Shootings of Asian-Americans in Atlanta

They're also pretending they are the ones who freed the slaves and they were the ones who were in favor of civil rights acts.
Who is this “they” you refer to?

no one on this forum was alive in 1865

and most of us were not old enough to vote when the civil rights act was passed
So it wasn't all about race


By the 1990s Republicans were starting to win elections at the statewide and local level throughout the South, even though Democrats retained majorities in several state legislatures through the 2000s and 2010s.[35][36] By 2014, the region was heavily Republican at the local, state and national level.[36][37] A key element in the change was the transformation of evangelical white Protestants in the south from largely nonpolitical to heavily Republican. Pew pollsters reported, "In the late 1980s, white evangelicals in the South were still mostly wedded to the Democratic Party while evangelicals outside the South were more aligned with the GOP. But over the course of the next decade or so, the GOP made gains among white Southerners generally and evangelicals in particular, virtually eliminating this regional disparity."[38]Exit polls in the 2004 presidential election showed that Republican George W. Bush led Democrat John Kerry by 70–30% among Southern whites, who comprised 71% of the voters there. By contrast, Kerry had a 90–9 lead among the 18% of African American Southern voters. One-third of the Southern voters said they were white evangelicals; they voted for Bush by 80–20.[39]

After the 2016 election, every state legislature in the South was GOP-controlled.[40] Republican nominee for President Donald Trump notably won Elliott County, KY, becoming the first Republican nominee for President to ever win that county.[41]

Republicans won the white southern vote with religion, guns and gay issues too. Social wedge issues. Race is only one of them.
 
Anyone who says otherwise is a racist or ignorant.
In the old soviet union libs like you and Superbad used to call people like me enemies of the state

In America libs use the term “racism” as their catch-all accusation for dissenters

I dont support racist organizations but I bet you a Superbad do

the racist and segregated Congressional Black Caucus for instance

funded by taxpayers it only admits black people
Your policies are racist. Our policies are socialist so you call us socialists. We call you like we see you.

Arguing that diversity programs are themselves racist, is ignorant and or racist
What policy is racist, and why is it racist.
 
I don’t go to their sites the fbi does.
i don't go there either because they don't seem to exist

except as talking point issued by the politicized FBI

Playing dumb to the facts doesn't work.
They're also pretending they are the ones who freed the slaves and they were the ones who were in favor of civil rights acts. Such liars. They won't admit they understand the southern strategy turned white racist Democrats into the racist Republicans we have today.
List those racist Dims who turned into Republicans.

So far, your racist friend has 1 on his list. Help the lil fella out.
It was you white voters who changed. Blacks gave credit for the civil rights movements to democrats who picked up the cause. Because blacks were voting democrat white southerners started voting gop and the gop agenda today is anti mlk.

You guys supported mlk as much as you do blm
So you can't come up with a list either.

Dismissed.

Studies show that Southern whites shifted to the Republican Party due to racial conservatism.[13][15][16] Among white Southerners, Democratic loyalties first fell away at the presidential level, and several decades later at the state and local levels.


Do you want to pull up the studies?

Do you really not know the history?

Few Southern Democrats rejected the 1948 Democratic political platform over President Harry's Truman's civil rights platform.[22] They met at Birmingham, Alabama, and formed a political party named the "States' Rights" Democratic Party, more commonly known as the "Dixiecrats." Its main goal was to continue the policy of racial segregation in the South and the Jim Crow laws that sustained it. South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond, who had led the walkout, became the party's presidential nominee. Mississippi Governor Fielding L. Wright received the vice-presidential nomination. Thurmond had a moderate position in South Carolina politics, but with his allegiance with the Dixiecrats, he became the symbol of die-hard segregation.[23] The Dixiecrats had no chance of winning the election since they failed to qualify for the ballots of enough states. Their strategy was to win enough Southern states to deny Truman an electoral college victory and force the election into the House of Representatives, where they could then extract concessions from either Truman or his opponent Thomas Dewey on racial issues in exchange for their support. Even if Dewey won the election outright, the Dixiecrats hoped that their defection would show that the Democratic Party needed Southern support to win national elections, and that this fact would weaken the Civil Rights Movement among Northern and Western Democrats. However, the Dixiecrats were weakened when most Southern Democratic leaders (such as Governor Herman Talmadge of Georgia and "Boss" E. H. Crump of Tennessee) refused to support the party.[24] In the November election, Thurmond carried the states of Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina.[25] Outside of these four states, however, it was only listed as a third-party ticket. Thurmond received well over a million popular votes and 39 electoral votes.


