Scott Walker: I Took On Unions, I Can Take On ISIS

whacked out conspiracy theories...this is no theory my wing nut this is documented fact...Ronald"depend undergarment" Reagan traded arms for hostages with the Ayatollah

No, he sold them weapons at four times the cost in order to get their cooperation to free hostages. That's not trading arms for hostages. That's selling them arms as a matter of policy.

And here's the gag. The reason why the Iran-Iraq War went on as long as it did was that most of the world kept selling Saddam and the Ayatollahs weapons as long as they had the oil money to pay for them. China, Russia and France just saw weapons sales as commerce. We tried to see weapons sales as buying us influence.
OK here is Ronald in his own words...

arms-for-hostages.gif




he delayed the release of the hostages in Iran by promising the Ayatollahs a better deal and he delivered

Without Reagan's Treason, Iran Would Not Be a Problem

the American Embassy in Tehran.

Bani-Sadr was a moderate and, as he explained in an editorial for The Christian Science Monitor earlier this year, had successfully run for President on the popular position of releasing the hostages:

"I openly opposed the hostage-taking throughout the election campaign.... I won the election with over 76 percent of the vote.... Other candidates also were openly against hostage-taking, and overall, 96 percent of votes in that election were given to candidates who were against it [hostage-taking]."

Carter was confident that with Bani-Sadr's help, he could end the embarrassing hostage crisis that had been a thorn in his political side ever since it began in November of 1979.

But Carter underestimated the lengths his opponent in the 1980 Presidential election, California Governor Ronald Reagan, would go to screw him over.


Behind Carter's back, the Reagan campaign worked out a deal with the leader of Iran's radical faction - Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini - to keep the hostages in captivity until after the 1980 Presidential election.

This was nothing short of treason. The Reagan campaign's secret negotiations with Khomeini - the so-called "October Surprise" - sabotaged Carter and Bani-Sadr's attempts to free the hostages. And as Bani-Sadr told The Christian Science Monitor in March of this year, they most certainly "tipped the results of the [1980] election in Reagan's favor."
 
36 Reasons Why You Should Thank a Union
  • Weekends
  • All Breaks at Work, including your Lunch Breaks
  • Paid Vacation
  • FMLA
  • Sick Leave
  • Social Security
  • Minimum Wage
  • Civil Rights Act/Title VII (Prohibits Employer Discrimination)
  • 8-Hour Work Day
  • Overtime Pay
  • Child Labor Laws
  • Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSHA)
  • 40 Hour Work Week
  • Worker's Compensation (Worker's Comp)
  • Unemployment Insurance
  • Pensions
  • Workplace Safety Standards and Regulations
  • Employer Health Care Insurance
  • Collective Bargaining Rights for Employees
  • Wrongful Termination Laws
  • Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
  • Whistleblower Protection Laws
  • Employee Polygraph Protect Act (Prohibits Employer from using a lie detector test on an employee)
  • Veteran's Employment and Training Services (VETS)
  • Compensation increases and Evaluations (Raises)
  • Sexual Harassment Laws
  • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • Holiday Pay
  • Employer Dental, Life, and Vision Insurance
  • Privacy Rights
  • Pregnancy and Parental Leave
  • Military Leave
  • The Right to Strike
  • Public Education for Children
  • Equal Pay Acts of 1963 & 2011 (Requires employers pay men and women equally for the same amount of work)
  • Laws Ending Sweatshops in the United States
Greater New Orleans AFL-CIO - Thank a Union 36 Ways Unions Have Improved Your Life

I've worked both sides of the fence in my lifetime. There needs to be a reasonable balance between labor and management. Germany is a good example where they work well together.

IOW, unions are a victim of their own success. Everything they've fought for is now law, but they're acting like it's still 1952.
If you don't continue to protect these rights, you will lose them. It is the same thing with democracy: if you don't vote, if you don't continue to protect your democratic rights, you will lose them.

There's a difference between protecting what is gained and fighting to get it in the first place.
Not really.
 
Y'know....maybe Walker could take on ISIS. Maybe he couldn't.

But the one thing we know for certain:

Obama WON'T
send your loved ones to fight ISIS bro...if Brainless43 had not invaded Iraq there would be no ISIS
If obama Didn't have a premature Ejaculation from Iraq we Wouldn't of had ISIS , you fool .
Interestingly, people voted for him because he promised to get us out of Iraq. In fact, anything less than staying there 20 or more years would have been premature. And then, you'd be vilifying him for staying there. As far as Republicans are concerned, it doesn't matter what Obama does, you will find it a fault. Whatever he does, you will say it is the wrong thing. So, it really doesn't matter what you criticize him for: you've lost all credibility in criticizing him because you criticize EVERYTHING he does, regardless.
That is untrue. Republicans have supported Obama's move against ISIS, criticizing them only because they arent foreceful enough. Republicans voted to confirm his choice fo SecDef and Attorney General.
No, the GOP is opposed to Obama's stupid failed policies. And that's virtually all of them. He claimed credit for getting us out of Iraq. Until it became clear that was a terrible idea (something his own advisors told him). Then he claimed it was Bush's fault and he had nothing to do with it.

