conflicting testimony can be posted all day..the point is there has been no real investigation no testimony under oath..no cross examination ..no full disclosure of evidence and evidenced disposed of illegally
Why oh why must we teach you guys over and over?
Director Tenet, Deputy Director McLaughlin, I would like to ask you to raise your right hands. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
TENET: I do.
MCLAUGHLIN: I do.
KEAN: Thank you very much. Your written remarks, I guess you'll simply summarize those in 10 minutes or so and so we can get into questions.
Transcript: Wednesday's 9/11 Commission Hearings (washingtonpost.com)
Looks like testimony under oath to me.
When id-eots said "no testimony under oath" he meant, "sure some testimony has been given under oath!" Id-eots is not familiar with the meaning of words -- or with the notion of "truth" having any meaning.
Id-eots is, afterall, just a fucking Troofer lying idiot.