Slut Or Not??

[Luissa]

Like it or not Websters defines "slut" as a promiscuous woman. What do you call an unmarried woman who testifies before congress about wanting taxpayers to pay for her escalating cost of birth control?

She is also advocate for women who have been victims of domestic violence, does that make her a victim of domestic violence?

 

[Luissa]

Like it or not Websters defines "slut" as a promiscuous woman. What do you call an unmarried woman who testifies before congress about wanting taxpayers to pay for her escalating cost of birth control?

not a slut

In “A Study of History,” by Arnold J. Toynbee, in the chapter called ‘Schism in the Soul, “Toynbee observed that one of the consistent symptoms of a disintegrating civilization is that elites begin to imitate the bottom of society. ... In disintegrating civilizations, the creative minority (elites) are no longer confident and setting the example. They "lapse into truancy" (reject the obligations of citizenship) and "surrender to a sense of promiscuity" (succumb to vulgarization of manners, the arts and language). Until a few decades ago, the groups we used to call "low-class" or "trash", are now called the underclass. The upper-class, instead of challenging trashy behavior, often imitates and placates it.

a. … four-letter words were unknown in public discourse and among the elites and were used sparingly even in private discourse. Today, vulgar language knows no class, sex, age or place. As late as 1960, sleeping with one's boyfriend was mostly a lower-class thing. It was deemed sluttish and something to be kept secret; today it's open and assumed to be normal…. In some instances, unwed mothers proudly hold baby showers celebrating their illegitimate offspring. Homosexual marriages were unheard of; today, in some jurisdictions, homosexual marriages have legal sanction. Of course, to be judgmental about the new codes of conduct is to risk being labeled a prude and possibly a racist, sexist or a homophobe.”
America's New Role Models

I don't give a shit about whatever you copy and paste to support your argument that the woman is a slut. She isn't a slut, she is a law student who has dedicated her career to women's rights, and being an activist for domestic violence victims.
If you want to look like a fool by labeling her a slut, go right ahead.

 

[Luissa]

I wonder how it is to be some of you?? So judgmental? Do you ever stop and realize you are letting someone or something run your life by not thinking for yourself when making a judgment call in regards to other humans?

 

[Foxfyre]

Well said but are you willing to take on the electric scooter for Gramps and Granny companies?
Medicare pays an average of almost $1000 OVER what the market rate is on each one.
And most seniors that buy one do not even need it.
Until we take this on ACROSS THE BOARD, nothing gets done. Medicare costs tens times more for us taxpayers than anything else and the fraud rate is astronomical.
Medicare is government mandate galore!
No politician will do anything about it. Bush was the absolute worst big government spender in that area.
Can anyone name a Republican with the balls to end Medicare?
Until WE CITIZENS QUIT DEMANDING IT, nothing changes.
End it tomorrow. Send those programs to the states.

Absolutely. I have been beating the drum forever that the federal government should be doing NOTHING that the various states or private enterprise cannot do more efficiently, effectively, and/or economically. That means it provides the common defense and promotes the general welfare to secure ALL our unalienable rights, andf then leaves us alone to form whatever sort of society we wish to have.

As for Granny's scooter, I don't see how any insurance company, let alone the tax payer, should be on the hook for that at least via government mandate. Let Granny buy her own scooter or look to me and the rest of the family to help her out. If the cost is too burdensome, help from the community or private charities can be accepted with profound gratitude.

As a matter of personal pride, ethics, and general sense of justice and morality, I don't expect YOU to buy it for her.

Why, you....you...you 'conservative' you!!!

Yeah, a mean old hard hearted conservative who doesn't share the convictions of those who don't care how hard it gets for Granny, just so the government is giving her something so some of our fellow Americans can feel righteous and be absolved of any personal responsibility for her themselves.

It would be wonderful if the Federal Government really was a global sized golden goose with the resources and wisdom to give all of us everything we need including electric scooters and condoms. It would be wonderful if insurance companies would just cover every possible need or want for every person at a price nobody minds paying. It would be wonderful if we all were relieved of all personal responsibility and obligation and could just relax knowing that all our basic needs would be met by somebody else either through their benevolence or via magnificent government mandate. And because all their needs were met there would be no racism or crime or graft or corruption and we would have Utopia ever after.

