Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The media is not telling you about all the very credible scientists that disagree, so you are not aware of them apparently. Second, the media you use must not tell you about the flaws with their modeling.How do you live with yourself being such a deeply dishonest person? Like how do you reconcile that when you lay down at night to sleep? You know as well as I what the vast, vast majority of scientists are saying about the climate. If anybody is corrupt and lying it is the handful of people desperately trying to make your propaganda websites credible.
Earth could become an uninhabitable HELL, study shows
Earth could look like Venus due to the 'runaway greenhouse effect' - a dramatic escalation in temperatures, report scientists at the University of Geneva.www.dailymail.co.uk
The linked story talks about this simulation. The reason I am posting about it here is to point out what is going on here. These "climate scientists" have been pulling stunts like this for years now. They run these concocted computer models that are dependent upon multiple variables, many combinations of which either do not occur in nature or are highly unlikely to occur. Some of their modeling runs mathematical equations that work going forward, but do not work in reverse. For example, 10 plus 10 equals 20. 20 minus 10 equals 10. But in the climate scientology world, where ongoing life-and-death crisis is necessary to keep the funding flowing, 10 plus 10 equals 20, but 20 minus 10 may equal 3. This is the sort of end-result focused, corrupt modeling that the "climate scientists" are dealing with. They seemingly attempt to justify such an unscientific approach with the rather base ethic of "Yeah, but what if it IS true?!? Then we are all going to die!!"
This "simulation" is dependent upon the equations and variables these "climate scientists" programmed. I mean, they could just as easily create a simulation of another ice age. It depends on who is writing the code in the modeling software. Why aren't people asking for independent evaluations of these models? I could create a modeling system on paper that determines for every cigar I smoke I get a sloppy hummer from Erin Burnett. That may be what I want to happen, but I can tell you with a very high degree of certainty that it ain't gonna happen.
The purpose of this end of the world simulation is to keep people upset in order to (1) keep the money flowing to these half-assed scientists, because this is how they are getting paid; and (2) to further the neo-Marxist narratives that keep people on edge and falsely believing that every day they wake up on the precipice of death due to one of many non-existent crises.
How do you live with yourself being such a deeply dishonest person? Like how do you reconcile that when you lay down at night to sleep? You know as well as I what the vast, vast majority of scientists are saying about the climate. If anybody is corrupt and lying it is the handful of people desperately trying to make your propaganda websites credible.
stop driving ICE vehicles or we all die isn't irrational at all, no more gas stoves, no more coal plants no more anything cause the warmer's say so. haaahahahhahahhaa. Tell you what kitty, when you can post evidence of fking one thing, then come back to the board you fking scare tacticNeedless to say, you don't see anyone on the moral and rational side talking like that.
Instead of addressing what I said you instead simply label me a “denier” so you don’t have to. Then you proceed to parrot a narrative concocted for you.Yeah, yeah, the usual projection from the denier side. Their side constantly lies and fakes data, posters like the OP here fully support that, so they think everyone else has to be as corrupt and dishonest as they are themselves. They're so corrupt, they can't even imagine that another person might not be corrupt.
Deniers, we are not like you. We won't lie for money, or support those who do.
Follow the money. All of the corrupting bribe money flows to the denier side, so all of the fraud and garbage science comes from the denier side.
The honest scientists, any of them could double their salaries if they were willing to lie for the deniers. They don't. They reject denier bribe money, which gives them even more credibility.
You know why climate science has such credibility? Because it's been right with the predictions for decades now.
The denier side? They're all still pretty much universally predicting a new ice age tomorrow. They've been getting everything wrong for over 40 years now, hence the world rightfully classifies them as cult clowns.
He is one of those mush brained Gen X/Y douchebags, dumber than shit.How are you capable of breathing with your suffering from such profound stupidity?
I did address it. I pointed out it was all projection on your part.Instead of addressing what I said
No, you did not. You just spouted a narrative, which you most likely do not even understand. You are a parrot, and a toad - a parrot-toad.I did address it. I pointed out it was all projection on your part.
And you couldn't respond, because I was right.
Are you denying that your side has been a pack of bozos that has gotten every single thing wrong for 40 years now?
Are you denying just how stellar the climate predictions have been?
You are, which is why you're correctly labeled as a denier. You deny basic reality, so you are a denier.
They won't have to wait long. I've got one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel.they want you dead is their solution. haven't you all figured it out yet? take this, take that, stop this stop that?
Mamooth was a just a fucking parrot, and dumber and jam shit.stop driving ICE vehicles or we all die isn't irrational at all, no more gas stoves, no more coal plants no more anything cause the warmer's say so. haaahahahhahahhaa. Tell you what kitty, when you can post evidence of fking one thing, then come back to the board you fking scare tactic
No, you did not. You just spouted a narrative, which you most likely do not even understand. You are a parrot, and a toad - a parrot-toad.
