[Shocking] Washington Post demands a Clinton investigation!

Yep. Even the left wing media is now demanding that the Clintons be investigated.

[Shocking] Washington Post demands a Clinton investigation!

You know, I clicked on your link and saw that it was a far right site, as well as was unable to read the article because of the ad they pasted over the top of it to try to get me to support their site.

So.............like I do whenever I come across links like this, I did a Google search for "washington post clinton investigation", and guess what?

Yeah, the Wapo did publish an article about reopening the investigation on Clinton, but only problem is, one was an OPINION piece, and another was a letter to the editor.

Nope, nothing to see here.
Here is the actual article by By Marc A. Thiessen November 19 at 7:12 PM

Opinion | Yes, the Clintons should be investigated

Thank you for posting the actual link to the article that is an OPINION piece (even says so in your link), and not actual news.

Again...............nothing to see here..................it's not an actual investigation, it is someone's OPINION that an investigation should be continued.
An opinion piece that was printed in the Washington Post. Which is what the OP stated.

You tried to present it as hard news, and not some opinion of a writer on their staff.

And yeah, so what if they printed it? That does NOT mean they agree with it though, because differing opinions are printed in the editorial section of the papers all the time. Even for the little local paper here in Amarillo. They will present differing opinions all the time.
The guy who wrote the article is employed by the Washington Post. They printed the article.

An article printed in the Washington Post is asking for a Clinton investigation. That's the truth. That's what the OP stated.
 
Yep. Even the left wing media is now demanding that the Clintons be investigated.

[Shocking] Washington Post demands a Clinton investigation!

Hey republic dickhead, marc theissen is an OPINION WRITER who works FOR the Post.


God, your stupid.
And yet the Washington Post printed it. Doesn't matter if it's an opinion piece. They printed it. That implies that they agree with it.

The Wall Street Journal printed an article about a guy that said he believes in Bigfoot. Does that imply that they agree with him it?
 
Yep. Even the left wing media is now demanding that the Clintons be investigated.

[Shocking] Washington Post demands a Clinton investigation!

No they’re not. They published a right-wing opinion piece written by Republican Marc Thiessen, a former speechwriter for George W. Bush.

The Post employs a number of columnists from both sides of the political spectrum and their opinions are their own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of WAPO.
 
Yep. Even the left wing media is now demanding that the Clintons be investigated.

[Shocking] Washington Post demands a Clinton investigation!

No they’re not. They published a right-wing opinion piece written by Republican Marc Thiessen, a former speechwriter for George W. Bush.

The Post employs a number of columnists from both sides of the political spectrum and their opinions are their own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of WAPO.
Doesn't matter. It was printed in the Washington Post. Which is what the OP stated.
 
You know, I clicked on your link and saw that it was a far right site, as well as was unable to read the article because of the ad they pasted over the top of it to try to get me to support their site.

So.............like I do whenever I come across links like this, I did a Google search for "washington post clinton investigation", and guess what?

Yeah, the Wapo did publish an article about reopening the investigation on Clinton, but only problem is, one was an OPINION piece, and another was a letter to the editor.

Nope, nothing to see here.
Here is the actual article by By Marc A. Thiessen November 19 at 7:12 PM

Opinion | Yes, the Clintons should be investigated

Thank you for posting the actual link to the article that is an OPINION piece (even says so in your link), and not actual news.

Again...............nothing to see here..................it's not an actual investigation, it is someone's OPINION that an investigation should be continued.
An opinion piece that was printed in the Washington Post. Which is what the OP stated.

You tried to present it as hard news, and not some opinion of a writer on their staff.

And yeah, so what if they printed it? That does NOT mean they agree with it though, because differing opinions are printed in the editorial section of the papers all the time. Even for the little local paper here in Amarillo. They will present differing opinions all the time.
The guy who wrote the article is employed by the Washington Post. They printed the article.

An article printed in the Washington Post is asking for a Clinton investigation. That's the truth. That's what the OP stated.

What the Washington Post wants is printed in their editorials. None of those editorials has "demanded an investigation of the Clinton's"


You apparently don't know the difference.
 
Here is the actual article by By Marc A. Thiessen November 19 at 7:12 PM

Opinion | Yes, the Clintons should be investigated

Thank you for posting the actual link to the article that is an OPINION piece (even says so in your link), and not actual news.

Again...............nothing to see here..................it's not an actual investigation, it is someone's OPINION that an investigation should be continued.
An opinion piece that was printed in the Washington Post. Which is what the OP stated.

You tried to present it as hard news, and not some opinion of a writer on their staff.

And yeah, so what if they printed it? That does NOT mean they agree with it though, because differing opinions are printed in the editorial section of the papers all the time. Even for the little local paper here in Amarillo. They will present differing opinions all the time.
The guy who wrote the article is employed by the Washington Post. They printed the article.

