SCOTUS divided over SSM

[Where_r_my_Keys]

That's not marriage and it's certainly not Denmark.

Pop23: Alex, I'll take USMB champions for 500

Alex: Won the 2015 USMB dodgeball championship

Pop23: that would be "who is SeaWytch"

Alex: correct, also acceptable would be "What is SeaWytch"

We'll be back with final jeapordy after theses brief messages

Was it marriage Pop? Did you know that some US states have already decriminalized adult incest?

When are you filing your case, Pops?

Was what marriage. Please try to make sense and:

In a discussion, attempt to answer as many questions as you ask......

K?

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

That's due to the mental disorder consistent with that rationalization.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Pop23: Alex, I'll take USMB champions for 500

Alex: Won the 2015 USMB dodgeball championship

Pop23: that would be "who is SeaWytch"

Alex: correct, also acceptable would be "What is SeaWytch"

We'll be back with final jeapordy after theses brief messages

Was it marriage Pop? Did you know that some US states have already decriminalized adult incest?

When are you filing your case, Pops?

Was what marriage. Please try to make sense and:

In a discussion, attempt to answer as many questions as you ask......

K?

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

50 years? Try 15 years. It is hard to think of same sex marriage as a right since it didnt exist 15 years ago.

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Pop23: Alex, I'll take USMB champions for 500

Alex: Won the 2015 USMB dodgeball championship

Pop23: that would be "who is SeaWytch"

Alex: correct, also acceptable would be "What is SeaWytch"

We'll be back with final jeapordy after theses brief messages

Was it marriage Pop? Did you know that some US states have already decriminalized adult incest?

When are you filing your case, Pops?

Was what marriage. Please try to make sense and:

In a discussion, attempt to answer as many questions as you ask......

K?

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

60 years ago they would have said the same about interracial marriages....100 years ago, blacks and women voting...200 years ago NOT owning other humans as property...and on and on.

ROFLMNAO.

How sad is it that the Intellectually Less Fortunate can't find the means to understand the distinction between genetic minorities and DEVIANT BEHAVIOR which presents as MENTAL DISORDER.

It's probably the mental

And this is why, if SSM is forced on all States, that a backlash will occur, once Americans see what starts to happen to people that don't toe the line.

Americans like the idea of equality, but hate bullies, and Gay rights advocates are more and more becoming the bullies.

I think you are fantasizing. Here's the reality. When you guys decided that Bigoted Bakers and Photographers were your last line of defense against the icky butt sex, the Big Corporations told the Republican Governors, "No, don't do that!"

Here's the main reason why the gays will win in the end. Everyone has someone in their circle of friends and family who is gay, and no one like getting the stink-eye at thanksgiving.

Yes all those bigoted bakers cost you was several hundred seats in government representation.

Dam' BIGOTS!

 

[JoeB131]

Yes all those bigoted bakers cost you was several hundred seats in government representation.

Dam' BIGOTS!

Not really. Republicans didn't talk about gay marriage at all in 2014. In fact, 300 Republican lawmakers sent SCOTUS a letter asking them to please strike down all the gay marriage laws so they don't have to talk about this shit.

You homophobes got played by the rich, guy. Gays are getting married and rich people got free trade treaties and wage reductions on dumb rednecks like you. Good going.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no Appeal to Ignorance of the law (Article 4, Section 2) except for the infidel, protestant, and renegade Right.

 

[Skylar]

Was it marriage Pop? Did you know that some US states have already decriminalized adult incest?

When are you filing your case, Pops?

Was what marriage. Please try to make sense and:

In a discussion, attempt to answer as many questions as you ask......

K?

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

50 years? Try 15 years. It is hard to think of same sex marriage as a right since it didnt exist 15 years ago.

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And in 37 of 50 States, it includes one man and one man. ANd one woman and woman woman.

Marriage isn't inherent. We made it. We define it.

 

[bodecea]

Was it marriage Pop? Did you know that some US states have already decriminalized adult incest?

When are you filing your case, Pops?

Was what marriage. Please try to make sense and:

In a discussion, attempt to answer as many questions as you ask......

K?

