SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics

[ScienceRocks]

SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..
-That doesn't Invest in tech outside of the private sector doing it for their own benefit.
-Doesn't have an Educational system that allows for a large percentage of the population to be educated. Yes, you either have a shit load of money to send your children to private or you don't get it..
-No regulations on the business sector and monopolies' are welcome.
-Doesn't allow science institutions for the benefit of the nation. Want warning? Pay a private corp for it or you're out of luck.
-Allows a monopoly to pave the roads and charge as much as it damn well wishes.
-That allows slave labor or child labor. You see there's no federal laws and businesses shouldn't be regulated, you say.
-Environmental laws that demand that we don't fuck up the air or water. India or china you could say, but I wouldn't say they're first world in that area.

Show me one with a federal government that sit there with its finger up its ass looking at a wall. One with at least $20,000/year per capita for the common man would be a good clue on what I am talking about.

 

[nodoginnafight]

I have never seen Libertarianism practiced in any country. I think one South American country floated it for about 3 months.

 

[The Rabbi]

SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..
-That doesn't Invest in tech outside of the private sector doing it for their own benefit.
-Doesn't have an Educational system that allows for a large percentage of the population to be educated. Yes, you either have a shit load of money to send your children to private or you don't get it..
-No regulations on the business sector and monopolies' are welcome.
-Doesn't allow science institutions for the benefit of the nation. Want warning? Pay a private corp for it or you're out of luck.
-Allows a monopoly to pave the roads and charge as much as it damn well wishes.
-That allows slave labor or child labor. You see there's no federal laws and businesses shouldn't be regulated, you say.
-Environmental laws that demand that we don't fuck up the air or water. India or china you could say, but I wouldn't say they're first world in that area.

Show me one with a federal government that sit there with its finger up its ass looking at a wall. One with at least $20,000/year per capita for the common man would be a good clue on what I am talking about.

Show me one communist nation in the world.
SHow me one socialist nation in the world.
All of them are amalgams of different systems. Your post proves you are a loser and not much else.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

USA 1921-1928

The Roaring Twenties

Hoover and FDR went Keynesian and gave us a Depression worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years

 

[Billy000]

SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..
-That doesn't Invest in tech outside of the private sector doing it for their own benefit.
-Doesn't have an Educational system that allows for a large percentage of the population to be educated. Yes, you either have a shit load of money to send your children to private or you don't get it..
-No regulations on the business sector and monopolies' are welcome.
-Doesn't allow science institutions for the benefit of the nation. Want warning? Pay a private corp for it or you're out of luck.
-Allows a monopoly to pave the roads and charge as much as it damn well wishes.
-That allows slave labor or child labor. You see there's no federal laws and businesses shouldn't be regulated, you say.
-Environmental laws that demand that we don't fuck up the air or water. India or china you could say, but I wouldn't say they're first world in that area.

Show me one with a federal government that sit there with its finger up its ass looking at a wall. One with at least $20,000/year per capita for the common man would be a good clue on what I am talking about.

Show me one communist nation in the world.
SHow me one socialist nation in the world.
All of them are amalgams of different systems. Your post proves you are a loser and not much else.

As usual Rabbi you completely miss the point. The OP is not promoting communism or socialism. The economic system he is referring to could still capitalism. What he is talking about is limited government. A country with unregulated economy that could still be capitalism.

 

[Billy000]

SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..
-That doesn't Invest in tech outside of the private sector doing it for their own benefit.
-Doesn't have an Educational system that allows for a large percentage of the population to be educated. Yes, you either have a shit load of money to send your children to private or you don't get it..
-No regulations on the business sector and monopolies' are welcome.
-Doesn't allow science institutions for the benefit of the nation. Want warning? Pay a private corp for it or you're out of luck.
-Allows a monopoly to pave the roads and charge as much as it damn well wishes.
-That allows slave labor or child labor. You see there's no federal laws and businesses shouldn't be regulated, you say.
-Environmental laws that demand that we don't fuck up the air or water. India or china you could say, but I wouldn't say they're first world in that area.

Show me one with a federal government that sit there with its finger up its ass looking at a wall. One with at least $20,000/year per capita for the common man would be a good clue on what I am talking about.

This may be the best thread I have ever seen on this forum. You have articulated better than i ever could have on this subject.

 

[The Rabbi]

SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..
-That doesn't Invest in tech outside of the private sector doing it for their own benefit.
-Doesn't have an Educational system that allows for a large percentage of the population to be educated. Yes, you either have a shit load of money to send your children to private or you don't get it..
-No regulations on the business sector and monopolies' are welcome.
-Doesn't allow science institutions for the benefit of the nation. Want warning? Pay a private corp for it or you're out of luck.
-Allows a monopoly to pave the roads and charge as much as it damn well wishes.
-That allows slave labor or child labor. You see there's no federal laws and businesses shouldn't be regulated, you say.
-Environmental laws that demand that we don't fuck up the air or water. India or china you could say, but I wouldn't say they're first world in that area.

