Gideonprime
Guardian of the Wastes
- Jun 26, 2012
- 414
- 35
- 16
The stimuless money was earmarked for these types of projects.
Well, that's what we were told anyway . . . . .
some of it was spent on those projects around here at least.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The stimuless money was earmarked for these types of projects.
Well, that's what we were told anyway . . . . .
MASS transportation is one good works project, I supppose.
Of course there would be losers, too.
The airlines, for example.EVERYTHING is temporary.
A bulk of air-travel has (traditionally) been business-related.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM2Ll-_hFgo]iLinc Web Conferencing Smock - YouTube[/ame]
*
World Golf Tour - YouTube games
*
Any questions?
We have the money, we just do not have republicans in government that give a shit about anything other than making the president look bad.
Did it occur to you that if the budget is running a DEFICIT ( shortage ) then we done' HAVE ( possess ) the money? We would have to BORROW ( acquire it from another another ) the money.
yeah it is called re-investing. Companies do it all the time to help themselves grow.
As it is now we are borrowing to re-build nations overseas some of them rife with people who hate us.
Seems we'd be better served to borrow for our own bennefit rather than theirs.
Why not do what the previous administrations did and work on US infrastructure? Start up a project that would employ people that connects major cities and towns with data, shipping, and people traveling.
You could make a project to put High speed rail across the US, and couple large data and even power conduits along it. The present power system could be redone and made better.
Basically what i see is a web of high speed rail connections running between big cities. Along the rail system you would also run your power and data lines. This would create a lot of jobs and really make the US infrastructure so much better. It is the next generation of transportation systems, and it would really be great if they started this project.
Who is going to pay for this?
The stimuless money was earmarked for these types of projects.
Well, that's what we were told anyway . . . . .
Why not do what the previous administrations did and work on US infrastructure? Start up a project that would employ people that connects major cities and towns with data, shipping, and people traveling.
You could make a project to put High speed rail across the US, and couple large data and even power conduits along it. The present power system could be redone and made better.
Basically what i see is a web of high speed rail connections running between big cities. Along the rail system you would also run your power and data lines. This would create a lot of jobs and really make the US infrastructure so much better. It is the next generation of transportation systems, and it would really be great if they started this project.
The same people who pay for all liberal bullshit.
Us.
How is improving the nation's infrastructure liberal bs?
Sounds like a smarter use of money than many other things.
How many people are going to use a coast to coast bullet train?
Compare that to how many of us will be paying for it.
The cost benefit analysis doesn't favor the project
How is improving the nation's infrastructure liberal bs?
Sounds like a smarter use of money than many other things.
How many people are going to use a coast to coast bullet train?
Compare that to how many of us will be paying for it.
The cost benefit analysis doesn't favor the project
Agreed on a coast to coast bullet train. How about updating the grid, improving decaying bridges and roads. Highspeed rail on the east coast might work and through parts of Cali could also be viable.
How many people are going to use a coast to coast bullet train?
Compare that to how many of us will be paying for it.
The cost benefit analysis doesn't favor the project
Agreed on a coast to coast bullet train. How about updating the grid, improving decaying bridges and roads. Highspeed rail on the east coast might work and through parts of Cali could also be viable.
I suggest California build their own freaking bullet trains.
Agreed on a coast to coast bullet train. How about updating the grid, improving decaying bridges and roads. Highspeed rail on the east coast might work and through parts of Cali could also be viable.
I suggest California build their own freaking bullet trains.
So what is your solution? Pray for jobs?
I suggest California build their own freaking bullet trains.
So what is your solution? Pray for jobs?
The solution is to get the gubmint off our backs and let the private sector run wild. But you don't want to hear that.
California is the world's 9th largest economy.
They should build their own choo choo trains.
The same people who pay for all liberal bullshit.
Us.
How is improving the nation's infrastructure liberal bs?
Sounds like a smarter use of money than many other things.
How many people are going to use a coast to coast bullet train?
Compare that to how many of us will be paying for it.
The cost benefit analysis doesn't favor the project
So what is your solution? Pray for jobs?
The solution is to get the gubmint off our backs and let the private sector run wild. But you don't want to hear that.
California is the world's 9th largest economy.
They should build their own choo choo trains.
No I don;t want that.
The solution is to get the gubmint off our backs and let the private sector run wild. But you don't want to hear that.
California is the world's 9th largest economy.
They should build their own choo choo trains.
No I don;t want that.
Of course not. You want free gubmint stuff.
The solution is to get the gubmint off our backs and let the private sector run wild. But you don't want to hear that.
California is the world's 9th largest economy.
They should build their own choo choo trains.
No I don;t want that.
Of course not. You want free gubmint stuff.
How is improving the nation's infrastructure liberal bs?
Sounds like a smarter use of money than many other things.
How many people are going to use a coast to coast bullet train?
Compare that to how many of us will be paying for it.
The cost benefit analysis doesn't favor the project
Have you ever been out of the United States?
I suggest you go to Europe (or Japan).
No I don;t want that.
Of course not. You want free gubmint stuff.
You never have anything intelligent or constructive to post. Why post?