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

50 years? Try 15 years. It is hard to think of same sex marriage as a right since it didnt exist 15 years ago.

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

I see you are still trying to convince yourself.

 

[Skylar]

Was it marriage Pop? Did you know that some US states have already decriminalized adult incest?

When are you filing your case, Pops?

Was what marriage. Please try to make sense and:

In a discussion, attempt to answer as many questions as you ask......

K?

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

60 years ago they would have said the same about interracial marriages....100 years ago, blacks and women voting...200 years ago NOT owning other humans as property...and on and on.

ROFLMNAO.

How sad is it that the Intellectually Less Fortunate can't find the means to understand the distinction between genetic minorities and DEVIANT BEHAVIOR which presents as MENTAL DISORDER.

The worst thing you can say about homosexuality is that its unproductive. The same thing could be said of celibacy, masturbation, sex between those on birth control, or old people fucking.

There's nothing inherently 'disturbed' or 'evil' about any of it.

 

[Pop23]

Was what marriage. Please try to make sense and:

In a discussion, attempt to answer as many questions as you ask......

K?

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

50 years? Try 15 years. It is hard to think of same sex marriage as a right since it didnt exist 15 years ago.

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And in 37 of 50 States, it includes one man and one man. ANd one woman and woman woman.

Marriage isn't inherent. We made it. We define it.

Yes, and when that definition includes siblings we are in dero chit

 

[Pop23]

Was what marriage. Please try to make sense and:

In a discussion, attempt to answer as many questions as you ask......

K?

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

60 years ago they would have said the same about interracial marriages....100 years ago, blacks and women voting...200 years ago NOT owning other humans as property...and on and on.

ROFLMNAO.

How sad is it that the Intellectually Less Fortunate can't find the means to understand the distinction between genetic minorities and DEVIANT BEHAVIOR which presents as MENTAL DISORDER.

The worst thing you can say about homosexuality is that its unproductive. The same thing could be said of celibacy, masturbation, sex between those on birth control, or old people fucking.

There's nothing inherently 'disturbed' or 'evil' about any of it.

How about same sex siblings? Same?

 

[Skylar]

My stand has been the same, since day one, on these things. They are STATES decisions and NOT the federal government.

Wrong.

Most of the government gifts you get for being married are federal ones.

Where in the Constitution is the power over Marriage given to the Federal Government? No where, it's not given to the Federal Government, or prohibited by the Constitution to the States, so it is a State issue. The Federal Government can give 'gifts' and privileges to married people, but it's not in the Federal Government's Constitutional power to decide what is or what is not a lawful marriage.

Most of these perverts today WANT the decision (hell, ALL decisions) to be made at the federal level rather than the State level. Just like 99.9% of the crap that the feds have taken away from the states- it's about control. Nothing more.

Its about rights. The rights of the individual cannot be violated by the States. If the States wish to do so, they run headlong into federal legislation and federal judicial review.

Conservatives typically put the 10th amendment above the 9th. Where anyone genuinely interested in individual liberty would put the 9th above the 10th.

 

[Skylar]

The case Rabbi linked. Did Germany allow siblings to marry? You are SURE it's going to happen here...without any evidence supporting your desire.

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

50 years? Try 15 years. It is hard to think of same sex marriage as a right since it didnt exist 15 years ago.

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And in 37 of 50 States, it includes one man and one man. ANd one woman and woman woman.

Marriage isn't inherent. We made it. We define it.

Yes, and when that definition includes siblings we are in dero chit

How about something relevant to our discussion. You're obsession with incest isn't.

 

[Pop23]

Lol, 50 years ago anyone thinking same sex couples could marry would be thrown in a looney bin.

Lmao

50 years? Try 15 years. It is hard to think of same sex marriage as a right since it didnt exist 15 years ago.

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And in 37 of 50 States, it includes one man and one man. ANd one woman and woman woman.

Marriage isn't inherent. We made it. We define it.

Yes, and when that definition includes siblings we are in dero chit

How about something relevant to our discussion. You're obsession with incest isn't.

Answering your post isn't?

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I don't care if homos get married in their fag weddings as long as they don't do it in front of my house.

