See an Ignorant/Detached Liberal Ranting About Race Oppression (Revealing!)

[katsteve2012]

It is not a liberal/ conservative issue, you senile nutcase. It is an initiative that was put into effect to ensure that racist cretins like you, if in a position to discriminate are held accountable. Affirmative Action as it is written PROHIBITS discrimination based on age, race, religion and disability.

And, like it or not, white females have benefitted from it more than any other demographic.

Affirmative Action, as it is written, most certainly DOES NOT PROHIBIT discrimination based on age, race, religion and disability. It does just the opposite.

It discriminates on the basis of race and sex, and long as women and minorities are the beneficiaries, and white males are the victims, AS YOU ALREADY CLEARLY KNOW, despite your silly clown act.

White males are not victims, you nutcase.
In every category, in spite of affirmative action, on average they earn more than females and non whites, and hold over 75% of managerial positions in the workforce, yet represent approximately 35% of the population.

Post something to validate your idiotic conspiracy theories or STFU.

He can't . He is like the rest of the racists. He thinks he can declare something and because the other racists jump in agreement that he's stating fact. There is no data supporting his lie and no matter how many times he repeats it, we all know it's a lie.

And everytime that he posts that lie, he will continue to get it shoved where it belongs.

 

[IM2]

It is not a liberal/ conservative issue, you senile nutcase. It is an initiative that was put into effect to ensure that racist cretins like you, if in a position to discriminate are held accountable. Affirmative Action as it is written PROHIBITS discrimination based on age, race, religion and disability.

And, like it or not, white females have benefitted from it more than any other demographic.

Affirmative Action, as it is written, most certainly DOES NOT PROHIBIT discrimination based on age, race, religion and disability. It does just the opposite.

It discriminates on the basis of race and sex, and long as women and minorities are the beneficiaries, and white males are the victims, AS YOU ALREADY CLEARLY KNOW, despite your silly clown act.

White males are not victims, you nutcase.
In every category, in spite of affirmative action, on average they earn more than females and non whites, and hold over 75% of managerial positions in the workforce, yet represent approximately 35% of the population.

Post something to validate your idiotic conspiracy theories or STFU.

He can't . He is like the rest of the racists. He thinks he can declare something and because the other racists jump in agreement that he's stating fact. There is no data supporting his lie and no matter how many times he repeats it, we all know it's a lie.

And everytime that he posts that lie, he will continue to get it shoved where it belongs.

Well said.

 

[IM2]

It is not a liberal/ conservative issue, you senile nutcase. It is an initiative that was put into effect to ensure that racist cretins like you, if in a position to discriminate are held accountable. Affirmative Action as it is written PROHIBITS discrimination based on age, race, religion and disability.

And, like it or not, white females have benefitted from it more than any other demographic.

Affirmative Action, as it is written, most certainly DOES NOT PROHIBIT discrimination based on age, race, religion and disability. It does just the opposite.

It discriminates on the basis of race and sex, and long as women and minorities are the beneficiaries, and white males are the victims, AS YOU ALREADY CLEARLY KNOW, despite your silly clown act.

Do you realize that you just contradicted yourself? If white females are the "victims" of affirmative action, how does it discriminate on the basis of gender/sex?

It is known that you're a delusional, senile, nutcase, but you can't have it both ways.....even in your brain dead condition.

He needs to quit skipping the meds he can afford to buy because of Obamacare.

 

[katsteve2012]

It is not a liberal/ conservative issue, you senile nutcase. It is an initiative that was put into effect to ensure that racist cretins like you, if in a position to discriminate are held accountable. Affirmative Action as it is written PROHIBITS discrimination based on age, race, religion and disability.

And, like it or not, white females have benefitted from it more than any other demographic.

Affirmative Action, as it is written, most certainly DOES NOT PROHIBIT discrimination based on age, race, religion and disability. It does just the opposite.

It discriminates on the basis of race and sex, and long as women and minorities are the beneficiaries, and white males are the victims, AS YOU ALREADY CLEARLY KNOW, despite your silly clown act.

Do you realize that you just contradicted yourself? If white females are the "victims" of affirmative action, how does it discriminate on the basis of gender/sex?

It is known that you're a delusional, senile, nutcase, but you can't have it both ways.....even in your brain dead condition.

He needs to quit skipping the meds he can afford to buy because of Obamacare.

Not sure meds will work for him. A frontal lobotomy may be the solution.

