Senate Passed Unemployment Extension Better Stimulus Than A Tax Cut!

[mascale]

The Neanderthal Mantra of GOP Voodoo Economics is that deficit-creating tax cuts for the rich encourage spending. The reverse mantra is that deficit-creating unemployment benefits do not. That barely surfaces in the attached, but Democratic unemployment benefits extension is shown to directly encourage spending in the market-place, which the GOP opposed!

Jobless benefits extension clears Senate hurdle - Business - Stocks & economy - msnbc.com

"Neanderthal" becomes a proper adjective, even, when discussing GOP "Conservative" thinking and solutions generally. The Governor of All of Baton Rouge, LA, offers the most recent compare and contrast.

On the one hand, the great Socialist Leadership of the Democratic federal, administraive leadership, sought and encouraged a creative engagement in solving the Gulf Crisis, from clearly socially conscious BP: From the Start. The Republicans seemed more inclined to the "due process," like of class-action lawsuits, wherein claims are lucky to collect 10% of the amount. The Governor of All of Baton Rouge suggested piling up rocks, along the beaches.

Opting instead for the more scientific, and socialist, approach: With support from the Socialist, U. S. federal aministrative leadership, BP deployed and created new tednologies able to contain and curtail new emergencies: Even in the future. A Socialist, Progressive, basis for further exploration was in fact encouraged and created.

The rich more likely would take the money from the tax cuts, and put it into a cash account, noted even recently as an outcome of the Ivy League's own, "preservative stimulus," for the bail-out of state and local governments, and the teachers who caused the downturn in the first-place. The "preservatives" gummed up the usual stimulus effect of new projects: On a scale that the Ivy League could claim to be unprecedented.

In contrast, projects were created in the Gulf Coast solutions, and in the projects implementation, by-passing even the Governor of All Baton Rouge, LA.

And so there can now be rejoicing, even as the market place gains the $34.0 bil. in speniding the Republicans generally, refused to vote for.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Back on-shore: Apparently if it's rocks you got, then it's rocks you flaunt: As the GOP version of, "comprae and contrast" their way to the actual outcome in the federal legislatures, and at the spill site!)

 

[Guerrilla]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYNWztgHQtI"]YouTube - Rachel Maddow Uses Bush Sr Voodoo Economics Statement Against GOP Tax Cuts[/ame]

 

[WillowTree]

The Neanderthal Mantra of GOP Voodoo Economics is that deficit-creating tax cuts for the rich encourage spending. The reverse mantra is that deficit-creating unemployment benefits do not. That barely surfaces in the attached, but Democratic unemployment benefits extension is shown to directly encourage spending in the market-place, which the GOP opposed!

Jobless benefits extension clears Senate hurdle - Business - Stocks & economy - msnbc.com

"Neanderthal" becomes a proper adjective, even, when discussing GOP "Conservative" thinking and solutions generally. The Governor of All of Baton Rouge, LA, offers the most recent compare and contrast.

On the one hand, the great Socialist Leadership of the Democratic federal, administraive leadership, sought and encouraged a creative engagement in solving the Gulf Crisis, from clearly socially conscious BP: From the Start. The Republicans seemed more inclined to the "due process," like of class-action lawsuits, wherein claims are lucky to collect 10% of the amount. The Governor of All of Baton Rouge suggested piling up rocks, along the beaches.

Opting instead for the more scientific, and socialist, approach: With support from the Socialist, U. S. federal aministrative leadership, BP deployed and created new tednologies able to contain and curtail new emergencies: Even in the future. A Socialist, Progressive, basis for further exploration was in fact encouraged and created.

The rich more likely would take the money from the tax cuts, and put it into a cash account, noted even recently as an outcome of the Ivy League's own, "preservative stimulus," for the bail-out of state and local governments, and the teachers who caused the downturn in the first-place. The "preservatives" gummed up the usual stimulus effect of new projects: On a scale that the Ivy League could claim to be unprecedented.

In contrast, projects were created in the Gulf Coast solutions, and in the projects implementation, by-passing even the Governor of All Baton Rouge, LA.

