Senate DEMONRATS deliver stunning warning to Supreme Court: ‘Heal’ or face restructuring

The Supreme Court, the DOJ, the EPA, the..... you get the point. They are all influenced by politics. They manipulate and twist laws, missions, and policies to carry out party politics. Why do people think politics has become so vicious and so profitable.
 
What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?


Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?

.
What is Mitch waiting for?

The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?
 
What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?


Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?

.
What is Mitch waiting for?

The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?

I've heard that "Elections have consequences":

Go figure
 
What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?


Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?

.
What is Mitch waiting for?

The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?


Poor thing, the Biden rule and Reid's legacy came back to bite you in the ass. Like my grand pappy said, what goes around, comes around, deal with it commie.

.
 
Liberals spell it: "HEEL".

Meaning to follow the party line like lap-dogs.

And they mean it!

If The Supremes don't HEEL then liberals will lie on the floor of the courtroom whining and kicking their own heels on the stone-cold floor until they bleed. It's not all that hard because liberals lie as part of their daily routine of fealty to the party. Chronic liars.
 
What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?


Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?

.
What is Mitch waiting for?

The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?

I've heard that "Elections have consequences":

Go figure
Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.
 
Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?

.
What is Mitch waiting for?

The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?

I've heard that "Elections have consequences":

Go figure
Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.


That's a fucking lie, the commies are talking about legislation to increase the number of judges on the court if they manage to get the WH, so a commie can appoint them. And they're crying about the court being too political, they just want to appoint more activist judges to make it more political. You fucking commies keep it up and this cold civil war just might heat up.

.
 
What is Mitch waiting for?

The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?

I've heard that "Elections have consequences":

Go figure
Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.


That's a fucking lie, the commies are talking about legislation to increase the number of judges on the court if they manage to get the WH, so a commie can appoint them. And they're crying about the court being too political, they just want to appoint more activist judges to make it more political. You fucking commies keep it up and this cold civil war just might heat up.

.
To bad our founders wrote our Constitution in such a way as to solve the problem Republicans created when rhey refused to allow Obama's nomination a hearing.
 
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?

I've heard that "Elections have consequences":

Go figure
Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.


That's a fucking lie, the commies are talking about legislation to increase the number of judges on the court if they manage to get the WH, so a commie can appoint them. And they're crying about the court being too political, they just want to appoint more activist judges to make it more political. You fucking commies keep it up and this cold civil war just might heat up.

.
To bad our founders wrote our Constitution in such a way as to solve the problem Republicans created when rhey refused to allow Obama's nomination a hearing.


Why bother with hearing when he would have never been confirmed? Just going through the motions to make you commies happy isn't justification for wasting the senates time. BTW who is "rhey"?

.
 
Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?

.
What is Mitch waiting for?

The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?

I've heard that "Elections have consequences":

Go figure
Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.

By packing SCOTUS? Fuck off!
 
To bad our founders wrote our Constitution in such a way as to solve the problem Republicans created when rhey refused to allow Obama's nomination a hearing.
Where does the constitution say the Senate has to hold a hearing on a nomination from the President?
Cite the Article/section and quote the text.
 
The democrat Party cannot tolerate diversity: they want their fearless Leader to win every vote in every election, make all the laws and make all decisions.
 
"The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it," the brief said.

We know that all right.

"Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be 'restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'"

The court is too liberal, too constructivist, and too abstract in preferring its own arbitrary interpretations over the plain reading of the law of the Constitution.

Those cherished institutions of the liberal left simply need to be cut off and bled out. They left no room for us to heal from the damage they have inflicted on us under color of law.

In the same poll, 55 percent believed the Supreme Court was "motivated by politics" more than by the law.

Ultimately politics dictate the law, as it is elected senators and representatives and legislators who pass the laws.

They want judges appointed against the will of the people to enforce their dictatorship of a permanently disenfranchised proletariat.

The Socialist/Communist/DemonRATS no longer even hide their desire to be a DICTATORSHIP in America...

Commie proles.
 
What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?


Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?

.
What is Mitch waiting for?

The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?

Yup. They waited for democrats, ie, Plugs Biden, to set the standard, then acted on it.
 
What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?
Three branches of government but great Trump gets to pick more or another Republican president. But do you really want the American voters watching democrats pissing all over themselves because they can't have it their way?
 

Forum List

Back
Top