 

[katsteve2012]

All you do is whine about your victimhood.

No, I REPORT about it, partially to annoy you. , as is quite clear by your frequent
whining about it.

There is a big difference between accurate "reporting" and making fabricated statements that you never provide any proof for.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

And whites benefitted much more than anyone else from the GI Bill. Same for the New Deal. Social programs only became "bad" post the civil rights movement, you know, when them damn "darkies" got included.

No, it was when whites started getting discriminated against, as you probably know quite well.

Poor victimy white male fragility on full display.

You're not going to believe what I'm about to tell you - The Oatmeal

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

No, they are not VICTIMS, and neither are YOU.
In fact they have made the most notable progress during AA of ANY other demographic.

If you choose to deny that fact, that's your problem, not mine.

Your most obvious disability is your IGNORANCE, not your age. My 87 year old mother is much more mentally alert than you are.

You cannot rewrite facts or wish away the truth, which is why instead of showing any proof of all of the "millions" of white victims of AA that you imagine are in society, you think that just "saying" they are makes it true.

Of course white women are victims of AA. They, along with their white husbands and fathers constitute the largest group of victims of racial oppression/discrimination in America, over the past 58 years.

If you choose to deny that fact, that's your problem, not mine.

I will not accuse you of being IGNORANT, because I know you are knowledgable of the truth, from having been informed by me, numerous times. You're just a cheap, 2 bit, low-down LIAR, that's all.

You cannot rewrite facts or wish away the truth, which is why instead of acknowledging the truth as I have told it, including showing proof of AA discrimination against whites (as the obvious racial abnormalities in VA hospitals) in America, you think you can eradicate the reporting of this despicable racism, just by pretending it doesn't exist.

Too bad for you that It DOES exist, Mr DODGE, as anyone plainly sees, when they go into a VA hospital, or other government building.

I think it's high time we just gave up this nonsense that americans see racism as a thing at all, we obviously do not. Same for genocide. We're still up to both.

 

[MizMolly]

He doesn't SEE things. He's afraid if he did, all his leftist readings (brainwashings) would be annihilated.

This is not a left or right issue, you idiot. If you were not mentally impaired, as well as ignorant it would not be necessary to spoon feed facts to you. You have access to the same information as anyone else, you just choose to claim it doesn't exist.

What facts? Some things you read can be proven, a fact. Stats on women benefitting from AA, no proof. How do you prove a woman got the job because she was female?

He doesn't SEE things. He's afraid if he did, all his leftist readings (brainwashings) would be annihilated.

This is not a left or right issue, you idiot. If you were not mentally impaired, as well as ignorant it would not be necessary to spoon feed facts to you. You have access to the same information as anyone else, you just choose to claim it doesn't exist.

What facts? Some things you read can be proven, a fact. Stats on women benefitting from AA, no proof. How do you prove a woman got the job because she was female?

The majority of the gains by white females during AA were recognized in the first 3 decades of the initiative. There is much more evidence like this out there. This is only one example.

Interestingly, in spite of what the one who started this thread insists about white people being "victimized" by AA, white males as a demographic represent approximately 35% of the population, however they hold nearly 75% of managerial positions in the workforce.

That is not a case of "victimization".


Prior to AA gaining traction, white females in most cases held secretarial jobs, teaching jobs or positions in the service industry.

If you are 60+ years or older, you would have seen this yourself.


"A 1995 report by the California Senate Government Organization Committee found that white women held a majority of managerial jobs (57,250) compared with African Americans (10,500), Latinos (19,000), and Asian Americans (24,600) after the first two decades of affirmative action in the private sector. In 2015, a disproportionate representation of white women business owners set off concerns that New York state would not be able to bridge a racial gap among public contractors".

Women decided to be more than secretaries, more than mothers and housewives, that is what changed. They obtained higher educations and skills. It’s a slap in the face, rude and chauvinistic to think women weren’t and aren’t able to advance by themselves.

Who said women "could not advance themselves"?

Are you seriously of the belief that without legislative intervention that women would have eventually advanced in society as the equals of men?

By not denying women equal rights women were able to advance, not by giving them special provisions.

 

[protectionist]

By not denying women equal rights women were able to advance, not by giving them special provisions.

Thank you.

Affirmative Action raised loons have no conception of "equal rights"

 

[protectionist]

I think it's high time we just gave up this nonsense that americans see racism as a thing at all, we obviously do not. Same for genocide. We're still up to both.

