Senate Trial Should Last No More Than 5 Minutes

[Harpy Eagle]

Why do you people keep bringing this up?

There is no such requirement.

From the GOP...

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”

Relevance. Why are you people not bringing relevant, legal, charges?

Because no legal charges are necessary...why can you not read?

It’s a trial. The Chief Justice will decide.

A political trial, not a legal one.

No such thing under the United States legal system and the Judicial Branch will have last word.

Impeachment does not fall under the legal system

 

[Nostra]

Relevance. Why are you people not bringing relevant, legal, charges?

Because no legal charges are necessary...why can you not read?

It’s a trial. The Chief Justice will decide.

A political trial, not a legal one.

No such thing under the United States legal system and the Judicial Branch will have last word.

Impeachment does not fall under the legal system

So Mitch can make as political as Nazi did in the House and you won't whine, right?

 

[beautress]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

Roberts couldn't dismiss. The senate would have to vote on a motion to dismiss.

Impeachment is wide open. He should recommend dismissal, but if he says “dismissed” who will challenge his ruling? Marbury v. Madison 1803 “Judicial Review.” If it goes to the High Court 5-4... that he has authority to do this. We have had only two impeachment trials. It’s all fresh legal ground.

I don't know, Bush92. President Trump isn't likely to get fair treatment, and a few days ago, Tom Fitton gave air to a lot of worries set before the Senate. He isn't optimistic, and he wants it to be fair for President Trump, who so far hasn't received any due process from Pelosi and her Kangaroo Democrat Court.

All I can do is get down on my knees and ask God to take pity on those who've suffered unfairness, and due to the nature of the Deep State, it's not clear to me that it's all on one side, because the information is in for prosecutions for Hillary for a number of accidentally-on-a-purpose errors, but for some reason, nobody is charging her with doing what the Democrats claimed for 3 years that Trump did, and the goal post has moved all over the map every week, with the evidence pointing to Trump's innocence of the charges made against them.

The Democrats have reached outside the parameters of the law and drug in unique charges such as "obstruction of Congress," when actually Pelosi's Congress has been doing all it possibly could to obstruct the President's staff and in general, this Executive Branch, and imho, it has been unduly destroying America's peace of mind sans any logical explanation to the people of the United States. All this Pelosi badmouthing of President Trump as well as her minion's naysaying seems aimed at expropriating power of the Executive Branch and putting it in Pelosi's destructive lap.

Here's the Fitton interview from 4 days ago (Video takes just under 5 minutes.):

​

 

[beautress]

Relevance. Why are you people not bringing relevant, legal, charges?

Because no legal charges are necessary...why can you not read?

It’s a trial. The Chief Justice will decide.

A political trial, not a legal one.

No such thing under the United States legal system and the Judicial Branch will have last word.

Impeachment does not fall under the legal system

Golfing Gator said: "mpeachment does not fall under the legal system"​

Yes it does. Chief Justice Roberts should be there tomorrow if that's when it starts to preside over the hateful rancor the Democrats in the House have created to slap down the 6 or 7 inquiries into the Russian Collusion false narrative. The evidence points out it was likely created by Hillary Clinton's old War Room. Last I heard, she was hiding out in Ireland last week, seeking employment.

 

[beautress]

One last detail before tomorrow, Tom Fitton has some advice for the Senate tomorrow: Senate needs to recognize that Trump had NO due process rights during Hous impeachment.

​

 

[The VOR]

Senate Trial Should Last No More Than 5 Minutes

I agree. If the scumbag had any decency, he would show up and plead guilty to both articles.

But that won't happen, because we all know what a pussy private bone spurs is.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Because no legal charges are necessary...why can you not read?

It’s a trial. The Chief Justice will decide.

A political trial, not a legal one.

No such thing under the United States legal system and the Judicial Branch will have last word.

Impeachment does not fall under the legal system

Golfing Gator said: "mpeachment does not fall under the legal system"​

Yes it does. Chief Justice Roberts should be there tomorrow if that's when it starts to preside over the hateful rancor the Democrats in the House have created to slap down the 6 or 7 inquiries into the Russian Collusion false narrative. The evidence points out it was likely created by Hillary Clinton's old War Room. Last I heard, she was hiding out in Ireland last week, seeking employment.

The only reason the Chief Justice is there is because the VP is not considered impartial in the impeachment of a president.

The role of the chief justice in an impeachment trial - SCOTUSblog

Sometime in the next week or two, the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump will convene in the Senate. When it does, Chief Justice John Roberts will preside. There has been a good deal written about Roberts’ role, some of it intimating – or at least hoping – that Roberts could wrench control from the politicians who make up the Senate and transform the proceeding into a trial of the conventional judicial sort, with both sides able to compel the appearance of live witnesses and the production of documents and to inquire into any matter logically relevant to the charges against the president.

