Some Dems now saying that Bill Clinton should have resigned for sex scandal, so Trump should, too

It's a hoot to hear all the bend over backwards attempts the Trump cult makes t
So what are dems waiting for?

English please.

You're far dumber than I thought.
I had no idea you couldnt read a simple sentence.

Simple is a good word for it.

what are the Democrats supposed to be not waiting for?

Holy Fuck you're stupid.
If as you claim dems have all this evidence on Trump what are they waiting for?

The evidence is undeniable. Even you can't deny it without making a fool of yourself. What the Democrats do or don't do doesn't change those facts.

So you're actually claiming that there is undeniable proof Trump did something wrong and dems are just going to ignore it?:booze:
 
It's a hoot to hear all the bend over backwards attempts the Trump cult makes t
English please.

You're far dumber than I thought.
I had no idea you couldnt read a simple sentence.

Simple is a good word for it.

what are the Democrats supposed to be not waiting for?

Holy Fuck you're stupid.
If as you claim dems have all this evidence on Trump what are they waiting for?

The evidence is undeniable. Even you can't deny it without making a fool of yourself. What the Democrats do or don't do doesn't change those facts.

So you're actually claiming that there is undeniable proof Trump did something wrong and dems are just going to ignore it?:booze:

Are you agreeing with me?
 
You're far dumber than I thought.
I had no idea you couldnt read a simple sentence.

Simple is a good word for it.

what are the Democrats supposed to be not waiting for?

Holy Fuck you're stupid.
If as you claim dems have all this evidence on Trump what are they waiting for?

what should they be doing that they're waiting for?

Stupid sure runs deep among dems.

says someone who clearly can't articulate a point.

now what is it that they're waiting to do?

You're not too bright are you?
 
How the far left forget about the abuse of women along the way to the white house.

The impeachment process of Bill Clinton was initiated by the House of Representatives on December 19, 1998, against Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice.

Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia

In sending the case forward, the House Judiciary Committee had relied heavily on a four-year investigation into several alleged scandals—including improper Arkansas real estate deals, suspected fundraising violations, claims of sexual harassment and accusations of cronyism involving the firing of White House travel agents—involving Clinton and his wife, Hillary.

House votes to impeach Clinton , Oct. 8, 1998

IMPEACHMENT: THE OVERVIEW -- CLINTON IMPEACHED; HE FACES A SENATE TRIAL, 2D IN HISTORY; VOWS TO DO JOB TILL TERM'S 'LAST HOUR'

And you can see that the far left will always protect their own, just look at all those that think Fraken did nothing wrong as it was supposed to be a humorous picture.

Clinton was found not guilty. I'm not surprised you don't know that.

The investigation centered on consensual sex. Yes, 20+ years laters a good number have changed their mind, "liberals" too. So, if any thing was learned, it is be more careful in impeaching, and sex isn't the only grounds to impeach.

Monica went there to play with the president. she wasn't the problem and she wasn't troubled by it in terms of feeling victimized. (though, like a lot of women who cheat with a married man, she got hurt because she realized she was just playtime). it was Linda Tripp and her fellow Clinton haters who reported that.... not the person involved in the relationship.

Tripp scoured the earth for accusers. The questions concerned non consensual sex, then consenual. I see no perjury.

what I always found amazing is that while he was leading the charge against bill for playing with an adult intern, newt was bonking Clarissa while cheating on his wife. and whom he ultimately sued for divorce, serving her while she was in bed following a mastectomy. this was the guardian of our moral compass.

beyond screwed up... .but certainly set the table for what's happening now.

Yes, Newt did not set the stage for considering this as non political.
 
In hindsight, Dubya should have gone to prison for torturing prisoners of war...therefore, Bill and Hillary Clinton should go to prison for accepting $150 million from Putin for 20% of the US Uranium reserves.
 
Of course Clinton should have resigned. Dem's appointed themselves the defender of women then elected a perv wife cheating intern banging accused rapist POS.
 
It's still amazing that he used a female intern as a humidor and the same Dems who hate Moore over a forged signature, still idolize BJ Clinton
 
The glaring problem is the dems didn't demand Bubba's resignation when it happened
now they say they should have. so since they should have and admit it was wrong, we now need to correct, or OVER CORRECT things by impeaching trump for things he said decades ago.

Dems are freaking stupid
it's beyond ridiculous at times. just make shit up and move standards around - as long as they get what THEY want in the end.
 
