Self Defense: Only available to Whites in Texas.

JFK_USA

Gold Member
Aug 31, 2009
2,606
412
130
A great article on the two different justice systems in America depending on your race.

One white person gets off for self defense for shooting and killing a police officer for entering during a "no knock" raid. The determination being that the shooting was reasonable.

A black person shoots and kills a police officer during a "no knock" raid. The grand jury there with almost the exact same facts say it was unreasonable to assume it was someone breaking into his home. He is facing the death penalty and Rick Perry honors the dead cop shot by the black person but not the one shot by a white person.

These are what these protests are about. That black people face a different justice system than whites. That the same act by two different people yields two different results. One is deemed reasonable and is home for the holidays, the other facing death.

But I guess pointing out the obvious discrepancies in our justice system is "race-baiting" and black people should just take it. The nerve of them to think they deserve to be treated as equals.

The Right of Self Defense in Texas Completely Depends on Race
 
Like the black Florida woman who was sentenced to 20 years in jail for firing a warning shot in her own home while Zimmerman got a hero's send off from conservatives.

Yeah but there is no biased in our justice system. That lady was defending herself from her abusive ex husband and sentenced to 20 years.
 
There are a few distinguishing characteristics in the cases, but they don't seem to justifying the difference between seeking the death penalty and just clearing the guy.

Troubling case.
 
So that means it's ALL WHITE peoples fault.

white people better start protecting yourselves with more and more BS like this going around
 
Politicausa

a site run by the Far left/progressives/ commies. so this is expected. Stir up the hate against white people. you better wake the hell up
 
So that means it's ALL WHITE peoples fault.

white people better start protecting yourselves with more and more BS like this going around

There goes Staph providing a defense on something no one said just like in the other thread

The Landmine In Labeling Someone Black Page 7 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

oh brother. white people made it about themselves. Are they out protesting the protesters? get real that is just dumb

And here is Staph making it about ALL white people when its not
 
Mr. Guy (the black gentleman) was a convicted felon. Why was he in possession of a firearm illegally? Had he not broken the law against felons possessing firearms, he could not have shot the intruders and would not be in the trouble he's in now.

See how great gun laws work to keep guns out of the hands of convicted felons?

Affidavit For Search Warrant:
http://media.graytvinc.com/documents/FR000000.pdf
 
Last edited:
Mr. Guy (the black gentleman) was a convicted felon. Why was he in possession of a firearm illegally? Had he not broken the law against felons possessing firearms, he could not have shot the intruders and would not be in the trouble he's in now.

See how great gun laws work to keep guns out of the hands of convicted felons?

Affidavit For Search Warrant:
http://media.graytvinc.com/documents/FR000000.pdf

These days, a gambler is a convicted felon. What felony did he commit?
 
Considering that the source of the information is an obvious left wing hate site, a reasonable person would have to conclude that there is a lot more information NOT included in the article. You'll have to do better than that.
 
His felonies are listed in the affidavit I linked.

Not for singing too loud in church. I get your point though.

"...multiple convictions including bank robbery, theft, burglary and felon in possession of a firearm..."
 
Last edited:
Considering that the source of the information is an obvious left wing hate site, a reasonable person would have to conclude that there is a lot more information NOT included in the article. You'll have to do better than that.

This too. But based on what I saw so far, the black man should be pardoned. The article seems to think that the white man should be jail.

Funny how liberals always side with oathbreakers when it involves a white man.


To clarify what I said, the article says the following:
"Why isn't the white man in jail?"

What the article should be saying is:
"Why isn't the black man being pardoned?"
 
Considering that the source of the information is an obvious left wing hate site, a reasonable person would have to conclude that there is a lot more information NOT included in the article. You'll have to do better than that.

A reasonable person would find the fault in the article instead of providing rumor and innuendo
 

Forum List

Back
Top