Get down and take a knee.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
SCOTUS will hear Trump's IMMUNITY claim over criminal election interference charges
- Thread starter Lakhota
- Start date
WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 27,832
- 16,985
- 1,415
While you are down thereGet down and take a knee.
Blow me
LOL....The earliest a trial might start is about the second POTUS debate due to discovery and pre-trial motions.
Smith even tried giving the Trump team documents and they refused them due to everything being on hold till SCOTUS decides.
It's a big win for Trump.
Smith even tried giving the Trump team documents and they refused them due to everything being on hold till SCOTUS decides.
It's a big win for Trump.
LOL....The earliest a trial might start is about the second POTUS debate due to discovery and pre-trial motions.
Smith even tried giving the Trump team documents and they refused them due to everything being on hold till SCOTUS decides.
It's a big win for Trump.
and when Trump loses the general election...
Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 36,049
- 20,780
- 2,945
No one did.No one else would have the gall to argue that they are above our laws.
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,025
- 62,458
- 3,605
Investigating claims of voter fraud is not trying to overturn an election... the charge should have never been brought...WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to decide whether former President Donald Trump can claim presidential immunity over criminal election interference charges, adding a new hurdle to a trial taking place.
The court in a brief order said it would hear arguments and issue a ruling on the immunity claim. In the meantime, the case is on hold, meaning no trial can take place.
The order said the court would hear the case the week of April 22.
The case could take months to resolve.
Even if Trump loses, the trial would not take place until well into election season. If Trump were to win in a ruling, the charges would be dismissed.
More at the link below...
Supreme Court to consider Trump immunity claim in further delay of election interference trial
Even if the justices ultimately rule against Trump, the court’s intervention puts the trial’s start date in question.www.nbcnews.com
This should be a no-brainer - but we'll see. Another stalling tactic for Trump. What do you think?
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,025
- 62,458
- 3,605
He won't lose... he didn't lose in 2020 he won in a landslide...and when Trump loses the general election...
Remember when "election interference" was a Russia thing?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Now it's the subverted Marxist DNC.
It's like (is) a cold civil war, really.
The IRONY of charging Trump with election interference is off the charts!
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Now it's the subverted Marxist DNC.
It's like (is) a cold civil war, really.
The IRONY of charging Trump with election interference is off the charts!
Last edited:
two_iron
Diamond Member
The party that likes to fuck kids hates a democratic republic... they hate the Constitution, they hate our founding fathers, they hate checks and balances, they hate a 2-party system, and by definition they hate themselves.
We fucking hate them too.
We fucking hate them too.
crossbody
Diamond Member
- Jan 30, 2024
- 1,006
- 906
- 1,893
With Biden mandating people get a crazy vaccine that injured them, the democrats better hope like crazy there is presidential immunity; while in office and out. Even to the point of calling it "safe and effective" and lose your job if don't get it. All the lies and misleading the American people. Yea, we can't wait to see how this immunity verdict goes.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 93,153
- 61,352
- 2,645
You come here to lie to yourself out loud, don't you?USSC judges have eyes and ears as to goings on. This will be a quick 8-1 favoring Trump and then quickly but…but…followed by another indictment from scums
Why in the hell would a ruling go in trump's favor? Did you not see how team Trump was laughed out of the courtroom the first time?
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 93,153
- 61,352
- 2,645
Shut up liar. You're embarrassing yourself.He won't lose... he didn't lose in 2020 he won in a landslide...
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 93,153
- 61,352
- 2,645
Get these freakish lies out of here.With Biden mandating people get a crazy vaccine that injured them, the democrats better hope like crazy there is presidential immunity; while in office and out. Even to the point of calling it "safe and effective" and lose your job if don't get it. All the lies and misleading the American people. Yea, we can't wait to see how this immunity verdict goes.
MAGA Macho Man
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #34
Trump Wins In The End!
The President DOES HAVE Immunity.........
ArtII.S3.5.1 Presidential Immunity to Suits and Official Conduct
Article II, Section 3:
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
In its 1867 decision Mississippi v. Johnson, the Supreme Court established that the President is largely beyond the reach of the judiciary by holding that it could not direct President Andrew Johnson in how he exercised his purely executive and political powers.1 The Court stated, it had no jurisdiction . . . to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties.2
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-5-1/ALDE_00013392/
The President DOES HAVE Immunity.........
ArtII.S3.5.1 Presidential Immunity to Suits and Official Conduct
Article II, Section 3:
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
In its 1867 decision Mississippi v. Johnson, the Supreme Court established that the President is largely beyond the reach of the judiciary by holding that it could not direct President Andrew Johnson in how he exercised his purely executive and political powers.1 The Court stated, it had no jurisdiction . . . to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties.2
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-5-1/ALDE_00013392/
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 14,592
- 4,875
- 210
With Biden mandating people get a crazy vaccine that injured them, the democrats better hope like crazy there is presidential immunity; while in office and out. Even to the point of calling it "safe and effective" and lose your job if don't get it. All the lies and misleading the American people. Yea, we can't wait to see how this immunity verdict goes.
Zincwarrior
Platinum Member
- Nov 18, 2021
- 17,215
- 10,456
- 1,138
If he wins, Biden should immediately use his newfound power to put Trump against a wall and shot for treason within an hour of the decision. SCOTUS said he could do it.WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to decide whether former President Donald Trump can claim presidential immunity over criminal election interference charges, adding a new hurdle to a trial taking place.
The court in a brief order said it would hear arguments and issue a ruling on the immunity claim. In the meantime, the case is on hold, meaning no trial can take place.
The order said the court would hear the case the week of April 22.
The case could take months to resolve.
Even if Trump loses, the trial would not take place until well into election season. If Trump were to win in a ruling, the charges would be dismissed.
More at the link below...
Supreme Court to consider Trump immunity claim in further delay of election interference trial
Even if the justices ultimately rule against Trump, the court’s intervention puts the trial’s start date in question.
This should be a no-brainer - but we'll see. Another stalling tactic for Trump. What do you think?
Oops.
Freedomisneverfree
Diamond Member
- Jul 28, 2021
- 3,953
- 5,483
- 1,938
WIN President Trump WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I know you can do it! 
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 23,297
- 12,370
- 1,288
You are so very naive if you really believe this. Trump will be going to trial.USSC judges have eyes and ears as to goings on. This will be a quick 8-1 favoring Trump and then quickly but…but…followed by another indictment from scums
Freedomisneverfree
Diamond Member
- Jul 28, 2021
- 3,953
- 5,483
- 1,938
I think Biden should be shot firstIf he wins, Biden should immediately use his newfound power to put Trump against a wall and shot for treason within an hour of the decision. SCOTUS said he could do it.
Oops.
crossbody
Diamond Member
- Jan 30, 2024
- 1,006
- 906
- 1,893
Trump NEVER mandated everyone better get it or lose your job, nor did Trump cali it safe and effective.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 157
- Replies
- 438
- Views
- 6K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 432
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8104
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-