And so there can now be rejoicing, even as the market place gains the $34.0 bil. in speniding the Republicans generally, refused to vote for.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Back on-shore: Apparently if it's rocks you got, then it's rocks you flaunt: As the GOP version of, "comprae and contrast" their way to the actual outcome in the federal legislatures, and at the spill site!)

so the mother fucking demonRats forged right ahead and put us furthur into debt..

 

[Guerrilla]

so the mother fucking demonRats forged right ahead and put us furthur into debt..

How do you feel about extending the Bush tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans?

 

[B. Kidd]

A 5th extension for unemployment benefits. Just another delay on the road to eventual economic/social collapse.

 

[WillowTree]

so the mother fucking demonRats forged right ahead and put us furthur into debt..

How do you feel about extending the Bush tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans?

why do you ask?

 

[Misty]

so the mother fucking demonRats forged right ahead and put us furthur into debt..

How do you feel about extending the Bush tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans?

I actual lived this, so I know this data is correct. And I am not rich but was considered rich by the tax man.


"According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total."

"This shift may have occurred because as the wealthy (who are arguably the most industrious and productive citizens) are better-incentivized to be industrious and productive through lower taxes, they create higher incomes for themselves and end up paying more taxes."


American Thinker: Lying About Bush's Tax Cuts

 

[Truthmatters]

American workers are worthless and only the CEOs are working for their money in the USA.

That is what you are claiming now huh?

 

[Guerrilla]

How do you feel about extending the Bush tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans?

why do you ask?[/quote]

Because that's how the mother effin demon-Repubs forge ahead and help put us further into debt.

One of these ideas helps our citizens and puts money back into the economy immediately, and the other idea only helps to further strengthen the people in our society who need it the least, while adding to the deficit. Aren't all Repubs and Tea Partiers all deficit hawks right about now?

 

[Greenbeard]

"This shift may have occurred because as the wealthy (who are arguably the most industrious and productive citizens) are better-incentivized to be industrious and productive through lower taxes, they create higher incomes for themselves and end up paying more taxes."

Really, greater income inequality? Resulting from Republican tax policy? That's unpossible!

 

[Guerrilla]

I actual lived this, so I know this data is correct. And I am not rich but was considered rich by the tax man.


"According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total."

"This shift may have occurred because as the wealthy (who are arguably the most industrious and productive citizens) are better-incentivized to be industrious and productive through lower taxes, they create higher incomes for themselves and end up paying more taxes."
American Thinker: Lying About Bush's Tax Cuts

So how did the deficit go from 36% under Clinton to 89% under Bush, even though Bush refused to put War costs on the national deficit? Bush's deficits were even worse than recorded, if War costs were included.

Why don't you people just admit it, you want policy that will help keep your kind rich for as long as possible. You don't want the best for America as a country, you want what's best for the elite's bank accounts for as long as possible.

That flies in the face of what is good for America. Growing an impoverished underclass while fewer and fewer benefit as a result of policies that favor the top 1-3% of the population is not a sustainable way to make our country better.

You should know that. Most people know that. Now you just have to decide what kind of country you want to live in. 1-2% rich elite, or greater happiness and power and opportunity offered to more and more people.

What's more democratic?

 

[WillowTree]

How do you feel about extending the Bush tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans?

why do you ask?

Because that's how the mother effin demon-Repubs forge ahead and help put us further into debt.

One of these ideas helps our citizens and puts money back into the economy immediately, and the other idea only helps to further strengthen the people in our society who need it the least, while adding to the deficit. Aren't all Repubs and Tea Partiers all deficit hawks right about now?[/QUOTE]

but the mother effen Republicans are not in charge now, your mother effen retard is and he and the demonRats are running up astronomical debt. How do you feel about that?

 

[Avatar4321]

Tell me something, what would motivate you more to find or create a job?

1)Knowing that you can collect money from the government by doing nothing

or

2)Knowing you can keep more of your own money if you go out and earn it.

 

[Jon]

Thank you, America, for writing this Congress and administration a blank check.

You fucking idiots.

 

[Truthmatters]

There are 5 people for every job on the market.

You are going to kill the republican party with this stupid tact of calling unemployed people names.