And will continue to be, as long as Affirmative Action is not banned in all 50 states. (currently banned in only 8)

 

[protectionist]

Poor victimy white male fragility on full display.

All correct, except for the fragility part. Back to the drawing board for you.

 

[protectionist]

White males are not victims, you nutcase.
In every category, in spite of affirmative action, on average they earn more than females and non whites, and hold over 75% of managerial positions in the workforce, yet represent approximately 35% of the population.

Post something to validate your idiotic conspiracy theories or STFU.

It's already BEEN posted, 100 times, you bozos.

 

[protectionist]

Do you realize that you just contradicted yourself? If white females are the "victims" of affirmative action, how does it discriminate on the basis of gender/sex?

It is known that you're a delusional, senile, nutcase, but you can't have it both ways.....even in your brain dead condition.

Are you brain dead ? It discriminates on the basis of gender/sex by denying white males equal access to jobs, job promotions, college admissions, college financial aid, business loans, etc, etc.

Next question is >> why do you ask questions about what you already know ? That's a rhetorical question. I'll supply the answer. Because you're totally>>

 

[protectionist]

He can't . He is like the rest of the racists. He thinks he can declare something and because the other racists jump in agreement that he's stating fact. There is no data supporting his lie and no matter how many times he repeats it, we all know it's a lie.

HA HA HA. What would liberals ever do without their precious "data" (ie. BS concocted in liberal universities, media rooms, and think tanks)

The funny part is they think the idea has a toe to stand on.

 

[IM2]

He can't . He is like the rest of the racists. He thinks he can declare something and because the other racists jump in agreement that he's stating fact. There is no data supporting his lie and no matter how many times he repeats it, we all know it's a lie.

HA HA HA. What would liberals ever do without their precious "data" (ie. BS concocted in liberal universities, media rooms, and think tanks)

The funny part is they think the idea has a toe to stand on.

You can't show any discrimination against whites and you saying so is just not enough. You lose old stale saltine. Move on.

 

[IM2]

Do you realize that you just contradicted yourself? If white females are the "victims" of affirmative action, how does it discriminate on the basis of gender/sex?

It is known that you're a delusional, senile, nutcase, but you can't have it both ways.....even in your brain dead condition.

Are you brain dead ? It discriminates on the basis of gender/sex by denying white males equal access to jobs, job promotions, college admissions, college financial aid, business loans, etc, etc.

Next question is >> why do you ask questions about what you already know ? That's a rhetorical question. I'll supply the answer. Because you're totally>>

View attachment 290182

Bullshit.

 

[IM2]

Poor victimy white male fragility on full display.

All correct, except for the fragility part. Back to the drawing board for you.

You are the poster child for white fragility.

 

[protectionist]

And they have been informed by me that you're a dumbfuck who spends Saturdays at a track betting on centaur races. You can't show any racism by me. White women have benefitted the most from AA. You and DizzyMolly just need to understand this is a fact that is not debatable. You really need to quit wasting your social security money betting on centaurs.

HA HA. Your dopey idea about white woman has been squashed so many times it's uncountable any more.

How interesting that every time I post about the malicious racism of Affirmative Action, the same two lost-cause, racist blockheads show up to post obvious gibberish about it.

Maybe one day they'll tell us what their vested interest is with AA. Maybe they make their money (and sell their souls) by administering these despicable and illegal atrocities. They sure show lot of interest, don't they ? We'll just sit back and speculate on that.

 

[protectionist]

You are the poster child for white fragility.

HA HA. If I was fragile , I wouldn't be handing you your ass, as I'm doing right now, you putz.

 

[IM2]

And they have been informed by me that you're a dumbfuck who spends Saturdays at a track betting on centaur races. You can't show any racism by me. White women have benefitted the most from AA. You and DizzyMolly just need to understand this is a fact that is not debatable. You really need to quit wasting your social security money betting on centaurs.

HA HA. Your dopey idea about white woman has been squashed so many times it's uncountable any more.

How interesting that every time I post about the malicious racism of Affirmative Action, the same two lost-cause, racist blockheads show up to post obvious gibberish about it.

Maybe one day they'll tell us what their vested interest is with AA. Maybe they make their money (and sell their souls) by administering these despicable and illegal atrocities. They sure show lot of interest, don't they ? We'll just sit back and speculate on that.

View attachment 290188

Actually what I have said has been backed by facts. You can't produce any.

In fact, you're so ignorant facts turn to liberals.