All that they are doing is presenting a theory that if temperature rises then this is what will happen based on what is known.Earth could become an uninhabitable HELL, study shows
Earth could look like Venus due to the 'runaway greenhouse effect' - a dramatic escalation in temperatures, report scientists at the University of Geneva.
The linked story talks about this simulation. The reason I am posting about it here is to point out what is going on here. These "climate scientists" have been pulling stunts like this for years now. They run these concocted computer models that are dependent upon multiple variables, many combinations of which either do not occur in nature or are highly unlikely to occur. Some of their modeling runs mathematical equations that work going forward, but do not work in reverse. For example, 10 plus 10 equals 20. 20 minus 10 equals 10. But in the climate scientology world, where ongoing life-and-death crisis is necessary to keep the funding flowing, 10 plus 10 equals 20, but 20 minus 10 may equal 3. This is the sort of end-result focused, corrupt modeling that the "climate scientists" are dealing with. They seemingly attempt to justify such an unscientific approach with the rather base ethic of "Yeah, but what if it IS true?!? Then we are all going to die!!"
This "simulation" is dependent upon the equations and variables these "climate scientists" programmed. I mean, they could just as easily create a simulation of another ice age. It depends on who is writing the code in the modeling software. Why aren't people asking for independent evaluations of these models? I could create a modeling system on paper that determines for every cigar I smoke I get a sloppy hummer from Erin Burnett. That may be what I want to happen, but I can tell you with a very high degree of certainty that it ain't gonna happen.
The purpose of this end of the world simulation is to keep people upset in order to (1) keep the money flowing to these half-assed scientists, because this is how they are getting paid; and (2) to further the neo-Marxist narratives that keep people on edge and falsely believing that every day they wake up on the precipice of death due to one of many non-existent crises.
The collective stupidity of people like you is actually a detriment to our entire species. Humanity would be better off if you didn't exist.The media is not telling you about all the very credible scientists that disagree, so you are not aware of them apparently. Second, the media you use must not tell you about the flaws with their modeling.
Forget about me, how do YOU sleep at night with the leftist media’s hand up your ass, you piece of shit?
Earth could become an uninhabitable HELL, study shows
Earth could look like Venus due to the 'runaway greenhouse effect' - a dramatic escalation in temperatures, report scientists at the University of Geneva.
The linked story talks about this simulation. The reason I am posting about it here is to point out what is going on here. These "climate scientists" have been pulling stunts like this for years now. They run these concocted computer models that are dependent upon multiple variables, many combinations of which either do not occur in nature or are highly unlikely to occur. Some of their modeling runs mathematical equations that work going forward, but do not work in reverse. For example, 10 plus 10 equals 20. 20 minus 10 equals 10. But in the climate scientology world, where ongoing life-and-death crisis is necessary to keep the funding flowing, 10 plus 10 equals 20, but 20 minus 10 may equal 3. This is the sort of end-result focused, corrupt modeling that the "climate scientists" are dealing with. They seemingly attempt to justify such an unscientific approach with the rather base ethic of "Yeah, but what if it IS true?!? Then we are all going to die!!"
This "simulation" is dependent upon the equations and variables these "climate scientists" programmed. I mean, they could just as easily create a simulation of another ice age. It depends on who is writing the code in the modeling software. Why aren't people asking for independent evaluations of these models? I could create a modeling system on paper that determines for every cigar I smoke I get a sloppy hummer from Erin Burnett. That may be what I want to happen, but I can tell you with a very high degree of certainty that it ain't gonna happen.
The purpose of this end of the world simulation is to keep people upset in order to (1) keep the money flowing to these half-assed scientists, because this is how they are getting paid; and (2) to further the neo-Marxist narratives that keep people on edge and falsely believing that every day they wake up on the precipice of death due to one of many non-existent crises.
You're some old loser that lives on an internet forum and pretends to be some kind of authority on science.How are you capable of breathing with your suffering from such profound stupidity?
You are certainly are one of the best Gullibles we have here and I hope you are free and avaiable for any future Gullibility events against other sites or outside organisations looking for a fight .How do you live with yourself being such a deeply dishonest person? Like how do you reconcile that when you lay down at night to sleep? You know as well as I what the vast, vast majority of scientists are saying about the climate. If anybody is corrupt and lying it is the handful of people desperately trying to make your propaganda websites credible.
You can barely accomplish typing something intelligible. Nobody wants your opinion, retard.You are certainly are one of the best Gullibles we have here and I hope you are free and avaiable for any future Gullibility events against other sites or outside organisations looking for a fight .
Just love your conviction and I assume you are clear in terms of drugs taking and blood doping .
It has always been a good argument if the authority is actually an authority. Scientists are the authority on science. You morons don't actually understand how debate and logical fallacies work.
Here you are!! Too fking funny as if you hold more weight than himYou're some old loser that lives on an internet forum and pretends to be some kind of authority on science.