For better or worse, neither the Constitution, the rules of the Senate, historical precedent nor the personal predilections of Roberts himself make this the least bit likely. Instead, Roberts is most likely to serve as a dignified figurehead in an affair entirely dominated by the Republican senatorial caucus.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Show me a historical example of when the Congress has defied the Supreme Court? You don’t have one. My point is, and always has been “slow boy” that if Roberts dismisses...Senate won’t do shit. Trump’s lawyers will ask for this right away as it is basic procedural due process move.

Roberts is not going to dismiss, Roberts is there as a figurehead in a role that is filled by the VP in the impeachment of any other official except the President.

You are truly one of the most misinformed people I have ever ran across.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That’s the point I just made. P? It’s all political. Unless the bring ‘p(the leftist, Marx, Democrats) an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?

It was designed to be political, that is the way the Constitution sets it up, it was never meant to be a legal proceeding.

So it admitted it is political. Very good. Now sell that bullshit to US voters?

Of course it is political, that is the way our Founding Fathers designed it. There is no other way for it to be.

Founders never deemed it to be that way. Why you’re a goddamn phony as a “Libertarian.”

They said so in the fucking Constitution. Why are you so ignorant? Did you graduate High School?

 

[beautress]

It’s a trial. The Chief Justice will decide.

A political trial, not a legal one.

No such thing under the United States legal system and the Judicial Branch will have last word.

Impeachment does not fall under the legal system

Golfing Gator said: "mpeachment does not fall under the legal system"​

Yes it does. Chief Justice Roberts should be there tomorrow if that's when it starts to preside over the hateful rancor the Democrats in the House have created to slap down the 6 or 7 inquiries into the Russian Collusion false narrative. The evidence points out it was likely created by Hillary Clinton's old War Room. Last I heard, she was hiding out in Ireland last week, seeking employment.

The only reason the Chief Justice is there is because the VP is not considered impartial in the impeachment of a president.

The role of the chief justice in an impeachment trial - SCOTUSblog

Sometime in the next week or two, the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump will convene in the Senate. When it does, Chief Justice John Roberts will preside. There has been a good deal written about Roberts’ role, some of it intimating – or at least hoping – that Roberts could wrench control from the politicians who make up the Senate and transform the proceeding into a trial of the conventional judicial sort, with both sides able to compel the appearance of live witnesses and the production of documents and to inquire into any matter logically relevant to the charges against the president.

For better or worse, neither the Constitution, the rules of the Senate, historical precedent nor the personal predilections of Roberts himself make this the least bit likely. Instead, Roberts is most likely to serve as a dignified figurehead in an affair entirely dominated by the Republican senatorial caucus.

I didn't look at any news source, but I knew the Impeachment Trial in the Senate is always under the jurisdiction of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Glad to bring your education up a notch.

How Chief Justice John Roberts would preside over the politically charged Trump impeachment trial
​

Chief Justice Rhinequist presided over the Clinton Impeachment Trial to make certain everything went by the book of fairness this country operates under. And it is in the Constitution as the above link to a generally leftist paper says. You really should read the Constitution's provisions occasionally rather than being critical of people who happen to be well-informed Republicans. There's not a specific cure for TDS, but you can control it by understanding what went into the Constitution to make certain all was fair, and what unfolds between the time the trial started and until it is over will hopefully assure you that Republicans do support the fairness aspect of the Constitution, even though Adam Schiff and Jerold Nadler both ignored their responsibilities, and the House Speaker who was gloating about how permanent this impeachment was going to be should be dismissed from any and all public speaking in behalf of all 500+ members of the House she just humiliated.

 

[jc456]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

 

[beautress]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

Before you light into Mr. Bush92, jc456, please read the Constitution a little more closely. Thx.

 

[jc456]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

Before you light into Mr. Bush92, jc456, please read the Constitution a little more closely. Thx.

like the house, the senate makes their own rules. nothing to do with the constitution. if you wish to walk that road, the senate doesn't listen to witnesses, only the managers from the house.

 

[colfax_m]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

Before you light into Mr. Bush92, jc456, please read the Constitution a little more closely. Thx.

like the house, the senate makes their own rules. nothing to do with the constitution. if you wish to walk that road, the senate doesn't listen to witnesses, only the managers from the house.

Every impeachment trial in the Senate has included witnesses.

 

[jc456]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

Before you light into Mr. Bush92, jc456, please read the Constitution a little more closely. Thx.

like the house, the senate makes their own rules. nothing to do with the constitution. if you wish to walk that road, the senate doesn't listen to witnesses, only the managers from the house.

Every impeachment trial in the Senate has included witnesses.

so? it isn't in the rules.You can post them if you wish, the rules that say that in the constitution that is.