An article printed in the Washington Post is asking for a Clinton investigation. That's the truth. That's what the OP stated.

What the Washington Post wants is printed in their editorials. None of those editorials has "demanded an investigation of the Clinton's"


You apparently don't know the difference.
From the article...

"Any impartial investigation of Russia’s efforts to meddle in our democratic process needs to include a full inquiry of the Russian money flowing into Clinton world. Such an inquiry is not a distraction. It is critical to restoring public faith in American democracy."
 
Thank you for posting the actual link to the article that is an OPINION piece (even says so in your link), and not actual news.

Again...............nothing to see here..................it's not an actual investigation, it is someone's OPINION that an investigation should be continued.
An opinion piece that was printed in the Washington Post. Which is what the OP stated.

You tried to present it as hard news, and not some opinion of a writer on their staff.

And yeah, so what if they printed it? That does NOT mean they agree with it though, because differing opinions are printed in the editorial section of the papers all the time. Even for the little local paper here in Amarillo. They will present differing opinions all the time.
The guy who wrote the article is employed by the Washington Post. They printed the article.

An article printed in the Washington Post is asking for a Clinton investigation. That's the truth. That's what the OP stated.

What the Washington Post wants is printed in their editorials. None of those editorials has "demanded an investigation of the Clinton's"


You apparently don't know the difference.
From the article...

"Any impartial investigation of Russia’s efforts to meddle in our democratic process needs to include a full inquiry of the Russian money flowing into Clinton world. Such an inquiry is not a distraction. It is critical to restoring public faith in American democracy."

Well since the Clinton's Foundation's records as well as their tax returns are public records, an investigation should have already been conducted.
 
The Wall Street Journal printed an article about a guy that said he believes in Bigfoot. Does that imply that they agree with him it?

I think conservatives may now be shocked that WaPo regularly prints op-eds from Cons and Bigfoot Aficionados.

Can we say the same of Breitbart, TownHall or DailyCaller printing same from Lib-ral Loons?

Naaaah :cool-45:
 
Yea, go ahead. Investigate Clinton again. You know she's laughing her ass off. After 30 years of Republicans spending over 70 million in taxpayer money going after her and her family? What could be the GOP defense? There isn't one.


Really? She comes off like she is still sore after the ass Rape she got in yet another election.
 
Yep. Even the left wing media is now demanding that the Clintons be investigated.

[Shocking] Washington Post demands a Clinton investigation!

No they’re not. They published a right-wing opinion piece written by Republican Marc Thiessen, a former speechwriter for George W. Bush.

The Post employs a number of columnists from both sides of the political spectrum and their opinions are their own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of WAPO.
Doesn't matter. It was printed in the Washington Post. Which is what the OP stated.

No, the OP said that the left wing media is calling for an investigation. One opinion piece written by a right wing writer is not “the left wing media”.

On this basis we could say that FOX News says that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with the Uranium One sale.

FOX News reported that Clinton had nothing to do with the Uranium One sale and the whole thing is a hoax to distract fro the Russia investigation.
 
Yep. Even the left wing media is now demanding that the Clintons be investigated.

[Shocking] Washington Post demands a Clinton investigation!

No they’re not. They published a right-wing opinion piece written by Republican Marc Thiessen, a former speechwriter for George W. Bush.

The Post employs a number of columnists from both sides of the political spectrum and their opinions are their own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of WAPO.
Doesn't matter. It was printed in the Washington Post. Which is what the OP stated.

No, the OP said that the left wing media is calling for an investigation. One opinion piece written by a right wing writer is not “the left wing media”.

On this basis we could say that FOX News says that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with the Uranium One sale.

FOX News reported that Clinton had nothing to do with the Uranium One sale and the whole thing is a hoax to distract fro the Russia investigation.


 
At least some Democrats are finally coming around to acknowledging the Clinton Evil. Progress at last.
 
"If I go down, the Arab son goes down." The movements we see here are of the Left, and we know that post #34 and most others don't have a clue about that.
 
The trajectory is relentless. Vince Foster "suicide" will include a Saudi Ambassador and Harper's Weekly, to see how close in proximity to Foster's body at Fort Marcy Park:

B & O Railroad / Stonewall Jackson
Jackson's operations against the B&O Railroad (1861) - Wikipedia
'....ref # 25 Harper's Weekly, 20 July 1861 and woodcut print entitled "Locomotive and Tender Thrown from the Railway Bridge at Harper's Ferry by the Rebels." '

All Not So Quiet Along the Potomac
dclawyeronthecivilwar.blogspot.com/2011/93/civil-war-forts-of-arlington-tour-part_07.html
'....residence of the Saudi Ambassador....'

"Whitewater is a can of worms that you should NOT open."
(Vince Foster)
 

Forum List

Back
Top