But us old hard hearted conservatives know that is wishes were horses, beggars would ride, and that we'll probably have to wait for heaven for all that. Meanwhile we know that resources are limited to what we actually produce, and that personal responsibility and a willingness to work for what we have and respect and protection of our unalienable rights offers the best shot at prosperity for all of us.

An entitlement mentality or a willingness to give up American exceptionalism in favor of a 'benevolent monarchy' is the surest prescription to decline and lack of opportunity for all but those who seized the power.

 

[Katzndogz]

As it is now why should I have to be in an insurance pool where many employees of other companies have smokers, heavy drinking fat folks?
That is the current system. And look at Medicare. Most of those folks are beyond fat and we all have to pay.
Something has to change sports fans. Those of us that have a few million invested in our private companies see the problems with the current system first hand and it is beyond broke.
We oppose the Obama plan 100%
We advocate a wellness plan mandatory. If you are unhealthy as a result of your smoking, being fat and lazy and are not willing to get fit and in shape then you are automatically labeled as such and the entire pool of employees in your organization are rated accordingly. Corporations can fire at will if those folks are unwilling to receive the help offered both by the insurance industry, as wellness programs will be the norm within 10 years.
The private insurance companies want this change. They are also tired of the massive costs of underwriting an unhealthy nation. 1000+ different companies with 1000+ different plans, commissions, rules and massive underwriting costs add almost 50% to health care premiums.
The good news is my main business just went to this wellness model and my costs were cut $2K a year per employee with a dental plan thrown in for free.
Only when we change the system from a disease care model to a wellness health care model will we see costs go down. Continue on this private blank check "health" care night mare we are now using and Medicare costs alone will bankrupt us in 20 years.

But it isn't necessary to mandate insurance for a wellness model either. When I was working for a hospital in Kansas we became aware of a lot of health issues with our 300+ employees. (I was working in human resources and doing commications at the time so was on the inside track.) So the employer offered a bonus up front for non smokers with the incentive of a bonus offered to any employees who would quit smoking for three months. (Testing was required of course to ensure no nicotine in the system.) It was a huge incentive and produced some great results. And because of the regular testing, I'm pretty sure we addressed some other substance abuse as well.

We set up a program for overweight employees with a modest kitty everybody contributed to to sign up and maintain, some nurses volunteered their time to do and record the weigh ins, and a couple of doctors volunteered their time to do initial check ups and help develop diet plans etc. Each week, the employees who gained weight put a dollar in the kitty for each pound or partial pound gained. The one who lost the most got the kitty for the week. Another huge success producing some outstanding results.

Taking personal responsibility and self-directed social contract is so superior to any government program or paying for insurance for what people can do for themselves.

Were these programs voluntary? Suppose someone just demanded the kitty as a matter of fairness, they had never won one before. Would they get it?

 

[Sunshine]

Like it or not Websters defines "slut" as a promiscuous woman. What do you call an unmarried woman who testifies before congress about wanting taxpayers to pay for her escalating cost of birth control?

Birth control is used for things other than to prevent conception. Where do you get that her needs for birth control were escalating, or that she had any birth control needs at all?
She referenced in her testimony a person who needed the pills for something other than contraception. Likely the operation to remove the woman's ovary cost more than many years of the pill.

Fluke eventually testified before a House Democratic panel, telling a sad story about a female friend who lost an ovary because Georgetown's student insurance would not cover the birth control she needed to treat a medical condition

Read more: Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

There are many women on the pill who are not sexually active at all, and there is no indication that she is, at least not from what I read. I've been to law school, and I know the demands on time. So, if she is, more power to her, she would be quite a woman to have much of any life at all outside law school.

I think Limbaugh has crossed a line here, which is deeper than any line he has crossed previously. If republicans have any sense, they will distance themselves from him. Who is he to talk anyway. He got caught coming back from the Dominican Republic with Viagra that had someone else's name on it.

He is nothing but an entertainer no different than a hell fire and brimstone televangelist.

Oh BTW: the VA pays for Levitra for vets.

 

[Luissa]

Absolutely. I have been beating the drum forever that the federal government should be doing NOTHING that the various states or private enterprise cannot do more efficiently, effectively, and/or economically. That means it provides the common defense and promotes the general welfare to secure ALL our unalienable rights, andf then leaves us alone to form whatever sort of society we wish to have.

