Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When Hamas stops hiding behind the skirts of their women and children, like the pussies they are, their collateral civilian casualties will be greatly reduced.Hamas is the aggressor and terrorist group. Stop funding them.
You don't think the Palestinian civilians are being terrorized by widespread Israeli military assaults on their homes, schools, and markets?
Come on dude, it is a fact that you are Bibi's bitch.
"According to Israeli historian, professor Israel Shahak, Harry Truman took $2 million bribe from Jewish groups to run his re-election campaign. Thats why our recognition of Israel was rushed through so fast (11 minutes after Ben Gurion unilaterally declared the State of Israel on May 14, 1948), John F. Kennedy told Gore Vidal."
.
So A Subversive DEMOCRAT was BOUGHT BY THE JEWS!!!! .....I Trust both DEAD MEN to have told the TRUTH, or SOMEONE made up a story???
Assuming that back then presidents were allowed to accept bribes, excuse me flacaltenn, I meant to say campaign donations,
Harry Truman recognised Israel - but not a Jewish state!
.
So A Subversive DEMOCRAT was BOUGHT BY THE JEWS!!!! .....I Trust both DEAD MEN to have told the TRUTH, or SOMEONE made up a story???
Assuming that back then presidents were allowed to accept bribes, excuse me flacaltenn, I meant to say campaign donations,
Harry Truman recognised Israel - but not a Jewish state!
.
Well Harry was known to be a Jew hater, or was it because of his wife and family?.... But a $2 million BRIBE of a corrupt Democrat was all that was necessary to create Israel.... I think there might have been a little more than that.... want to check?
Assuming that back then presidents were allowed to accept bribes, excuse me flacaltenn, I meant to say campaign donations,
Harry Truman recognised Israel - but not a Jewish state!
.
Well Harry was known to be a Jew hater, or was it because of his wife and family?.... But a $2 million BRIBE of a corrupt Democrat was all that was necessary to create Israel.... I think there might have been a little more than that.... want to check?
Well, you are right, there is more.
Political demagoguery.
A country can get away with murder if they are friends.
.
America is considered the moral leader of the world. I wont bother to comment on the merit of that claim (either made by us or others). But its a simple fact that American foreign policy often has a strong moral element to it. For example, during the cold war, we promoted policies to encourage the Soviet Union to allow the emigration of Russian Jews to Israel. Furthermore, President Carter famously elevated human rights in his dealings with other nations. In fact, I believe the US always includes restrictions on the use of military aid and the weapons we supply to allies in the sense that we wont allow them to be used except for defensive purposes.
With that said, the IDF shelling and bombing of Gaza is arguably not about self-defense considering the nature of the assault and the civilian death toll which is completely one-sided in terms of numbers. In that regard, the numbers I've seen are quite shocking. I wont claim the number Im providing is an official one, but what Ive seen reported on the news is approximately 1,400 Palestinian deaths, mostly civilians, compared to 56 Israeli soldiers and 3 civilians.
The Israelis are using our military aid and weapons we supply to engage in these wholesale deaths which is the result of targeting civilian areas.
So, in the interests of human rights and the American interest of not being seen as condoning the killing of so many innocent lives, including women and children, should President Obama suspend military aid to Israel in the interest of trying to stop the killing of so many civilians?
Let;s face it/
Israhell exists becuase the US is the ONLY country which recognizes them.
Ben Gurion bought Truman for Two million dollars cash.
The US has provided them over 100 BBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars in foreign aid - and whatever WMD's they need.
So now you see the reason they are our friend.
.
Cuntumacious, proof that Ben Gurian bought off Truman for $2 million dollars.... or you just suck muslim terrorists cock!
Come on dude, it is a fact that you are Bibi's bitch.
"According to Israeli historian, professor Israel Shahak, Harry Truman took $2 million bribe from Jewish groups to run his re-election campaign. “That’s why our recognition of Israel was rushed through so fast (11 minutes after Ben Gurion unilaterally declared the State of Israel on May 14, 1948),” John F. Kennedy told Gore Vidal."
.
Well Harry was known to be a Jew hater, or was it because of his wife and family?.... But a $2 million BRIBE of a corrupt Democrat was all that was necessary to create Israel.... I think there might have been a little more than that.... want to check?