The people wanted out of Iraq, now you run it a few times in your head and explain any move that gets us out of Iraq and ISIS doesn't appear...

ISIS was created the day a GOP administration invaded and appointed a bunch of corrupt leaders. This could also have been avoided if they didn't disband the army..

You are complaining that the Dems are cleaning your crap up quick enough... Just like the economy which ye screwed up too...

As for Scott Walker, run the guy. We will be pissing ourselves laughing, he is a joke.

Lets stop messing with the clowns, Jeb is probably going to be elected because he is the only one with a realistic shot. Rabbi (and others) will vilify him until elected and then will back him... We know this game...
The simple choice to America is: Elect a GOP President and US will invade ISIS and Iran. This will cost Trillions and eventually bankrupt America.
It is irrelevant what "the people" wanted What matters is good policy. And Obama doesnt do good policy. He was warned by his own staff that leaving Iraq was a mistake. But he did it anyway.
The Dems have had 6 years to fix this economy. They failed. It is worse today than when Obama took office, as we are in a secular slow growth cycle, not a cyclical bump.
You are pissing yourselves over Scott Walker all right. Pissing yourselves because you're terrified of a smart man with a record of accomplishments. And all you've got is a has-been radical liar with a vagina.
 
Republicans voted to confirm his choice fo SecDef and Attorney General.
>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<
something they never should have done.., both of them are unfit to serve as ditch diggers. just my OPINION. :up:
No, Carter is actually well qualified for the job. He appears to be a solid pick. Now the question is how long he will last after Obama throws him under the bus,like every other SecDef he's had.
 
...you criticize EVERYTHING he does, regardless.
>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<
name one fucking thing that muslime commie mulatto son-of-a-bitch has done that is GOOD for America.........,




i am waiting.....
You're an idiot. That has been posted multiple times on this board. If you don't know, look it up. It is published online that he has accomplished a great deal, and, as well, he is not considered a failure by presidential historians, not by any means--he is about average, falls within the middle as far as rating presidents. History will probably record him as being average as far as presidents. Not great but not a failure, not a failure like GW Bush. If you don't know the specific things Obama has accomplished, I suggest you look it up yourself because it has been posted on this board multiple times.
 
OK here is Ronald in his own words...

No, that's how the newspapers portrayed it. The actual story is more complicated.

You see, the funny thing is, our policy in the middle east is the same no matter who is in office, Democrat or Republican. It's sticking our dicks into a hornet's nest and wondering why we get stung.

Was what Reagan did Stupid? Yes. So is what Carter did, what Clinton did, what the Bushes did, what Obama is doing and probably what Scott Walker will do when HE'S president.

But when you let the Zionists and the Oil Companies set our mid-east policy, you just to got to try to keep making sweet, sweet love to that Hornet's nest.
 
send your loved ones to fight ISIS bro...if Brainless43 had not invaded Iraq there would be no ISIS
If obama Didn't have a premature Ejaculation from Iraq we Wouldn't of had ISIS , you fool .
Interestingly, people voted for him because he promised to get us out of Iraq. In fact, anything less than staying there 20 or more years would have been premature. And then, you'd be vilifying him for staying there. As far as Republicans are concerned, it doesn't matter what Obama does, you will find it a fault. Whatever he does, you will say it is the wrong thing. So, it really doesn't matter what you criticize him for: you've lost all credibility in criticizing him because you criticize EVERYTHING he does, regardless.
That is untrue. Republicans have supported Obama's move against ISIS, criticizing them only because they arent foreceful enough. Republicans voted to confirm his choice fo SecDef and Attorney General.
No, the GOP is opposed to Obama's stupid failed policies. And that's virtually all of them. He claimed credit for getting us out of Iraq. Until it became clear that was a terrible idea (something his own advisors told him). Then he claimed it was Bush's fault and he had nothing to do with it.

The people wanted out of Iraq, now you run it a few times in your head and explain any move that gets us out of Iraq and ISIS doesn't appear...

ISIS was created the day a GOP administration invaded and appointed a bunch of corrupt leaders. This could also have been avoided if they didn't disband the army..