As for Granny's scooter, I don't see how any insurance company, let alone the tax payer, should be on the hook for that at least via government mandate. Let Granny buy her own scooter or look to me and the rest of the family to help her out. If the cost is too burdensome, help from the community or private charities can be accepted with profound gratitude.

As a matter of personal pride, ethics, and general sense of justice and morality, I don't expect YOU to buy it for her.

Why, you....you...you 'conservative' you!!!

Yeah, a mean old hard hearted conservative who doesn't care how hard it gets for Granny, just so the government is giving her something so some of our fellow Americans can feel righteous and be absolved of any personal responsibility for her themselves.

It would be wonderful if the Federal Government really was a global sized golden goose with the resources and wisdom to give all of us everything we need including electric scooters and condoms. It would be wonderful if insurance companies would just cover every possible need or want for every person at a price nobody minds paying. It would be wonderful if we all were relieved of all personal responsibility and obligation and could just relax knowing that all our basic needs would be met by somebody else either through their benevolence or via magnificent government mandate. And because all their needs were met there would be no racism or crime or graft or corruption and we would have Utopia ever after.

But us old hard hearted conservatives know that is wishes were horses, beggars would ride, and that we'll probably have to wait for heaven for all that. Meanwhile we know that resources are limited and that personal responsibility and a willingness to work for what we have and respect and protection of our unalienable rights offers the best shot at prosperity for all of us.

An entitlement mentality or a willingness to give up American exceptionalism in favor of a 'benevolent monarchy' is the surest prescription to decline and lack of opportunity for all but those who seized the power.

You live in Utopia if you think without social security and medicaid/medicare that the elderly and disabled would be taking care of.
I don't think the government should pay for it so I can feel righteous. I am pretty comfortable in what I provide for the elderly. I think the government should help some elderly because no one else will, including charities. Why do you think Alzheimer's has less funding than most any other major disease, especially when the baby boomers are starting to develop it? People in this country don't care about the elderly. Families don't always care what happens to their family members, and some people have no family left.
I have been in some pretty bad homes, and bad situations when I did in home care. You are the one living in some fantasy land Utopia. And you have no clue what really goes on with the elderly.

As for the condom argument, you are pretty clueless when it comes to that too.

 

[Luissa]

Like it or not Websters defines "slut" as a promiscuous woman. What do you call an unmarried woman who testifies before congress about wanting taxpayers to pay for her escalating cost of birth control?

Birth control is used for things other than to prevent conception. Where do you get that her needs for birth control were escalating, or that she had any birth control needs at all?
She referenced in her testimony a person who needed the pills for something other than contraception.

Fluke eventually testified before a House Democratic panel, telling a sad story about a female friend who lost an ovary because Georgetown's student insurance would not cover the birth control she needed to treat a medical condition

Read more: Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

There are many women on the pill who are not sexually active at all, and there is no indication that she is, at least not from what I read. I've been to law school, and I know the demands on time. So, if she is, more power to her, she would be quite a woman to have much of any life at all outside law school.

I think Limbaugh has crossed a line here, which is deeper than any line he has crossed previously. If republicans have any sense, they will distance themselves from him. Who is he to talk anyway. He got caught coming back from the Dominican Republic with Viagra that had someone else's name on it.

He is nothing but an entertainer no different than a hell fire and brimstone televangelist.

Beware PoliticalChic will now copy and paste an argument as to why this women is a slut, and Fox will spout of something about not wanting to pay for condoms.

 

[Sunshine]

Like it or not Websters defines "slut" as a promiscuous woman. What do you call an unmarried woman who testifies before congress about wanting taxpayers to pay for her escalating cost of birth control?

Birth control is used for things other than to prevent conception. Where do you get that her needs for birth control were escalating, or that she had any birth control needs at all?
She referenced in her testimony a person who needed the pills for something other than contraception.

Fluke eventually testified before a House Democratic panel, telling a sad story about a female friend who lost an ovary because Georgetown's student insurance would not cover the birth control she needed to treat a medical condition

Read more: Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

There are many women on the pill who are not sexually active at all, and there is no indication that she is, at least not from what I read. I've been to law school, and I know the demands on time. So, if she is, more power to her, she would be quite a woman to have much of any life at all outside law school.

I think Limbaugh has crossed a line here, which is deeper than any line he has crossed previously. If republicans have any sense, they will distance themselves from him. Who is he to talk anyway. He got caught coming back from the Dominican Republic with Viagra that had someone else's name on it.

