Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Now this is really weird. I am the opposite here. My post was for single.Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
Clarify your point.A man gets married, he has no rights at all. It is part of the vows.
The purpose of marriage is to have babies.Clarify your point.A man gets married, he has no rights at all. It is part of the vows.
“My body, my choice” should apply equally for men. It is after all his “body” that will have to work to support her, and the child. Whether she sticks around, or not.I probably posted too soon. I know of a case where the woman talked the guy into marriage. Daily threw the pills into the toilet, got pregnant. As soon as the baby was born, off to the lawyer for divorce and support. All in exactly 9+ months.
Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
I agree. So what do you disagree with? I think that the man should have a say in the decision post marriage.The purpose of marriage is to have babies.Clarify your point.A man gets married, he has no rights at all. It is part of the vows.
I think you misunderstand. This isn’t to say he can make her have an abortion. It proposes a legal mechanism that allows a man to abdicate responsibility for the baby carried to term. Just like women have the option, through abortion.Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
Free to choose to keep the baby and make the guy pay for it?Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
No...I have it correct...pre marriage no...post marriage yes.I think you misunderstand. This isn’t to say he can make her have an abortion. It proposes a legal mechanism that allows a man to abdicate responsibility for the baby carried to term. Just like women have the option, through abortion.Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
Yes...on both counts. Single and married.Free to choose to keep the baby and make the guy pay for it?Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
The thread is about responsibility after the fact, not aborton.No...I have it correct...pre marriage no...post marriage yes.I think you misunderstand. This isn’t to say he can make her have an abortion. It proposes a legal mechanism that allows a man to abdicate responsibility for the baby carried to term. Just like women have the option, through abortion.Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
He has no say pre, and he has a say post
That is the specific problem such legislation would alleviate.Free to choose to keep the baby and make the guy pay for it?Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
And I agree. However, it is complicated.That is the specific problem such legislation would alleviate.Free to choose to keep the baby and make the guy pay for it?Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
Legislation would not alleviate this. This can only be changed in the courts. If legislation were drafted it would quickly be struck own by the courts.That is the specific problem such legislation would alleviate.Free to choose to keep the baby and make the guy pay for it?Single women are free to choose their course of action up to the legal point (as determined by the court) as to terminate. Men should have no say in the matter. Wraps it fohs ya taps it...bitches be triflin.Then by that token should single women be denied abortions; in keeping with your ruling for men?Single No Married YesSince women have the legal right to dodge the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy; shouldn’t men be given that same legal consideration? Whereby if a woman claims to have been impregnated by a man; that man should have the right to file a claim in court absolving him of responsibility for that mass of tissue, from that moment forward.
If yes; hit agree. If not; but the woman should still have the right to an abortion; explain why...
GO!!!
Single women have not joined into a legally binding agreement, marriage. Married women have and as part of a legal union the man should have a say (save medical reasons) in the course of action.
