- Banned
- #401
Two completely different techniques. You can argue the opposite from now until doomsday but you will still be either wrong or lying.
absolutely NOT true. strapping the subject to an inclined board, wrappng a towel around the nose and mouth and pouring water over the towel has the same effect today as it did in WWII: it is torture.
No. It isn't.
It's unpleasant as all get-out, but falls short of being "torture."
See how that works? YOU (and your fellow believers) can keep SAYING it, and that doesn't make it any more the truth than my repeated denial (and the denial of those similarly inclined) makes it false.
In reality, it is not a settled question.
I can see how it could qualify as "torture," depending on the definition employed.*
But, I can also see how it falls short of qualifying as torture, regardless of the fact that it sucks big time.
________________
* For example, one MIGHT be persuaded by defintion 2 in Merriam Webster. And, if so, a fair argument can be made that "waterboarding" fails to quite qualify.
torture - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online DictionaryMain Entry: 1tor·ture
Pronunciation: \ˈtȯr-chər\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French, from Old French, from Late Latin tortura, from Latin tortus, past participle of torquēre to twist; probably akin to Old High German drāhsil turner, Greek atraktos spindle
Date: 1540
1 a : anguish of body or mind : agony b : something that causes agony or pain
2 : the infliction of intense pain (as from burning, crushing, or wounding) to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure
* * * *
what a sophomoric and foolish response. Do you think that jursts at the Hague presiding over a war crimes trial will go to Mirriam-Webster - or even OED - to determine what is and is not "torture"?
The fact of the matter is that, in international courts, waterboarding has already been classified as torture. And America classified it as torture when prosecuting japanese war criminals. what is good for the goose, is good for the gander.