Show me one with a federal government that sit there with its finger up its ass looking at a wall. One with at least $20,000/year per capita for the common man would be a good clue on what I am talking about.

Show me one communist nation in the world.
SHow me one socialist nation in the world.
All of them are amalgams of different systems. Your post proves you are a loser and not much else.

As usual Rabbi you completely miss the point. The OP is not promoting communism or socialism. The economic system he is referring to could still capitalism. What he is talking about is limited government. A country with unregulated economy that could still be capitalism.

Any country with its own currency could be said to have a regulated economy. So I'm not letting you simply move the goal post on this one.

What was the point of this idiotic thread again?

 

[Billy000]

Show me one communist nation in the world.
SHow me one socialist nation in the world.
All of them are amalgams of different systems. Your post proves you are a loser and not much else.

As usual Rabbi you completely miss the point. The OP is not promoting communism or socialism. The economic system he is referring to could still capitalism. What he is talking about is limited government. A country with unregulated economy that could still be capitalism.

Any country with its own currency could be said to have a regulated economy. So I'm not letting you simply move the goal post on this one.

What was the point of this idiotic thread again?

Only you would quivel over the semantics when you have no argument. Matthew articulated exactly what he means quite clearly to where even you understand it.

The idea is that a libertarian nation can only fail without a structured government.

 

[Nyvin]

USA 1921-1928

The Roaring Twenties

Hoover and FDR went Keynesian and gave us a Depression worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years

Hoover was a Republican and not progressive at all...

 

[Vandalshandle]

USA 1921-1928

The Roaring Twenties

Hoover and FDR went Keynesian and gave us a Depression worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years

It does not seem to dent your theory about Hoover and FDR that the 1930's depression was a worldwide event?

 

[The Rabbi]

USA 1921-1928

The Roaring Twenties

Hoover and FDR went Keynesian and gave us a Depression worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years

It does not seem to dent your theory about Hoover and FDR that the 1930's depression was a worldwide event?

No, because the Depression was monumentally less severe in every other country and recovery happened much sooner.
Oops.

 

[kaz]

SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

I'm not sure which idea is more stupid. That you believe that a system not having been tried proves proves it won't work, or that every socialist government has been a failure and yet you still want that.

 

[The Rabbi]

USA 1921-1928

The Roaring Twenties

Hoover and FDR went Keynesian and gave us a Depression worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years

Hoover was a Republican and not progressive at all...

Hoover was a progressive. So was TR for that matter.
You lose again because you are a low information motherfucker.

 

[The Rabbi]

SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

I'm not sure which idea is more stupid. That you believe that an idea that hasn't tried proves it won't work, or that every socialist government has been a failure and yet you still want that.

You could add that he thinks he's contributing something by rehashing the same argument that gets made on here about once a month.

 

[ScienceRocks]

USA 1921-1928

The Roaring Twenties

Hoover and FDR went Keynesian and gave us a Depression worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years

Did we have regulations and public schools during the roaring twenties? Did monopolies run free as unchained capitalism had been allowed to do during the 1890's once again?

Doesn't seem very libertarian to me.

 

[Meathead]

Singapore is one of the world's richest nations and is economically largely, though not completely, libertarian. Economic freedom is its cornerstone.

Economy of Singapore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[CrusaderFrank]

USA 1921-1928

The Roaring Twenties

Hoover and FDR went Keynesian and gave us a Depression worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years

Hoover was a Republican and not progressive at all...

That's like saying Teddy Roosevelt was a Republican...Progressive is how you say Socialist in USA Speak

 

[The Rabbi]

Singapore is one of the world's richest nations and is economically largely, though not completely, libertarian. Economic freedom is its cornerstone.

Economy of Singapore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mauritius is rated as mostly free and of course has one of the strongest economies in Africa. Countries with strong property rights, transparency, and limited goernment are all among the wealthiest. Surprise.

 

[Pete7469]

USA 1921-1928

The Roaring Twenties

Hoover and FDR went Keynesian and gave us a Depression worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years

Hoover was a Republican and not progressive at all...

Hoover was a progressive. So was TR for that matter.
You lose again because you are a low information motherfucker.

You pretty much stole my thunder there. If we had maintained the system that turned us into an industrial and financial juggernaut in the first place we'd be better off now.

Thanks to prog tools we're being overtaken by turd world countries that have all but rejected the hardcore marxist bullshit that dragged them into the sewer they're steadily climbing out of.

 

[Billy000]

Singapore is one of the world's richest nations and is economically largely, though not completely, libertarian. Economic freedom is its cornerstone.

Economy of Singapore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lol did you even read the article? Because I did. There is nothing libertarian about Singapore. The government has a huge stake in the economy and it has socialized healthcare system. Not only that, but it invests a great deal in education.

It's am impressive economy no doubt, but it is not at all libertarian.