For nearly a century after Reconstruction, the white South identified with the Democratic Party. Republicans controlled parts of the mountains districts and they competed for statewide office in the border states. Before 1948, southern Democrats believed that their party, with its respect for states' rights and appreciation of traditional southern values, was the defender of the southern way of life. Southern Democrats warned against designs on the part of northern liberals and Republicans and civil rights activists whom they denounced as "outside agitators".[citation needed]

The adoption of the first civil rights plank by the 1948 convention and President Truman's Executive Order 9981, which provided for equal treatment and opportunity for African-American military service members, divided the party's northern and southern wings.[28] In 1952, the Democratic Party named John Sparkman, a moderate Senator from Alabama, as their vice presidential candidate with the hope of building party loyalty in the South.[29][30] By the late 1950s, the national Democratic Party again began to embrace the Civil Rights Movement, and the old argument that Southern whites had to vote for Democrats to protect segregation grew weaker. Modernization had brought factories, national businesses and a more diverse culture to cities such as Atlanta, Dallas, Charlotte and Houston. This attracted millions of northern migrants, including many African Americans. They gave priority to modernization and economic growth over preservation of the old ways.[31]

The Civil Rights act of 1964 and The Voting Rights Act of 1965 were passed by bipartisan majorities of northern congressmen. Only a small element resisted, led by Democratic governors Lester Maddox of Georgia, and especially George Wallace of Alabama. These populist governors appealed to a less-educated, blue-collar electorate that favored the Democratic Party, but supported segregation.[32] After the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court case that outlawed segregation in schools in 1954, integration caused enormous controversy in the white South. For this reason, compliance was very slow and was the subject of violent resistance in some areas.[33]

The Democratic Party no longer acted as the champion of segregation. Newly-enfranchised African American voters began supporting Democratic candidates at the 80-90-percent levels, producing Democratic leaders such as Julian Bond and John Lewis of Georgia, and Barbara Jordan of Texas.[34]

Many white southerners switched to the Republican Party, some for reasons unrelated to race. The majority of white southerners shared conservative positions on taxes, moral values and national security. The Democratic Party had increasingly liberal positions rejected by these voters.[35] In addition, the younger generations, who were politically conservative but wealthier and less attached to the Democratic Party, replaced the older generations who remained loyal to the party.[35] The shift to the Republican Party took place slowly and gradually over almost a century.[35]

Studies?

The claim was all these racist Dims in Congress switched to Republican. So far, that list contains 1 name.
 
Anyone who says otherwise is a racist or ignorant.
In the old soviet union libs like you and Superbad used to call people like me enemies of the state

In America libs use the term “racism” as their catch-all accusation for dissenters

I dont support racist organizations but I bet you a Superbad do

the racist and segregated Congressional Black Caucus for instance

funded by taxpayers it only admits black people
Your policies are racist. Our policies are socialist so you call us socialists. We call you like we see you.

Arguing that diversity programs are themselves racist, is ignorant and or racist
A diversity program that targets selected races by skin color is itself racist

the left - you - are the biggest racists in America
 
Anyone who says otherwise is a racist or ignorant.
In the old soviet union libs like you and Superbad used to call people like me enemies of the state

In America libs use the term “racism” as their catch-all accusation for dissenters

I dont support racist organizations but I bet you a Superbad do

the racist and segregated Congressional Black Caucus for instance

funded by taxpayers it only admits black people
Your policies are racist. Our policies are socialist so you call us socialists. We call you like we see you.

Arguing that diversity programs are themselves racist, is ignorant and or racist
What policy is racist, and why is it racist.
I’m not going to get into it with you. If you don’t already know it’s cause you don’t want to know
 
Anyone who says otherwise is a racist or ignorant.
In the old soviet union libs like you and Superbad used to call people like me enemies of the state

In America libs use the term “racism” as their catch-all accusation for dissenters

I dont support racist organizations but I bet you a Superbad do

the racist and segregated Congressional Black Caucus for instance

funded by taxpayers it only admits black people
Your policies are racist. Our policies are socialist so you call us socialists. We call you like we see you.