 

[jc456]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

Before you light into Mr. Bush92, jc456, please read the Constitution a little more closely. Thx.

like the house, the senate makes their own rules. nothing to do with the constitution. if you wish to walk that road, the senate doesn't listen to witnesses, only the managers from the house.

Every impeachment trial in the Senate has included witnesses.

BTW, every impeachment investigation in the house allowed the minority to bring in witnesses. Did the repubs get to bring in witnesses for trump? just say no and call it a day.

 

[jc456]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

Before you light into Mr. Bush92, jc456, please read the Constitution a little more closely. Thx.

so did you post that line in the constitution yet?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

A political trial, not a legal one.

No such thing under the United States legal system and the Judicial Branch will have last word.

Impeachment does not fall under the legal system

Golfing Gator said: "mpeachment does not fall under the legal system"​

Yes it does. Chief Justice Roberts should be there tomorrow if that's when it starts to preside over the hateful rancor the Democrats in the House have created to slap down the 6 or 7 inquiries into the Russian Collusion false narrative. The evidence points out it was likely created by Hillary Clinton's old War Room. Last I heard, she was hiding out in Ireland last week, seeking employment.

The only reason the Chief Justice is there is because the VP is not considered impartial in the impeachment of a president.

The role of the chief justice in an impeachment trial - SCOTUSblog

Sometime in the next week or two, the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump will convene in the Senate. When it does, Chief Justice John Roberts will preside. There has been a good deal written about Roberts’ role, some of it intimating – or at least hoping – that Roberts could wrench control from the politicians who make up the Senate and transform the proceeding into a trial of the conventional judicial sort, with both sides able to compel the appearance of live witnesses and the production of documents and to inquire into any matter logically relevant to the charges against the president.

For better or worse, neither the Constitution, the rules of the Senate, historical precedent nor the personal predilections of Roberts himself make this the least bit likely. Instead, Roberts is most likely to serve as a dignified figurehead in an affair entirely dominated by the Republican senatorial caucus.

I didn't look at any news source, but I knew the Impeachment Trial in the Senate is always under the jurisdiction of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Glad to bring your education up a notch.

How Chief Justice John Roberts would preside over the politically charged Trump impeachment trial
​

Chief Justice Rhinequist presided over the Clinton Impeachment Trial to make certain everything went by the book of fairness this country operates under. And it is in the Constitution as the above link to a generally leftist paper says. You really should read the Constitution's provisions occasionally rather than being critical of people who happen to be well-informed Republicans. There's not a specific cure for TDS, but you can control it by understanding what went into the Constitution to make certain all was fair, and what unfolds between the time the trial started and until it is over will hopefully assure you that Republicans do support the fairness aspect of the Constitution, even though Adam Schiff and Jerold Nadler both ignored their responsibilities, and the House Speaker who was gloating about how permanent this impeachment was going to be should be dismissed from any and all public speaking in behalf of all 500+ members of the House she just humiliated.

So, you repeat that what I just said and even claim to educate me...whatever you need to do to feel better about yourself is good with me.

Also, SCOTUSBlog is not a paper and it is rated on of the least biased sites on the web.

 

[colfax_m]

McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment. Trump lawyers should motion to dismiss with Chief Justice Roberts, who acts as trial judge, and he should immediately dismiss for lack of a tangible crime.

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

Before you light into Mr. Bush92, jc456, please read the Constitution a little more closely. Thx.

like the house, the senate makes their own rules. nothing to do with the constitution. if you wish to walk that road, the senate doesn't listen to witnesses, only the managers from the house.

Every impeachment trial in the Senate has included witnesses.

BTW, every impeachment investigation in the house allowed the minority to bring in witnesses. Did the repubs get to bring in witnesses for trump? just say no and call it a day.

Actually they did!

Gordon Sondland
Kurt Volker
Tim Morrison
Jonathan Turley

Did you not know this?

 

[jc456]

submissive fks the GOP are. why do the dems getting to call witnesses? The GOP wasn't allowed to in the house! what the fk is wrong with the submissive fks on the right? hly shit, the stupid that is them is amazing.

Before you light into Mr. Bush92, jc456, please read the Constitution a little more closely. Thx.

like the house, the senate makes their own rules. nothing to do with the constitution. if you wish to walk that road, the senate doesn't listen to witnesses, only the managers from the house.

Every impeachment trial in the Senate has included witnesses.

BTW, every impeachment investigation in the house allowed the minority to bring in witnesses. Did the repubs get to bring in witnesses for trump? just say no and call it a day.

Actually they did!

Gordon Sondland
Kurt Volker
Tim Morrison
Jonathan Turley

Did you not know this?

hahahahahahahahahahahaha Turley wasn't a witness. too fking funny on the others, none of those were repubs.