The glaring problem is the dems didn't demand Bubba's resignation when it happened
now they say they should have. so since they should have and admit it was wrong, we now need to correct, or OVER CORRECT things by impeaching trump for things he said decades ago.

Dems are freaking stupid
it's beyond ridiculous at times. just make shit up and move standards around - as long as they get what THEY want in the end.

They didn't learn a damn thing last Nov...forward march with this stupid shit
 
The glaring problem is the dems didn't demand Bubba's resignation when it happened
now they say they should have. so since they should have and admit it was wrong, we now need to correct, or OVER CORRECT things by impeaching trump for things he said decades ago.

Dems are freaking stupid
it's beyond ridiculous at times. just make shit up and move standards around - as long as they get what THEY want in the end.

They didn't learn a damn thing last Nov...forward march with this stupid shit

You're one November behind.
 
Those same dems didn’t come out earlier as they had something to lose. Now they don’t since the Hill is toast. Very convenient for them.
 
Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.
No, the hypocrisy is how YOU defended Clinton and DIDN'T call for his resignation but are calling for Trump's now, even though Clinton lied under oath (an impeachable offense).

lol, Clinton was impeached and found not guilty.
He didn't stand trial for anything, how could he be found "not guilty"? You are so dumb. :lol:
 
Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.
If Trump ever turns the WH into his personal brothel or sexual pleasure house let us know as that is the day we will all ask him to resign.

How the far left forget about the abuse of women along the way to the white house.

The impeachment process of Bill Clinton was initiated by the House of Representatives on December 19, 1998, against Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice.

Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia

In sending the case forward, the House Judiciary Committee had relied heavily on a four-year investigation into several alleged scandals—including improper Arkansas real estate deals, suspected fundraising violations, claims of sexual harassment and accusations of cronyism involving the firing of White House travel agents—involving Clinton and his wife, Hillary.

House votes to impeach Clinton , Oct. 8, 1998

IMPEACHMENT: THE OVERVIEW -- CLINTON IMPEACHED; HE FACES A SENATE TRIAL, 2D IN HISTORY; VOWS TO DO JOB TILL TERM'S 'LAST HOUR'

And you can see that the far left will always protect their own, just look at all those that think Fraken did nothing wrong as it was supposed to be a humorous picture.

Clinton was found not guilty. I'm not surprised you don't know that.

The investigation centered on consensual sex. Yes, 20+ years laters a good number have changed their mind, "liberals" too. So, if any thing was learned, it is be more careful in impeaching, and sex isn't the only grounds to impeach.

Monica went there to play with the president. she wasn't the problem and she wasn't troubled by it in terms of feeling victimized. (though, like a lot of women who cheat with a married man, she got hurt because she realized she was just playtime). it was Linda Tripp and her fellow Clinton haters who reported that.... not the person involved in the relationship.
Gillibrand deserves credit for coming out against the Clinton's. Maybe the Clinton's will finally get what they are due.


Why Kirsten Gillibrand saying that Bill Clinton should’ve resigned is a big deal
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Thursday went to a place that few Democrats have dared or cared to go when it comes to allegations of sexual assault: Calling out Bill Clinton.

From the New York Times:

Asked directly if she believed Mr. Clinton should have stepped down [when he faced his own allegations as president], Ms. Gillibrand took a long pause and said, “Yes, I think that is the appropriate response.”

That long pause suggests this was not something that the senator from New York said lightly, nor that she necessarily planned on saying. Yet here we are.
Analysis | Why Kirsten Gillibrand saying that Bill Clinton should’ve resigned is a big deal
 
Clinton was found not guilty. I'm not surprised you don't know that.

The investigation centered on consensual sex. Yes, 20+ years laters a good number have changed their mind, "liberals" too. So, if any thing was learned, it is be more careful in impeaching, and sex isn't the only grounds to impeach.

Monica went there to play with the president. she wasn't the problem and she wasn't troubled by it in terms of feeling victimized. (though, like a lot of women who cheat with a married man, she got hurt because she realized she was just playtime). it was Linda Tripp and her fellow Clinton haters who reported that.... not the person involved in the relationship.

Tripp scoured the earth for accusers. The questions concerned non consensual sex, then consenual. I see no perjury.

what I always found amazing is that while he was leading the charge against bill for playing with an adult intern, newt was bonking Clarissa while cheating on his wife. and whom he ultimately sued for divorce, serving her while she was in bed following a mastectomy. this was the guardian of our moral compass.

beyond screwed up... .but certainly set the table for what's happening now.