You are complaining that the Dems are cleaning your crap up quick enough... Just like the economy which ye screwed up too...

As for Scott Walker, run the guy. We will be pissing ourselves laughing, he is a joke.

Lets stop messing with the clowns, Jeb is probably going to be elected because he is the only one with a realistic shot. Rabbi (and others) will vilify him until elected and then will back him... We know this game...
The simple choice to America is: Elect a GOP President and US will invade ISIS and Iran. This will cost Trillions and eventually bankrupt America.
It is irrelevant what "the people" wanted What matters is good policy. And Obama doesnt do good policy. He was warned by his own staff that leaving Iraq was a mistake. But he did it anyway.
The Dems have had 6 years to fix this economy. They failed. It is worse today than when Obama took office, as we are in a secular slow growth cycle, not a cyclical bump.
You are pissing yourselves over Scott Walker all right. Pissing yourselves because you're terrified of a smart man with a record of accomplishments. And all you've got is a has-been radical liar with a vagina.
throneoflies.png
 
...you criticize EVERYTHING he does, regardless.
>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<
name one fucking thing that muslime commie mulatto son-of-a-bitch has done that is GOOD for America.........,




i am waiting.....
You're an idiot. That has been posted multiple times on this board. If you don't know, look it up. It is published online that he has accomplished a great deal, and, as well, he is not considered a failure by presidential historians, not by any means--he is about average, falls within someone where in the middle as far as rating presidents. History will probably record him as being average as far as presidents. Not great but not a failure, a failure like GW Bush. If you don't know the specific things Obama has accomplished, I suggest you look it up yourself because it has been posted on this board multiple times.
Wow he got out of bed and tied his shoes on his own! Big accomplishment! He signed legislation passed by a solidly Democrat Congress! Big Accomplishment! He is highly rated by leftist historians who are afraid to be called racists. Big Accomplishment!
No, the facts are he is the worst president in US history. His administration is the most corrupt ever. His foreign policy is a joke and our allies and enemies both know it. He has produced the worst economy since WW2. These are facts.
 
OK here is Ronald in his own words...

No, that's how the newspapers portrayed it. The actual story is more complicated.

You see, the funny thing is, our policy in the middle east is the same no matter who is in office, Democrat or Republican. It's sticking our dicks into a hornet's nest and wondering why we get stung.

Was what Reagan did Stupid? Yes. So is what Carter did, what Clinton did, what the Bushes did, what Obama is doing and probably what Scott Walker will do when HE'S president.

But when you let the Zionists and the Oil Companies set our mid-east policy, you just to got to try to keep making sweet, sweet love to that Hornet's nest.
Fk you you are just bloviating the mother fucker Ronald Reagan is a traitor and a criminal ....and his being dead is a great thing...
 
Y'know....maybe Walker could take on ISIS. Maybe he couldn't.

But the one thing we know for certain:

Obama WON'T
send your loved ones to fight ISIS bro...if Brainless43 had not invaded Iraq there would be no ISIS
Yea, we know your yellow back wont enlist, but we all know you love to cash those welfare checks.
You are just a blow hard yellow belly war monger as long as others die
Yea we all know who wears the skirt here , bitch
 
he delayed the release of the hostages in Iran by promising the Ayatollahs a better deal and he delivered

the American Embassy in Tehran.

Bani-Sadr was a moderate and, as he explained in an editorial for The Christian Science Monitor earlier this year, had successfully run for President on the popular position of releasing the hostages:

"I openly opposed the hostage-taking throughout the election campaign.... I won the election with over 76 percent of the vote.... Other candidates also were openly against hostage-taking, and overall, 96 percent of votes in that election were given to candidates who were against it [hostage-taking]."

Now, guy, you had maybe a legit point that trading arms for help in releasing hostages was a bad idea.

But then you went into crazy-land with the "October Surprise" conspiracy theory, which really is the kind of nutbaggery like Benghazi Conspiracy theories and 9/11 Truthers.

Even the liberal Politico states this is bunk.

Reagan s October Surprise is Still Getting Debunked - The Daily Beast
 
Y'know....maybe Walker could take on ISIS. Maybe he couldn't.

But the one thing we know for certain:

Obama WON'T
send your loved ones to fight ISIS bro...if Brainless43 had not invaded Iraq there would be no ISIS
Yea, we know your yellow back wont enlist, but we all know you love to cash those welfare checks.
You are just a blow hard yellow belly war monger as long as others die
Yea we all know who wears the skirt here , bitch
Bear you are a physical coward a yellow belly and a punk...Fk you asshole ... I am laughing at you
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top