He is nothing but an entertainer no different than a hell fire and brimstone televangelist.

Beware PoliticalChic will now copy and paste an argument as to why this women is a slut, and Fox will spout of something about not wanting to pay for condoms.

Well, I think PC is able to think for herself. I haven't read the whole thread, but I don't think she is easily led down a stupid path. She certainly set the situation up for discussion in the OP, and did not seem to be voicing any opinion at all.

Of course, my leanings are issue specific, so this is where I get called a 'dirty liberal' after I have been called a 'dirty conservative' for months on end.

I don't think we have to worry about Medicare going away any time soon, either. Few things have humbled me more than when my childrn wanted to take me in last summer when I was so sick. But I am not finished working and butted heads with the doctor for a week over it. The day may or may not come when I have to go to them, but at least I know they want me to.

Incidentally, I've been dealing with a VERY old man this week trying to care for his wife who has Alzheimer's it was killing him and he wouldn't put her into a nursing home. I became so concerned I reported them to the state as the had no children and no other family. But the state wouldn't even investigate. His wife had to go to the hospital the next day and she is now going to a nursing home, thank God. So, let me assure everyone that the state is not gung ho to even take care of 'granny.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

not a slut

In “A Study of History,” by Arnold J. Toynbee, in the chapter called ‘Schism in the Soul, “Toynbee observed that one of the consistent symptoms of a disintegrating civilization is that elites begin to imitate the bottom of society. ... In disintegrating civilizations, the creative minority (elites) are no longer confident and setting the example. They "lapse into truancy" (reject the obligations of citizenship) and "surrender to a sense of promiscuity" (succumb to vulgarization of manners, the arts and language). Until a few decades ago, the groups we used to call "low-class" or "trash", are now called the underclass. The upper-class, instead of challenging trashy behavior, often imitates and placates it.

a. … four-letter words were unknown in public discourse and among the elites and were used sparingly even in private discourse. Today, vulgar language knows no class, sex, age or place. As late as 1960, sleeping with one's boyfriend was mostly a lower-class thing. It was deemed sluttish and something to be kept secret; today it's open and assumed to be normal…. In some instances, unwed mothers proudly hold baby showers celebrating their illegitimate offspring. Homosexual marriages were unheard of; today, in some jurisdictions, homosexual marriages have legal sanction. Of course, to be judgmental about the new codes of conduct is to risk being labeled a prude and possibly a racist, sexist or a homophobe.”
America's New Role Models

I don't give a shit about whatever you copy and paste to support your argument that the woman is a slut. She isn't a slut, she is a law student who has dedicated her career to women's rights, and being an activist for domestic violence victims.
If you want to look like a fool by labeling her a slut, go right ahead.

It is not only this young lady...but the fact that you, also, subscribe to the despoilment of the culture.....disappoints.

I believe that, at a quieter time, you'll reconsider whether or not the society in which you reside should be one in which folks broadcast details about the most private moments in life, and demand that the government endorse same....


And since my reading material irritates you, let me add the following...

The 17th and 18th century secular philosophers downplayed both the classical and the religious, but all agreed that virtues were important for the good life of individuals and for the well-being of both society and state. This influences the relationship between the character of the people, and the health of the polity.
Gertrude Himmelfarb, in her book “The De-Moralization of Society.”

 

[Dragon]

The problem comes when the government presumes to dictate what will be covered.

Well, someone is going to. Seriously, what difference does it make to your argument whether it's the government or a private company that does the dictating? The decision still has to be made, and the arguments presented here are mostly criticizing a specific decision (to cover or not cover contraceptives), rather than who is making the decision. The critique of the government setting standards for health insurance really has nothing to do with the question of whether contraceptives should be covered and, quite honestly, shouldn't even be brought up; that's for a different topic.

You still haven't established any significant difference between covering contraceptives and covering, say, blood-pressure medication. Both are prophylactics, intended to prevent undesirable conditions (pregnancy on the one hand or the various complications from high blood pressure on the other). On what basis COULD you make that distinction, except in terms of wanting to discourage unmarried sex?

 

[Sunshine]

A sexually active Georgetown Law Student that is in her early to mid 20s is a slut.
Most women in their early to mid 20s that are not married are sluts.
Glad we can clear that up.

