hortysir
In Memorial of 47
18 years ago, yet we're not allowed to use Rev. Wright
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know, children were born mostly to two parent families in the Puritan days (and up through the 50s and 60s, but never mind THAT) and abortion, crime rates, and teen pregnancy were all lower.
Are you talking Moral Code....or Morality LAW, enforced morality by the government.
Yes. How dare a woman choose to raise a child without a husband.
You know, children were born mostly to two parent families in the Puritan days (and up through the 50s and 60s, but never mind THAT) and abortion, crime rates, and teen pregnancy were all lower.
In those Puritan days, women couldn't vote, were owned by their husband and domestic violence was much higher.
And you want to go back to that for what reason?
You know, children were born mostly to two parent families in the Puritan days (and up through the 50s and 60s, but never mind THAT) and abortion, crime rates, and teen pregnancy were all lower.
In those Puritan days, women couldn't vote, were owned by their husband and domestic violence was much higher.
And you want to go back to that for what reason?
Not one of the rw's chose to actually read the link. And, every one of them LIED about what it said and what crazy Santorum said.
You know, children were born mostly to two parent families in the Puritan days (and up through the 50s and 60s, but never mind THAT) and abortion, crime rates, and teen pregnancy were all lower.
In those Puritan days, women couldn't vote, were owned by their husband and domestic violence was much higher.
And you want to go back to that for what reason?
In those days, everybody pissed in a china cup, ate with their left pinky quirked slightly, and banged their sisters.
Prove it isn't so, dumbass.
The difference is..I can actually prove that women weren't "owned" by their husbands.
Yes. How dare a woman choose to raise a child without a husband.
It should be something to be ashamed of, especially when the taxpayers are footing the bill.
Yes. How dare a woman choose to raise a child without a husband.
It should be something to be ashamed of, especially when the taxpayers are footing the bill.
There ought to be a law.....Bring the Stocks back!
Santorum: Single Moms Are "Breeding More Criminals" | Mother Jones
GAWD - this little scum just can't help himself. Never mind that this position is just plain stupid. He tells a couple of huge whoppers but that's par for the R's. But, notice that he actually blames women for stepping up, for taking responsibility for their children while the dead beat dads are celebrated in the repub congress.
What about the FATHERS of these children? Why don't the rw's or the pubs or the bags have anything to say about fathers?
Is it because, like Rush, they don't really understand that it takes two to make a pregnancy? Or is it because, like Rush, rw's believe children should go hungry?
Sanatorium the Peeping Tom needs to put the blame where it belongs and that is squarely on the men to dump the woman AND their children.
He, and we should be celebrating AND HELPING the courageous women who, against all odds, against every effort of the damn pubs to crush them, still stay with their kids, still struggle to put a roof over their heads and meals on the table.
Yes. How dare a woman choose to raise a child without a husband.
It should be something to be ashamed of, especially when the taxpayers are footing the bill.
Man, someone really needs to punch you in the face.