Sharron Angle: "I'll answer those questions when I'm the Senator"

It amazes me that the public lets the tea baggers get away with this. To openly refuse to talk to the press and still manage to get elected.

Never seen anything like it

Yup.. it reminds of Obama and his refusal to answer questions during the year long Obamacare debates. Oh ya sure, he had some questions fed to him but still.. Pathetic huh..

Not remotely close to the truth. Obama went on every available news outlet to push for healthcare.

He even attended the Republican caucus and faced all of the Republicans single handedly. Kicked their ass too

Tea Baggers refuse to talk to anyone but Fox News. Reporters have no choice but to do ambush interviews

Reality eludes you, Obama generally answers questions under 3 conditions 1) the interviewer has fed questions and are sucking up, 2) he has the answers fed to him by the teleprompter, 3) He sets up audiences that are loyal subjects and uses his tele-prompter.. otherwise he comes off looking like an idiot .. much like he did in that Republican caucus.
 
Yup.. it reminds of Obama and his refusal to answer questions during the year long Obamacare debates. Oh ya sure, he had some questions fed to him but still.. Pathetic huh..

Not the same thing at all.... unless he was caught on route to somewhere, with a camera and a mike shoved in his face and some idiot asking questions that require more than a one sentence reply.

It is a TACTIC. It is DELIBERATE. The media use it for political point scoring. This is not rocket science.

It goes beyond someone trying to make a name for themseles on youtube. These are major local and national news outlets that have to resort to ambush interviews because Tea Baggers refuse to talk to them.

It just amazes me that a tea bagger can tell a major news agency that they won't talk to them and somehow the public lets them get away with it

Oh My God. You are either seriously dumb or being deliberately whiny.

The media use one of two methods to speak to politicians. Firstly, they contact the office of the politician and request an interview - this may be live or pre-recorded. Sometimes, if the politician consistently refuses an interview OR if they have an ax to grind, they just send a crew to 'door-step' the politician. Now, unless you can prove the former, then you cannot claim that she was being evasive. She may, she may not. That is logic.

And... for the record... this tactic is used with Democrat politicians with equally suspicious results.

These are facts. Not my opinions. Fact - I know how the media work. I know they use this tactic deliberately to make politicians look bad.

You will find clips - from MAJOR networks (not someone 'out to make a name for themselves') showing this technique. It sucks. It sucks when it is done to a Democrat and it sucks when it is done to a "tea bagger". You're either too stupid or too partisan to understand basic facts.
 
Yup.. it reminds of Obama and his refusal to answer questions during the year long Obamacare debates. Oh ya sure, he had some questions fed to him but still.. Pathetic huh..

Not remotely close to the truth. Obama went on every available news outlet to push for healthcare.

He even attended the Republican caucus and faced all of the Republicans single handedly. Kicked their ass too

Tea Baggers refuse to talk to anyone but Fox News. Reporters have no choice but to do ambush interviews

Reality eludes you, Obama generally answers questions under 3 conditions 1) the interviewer has fed questions and are sucking up, 2) he has the answers fed to him by the teleprompter, 3) He sets up audiences that are loyal subjects and uses his tele-prompter.. otherwise he comes off looking like an idiot .. much like he did in that Republican caucus.

Actually, that's not true either. Sometimes the questions are given in advance. Often they will agree subjects, but not questions. You can usually tell with Obama - and pretty much any other politician, which method has been used. Because they will be much more concise with pre-prepared questions. No politician uses a teleprompter with tv interviews.
 
It amazes me that the public lets the tea baggers get away with this. To openly refuse to talk to the press and still manage to get elected.

Never seen anything like it

Yup.. it reminds of Obama and his refusal to answer questions during the year long Obamacare debates. Oh ya sure, he had some questions fed to him but still.. Pathetic huh..

Not remotely close to the truth. Obama went on every available news outlet to push for healthcare.