Arguing that diversity programs are themselves racist, is ignorant and or racist
A diversity program that targets selected races by skin color is itself racist

the left - you - are the biggest racists in America
I’m a white man.
 
you buy into the idea that the FBI is out to get Trump too? RINO's, Democrats, Every other country in the free world, the media and now the FBI huh?
Globalism is everywhere

most “friendly” countries were ok with trump except for germany and its fuhrer merkel
No. The rest of the world doesn’t deny global warming.
The simply don’t give a damn; it’s not their money they’re after.
 
you buy into the idea that the FBI is out to get Trump too? RINO's, Democrats, Every other country in the free world, the media and now the FBI huh?
Globalism is everywhere

most “friendly” countries were ok with trump except for germany and its fuhrer merkel
No. The rest of the world doesn’t deny global warming.
The simply don’t give a damn; it’s not their money they’re after.
Oh brother. So basically you're a conspiracy theorist.
 
Yep and it was so called Christians who opposed him at the same time.
If white Christians didnt oppose slavery you’d still be picking cotton

It was white, racist, Southern Christians that wanted slavery fool. What a idiot.
you left out the fact they were Democrat voters as well....they literally went to war because a Republican won and they didn't get their way....very similar to what the Dems did in 2016

They were white, democrat, conservatives.
ok...usually though the adjective comes before the noun...so white, conservative Dems...but yeah I agree.

Yep and those Democrats are Republicans today.
List the Dims who switched to the Republican party.

None of you idiots can ever come up with a list.

Strom Thurmond, he was the Republican champion for years. You loved Jesse Helms, Trent Lott, he'll any democrat from the South pretty much became a republican in the 70s.
None of those men belonged to the KKK and I have no problems associating with them

Democrat Robert Byrd was a high ranking Klamsman
Xiden, who opposed enforcement of Brown v Board of Education, had mentors like Sen Eastland (D), who was a member of the White Citizen's Council...which was essentially the DNC's direct link to the terrorist wing...the KKK. Citizens' Councils - Wikipedia

We just got rid of the most divisive, racist president we have had since Woodrow Wilson.
Wilson set the stage for all of the Prog programs. So you should think differently of him. Progs will turn on you someday. I can only keep saying it. The party rules everything. The individuals in it are at the pleasure of the party until not needed. Yo would think that the ghettos that are still here through all legislation would wise you up. Obama is not what you think him as.

What? Woodrow Wilson was a straight out racist, fool. Wilson segregated the Federal Gov't after Reconstruction. "Segregation is not humiliating, but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen."

View attachment 471911

Wilson allowed the screening of "Birth of a Nation" at the White House. Wilson was against Reconstruction, WTF are you talking about.

^^^ lol dumbass thinks Woodrow Wilson was around during Reconstruction. No wonder he's always crying for Whitey to give him stuff; he dropped out of 3rd grade.
 
Yep and it was so called Christians who opposed him at the same time.
If white Christians didnt oppose slavery you’d still be picking cotton

It was white, racist, Southern Christians that wanted slavery fool. What a idiot.
you left out the fact they were Democrat voters as well....they literally went to war because a Republican won and they didn't get their way....very similar to what the Dems did in 2016

They were white, democrat, conservatives.
ok...usually though the adjective comes before the noun...so white, conservative Dems...but yeah I agree.

Yep and those Democrats are Republicans today.
List the Dims who switched to the Republican party.

None of you idiots can ever come up with a list.

Strom Thurmond, he was the Republican champion for years. You loved Jesse Helms, Trent Lott, he'll any democrat from the South pretty much became a republican in the 70s.
None of those men belonged to the KKK and I have no problems associating with them

Democrat Robert Byrd was a high ranking Klamsman
Xiden, who opposed enforcement of Brown v Board of Education, had mentors like Sen Eastland (D), who was a member of the White Citizen's Council...which was essentially the DNC's direct link to the terrorist wing...the KKK. Citizens' Councils - Wikipedia

We just got rid of the most divisive, racist president we have had since Woodrow Wilson.
Obama was not racist just divisive

Trump was divisive, racist, arrogant, narcist, etc.