 

[Pop23]

50 years? Try 15 years. It is hard to think of same sex marriage as a right since it didnt exist 15 years ago.

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And in 37 of 50 States, it includes one man and one man. ANd one woman and woman woman.

Marriage isn't inherent. We made it. We define it.

Yes, and when that definition includes siblings we are in dero chit

How about something relevant to our discussion. You're obsession with incest isn't.

Answering your post isn't?

Or is making it what we (as in you) say it is irrelevant also?

 

[Skylar]

50 years? Try 15 years. It is hard to think of same sex marriage as a right since it didnt exist 15 years ago.

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And in 37 of 50 States, it includes one man and one man. ANd one woman and woman woman.

Marriage isn't inherent. We made it. We define it.

Yes, and when that definition includes siblings we are in dero chit

How about something relevant to our discussion. You're obsession with incest isn't.

Answering your post isn't?

Not when you start babbling about incest, no.

I take this as a good sign. If your argument against same sex marriage had merit, you wouldn't have needed to abandon any discussion of it.

 

[Pop23]

That's because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And in 37 of 50 States, it includes one man and one man. ANd one woman and woman woman.

Marriage isn't inherent. We made it. We define it.

Yes, and when that definition includes siblings we are in dero chit

How about something relevant to our discussion. You're obsession with incest isn't.

Answering your post isn't?

Not when you start babbling about incest, no.

I take this as a good sign. If your argument against same sex marriage had merit, you wouldn't have needed to abandon any discussion of it.

Sidestepping again skylar?

My argument MUST be awesome as not you, seawytch, Bodey or any of the SSM crowd have attempted to address it.



Because you can't!

That's the problem with a paradox, isn't it?

 

[Skylar]

Marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And in 37 of 50 States, it includes one man and one man. ANd one woman and woman woman.

Marriage isn't inherent. We made it. We define it.

Yes, and when that definition includes siblings we are in dero chit

How about something relevant to our discussion. You're obsession with incest isn't.

Answering your post isn't?

Not when you start babbling about incest, no.

I take this as a good sign. If your argument against same sex marriage had merit, you wouldn't have needed to abandon any discussion of it.

Sidestepping again skylar?

My argument MUST be awesome as not you, seawytch, Bodey or any of the SSM crowd have attempted to address it.



Because you can't!

That's the problem with a paradox, isn't it?

Yawning.....still won't address the topic, huh? When you're willing to discuss same sex marriage or the case being heard by the USSC, I'll be around.

 

[Pop23]

Yes, and when that definition includes siblings we are in dero chit

How about something relevant to our discussion. You're obsession with incest isn't.

Answering your post isn't?

Not when you start babbling about incest, no.

I take this as a good sign. If your argument against same sex marriage had merit, you wouldn't have needed to abandon any discussion of it.

Sidestepping again skylar?

My argument MUST be awesome as not you, seawytch, Bodey or any of the SSM crowd have attempted to address it.



Because you can't!

That's the problem with a paradox, isn't it?

Yawning.....still won't address the topic, huh? When you're willing to discuss same sex marriage or the case being heard by the USSC, I'll be around.

Ohhhhh now it's same sex marriage, just a minute ago it was gay marriage.

Make up your freaking mind!

 

[Skylar]

How about something relevant to our discussion. You're obsession with incest isn't.

Answering your post isn't?

Not when you start babbling about incest, no.

I take this as a good sign. If your argument against same sex marriage had merit, you wouldn't have needed to abandon any discussion of it.

Sidestepping again skylar?

My argument MUST be awesome as not you, seawytch, Bodey or any of the SSM crowd have attempted to address it.



Because you can't!

That's the problem with a paradox, isn't it?

Yawning.....still won't address the topic, huh? When you're willing to discuss same sex marriage or the case being heard by the USSC, I'll be around.

Ohhhhh now it's same sex marriage, just a minute ago it was gay marriage.

Make up your freaking mind!

Laughing.....another red herring?

When you're ready to discuss gay marriage, join us. But its clear you've already abandoned that topic.....and run.

Shrugs....keep running.