NPR - biased or just bad humor?

[Ame®icano]

Learn To Speak Tea Bag

Should publicly financed media take sides?

 

[mudwhistle]

Should they???

No. But they do.

The Dems have a good racket here. They fund some of their media sources like NPR and PBS....they send billions to their supporters. Unions like SEIU and the Machinist Union get the full support of the US government. They bribe Senators getting them to vote for their shit-bills.....and they do it with taxpayer money...not their own.

Really smart...and really unethical. If the shoe was on the other food imagine the whining in Washington that we would be hearing about using taxpayer dollars to elect Republicans.

 

[del]

Learn To Speak Tea Bag

Should publicly financed media take sides?

no.

nice avatar. did it come with a hood?

 

[uscitizen]

We had this subject on another thread yesterday.

btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.

 

[jillian]

someone did this thread yesterday.

the cartoon was pretty funny.

 

[mudwhistle]

We had this subject on another thread yesterday.

btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.

If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.

Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.

I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.

 

[mudwhistle]

Learn To Speak Tea Bag

Should publicly financed media take sides?

no.

nice avatar. did it come with a hood?

Nice race-baiting

 

[jillian]

We had this subject on another thread yesterday.

btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.

If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.

Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.

I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.

so you believe in censorship?

well, AQ agreed with you regarding cartoons depicting mohammed.

tell me how you're better than them again.

 

[uscitizen]

We had this subject on another thread yesterday.

btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.

If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.

Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.

I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.

And who are WE? Do WE all agree on what to tell them?

Do you mean your party?

 

[Oddball]

Really smart...and really unethical. If the shoe was on the other food imagine the whining in Washington that we would be hearing about using taxpayer dollars to elect Republicans.

You mean that it can get worse than the bellyaching about Fix News?

 

[del]

Learn To Speak Tea Bag

Should publicly financed media take sides?

no.

nice avatar. did it come with a hood?

Nice race-baiting

nice ears. do you have the action figure?

 

[xsited1]

Learn To Speak Tea Bag

Should publicly financed media take sides?

They've almost lost public funding in the past for being biased. They still do it, but it's not as blatant. IMO, NPR should lose all public funding because I don't believe government should finance public radio.

 

[Oddball]

If that piece of crap 'toon isn't blatantly biased, nothing is.

 

[uscitizen]

Stll funny as heck, but most humor is biased.

 

[mudwhistle]

We had this subject on another thread yesterday.

btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.

If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.

Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.

I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.

so you believe in censorship?

well, AQ agreed with you regarding cartoons depicting mohammed.

tell me how you're better than them again.

I think censorship is bad.

I think giving both sides equal time is only fair.

After all....I'm not afraid of debating issues many Libs claim are closed to discussion.

 

[uscitizen]

If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.

Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.

I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.

so you believe in censorship?

well, AQ agreed with you regarding cartoons depicting mohammed.

tell me how you're better than them again.

I think censorship is bad.

I think giving both sides equal time is only fair.

After all....I'm not afraid of debating issues many Libs claim are closed to discussion.

so you support the Fairness Doctrine?

 

[Si modo]

Learn To Speak Tea Bag

Should publicly financed media take sides?

Nope.

 

[mudwhistle]

Stll funny as heck, but most humor is biased.

I don't think it was all that funny nor imaginative.

It was snooty and smug.

Talking about *tea-baggers* like they're morons.

Seems any good joke has a great deal of truth to it.

All this does is reveal the stereotypes elitists use in everyday life while holding their glass of Champagne while at their get-togethers.

 

[Si modo]

so you believe in censorship?

well, AQ agreed with you regarding cartoons depicting mohammed.

tell me how you're better than them again.

I think censorship is bad.

I think giving both sides equal time is only fair.

After all....I'm not afraid of debating issues many Libs claim are closed to discussion.

so you support the Fairness Doctrine?

Comparing lawn mowers to apples is irrelevant.

 

[uscitizen]

I think censorship is bad.

I think giving both sides equal time is only fair.

After all....I'm not afraid of debating issues many Libs claim are closed to discussion.

so you support the Fairness Doctrine?

Comparing lawn mowers to apples is irrelevant.

Ever watch PBS or listen to NPR? they often have more on there representing the right than the left. An attempt to appease the right I suppose.