Did he oppose Reconstruction, too?
 
I’m a white man.
I’m not impressed

Indians scouted for the US Cavalary to hunt down other Indians back in the day
A better comparison you could have made was the mistake Indians made letting us come to this country. They thought their culture could co exist with ours and eventually our culture overtook theirs.

Those Indians you are talking about sound like a bunch of Ben Carson's.

And I'm not scouting for the blacks. What do I have to gain from it? Those indians got paid. That's why they did it. If you can't beat them join them.

See you don't realize you white conservatives to me are the other side. Just because 99.9% of your party is white doesn't mean it's the party for all whites. The other half of whites are Liberal Progressive Democrats who could never associate with white conservative Republicans.

The only time I agree with Conservative Republicans is when they are arguing with Muslims. And even then sometimes I agree with the Muslims. Like if Republicans want to say this is a christian nation. No it's not. I can't go along with that. But if it were between Christianity and Islam, I would choose Christianity. Gun to head.
 
Yep and it was so called Christians who opposed him at the same time.
If white Christians didnt oppose slavery you’d still be picking cotton

It was white, racist, Southern Christians that wanted slavery fool. What a idiot.
you left out the fact they were Democrat voters as well....they literally went to war because a Republican won and they didn't get their way....very similar to what the Dems did in 2016

They were white, democrat, conservatives.
ok...usually though the adjective comes before the noun...so white, conservative Dems...but yeah I agree.

Yep and those Democrats are Republicans today.
List the Dims who switched to the Republican party.

None of you idiots can ever come up with a list.

Strom Thurmond, he was the Republican champion for years. You loved Jesse Helms, Trent Lott, he'll any democrat from the South pretty much became a republican in the 70s.
None of those men belonged to the KKK and I have no problems associating with them

Democrat Robert Byrd was a high ranking Klamsman
Xiden, who opposed enforcement of Brown v Board of Education, had mentors like Sen Eastland (D), who was a member of the White Citizen's Council...which was essentially the DNC's direct link to the terrorist wing...the KKK. Citizens' Councils - Wikipedia

We just got rid of the most divisive, racist president we have had since Woodrow Wilson.
Wilson set the stage for all of the Prog programs. So you should think differently of him. Progs will turn on you someday. I can only keep saying it. The party rules everything. The individuals in it are at the pleasure of the party until not needed. Yo would think that the ghettos that are still here through all legislation would wise you up. Obama is not what you think him as.

What? Woodrow Wilson was a straight out racist, fool. Wilson segregated the Federal Gov't after Reconstruction. "Segregation is not humiliating, but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen."

View attachment 471911

Wilson allowed the screening of "Birth of a Nation" at the White House. Wilson was against Reconstruction, WTF are you talking about.

^^^ lol dumbass thinks Woodrow Wilson was around during Reconstruction. No wonder he's always crying for Whitey to give him stuff; he dropped out of 3rd grade.
I think you nailed ole Superbad on that one
 
Anyone who says otherwise is a racist or ignorant.
In the old soviet union libs like you and Superbad used to call people like me enemies of the state

In America libs use the term “racism” as their catch-all accusation for dissenters

I dont support racist organizations but I bet you a Superbad do

the racist and segregated Congressional Black Caucus for instance

funded by taxpayers it only admits black people
Your policies are racist. Our policies are socialist so you call us socialists. We call you like we see you.

Arguing that diversity programs are themselves racist, is ignorant and or racist
What policy is racist, and why is it racist.
I’m not going to get into it with you. If you don’t already know it’s cause you don’t want to know
So you can't cite a single racist policy.

Thanks for admitting you are talking out of your ass.
 
Yep and it was so called Christians who opposed him at the same time.
If white Christians didnt oppose slavery you’d still be picking cotton

It was white, racist, Southern Christians that wanted slavery fool. What a idiot.
you left out the fact they were Democrat voters as well....they literally went to war because a Republican won and they didn't get their way....very similar to what the Dems did in 2016

They were white, democrat, conservatives.
ok...usually though the adjective comes before the noun...so white, conservative Dems...but yeah I agree.