Well, you are right, there is more.
Political demagoguery.
A country can get away with murder if they are friends.
.
Harry Clark...the WRITER of your article?
Political Campaign Contributions
2008 Election Cycle
Harry Clark - $10,700 in Political Contributions for 2008
Israel just hit a shelter 9 children reported killed, US "appalled".
Israel-Hamas: Shelling draws strong condemnation - CNN.com
"Appalled" is a diplomatic way of saying "attaboys"
Obama sent Bibi a private message inquiring whether they need more materiel to finish, once and for all, the Palestinian Genocide.
.
Your imagination runs wild.
The rest of us have you pegged as a jew-hater and a brain dead piece of shit. Please go kill yourself.
America is considered the moral leader of the world. I wont bother to comment on the merit of that claim (either made by us or others). But its a simple fact that American foreign policy often has a strong moral element to it. For example, during the cold war, we promoted policies to encourage the Soviet Union to allow the emigration of Russian Jews to Israel. Furthermore, President Carter famously elevated human rights in his dealings with other nations. In fact, I believe the US always includes restrictions on the use of military aid and the weapons we supply to allies in the sense that we wont allow them to be used except for defensive purposes.
With that said, the IDF shelling and bombing of Gaza is arguably not about self-defense considering the nature of the assault and the civilian death toll which is completely one-sided in terms of numbers. In that regard, the numbers I've seen are quite shocking. I wont claim the number Im providing is an official one, but what Ive seen reported on the news is approximately 1,400 Palestinian deaths, mostly civilians, compared to 56 Israeli soldiers and 3 civilians.
The Israelis are using our military aid and weapons we supply to engage in these wholesale deaths which is the result of targeting civilian areas.
So, in the interests of human rights and the American interest of not being seen as condoning the killing of so many innocent lives, including women and children, should President Obama suspend military aid to Israel in the interest of trying to stop the killing of so many civilians?
Looks like your poll backfired, Mustang. Not everyone here supports us abandoning our ally in the Middle East. Perhaps we should stop sending aid to Hamas, who uses human shields and masquerades as a group of humanitarians.
America is considered the moral leader of the world. I wont bother to comment on the merit of that claim (either made by us or others). But its a simple fact that American foreign policy often has a strong moral element to it. For example, during the cold war, we promoted policies to encourage the Soviet Union to allow the emigration of Russian Jews to Israel. Furthermore, President Carter famously elevated human rights in his dealings with other nations. In fact, I believe the US always includes restrictions on the use of military aid and the weapons we supply to allies in the sense that we wont allow them to be used except for defensive purposes.
With that said, the IDF shelling and bombing of Gaza is arguably not about self-defense considering the nature of the assault and the civilian death toll which is completely one-sided in terms of numbers. In that regard, the numbers I've seen are quite shocking. I wont claim the number Im providing is an official one, but what Ive seen reported on the news is approximately 1,400 Palestinian deaths, mostly civilians, compared to 56 Israeli soldiers and 3 civilians.
The Israelis are using our military aid and weapons we supply to engage in these wholesale deaths which is the result of targeting civilian areas.
So, in the interests of human rights and the American interest of not being seen as condoning the killing of so many innocent lives, including women and children, should President Obama suspend military aid to Israel in the interest of trying to stop the killing of so many civilians?
To stupid people two things that are vaguely similar look identical."Appalled" is a diplomatic way of saying "attaboys"
Obama sent Bibi a private message inquiring whether they need more materiel to finish, once and for all, the Palestinian Genocide.
.
Your imagination runs wild.
The rest of us have you pegged as a jew-hater and a brain dead piece of shit. Please go kill yourself.
Unfortunately, for several decades now, the usual response for virtually any and all criticism of Israel or Israeli actions is the charge of antisemitism. Do you know what that reminds me of? It reminds me of the complaint from certain quarters that any and all conservative criticism of President Obama is met with the charge of racism.
What do you say to that?
