Shooting Re-Creation Proves Oswald was Not Lone Gunman in JFK Murder

Vertebrae, rib and wrist....bone, bone and more bone. Any bullet smashing through all that bone would be spectacularly deformed. The "magic" bullet was compressed very slightly on the underside (not even in the nose where all that force between bullet and bone would necessarily have to leave great deformities).
Joe Rogan, a noted hunter says no way that bullet on display smashed through the bodies of two men and came out like it did and so Cyril Wecht agrees.
Rib and wrist no vertabrae

Once again you are wrong it was a tumbler.

Tumblers summersault after hitting something like JFK's soft tissue.

The damage to the bullet would then have been anywhere and was at the base rather than the nose.

This is why it was consistent with the wounds it caused

It did not begin hitting bones until it was tumbling and slowing down.

The hunter is comparing it to modern bullets which are far less likely to tumble and which hit bone first

There is nothing magical about it and the experts are simply ignoring or overlooking these details

The wound in connally is evisence of this. The entry wound in his back was an incision about an inch long rather than a puncture because the bullet was tumbling and hit him sideways.
 
Last edited:
Jack Ruby begged Earl Warren to let him testify before his commission. He told Dorothy Kigallen he was set up.


For some reason Earl Warren wasn't interested in what Ruby had to say. How odd! Former Nixon aide claims he has evidence Lyndon B. Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy's assassination in new book | Daily Mail Online
Ruby wanted out of jail nothing more.

He never claimed any such thing and maintained he acted alone.

Ruby never spoke to kilgallen. She only yelled some questions at him during a recess in his trial.

She never had a real one on one interview with Ruby

Your version of Ruby and Warren comes from the movie and is fictional.
 
Jack Ruby begged Earl Warren to let him testify before his commission. He told Dorothy Kigallen he was set up.


For some reason Earl Warren wasn't interested in what Ruby had to say. How odd! Former Nixon aide claims he has evidence Lyndon B. Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy's assassination in new book | Daily Mail Online
Warren did in fact listen to what Ruby had to say he simply did not take Ruby out of jail.

The link shows no evidence just a guy who claims to have evidence but never produces.
 
No need to convince anyone when you have the truth on your side. Speculation is fine but if you’re arguing two assassins only hit their target once...it’s likely your view of reality is warped
JFK was hit by gunfire more than once. If you can't even get elementary facts straight was does this say for your opinion?

Yes, he was hit twice; by Lee Harvey Oswald.
 
That 6.5x52mm Carcano bullet didn't look like it hit much of anything including light bone from what I have seen of round nose FMJ bullets used in hunting.
 
It does If you turn it over and look at the base.
The base of the bullet isn't what goes through all the bone, tissue, layers of clothing etc. genius! Get a fucking clue. It's the other end of the bullet, champ.
Once again yes the base is what passea through such material when the bullet is a tumbler.


The type of bullet was well known as a tumbler even before the assassination.

It begins to flip end over end as soon as it strikes something.

The first thing it struck was Kennedy's clothes and body which slowed it down and caused it to start tumbling which of course means it was as likely to strike bone base first as it would nose first.

The damage is consistent with this.
 
It does If you turn it over and look at the base.
The base of the bullet isn't what goes through all the bone, tissue, layers of clothing etc. genius! Get a fucking clue. It's the other end of the bullet, champ.
You are assuming all bullets continue traveling nose first which they do not.

This one was a tumbler the damage is consistent with what it hit
 
Warren did in fact listen to what Ruby had to say he simply did not take Ruby out of jail.
And why is that, genius? Warren was omniscient and knew everything Jack Ruby had to say ahead of time?

That's a funny way to conduct an investigation, ignoring a key figure in the Kennedy assassination. Yup, a real funny way to get to the bottom of a major crime.
 
Ok but that is belief.

What evidence do you have that he was wrong in the WC?