 

[mascale]

Bush II, Term I, came into office red-hot ready to ward off the (no-where impending) recession. The stock-market had tanked. So on the every-so-often days, he showed up for class at Yale University, (or for his stint in the National Guard), he had heard that to ward off a recession, taxes should be cut. Stimulus would happen.

Just where he passed out after that is not recorded. Whether or not he ever showed up for any of the rest of the lessons: Is probably also not recorded. The Ivy League is not too heavy into record-keeping. At Harvard University, it is not clear to this date if any of the Kennedy family had actually passed any of the coursework, they had showed up for--under similar stress, no doubt. The Cambridge Police are evern aware that their faculty seem to have trouble finding the keys to their. . . .late model homes, when the rest of the faculty are polled.

Beer is known to solve problems, at the Ivy League.

Surprise, Surprise: And to all of Yale University! Actually, even at Bush II, Term I, over 40% of U. S. federal income tax filers had no liability for federal income taxes.

This, they didn't know.

But, they knew that(?)!

So what did everyone learn about tax cuts for the rich?! Try and try again, they still don't work. The Rich Saudi Royal Family, however, had a distant relative who would eventually help solve the problem. The Procurements Debacle of Bush II, Terms I and II, was soon underway: In Afghanistan, and then in Iraq.

The tax cuts themselves, however, had not worked! They tried about three times, but they didn't work!

They kind of work like rocks. . . .piled on the beaches. . . .to stop the ocean, the tides, and the rise of the levels. See for example, "Los Angeles City Council agrees to buy lots at Marina--which have been under water for about twenty years!" (And that was about 1988! Little kids knew about wading, and rocks, even then!)

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many great winos, are found to not work, to this time! Many rich people there are among them, clearly--and to this time!)

 

[Guerrilla]

but the mother effen Republicans are not in charge now, your mother effen retard is and he and the demonRats are running up astronomical debt. How do you feel about that?

The Democrats are running up a debt, absolutely. The point is this deficit spending isn't intended to go on forever. It's a temporary remedy for the crisis our country was put in.

Once things turn around, we need to ween ourselves off of the spending that hopefully prevented us from falling further into an economic black hole.

Repubs want to pretend this spending is something the Dems want to do indefinately. It is NOT. However, it's a necessary remedy to help the economy when other aspects aren't performing as they typically do.

The Dems spending idea isn't a permanent fix. It's a temporary fix until other aspects of the economy get back to where it needs to be.

 

[Greenbeard]

but the mother effen Republicans are not in charge now, your mother effen retard is and he and the demonRats are running up astronomical debt. How do you feel about that?

"demonRats"? Be honest: are you old enough to vote?

 

[mudwhistle]

so the mother fucking demonRats forged right ahead and put us furthur into debt..

How do you feel about extending the Bush tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans?

You mean like you and me????

Those tax cuts effect everyone....not just the wealthy.

Our taxes are going to go up...not just the rich. The rich can find other ways of sheltering their earnings but we can't.....so we'll be hit the hardest when the Bush tax-cuts expire.

The Democrats have been lying to you and you bought it.

 

[mudwhistle]

but the mother effen Republicans are not in charge now, your mother effen retard is and he and the demonRats are running up astronomical debt. How do you feel about that?

The Democrats are running up a debt, absolutely. The point is this deficit spending isn't intended to go on forever. It's a temporary remedy for the crisis our country was put in.

Once things turn around, we need to ween ourselves off of the spending that hopefully prevented us from falling further into an economic black hole.

Repubs want to pretend this spending is something the Dems want to do indefinately. It is NOT. However, it's a necessary remedy to help the economy when other aspects aren't performing as they typically do.

The Dems spending idea isn't a permanent fix. It's a temporary fix until other aspects of the economy get back to where it needs to be.

The Dems do want to keep spending...but the purpose of all of the spending is to raise taxes. Once the effect of the debt starts hitting us hard they'll tell us that it needs to be reduced. So they'll say we all need to get skin in the game...invest in our futures...reach deep into our pockets and bail this country out of all of this debt.

Better yet....just give them our money and they'll give us what's left over. The little bit they feel we need to survive.

Serve your community.....be happy....fulfilled....and broke.