I can't seem to locate where she testified about her own sex life, assuming as a law student she has one, which is unlikely. She testified about a woman who needed the pill for a medical problem and who had to have an ovary removed because she couldn't get it.

Scratch that. Here is her testimony. All 5 minutes of it.

 

[Katzndogz]

Like it or not Websters defines "slut" as a promiscuous woman. What do you call an unmarried woman who testifies before congress about wanting taxpayers to pay for her escalating cost of birth control?

Birth control is used for things other than to prevent conception. Where do you get that her needs for birth control were escalating, or that she had any birth control needs at all?
She referenced in her testimony a person who needed the pills for something other than contraception. Likely the operation to remove the woman's ovary cost more than many years of the pill.

Fluke eventually testified before a House Democratic panel, telling a sad story about a female friend who lost an ovary because Georgetown's student insurance would not cover the birth control she needed to treat a medical condition

Read more: Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

There are many women on the pill who are not sexually active at all, and there is no indication that she is, at least not from what I read. I've been to law school, and I know the demands on time. So, if she is, more power to her, she would be quite a woman to have much of any life at all outside law school.

I think Limbaugh has crossed a line here, which is deeper than any line he has crossed previously. If republicans have any sense, they will distance themselves from him. Who is he to talk anyway. He got caught coming back from the Dominican Republic with Viagra that had someone else's name on it.

He is nothing but an entertainer no different than a hell fire and brimstone televangelist.

Oh BTW: the VA pays for Levitra for vets.

Did Rush Limbaugh make someone else pay for his viagra? Shoud possession of viagra be a crime? Liberal democrats may want conservatives to distance themselves from him, or condemn him. That's democrats, clearly if democrats don't realize by now that he's fully supported by conservative republicans there is something wrong with the democrat cognitive abiityl

 

[Sunshine]

Like it or not Websters defines "slut" as a promiscuous woman. What do you call an unmarried woman who testifies before congress about wanting taxpayers to pay for her escalating cost of birth control?

Birth control is used for things other than to prevent conception. Where do you get that her needs for birth control were escalating, or that she had any birth control needs at all?
She referenced in her testimony a person who needed the pills for something other than contraception. Likely the operation to remove the woman's ovary cost more than many years of the pill.

Fluke eventually testified before a House Democratic panel, telling a sad story about a female friend who lost an ovary because Georgetown's student insurance would not cover the birth control she needed to treat a medical condition

Read more: Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

Meet The Georgetown Law Student Rush Limbaugh Called A 'Slut' - Business Insider

There are many women on the pill who are not sexually active at all, and there is no indication that she is, at least not from what I read. I've been to law school, and I know the demands on time. So, if she is, more power to her, she would be quite a woman to have much of any life at all outside law school.

I think Limbaugh has crossed a line here, which is deeper than any line he has crossed previously. If republicans have any sense, they will distance themselves from him. Who is he to talk anyway. He got caught coming back from the Dominican Republic with Viagra that had someone else's name on it.

He is nothing but an entertainer no different than a hell fire and brimstone televangelist.

Oh BTW: the VA pays for Levitra for vets.

Did Rush Limbaugh make someone else pay for his viagra? Shoud possession of viagra be a crime? Liberal democrats may want conservatives to distance themselves from him, or condemn him. That's democrats, clearly if democrats don't realize by now that he's fully supported by conservative republicans there is something wrong with the democrat cognitive abiityl

I don't know who paid for Rush's Viagra. We weren't told. But it WAS a crime for him to be carting someone else's medication around from country to country and he got into BIG trouble for it as well he should have.

The VA pays for Levitra for veterans. Most people don't know that. But they do. So you pay for veterans to have sex married or not. I thought her testimony was reasonable. There are a lot of women who have to have the pill for medical reasons which have nothing to do with contraception. She addressed that very well. She also spoke of a married couple who had to give up their birth control because they couldn't afford it. As to switching schools, the cost of that most likely would cost even more. A lot of people in colleges like hers are there on scholarship. I went to Vanderbilt on scholarship and there is a BIG difference in the classes between the elite and those of us on scholarship. I wouldn't have been able to uproot my family and move, most likely few would be able to do that. And at the time, it was the only school in the area which offerered the MSN.

This whole discussion reminds me of one of my law school classmates who was SO pregnant by our last year. She dropped a book and when she bent over to pick it up one of the men kicked it out of her reach. You think law schools are receptive to women? Try going to one. You will experience many layers of education. This is likely just aimed at keeping women OUT!