Yes, Newt did not set the stage for considering this as non political.
This is well said...No? Yes?


The Clintons’ Day of Reckoning
As you would expect, Gillibrand is being threatened by Clinton loyalists. I say this is irrelevant – and not only because the democratic party establishment wants to make Hillary go away:

Suddenly, other Democrats will be asked if they agree with Gillibrand’s comments that the former president should have resigned.

Stuck between an oval-office desk and a hard place….

If a reasonably large number of Democrats decide to rewrite their view of Clinton’s legacy as one that should have ended in disgrace, that turns Clinton from a statesman into something closer to what many Republicans have long alleged.

Alleged”? You must be kidding.

It may never come to that, especially if other Democrats don’t join in Gillibrand’s statements about Clinton.

They won’t have a choice. They will have to make a public statement: side with the predator and his (nominally speaking) wife, or protect their own tails.

Conclusion

But in one fell swoop, [Gillibrand] put that debate squarely on the table. And you can bet the Clintons are apoplectic about that right now — especially considering the source.

Any tears out there?
bionic mosquito
 
If Trump ever turns the WH into his personal brothel or sexual pleasure house let us know as that is the day we will all ask him to resign.

How the far left forget about the abuse of women along the way to the white house.

The impeachment process of Bill Clinton was initiated by the House of Representatives on December 19, 1998, against Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice.

Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia

In sending the case forward, the House Judiciary Committee had relied heavily on a four-year investigation into several alleged scandals—including improper Arkansas real estate deals, suspected fundraising violations, claims of sexual harassment and accusations of cronyism involving the firing of White House travel agents—involving Clinton and his wife, Hillary.

House votes to impeach Clinton , Oct. 8, 1998

IMPEACHMENT: THE OVERVIEW -- CLINTON IMPEACHED; HE FACES A SENATE TRIAL, 2D IN HISTORY; VOWS TO DO JOB TILL TERM'S 'LAST HOUR'

And you can see that the far left will always protect their own, just look at all those that think Fraken did nothing wrong as it was supposed to be a humorous picture.

Clinton was found not guilty. I'm not surprised you don't know that.

The investigation centered on consensual sex. Yes, 20+ years laters a good number have changed their mind, "liberals" too. So, if any thing was learned, it is be more careful in impeaching, and sex isn't the only grounds to impeach.

Monica went there to play with the president. she wasn't the problem and she wasn't troubled by it in terms of feeling victimized. (though, like a lot of women who cheat with a married man, she got hurt because she realized she was just playtime). it was Linda Tripp and her fellow Clinton haters who reported that.... not the person involved in the relationship.
Gillibrand deserves credit for coming out against the Clinton's. Maybe the Clinton's will finally get what they are due.


Why Kirsten Gillibrand saying that Bill Clinton should’ve resigned is a big deal
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Thursday went to a place that few Democrats have dared or cared to go when it comes to allegations of sexual assault: Calling out Bill Clinton.

From the New York Times:

Asked directly if she believed Mr. Clinton should have stepped down [when he faced his own allegations as president], Ms. Gillibrand took a long pause and said, “Yes, I think that is the appropriate response.”

That long pause suggests this was not something that the senator from New York said lightly, nor that she necessarily planned on saying. Yet here we are.
Analysis | Why Kirsten Gillibrand saying that Bill Clinton should’ve resigned is a big deal

She's probably going to run for president and probably doesn't want to do that dragging any Clinton baggage along with her.
 
Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.
No, the hypocrisy is how YOU defended Clinton and DIDN'T call for his resignation but are calling for Trump's now, even though Clinton lied under oath (an impeachable offense).

lol, Clinton was impeached and found not guilty.
He didn't stand trial for anything, how could he be found "not guilty"? You are so dumb. :lol:

Impeachment leads to a trial in the Senate.
 
Politics at its finest!:badgrin:

Looking back, some Dems say Bill Clinton should have resigned.....so that means Trump should resign.

So hilarious. The hypocrisy is off the charts.


Gillibrand: Bill Clinton should have resigned over Lewinsky affair - CNNPolitics

Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.


Clinton did it while in office and it was not an allegation but it was fact.
People knew all the unproven allegations against Trump before he was elected and he was still elected.That is the major difference.
 

Forum List

Back
Top