He even attended the Republican caucus and faced all of the Republicans single handedly. Kicked their ass too

Tea Baggers refuse to talk to anyone but Fox News. Reporters have no choice but to do ambush interviews

You are either:

a. wrong

or

b. lying

I don't really care which but it is one or the other.
 
Yup.. it reminds of Obama and his refusal to answer questions during the year long Obamacare debates. Oh ya sure, he had some questions fed to him but still.. Pathetic huh..

Not remotely close to the truth. Obama went on every available news outlet to push for healthcare.

He even attended the Republican caucus and faced all of the Republicans single handedly. Kicked their ass too

Tea Baggers refuse to talk to anyone but Fox News. Reporters have no choice but to do ambush interviews

You are either:

a. wrong

or

b. lying

I don't really care which but it is one or the other.

Try:

c. brain-dead leftist hack
 
Coons backed out of the last 2 debates scheduled with O'Donnell for instance. :eusa_shhh:

Damn Coons

://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk40/timlovelace/cody22coon.jpg

You may Thank God for two things Sampson, well, I guess one anyhow, and that is that you are not running for public office on the Republican ticket. I doubt the left would have spared you the racist charge, inspite of your clarifying photos.:doubt:

JM
 
Not remotely close to the truth. Obama went on every available news outlet to push for healthcare.

He even attended the Republican caucus and faced all of the Republicans single handedly. Kicked their ass too

Tea Baggers refuse to talk to anyone but Fox News. Reporters have no choice but to do ambush interviews

Reality eludes you, Obama generally answers questions under 3 conditions 1) the interviewer has fed questions and are sucking up, 2) he has the answers fed to him by the teleprompter, 3) He sets up audiences that are loyal subjects and uses his tele-prompter.. otherwise he comes off looking like an idiot .. much like he did in that Republican caucus.

Actually, that's not true either. Sometimes the questions are given in advance. Often they will agree subjects, but not questions. You can usually tell with Obama - and pretty much any other politician, which method has been used. Because they will be much more concise with pre-prepared questions. No politician uses a teleprompter with tv interviews.

++++"Sometimes the questions are given in advance. Often they will agree subjects, but not questions"++++....

what?
 
Last edited:
Yup.. it reminds of Obama and his refusal to answer questions during the year long Obamacare debates. Oh ya sure, he had some questions fed to him but still.. Pathetic huh..

Not remotely close to the truth. Obama went on every available news outlet to push for healthcare.

He even attended the Republican caucus and faced all of the Republicans single handedly. Kicked their ass too

Tea Baggers refuse to talk to anyone but Fox News. Reporters have no choice but to do ambush interviews

Reality eludes you, Obama generally answers questions under 3 conditions 1) the interviewer has fed questions and are sucking up, 2) he has the answers fed to him by the teleprompter, 3) He sets up audiences that are loyal subjects and uses his tele-prompter.. otherwise he comes off looking like an idiot .. much like he did in that Republican caucus.

Nonsense.

Obama appeared on Fox News. No major news agency would agree to those conditions...never have
 
Not remotely close to the truth. Obama went on every available news outlet to push for healthcare.

He even attended the Republican caucus and faced all of the Republicans single handedly. Kicked their ass too

Tea Baggers refuse to talk to anyone but Fox News. Reporters have no choice but to do ambush interviews

Reality eludes you, Obama generally answers questions under 3 conditions 1) the interviewer has fed questions and are sucking up, 2) he has the answers fed to him by the teleprompter, 3) He sets up audiences that are loyal subjects and uses his tele-prompter.. otherwise he comes off looking like an idiot .. much like he did in that Republican caucus.

Nonsense.