"Blowback" is an idiotic concept.America is considered the moral leader of the world. I wont bother to comment on the merit of that claim (either made by us or others). But its a simple fact that American foreign policy often has a strong moral element to it. For example, during the cold war, we promoted policies to encourage the Soviet Union to allow the emigration of Russian Jews to Israel. Furthermore, President Carter famously elevated human rights in his dealings with other nations. In fact, I believe the US always includes restrictions on the use of military aid and the weapons we supply to allies in the sense that we wont allow them to be used except for defensive purposes.
With that said, the IDF shelling and bombing of Gaza is arguably not about self-defense considering the nature of the assault and the civilian death toll which is completely one-sided in terms of numbers. In that regard, the numbers I've seen are quite shocking. I wont claim the number Im providing is an official one, but what Ive seen reported on the news is approximately 1,400 Palestinian deaths, mostly civilians, compared to 56 Israeli soldiers and 3 civilians.
The Israelis are using our military aid and weapons we supply to engage in these wholesale deaths which is the result of targeting civilian areas.
So, in the interests of human rights and the American interest of not being seen as condoning the killing of so many innocent lives, including women and children, should President Obama suspend military aid to Israel in the interest of trying to stop the killing of so many civilians?
Looks like your poll backfired, Mustang. Not everyone here supports us abandoning our ally in the Middle East. Perhaps we should stop sending aid to Hamas, who uses human shields and masquerades as a group of humanitarians.
You assume too much. Cutting back on military aid as a way to hopefully modify the behavior of an ally is not the same things as cutting them loose. The problem is that without any realistic risk of ever losing their aid or having it temporarily suspended, any ally might very well embrace policies which reflect poorly on the country that's funding their war operations. In the case of the USA, that brings with it what's commonly referred to as blowback which certainly is not in America's interest.
To stupid people two things that are vaguely similar look identical.Your imagination runs wild.
The rest of us have you pegged as a jew-hater and a brain dead piece of shit. Please go kill yourself.
Unfortunately, for several decades now, the usual response for virtually any and all criticism of Israel or Israeli actions is the charge of antisemitism. Do you know what that reminds me of? It reminds me of the complaint from certain quarters that any and all conservative criticism of President Obama is met with the charge of racism.
What do you say to that?
In this case, criticism of Israel can be legitimate. But what makes it legitimate is that the criteria are uniform. So you cannot criticize Israel for attacking while excusing Hamas for attacking. You cannot criticize Israel for killing children without criticizing Hamas for killing children. You cannot criticize Israel for its treatment of Arabs without criticizing other Arab countries for their treatment of Arabs.
But anti-semites do all of those things. They excuse Arab murder, terror, and torture and criticise israel for doing what any normal country would do to defend its citizens.
"Blowback" is an idiotic concept.Looks like your poll backfired, Mustang. Not everyone here supports us abandoning our ally in the Middle East. Perhaps we should stop sending aid to Hamas, who uses human shields and masquerades as a group of humanitarians.
You assume too much. Cutting back on military aid as a way to hopefully modify the behavior of an ally is not the same things as cutting them loose. The problem is that without any realistic risk of ever losing their aid or having it temporarily suspended, any ally might very well embrace policies which reflect poorly on the country that's funding their war operations. In the case of the USA, that brings with it what's commonly referred to as blowback which certainly is not in America's interest.
Why would we want to discourage Israel from blowing the shit out of Hamas? What is in our interest in doing that? Half the Arab countries dont like them either.
To stupid people two things that are vaguely similar look identical.Unfortunately, for several decades now, the usual response for virtually any and all criticism of Israel or Israeli actions is the charge of antisemitism. Do you know what that reminds me of? It reminds me of the complaint from certain quarters that any and all conservative criticism of President Obama is met with the charge of racism.
What do you say to that?
In this case, criticism of Israel can be legitimate. But what makes it legitimate is that the criteria are uniform. So you cannot criticize Israel for attacking while excusing Hamas for attacking. You cannot criticize Israel for killing children without criticizing Hamas for killing children. You cannot criticize Israel for its treatment of Arabs without criticizing other Arab countries for their treatment of Arabs.
But anti-semites do all of those things. They excuse Arab murder, terror, and torture and criticise israel for doing what any normal country would do to defend its citizens.
What you just posted bears no relevance whatsoever to what I previously posted. Do I have to repeat it, or do you want a second stab at it?
