So Now Trump Can Wiretap All Democrats Running for Office

[deanrd]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

View attachment 150310

FISA warrants are EASY to acquire? Only an idiot would make such a stupid comment. Know nothing.

Yep, they are.

Have any idea how many are turned down? Less than 1%. It's why the Obamatons used it to wiretap political opponents.

Still proving stupid? So few are turned down because the criteria is so high. If you don't have legal and convincing evidence, you can never get one. What the hell is wrong with you? Just stop already. Ignorance is so unattractive. It really is. Go read up on it before you make another ignorant statement about obtaining a FISA warrant.

 

[Weatherman2020]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

Obama didn't wiretap a candidate.

The FISA court authorized the wiretapping of foreign agent Manafort before he was even a member of the Trump campaign.

FAIL.

Oh no. Just his campaign manager. After an earlier wiretapping warrant showed the accusation was a Nothing burger.

 

[g5000]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

Obama didn't wiretap a candidate.

The FISA court authorized the wiretapping of foreign agent Manafort before he was even a member of the Trump campaign.

FAIL.

Oh no. Just his campaign manager. After an earlier wiretapping warrant showed the accusation was a Nothing burger.

Do you think crooks should be left alone if they go to work for someone who might become President?

Really?

That's fascinating in its implications!

 

[Weatherman2020]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

View attachment 150310

FISA warrants are EASY to acquire? Only an idiot would make such a stupid comment. Know nothing.

Yep, they are.

Have any idea how many are turned down? Less than 1%. It's why the Obamatons used it to wiretap political opponents.

Still proving stupid? So few are turned down because the criteria is so high. If you don't have legal and convincing evidence, you can never get one. What the hell is wrong with you? Just stop already. Ignorance is so unattractive. It really is. Go read up on it before you make another ignorant statement about obtaining a FISA warrant.

Even the leftist Guardian says you're full of BS.

"Top secret documents obtained by the Guardian illustrate what the Fisa courtactually does – and does not do – when purporting to engage in "oversight" over the NSA's domestic spying. That process lacks many of the safeguards that Obama, the House GOP, and various media defenders of the NSA are trying to lead the public to believe exist."

Then it goes on to explain how easy it is.

Fisa court oversight: a look inside a secret and empty process | Glenn Greenwald

 

[g5000]

Yeah, Bush made the FISA court a rubber stamp.

Did the pseudocons listen back then?

Nope.

"HE'S KEEPING US SAFE!!!"

 

[Weatherman2020]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

Obama didn't wiretap a candidate.

The FISA court authorized the wiretapping of foreign agent Manafort before he was even a member of the Trump campaign.

FAIL.

Oh no. Just his campaign manager. After an earlier wiretapping warrant showed the accusation was a Nothing burger.

Do you think crooks should be left alone if they go to work for someone who might become President?

Really?

That's fascinating in its implications!

You're right! Everyone working for Dems should be wiretapped!

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah, Bush made the FISA court a rubber stamp.

Did the pseudocons listen back then?

Nope.

"HE'S KEEPING US SAFE!!!"

Thank you President Bush too! Between Bush and Obama, what great bipartisan teamwork!

 

[Care4all]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

View attachment 150310

ohhh just typical HOGWASH as usual coming from you! Manafort was allegedly under surveillance BEGINNING IN EARLY 2014...Mr. Uninformed, LONG before he ever became Trump's Campaign Manager and Long before Trump even declared himself a candidate....the wiretap was for something criminal, involving a foreign nation and him....it may not have anything to do with President Trump or maybe Trump was pulled in to what ever it is, by Manafort, later?

 

[Dschrute3]

Apparently, yes.

 

[nat4900]

And zero charges but he is guilty with no evidence. Who said the left loved fascist justice?

This may be eay over yourhalf brain (and that of your fellow morons)......BUT, here........

NYT: Manafort Told He Will Be Indicted - Newsmax.com

Paul Manafort told to expect an indictment by special counsel - The ...

Report: Mueller warned Manafort to expect an indictment | TheHill

 

[Weatherman2020]

And zero charges but he is guilty with no evidence. Who said the left loved fascist justice?

This may be eay over yourhalf brain (and that of your fellow morons)......BUT, here........

NYT: Manafort Told He Will Be Indicted - Newsmax.com

Paul Manafort told to expect an indictment by special counsel - The ...

Report: Mueller warned Manafort to expect an indictment | TheHill

Any year now!

 

[nat4900]

Now justifying giving the worlds leading sponsor of terrorism pallets of hard cash.

How fascist of you.

Here.....let me make it real SIMPLE for you and your fellow idiots.......

Was the money given back to Iran, OUR tax money.....OR, was it Iran's OWN money???

Answer that questions and you'll be just a tiny bit smarter ......Check with Hannity first, before answering.