Yep and those Democrats are Republicans today.
List the Dims who switched to the Republican party.

None of you idiots can ever come up with a list.

Strom Thurmond, he was the Republican champion for years. You loved Jesse Helms, Trent Lott, he'll any democrat from the South pretty much became a republican in the 70s.
None of those men belonged to the KKK and I have no problems associating with them

Democrat Robert Byrd was a high ranking Klamsman
Xiden, who opposed enforcement of Brown v Board of Education, had mentors like Sen Eastland (D), who was a member of the White Citizen's Council...which was essentially the DNC's direct link to the terrorist wing...the KKK. Citizens' Councils - Wikipedia

We just got rid of the most divisive, racist president we have had since Woodrow Wilson.
Wilson set the stage for all of the Prog programs. So you should think differently of him. Progs will turn on you someday. I can only keep saying it. The party rules everything. The individuals in it are at the pleasure of the party until not needed. Yo would think that the ghettos that are still here through all legislation would wise you up. Obama is not what you think him as.

What? Woodrow Wilson was a straight out racist, fool. Wilson segregated the Federal Gov't after Reconstruction. "Segregation is not humiliating, but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen."

View attachment 471911

Wilson allowed the screening of "Birth of a Nation" at the White House. Wilson was against Reconstruction, WTF are you talking about.

^^^ lol dumbass thinks Woodrow Wilson was around during Reconstruction. No wonder he's always crying for Whitey to give him stuff; he dropped out of 3rd grade.
I think you nailed ole Superbad on that one

Well, it's not like that's a challenge or anything; all he and the other racists want is a lot bling handed to them by Whitey, and getting themselves exempt from being arrested for anything criminal they feel like doing.
 
A better comparison you could have made was the mistake Indians made letting us come to this country.
Now you’re just rambling

the topic is the lib lie concerning alleged white racism

No doubt, there has been progress. Civil rights laws have been passed and affirmed. Companies are committing to and investing heavily in diversity, because more corporate leaders acknowledge that it makes good business sense. And several black billionaires and CEOs sit on the respective ranking lists.

However, according to both quantitative and qualitative data, working African-Americans — from those laboring in factories and on shop floors to those setting C-suite strategy — still face obstacles to advancement that other minorities and white women don’t. They are less likely than their white peers to be hired, developed, and promoted. And their lived experience at work is demonstrably worse even than that of other people of color.


At most large U.S. and multinational organizations, diversity and inclusion (D&I) has become an imperative. Companies are pushing for minority recruitment, paying for antibias training, and sponsoring nonwhite employees for high-potential leadership-development programs. Research has shown, and a great many executives now understand, that a heterogeneous workforce yields more innovation and better performance than a homogeneous one does.

And yet 55 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act and decades into these corporate D&I efforts, African-Americans’ progress toward top management roles and greater economic well-being and influence remains slow to nonexistent.
 
In fact, research shows that in the United States, the wealth gap between blacks and others continues to widen; experts predict that black families’ median wealth will decrease to $0 by 2050, while that of white families will exceed $100,000. Just 8% of managers and 3.8% of CEOs are black. In the Fortune 500 companies, there are currently only three black chief executives, down from a high of 12 in 2002. And at the 16 Fortune 500 companies that report detailed demographic data on senior executives and board members, white men account for 85% of those roles.

 
Black leaders have struggled to make inroads in a variety of influential industries and sectors. At U.S. finance companies, only 2.4% of executive committee members, 1.4% of managing directors, and 1.4% of senior portfolio managers are black. A mere 1.9% of tech executives and 5.3% of tech professionals are African-American. Black representatives and senators account for 9% of the U.S. Congress. The average black partnership rate at U.S. law firms from 2005 to 2016 was 1.8%.

African-Americans continue to face both explicit racism — stoked by the rise of white nationalism in the past few years — and subtle racism on the job. In the latter category, University of Utah professor emeritus Arthur Brief points to “aversive” racism (when people avoid those of different races or change their behavior around them) along with “modern” racism (when people believe that because blacks can now compete in the marketplace, they no longer face discrimination).
 

Forum List

Back
Top