 

[Big Fitz]

A sexually active Georgetown Law Student that is in her early to mid 20s is a slut.
Most women in their early to mid 20s that are not married are sluts.
Glad we can clear that up.

I can't seem to locate where she testified about her own sex life, assuming as a law student she has one, which is unlikely. She testified about a woman who needed the pill for a medical problem and who had to have an ovary removed because she couldn't get it.

Scratch that. Here is her testimony. All 5 minutes of it.

With all her sexual escapades... when does she have time to study law?

 

[Sunshine]

A sexually active Georgetown Law Student that is in her early to mid 20s is a slut.
Most women in their early to mid 20s that are not married are sluts.
Glad we can clear that up.

I can't seem to locate where she testified about her own sex life, assuming as a law student she has one, which is unlikely. She testified about a woman who needed the pill for a medical problem and who had to have an ovary removed because she couldn't get it.

Scratch that. Here is her testimony. All 5 minutes of it.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwWNh_4QAAk]Sandra Fluke's Controversial Birth Control Testimony - YouTube[/ame]

With all her sexual escapades... when does she have time to study law?

What are her 'sexual escapades?'

 

[Big Fitz]

I can't seem to locate where she testified about her own sex life, assuming as a law student she has one, which is unlikely. She testified about a woman who needed the pill for a medical problem and who had to have an ovary removed because she couldn't get it.

Scratch that. Here is her testimony. All 5 minutes of it.

Sandra Fluke's Controversial Birth Control Testimony - YouTube

With all her sexual escapades... when does she have time to study law?

What are her 'sexual escapades?'

If she's burning through that much birth control a year, I doubt it's be cause she's not using it.

 

[Sunshine]

With all her sexual escapades... when does she have time to study law?

What are her 'sexual escapades?'

If she's burning through that much birth control a year, I doubt it's be cause she's not using it.

Did you watch her testimony? She was referring to a woman who had polycystic ovary disease and who was gay. The gay woman using the birth control was being treated for polycystic ovary disease. Not to prevent contraception. Neither woman can conceive when they have sex with one another. I thought you would know that. Apparently not. I posted a link to her testimony. You should watch it. At no point in time did she ever mention herself.

 

[Sunshine]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwWNh_4QAAk]Sandra Fluke's Controversial Birth Control Testimony - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Cuyo]

1. “Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments” "He [Obama] encouraged me and supported me and thanked me for speaking out about the concerns of American women," Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments

2. “Fluke, who had been turned away from the official, men-only hearing on the issue of female contraception earlier in the month, spoke mostly about the high cost of contraceptives and their importance to women's health. Limbaugh understood her remarks to mean that not only did she think she could have as much sex as she wanted, with whomever she wanted, without compromising her health or producing a baby, but that she expected honest-to-goodness, God-fearing Americans like him to pick up the tab for it.” Rush Limbaugh's Sandra Fluke slander | Sadhbh Walshe | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk


3. slut (sl t). n. 1. a. A person, especially a woman, considered sexually promiscuoushttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/slut


4. The title of the OP is, by definition, proven. But the question is, why is this front page news”?

a. The Obama administration will do anything to get his string of failures out of the news. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/u...ded-on-birth-control-coverage-poll-finds.html

b. The hallmark of liberalism is the need to erase any criticism of personal behavior.

5. This is a grave error for society. Silence falls under the view of “TACIT APPROVAL AND LATENT COMPLICITY.”
If one is silent about bad behavior, one is agreeing to same.


6. In his new book, “Coming Apart,” Charles Murray decries the change in societal attitude that he calles “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental! As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, yet these individuals will not criticize the behaviors which are destroying the lower cultural class.

a. Ms. Fluke’s championing of the need for promiscuity is a case in point. The dogs of war have been released...attack the critic of poor behavior!

b. It is hardly shocking to see another Democrat-liberal President champion this decline in values.

c. The cultural upper-class looks at this situation, and, for the most part, simply shakes its head. Silently. Murray writes “The elites must preach what they practice.” The time is long past when the adults should consider if this Fluke-Obama agenda is the right one for America.
d. …..and make it’s opinion known:


Preach what they practice.
The water-cooler is the venue for this battle in the culture war!

How about you worry about your own dusty rot-crotch and keep your nose out of this woman's business?