 

[deanrd]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

View attachment 150310

FISA warrants are EASY to acquire? Only an idiot would make such a stupid comment. Know nothing.

Yep, they are.

Have any idea how many are turned down? Less than 1%. It's why the Obamatons used it to wiretap political opponents.

Still proving stupid? So few are turned down because the criteria is so high. If you don't have legal and convincing evidence, you can never get one. What the hell is wrong with you? Just stop already. Ignorance is so unattractive. It really is. Go read up on it before you make another ignorant statement about obtaining a FISA warrant.

Even the leftist Guardian says you're full of BS.

"Top secret documents obtained by the Guardian illustrate what the Fisa courtactually does – and does not do – when purporting to engage in "oversight" over the NSA's domestic spying. That process lacks many of the safeguards that Obama, the House GOP, and various media defenders of the NSA are trying to lead the public to believe exist."

Then it goes on to explain how easy it is.

Fisa court oversight: a look inside a secret and empty process | Glenn Greenwald

Even the Guardian? Another fringe news source?

How about this. Just for fun. Read about it rather than relying on what fringe kooks say. Isn't that a novel idea?

https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/sojudge.pdf
“So Judge, How Do I Get That FISA Warrant?”: The Policy and Procedure for Conducting Electronic Surveillance

 

[Weatherman2020]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

View attachment 150310

FISA warrants are EASY to acquire? Only an idiot would make such a stupid comment. Know nothing.

Yep, they are.

Have any idea how many are turned down? Less than 1%. It's why the Obamatons used it to wiretap political opponents.

Still proving stupid? So few are turned down because the criteria is so high. If you don't have legal and convincing evidence, you can never get one. What the hell is wrong with you? Just stop already. Ignorance is so unattractive. It really is. Go read up on it before you make another ignorant statement about obtaining a FISA warrant.

Even the leftist Guardian says you're full of BS.

"Top secret documents obtained by the Guardian illustrate what the Fisa courtactually does – and does not do – when purporting to engage in "oversight" over the NSA's domestic spying. That process lacks many of the safeguards that Obama, the House GOP, and various media defenders of the NSA are trying to lead the public to believe exist."

Then it goes on to explain how easy it is.

Fisa court oversight: a look inside a secret and empty process | Glenn Greenwald

Even the Guardian? Another fringe news source?

How about this. Just for fun. Read about it rather than relying on what fringe kooks say. Isn't that a novel idea?

https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/sojudge.pdf
“So Judge, How Do I Get That FISA Warrant?”: The Policy and Procedure for Conducting Electronic Surveillance

Opinion article?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Now justifying giving the worlds leading sponsor of terrorism pallets of hard cash.

How fascist of you.

Here.....let me make it real SIMPLE for you and your fellow idiots.......

Was the money given back to Iran, OUR tax money.....OR, was it Iran's OWN money???

Answer that questions and you'll be just a tiny bit smarter ......Check with Hannity first, before answering.

Should have been used for all the Americans killed or wounded by Iranian weapons.

But you Leftards love Islamic terrorism.

 

[kiwiman127]

Manafort has been LAUNDERING money for oligarchs for over a decade....He collaborated with Russian stooges in the Ukraine, AND neglected to register himself as an American acting for foreign interests............WITH ALL THAT CRIMINAL BAGGAGE, the orange clown picks him to run his campaign.

THEN, morons like the O/P has the balls to say that we're picking on him even after a legitimate FISA warrant???????



Stew in your own ulcers, R-W morons.................LOL

But, I am CERTAIN that the information gained about the "orange clown" was NEVER provided to Colostomy Clown in an attempt to undercut said orange clown's campaign, right?

Well, I see the same group of the uninformed are at it again, making fools out of themselves.
Manafort was the subject of the FISA order, not Trump. If the conversation did not cover the reason for the FISA approval, the conversation would be erased. It's the law.
Below is the law. Try to understand what it says, instead of your conjectured talking points.
"Information acquired from an electronic surveillance conducted pursuant to this subchapter concerning any United States person may be used and disclosed byFederal officers and employees without the consent of the United States person only in accordance with the minimization procedures required by this subchapter. No otherwise privileged communication obtained in accordance with, or in violation of, the provisions of this subchapter shall lose its privileged character. No information acquired from an electronic surveillance pursuant to this subchapter may be used or disclosed by Federal officers or employees except for lawful purposes."
50 U.S. Code § 1806 - Use of information

 

[nat4900]

REPENT, right wingers, the end is near...........LOL

 

[Ted Frazier]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

View attachment 150310

Was Manafort running for Office?

 

[Weatherman2020]

So just a simple FISA warrant, which are very easy to obtain is required. Thank you, Obama.

View attachment 150310

Was Manafort running for Office?

No! And neither will the staff of every Democrat running!

 

[Weatherman2020]

REPENT, right wingers, the end is near...........LOL