up in a very comprimising situation by being at a guy's house alone when he made it perfectly clear that the two of them were there to have sex. With the kind of signals he was sending out, it should be pretty clear to anybody with half a brain that she shouldn't have gone to his house.

    Not at all the Victim's Fault:

    Scenario starts the same, except the skimpy clothing is irrelevant. She goes to a club, talks to a guy. He seems interested in a little nocturnal activity, but she's not. However, she does get a bit tipsy and asks him for a ride home. He does so, follows her in the house, and rapes her. While there were a couple of mistakes she made (such as getting a ride home alone with a stranger), the rape was in no way, shape, or form her fault. That guy is 100% predator.

    Anyway, that's my take. Some might draw the lines in different places, but I think these three extreme examples illustrate about where I stand.
     
  7. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,550
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    Bullshit. You get to change your mind at any time. He can't take no for an answer, that's on him. By the by, dressing suggestively is no more an invitation for a criminal act than having a nice house and nice possessions makes the victim responsible for a robbery that takes place in his/her home.

    Again... garbage. She said no. It means no. Being alone with someone isn't putting oneself in a "compromising position".

    They're all the criminal's fault, dude.
     
  8. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64
    I like it and it hit the points of the topic.
     
  9. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64
    I would say on this answer about dressing: Do you understand the males mind? if you do then you'll clearly know we are attracted to sight. So if it is appealing then it will attract us. It ain't cute, it is arousing! I'm not stirring the pot here I'm merely making a comment that I believe many women are clueless about. Yes if she was wearing that then in all rights she should have been safe. But adding social issues as you dress that way then it's game on is also a common problem. So who is right and who is wrong. I don't go to the barber shop unless I need a hair cut, same with the bar i go to get frigging wasted. That is me, so I say social issues are part of the victim scenario

    And because you are older here not using age, but experience in life you wouldn't dress that way would you? This then would be about being wise. A clear difference of looking good and looking easy.
     
  10. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,550
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    A normal male doesn't force himself on someone unwilling.

    Rape is a crime of violence, not sex. The sex is incidental to domination and rage.

    And if I wear something that's low cut and shows a lot of cleavage or a skirt that's very short, it doesn't give someone the right to put their hands on me.
     

Share This Page