Should the FCC force FOX to warn viewers about GOLD

[percysunshine]

Damn...I red the title a bit too fast. I thought it was...

"Should the FCC force FOX to warn viewers about GOD?"


In other stock market news, the price of oil is going down.

.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The FCC has nothing in the fucking world to do with drug companies or approving anybody's advertising.

And Fox Noise is a cable channel anyway.

Fox News saved America. It has the only libertarian show on TV. Fox brought back America's political philosophy after liberals almost succeeded in burying it. What could be more heroic than that.

"Saved"? From what?

Liberals invented America's political philosophy.

if so that would mean liberals are for very very limited government as our Founders were.
Dear, do you feel our Founders were for very very limited govt. Isn't thinking fun?

 

[Vigilante]

The FCC has nothing in the fucking world to do with drug companies or approving anybody's advertising.

And Fox Noise is a cable channel anyway.

Fox News saved America. It has the only libertarian show on TV. Fox brought back America's political philosophy after liberals almost succeeded in burying it. What could be more heroic than that.

"Saved"? From what?

Liberals invented America's political philosophy. Ask the nurse to explain it to you when your meds come. Or give Thomas Freaking Jefferson a phone call.

OCD Pogo, off on her high horse again, ready to fall into the manure!

Jefferson was less a 'liberal' and more a revolutionary. Again, by definition.

He was ideologically a republican, in today's terms he was a conservative for conserving the Constitutional Republic!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Jefferson was less a 'liberal' and more a revolutionary. Again, by definition.

!

Dear, Jefferson was a conservative by today's definition. In fact, he Founded the Republlican Party in 1793 to stand for very very limited govt. Welcome to your first lesson in American history.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

He was ideologically a republican, in today's terms he was a conservative for conserving the Constitutional Republic!

Dear, there was nothing to conserve in Jefferson's day. His life was about establishing the Constitution as a conservative Republican document that forthcoming generations could then conserve as a blueprint for conservative or limited govt. If you're still confused please feel free to ask questions.

 

[Pogo]

Jefferson was less a 'liberal' and more a revolutionary. Again, by definition.

!

Dear, Jefferson was a conservative by today's definition. In fact, he Founded the Republlican Party in 1793 to stand for very very limited govt. Welcome to your first lesson in American history.

Then it's odd that the Republican Party itself claims to have been founded in 1854, while Jefferson claims to have died in 1826.

Which one's lying, o Special Ed?

 

[Pogo]

He was ideologically a republican, in today's terms he was a conservative for conserving the Constitutional Republic!

Dear, there was nothing to conserve in Jefferson's day. His life was about establishing the Constitution as a conservative Republican document that forthcoming generations could then conserve as a blueprint for conservative or limited govt. If you're still confused please feel free to ask questions.

Special Ed quotes Pissyante. The blind leading the blind...

Jefferson and the other founders were Liberals, opposed to the conservatism of the day -- which consisted of Government of, by and for the First and Second Estates -- meaning the Church and the "nobility". That's why we got a republic based on the power of the People with a protection against undue influence from the Church and an elected legislature entirely free of "nobility". That's what Liberalism means.

But you don't even understand linear time, so this will be way over your pointed little head...

 

[candycorn]

No. It's legal for people to sell stuff to folks they really don't need.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

No. It's legal for people to sell stuff to folks they really don't need.

of course, do we want a libcommie govt deciding what people really need?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Jefferson and the other founders were Liberals, opposed to the conservatism of the day -.

Dear, our Founders opposed the big central governments of all the days in human history!!

Thomas Jefferson:
"My reading of history convinces me that bad government results from too much government".

"Our country is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit: by consolidation of power first, and then corruption, its necessary consequence."

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Then it's odd that the Republican Party itself claims to have been founded in 1854,

Yes it does but this is the second Republican Party, not Jefferson's first Republican Party founded in 1793. Its a great choice too since it enables them capitalize on Lincoln's reputation as the greatest and most well known president in American History.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Liberals invented America's political philosophy.

if so then they were for very very limited govt as our founders were?