Obama appeared on Fox News. No major news agency would agree to those conditions...never have

Yup.. I sincerely doubt it with the Fox interviews also...:lol:
 
__________________
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."
Benito Mussolini



Wait! Given the Obama Administration's relationship with Government Motors (GM) and Chrysler Corp and this definition, what kind of régime does that make the present administration? Especially if we add in AIG and the two FMs, not to mention the present administration's subsidies to the solar panel, ethanol, agricultural, mortgage industries, cash for clunkers... or any administration for the last, how many years? No wonder those in the Tea Parties are upset. It would seem Political Junky and those in the Tea Party, together, have latched onto something!

JM
 
The war is lost.

...
Oh... and where the fuck is bin Laden?

Apparently he has instructed his AQAP (Al Qaeda in the Aarabian Pennisula) francise to take Obama up on his offer to "...Absorb a Terrorist Attack" via air mail.

JM
 
He even attended the Republican caucus and faced all of the Republicans single handedly. Kicked their ass too

you are the only lefty I have ever heard say so, the vaunted NY times and just about every lefty source I saw never made any such claim, in fact one of your head editorial lefty honchos at the times said the reps had their best day in that venue they have had in years, and that obama who filibustered, appeared hapless, uninformed and used the supremely stupid car insurance example to boot.
 
Coons backed out of the last 2 debates scheduled with O'Donnell for instance. :eusa_shhh:

Damn Coons

://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk40/timlovelace/cody22coon.jpg

You may Thank God for two things Sampson, well, I guess one anyhow, and that is that you are not running for public office on the Republican ticket. I doubt the left would have spared you the racist charge, inspite of your clarifying photos.:doubt:

JM

:eek:

Whew!!
 
__________________
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."
Benito Mussolini



Wait! Given the Obama Administration's relationship with Government Motors (GM) and Chrysler Corp and this definition, what kind of régime does that make the present administration? Especially if we add in AIG and the two FMs, not to mention the present administration's subsidies to the solar panel, ethanol, agricultural, mortgage industries, cash for clunkers... or any administration for the last, how many years? No wonder those in the Tea Parties are upset. It would seem Political Junky and those in the Tea Party, together, have latched onto something!

JM
It seems many are confused as to who bailed out GM.

BBC NEWS | Business | Bush unveils $17.4bn car bail-out
Video of Bush at the link. Bush: "Bankruptsy would not be responsible".
 
__________________
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."
Benito Mussolini



Wait! Given the Obama Administration's relationship with Government Motors (GM) and Chrysler Corp and this definition, what kind of régime does that make the present administration? Especially if we add in AIG and the two FMs, not to mention the present administration's subsidies to the solar panel, ethanol, agricultural, mortgage industries, cash for clunkers... or any administration for the last, how many years? No wonder those in the Tea Parties are upset. It would seem Political Junky and those in the Tea Party, together, have latched onto something!

JM
It seems many are confused as to who bailed out GM.

BBC NEWS | Business | Bush unveils $17.4bn car bail-out
Video of Bush at the link. Bush: "Bankruptsy would not be responsible".

Obama would be among the confused, because he claims he saved GM.
So that would put CON$ among the confused, because Bush would be the Socialist, Marxist, Communist, Fascist, Statist, Redistribution of Wealthist who took over the auto industry. :lol:
 
This is what Cons want to represent them in Washington.

The Plum Line - Sharron Angle: "I'll answer those questions when I'm the Senator"

This video of Sharron Angle is destined for cable play: It shows her refusing to answer a reporter's questions about national security policy and a local air force base, instead informing him smugly that "I'll answer those questions when I'm the Senator":

Angle, pressed by the reporter for her views on Iraq and Afghanistan, would only offer this cryptic reply:

"You know, the two wars that we're in right now is exactly what we're in."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prMIs4l6Iso&feature=player_embedded

You probably supported 0bamascare and "We have to pass the bill to know what's in it."

If you ask nicely, I bet the mods would change your name to Political Dimwit...

deflection is all you ever have
 
I love her response of returning the economy back to a good state by repealing obamacare even though that bill wasnt even around when the economy tanked. she is such a gem
 

Forum List

Back
Top