The WC report is full of holes. They are too numerous to list, and there are many publications on the subject. What evidence do you have that the WC report wasn't fabricated? Why did Jack Ruby have to kill Oswald?

OK….list the top ten “holes” then. This should be fun.
 
Warren did in fact listen to what Ruby had to say he simply did not take Ruby out of jail.
And why is that, genius? Warren was omniscient and knew everything Jack Ruby had to say ahead of time?

That's a funny way to conduct an investigation, ignoring a key figure in the Kennedy assassination. Yup, a real funny way to get to the bottom of a major crime.
He went to Dallas and spoke to Ruby

That is not ignoring him

They listened to Ruby and he had nothing to say he had not already said

He just wanted out and they said no
 
This one was a tumbler the damage is consistent with what it hit
You keep claiming that...a "tumbler". What are you basing all your claims on?
It is based on the shape and documented performance of such bullets years before the assassination and after.

As I pointed out it is also supported by the wound in connally back which you and the other experts ignore.

It was an incision resembling a stab wound because the bullet entered his back side ways not nose first.

Tumblers were very common bullets in that era even the ammo used by the us military in Vietnam performed as a tumbler and often caused bizarre wounds.

These little common facts ruin the fee self proclaimed experts who ignore them.
 
OK….list the top ten “holes” then. This should be fun.
Did Someone Alter the Medical Evidence?
Altering the medical evidence would have to be near the top. The single bullet theory, which has been a joke for decades is also a real black mark on the WC.
Misrepresenting witnesses. How the Warren Commission misrepresented JFK witnesses - JFK Facts
The fact that Earl Warren refused to let Jack Ruby testify to the commission....etc.etc. etc.

You can find all this yourself, you know. You don't seriously care about the case.
 
It is based on the shape and documented performance of such bullets years before the assassination and after.

As I pointed out it is also supported by the wound in connally back which you and the other experts ignore.

It was an incision resembling a stab wound because the bullet entered his back side ways not nose first.

Tumblers were very common bullets in that era even the ammo used by the us military in Vietnam performed as a tumbler and often caused bizarre wounds.

These little common facts ruin the fee self proclaimed experts who ignore them.
So you base your claims on bullshit? I thought so. You are full of it.
 
He went to Dallas and spoke to Ruby

That is not ignoring him

They listened to Ruby and he had nothing to say he had not already said

He just wanted out and they said no
Ruby wanted to testify in Washington DC in front of the Commission. Warren refused. So much for getting to the bottom of things.
 
OK….list the top ten “holes” then. This should be fun.
Did Someone Alter the Medical Evidence?
Altering the medical evidence would have to be near the top. The single bullet theory, which has been a joke for decades.
Misrepresenting witnesses. How the Warren Commission misrepresented JFK witnesses - JFK Facts
The fact that Earl Warren refused to let Jack Ruby testify to the commission....etc.etc. etc.

You can find all this yourself, you know. You don't seriously care about the case.

The single bullet theory (I used to be in your camp) was proven to not only be plausible but what actually occurred.

As for witnesses; you’d have to be more specific...

Ruby’s testimony was heard.

Testimony Of Jack L. Ruby

Screen Shot 2019-01-19 at 4.46.54 PM.png
 
It is based on the shape and documented performance of such bullets years before the assassination and after.

As I pointed out it is also supported by the wound in connally back which you and the other experts ignore.

It was an incision resembling a stab wound because the bullet entered his back side ways not nose first.

Tumblers were very common bullets in that era even the ammo used by the us military in Vietnam performed as a tumbler and often caused bizarre wounds.

These little common facts ruin the fee self proclaimed experts who ignore them.
So you base your claims on bullshit? I thought so. You are full of it.
Not bullshit well known facts to those who pay attention.

Sorry you hate facts but that is that

Try reading about the us ammo in Vietnam and how it was known to behave in such weird ways

Sorry kid you're just behind the curve and ignoring details.
 

Forum List

Back
Top