James Madison: "The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specific objectives. It is not like state governments, whose powers are more general. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government."

James Madison: in Federalist paper NO. 45: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce."

 

[Pogo]

Then it's odd that the Republican Party itself claims to have been founded in 1854,

Yes it does but this the second Republican Party, not Jefferson's first Republican Party founded in 1793. Its a great choice too since it enables them capitalism on Lincoln's reputation as the greatest and most well known president in American History.

Then how mindfuckingly stupid was it for you to have created this thread?

And while you're at it, do tell us all how anybody knew in 1854 that Abe Lincoln was going to be elected in the future, let alone what his legacy was going to be. Let alone what the fuck it has to do with "capitalism".


Linear time --- it's not for children.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Then how mindfuckingly stupid was it for you to have created this thread?

.

dear, if it was stupid why are you so afraid to tell us the reason it was stupid? What does your fear teach you?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

, do tell us all that anybody knew in 1854 that Abe Lincoln was going to be elected in the future,

dear, why would I tell you that??? Do you have a reason for asking me to tell you that? Does it ever occur to you to have a reason? See why we say a liberal will be slow?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Should the FCC force FOX to warn viewers about GOLD

No.

It should warn viewers that watching Fox is confirmation of their stupidity.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Should the FCC force FOX to warn viewers about GOLD

No.

It should warn viewers that watching Fox is confirmation of their stupidity.

Fox is libertarian like our Founders so if you say that you must be anti-American. Why not move to Cuba where you belong? Better hurry before they switch to capitalism too.

 

[Pogo]

Then how mindfuckingly stupid was it for you to have created this thread?

.

dear, if it was stupid why are you so afraid to tell us the reason it was stupid? What does your fear teach you?

That's an interesting post, actually.

Why is it interesting?

Because it's exactly the same thing you posted over two years ago when you tried to float this same turd:

However, of course Jefferson didn't found the Republican Party, so none of that is true -- thank God!

I like the evidence a liberal uses!! It will not even occur to a liberal to have evidence!!

WIKI: The Democratic-Republican Party or Republican Party was an American political party founded in the early 1790s by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Political scientists use the former name, even though there is no known use of it in the 1790's, while historians prefer the latter one; contemporaries generally called the party the "Republicans", along with many other names. In a broader sense the party was the concrete realization of Jeffersonian democracy, i.e., continued aggressive opposition to the British monarchy, opposition to monarchy and strong central government in general, celebration of individual freedom and liberty from strong central government, and state's rights.

you, sir, are a fucking maroon

if so why be so afraid to present your evidence? What does your fear tell you?

---- as you also did back in this thread as well. And you got schooled every single time -- by Republicans, Democrats, Independents and everybody in between who knows how to read.


What does your repeated posting the same ignorant crapola over and over expecting different results tell you?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

What does your repeated posting the same ignorant crapola over and over expecting different results tell you?

dear, if ignorant why so afraid to present an example of the ignorance?

 

[Pogo]

Should the FCC force FOX to warn viewers about GOLD

No.

It should warn viewers that watching Fox is confirmation of their stupidity.

Fox is libertarian like our Founders so if you say that you must be anti-American. Why not move to Cuba where you belong? Better hurry before they switch to capitalism too.

The Founders were Liberals; Libertarians weren't even invented yet. That would come around the same time as the Republican Party --- the one you keep insisting Jefferson founded 28 years after his own death.

The use of the word libertarian to describe a new set of political positions has been traced to the French cognate, libertaire, coined in a scathing letter French libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque wrote to mutualist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1857, castigating him for his sexist political views.[18][19] Déjacque also used the term for his anarchist publication Le Libertaire: Journal du Mouvement Social, which was printed from 9 June 1858 to 4 February 1861. In the mid-1890s, Sébastien Faure began publishing a new Le Libertaire while France's Third Republic enacted the lois scélérates ("villainous laws"), which banned anarchist publications in France. Libertarianism has frequently been used as a synonym for anarchism since this time.[20][21][22] (Wiki)​