"Science Without Religion Is Lame"

Thanks so much for the historic and ionic pictures of earlier Democrats.
Christians no matter what ...


You don't know that they were Christians....

....but we both know that they were Democrats.
They were proclaiming Jesus saves ..it was a large clue


Once again we return to a central theme revealed in your posts.....and, one would hope that the day will come when you feel such guilt based on what is clearly a lack of education....

....that you actually read a book or two.

Cerainly some kind adult will aid you in obtaining a library card.


You see....the 'Christianity' of Democrat KKKers is of a variance with that of actual Christians.

Take for example the KKKer that Roosevelt chose as his first Supreme Court nominee.....

And, Hugo Black's anti-Catholic bias, which showed up in his actions on the Supreme Court:

"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"


KKK.....more Democrat than Christian.

Would that describe you, too?
 
Few mainstream scientists[ advocate the approaches taken by post-normal science, even among those who agree with the goals of Funtowicz and Ravetz, t
 
....that you actually read a book or two.
Gee I wonder why the Bible Belt and the Zone of Most recalcitrant and vicious slavery coincide...:badgrin:[



I bet you wonder about all sorts of things.

Slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship all coincide with Democrats in office.


Don't forget that Jim Crow was an example of Democrat liberal big government in action.

The most popular Democrat former President has a life-long record of same.....and Democrats may very well put him right back in the White House.
 
Few mainstream scientists[ advocate the approaches taken by post-normal science, even among those who agree with the goals of Funtowicz and Ravetz, t



Mainstream as different from Liberal.
Mainstream means "Science" ...97% AGW


"No global warming at all for 18 years 9 months – a new record – The Pause lengthens again – just in time for UN Summit in Paris"
No global warming at all for 18 years 9 months – a new record - The Pause lengthens again – just in time for UN Summit in Paris


No real scientist supports the scam.
 
[

Slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship all coincide with Democrats in office.

.
594x334
tumblr_inline_mp0d5cK8ij1qz4rgp.gif
 
There are certain individuals, 'scientists,' who have either learned, or been born with a way of disconnecting their curiosity from any sense of responsibility.

(Better look that word up, Liberals)
aha I thought you were a little "post Normal " :badgrin:


You've altered the actual quote.....

It was this:

"¬Thus, we have a doctrine of mandated intellectual mendacity.
(Better look that word up, Liberals)"


I hope you looked it up.
 
There are certain individuals, 'scientists,' who have either learned, or been born with a way of disconnecting their curiosity from any sense of responsibility.

(Better look that word up, Liberals)
aha I thought you were a little "post Normal " :badgrin:


You've altered the actual quote.....

It was this:

"¬Thus, we have a doctrine of mandated intellectual mendacity.
(Better look that word up, Liberals)"


I hope you looked it up.
mandated intellectual mendacity.= Tea Billy Post Normal Science :badgrin:
 
Every part of the Earth's climate system has continued warming since 1998, with 2015 shattering temperature records.
What has global warming done since 1998?
Climate Myth...
It hasn't warmed since 1998
For the years 1998-2005, temperature did not increase. This period coincides with society's continued pumping of more CO2 into the atmosphere. (Bob Carter)

Even if we ignore long term trends and just look at the record-breakers, 2015, 2014, 2010, and 2005 were hotter than 1998.

The myth of no warming since 1998 was based on the satellite record estimates of the temperature of the atmosphere. However, as discussed in the video below by Peter Sinclair, even that argument is no longer accurate. The satellites show warming since 1998 too.
 
11. The views that include abortion, harvesting organs, eugenics, and other ways of disposing of human beings, evolved in several directions, first substituting the image of a self-creating dynamo for the universe, operating by automatic, undirected physical forces: never mind the contradictory nature of the concept, it served the need of eliminating a Creator. And with very little tweaking, both nature and the body became “ essentially amoral mechanisms to be used to whatever private ends we have.” Roger Lundin, “The Culture of Interpretation: Christian Faith and the Postmodern World,” p. 102.



a. "Remember, for Progressives, postmodern relativism is the glue that binds all of their myths." Berezow and Campbell, "Science Left Behind."

b. 'And, since postmodern relativism puts the soft social sciences on the same level as hard science….there is little value to objective research.'
Ibid.



12. 'One might think that the Holocaust would above all other events give the scientific atheist pause. Hitler’s Germany was a technologically sophisticated secular society, and Nazism itself, as party propagandists never tired of stressing, was “motivated by an ethic that prided itself on being scientific.” The words are those of the historian Richard Weikart, who in his treatise From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany made clear what anyone capable of reading the German sources already knew: A sinister current of influence ran from Darwin’s theory of evolution to Hitler’s policy of extermination.

A generation of German biologists had read Darwin and concluded that competition between species was reflected in human affairs by competition between races. These observations find no echo at all in the literature of scientific atheism.'
Berlinski, Op. Cit.
 
The French Revolution and the Enlightenment set the tone.
Society was to be based, not on religion and morality, but on science and reason.
An unmitigated failure......

"If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century."
French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror



13. Princeton philosopher Richard Rorty noted the change in authorship of morality: “The West has cobbled together, in the course of the last two hundred years, a specifically secularist moral tradition — one that regards the free consensus of the citizens of a democratic society, rather then the Divine Will, as the source of moral imperatives.”
Last Words from Richard Rorty | The Progressive


While Rorty considered this a great advance, consider how this fits the actions of Nazi Germany, in tune with its free consensus.



14.'Ask any well-educated person to identify the educational backgrounds of the Nazi mass murderers who made up the einsatzgruppen, the mobile killing units that massacred Jews and anti-Nazi dissidents before the gas chambers were invented. It is a safe bet that most would respond that the vast majority of einsatzgruppen members were poorly educated. In fact, however, of the four einsatzgruppen sent into Russia, for example, "Three of the four commanders held a doctorate, whilst one was a double Ph.D." (HolocaustResearchProject.org).





"Science Without Religion Is Lame"

Clearly, education by itself is no anodyne.
(Better look that up, Liberals)
 
Can you name any Monarch who slaughtered over 100 million of his/her own citizens?
100 million??

The slaughter in Russia was bad enough without the drastically overblown numbers you throw out. Really, how dishonest. Researchers are finding the first numbers were too high but most have stated that the actual deaths attributed to Stalin is around 9 million which includes German POWs.
 
Can you name any Monarch who slaughtered over 100 million of his/her own citizens?
100 million??

The slaughter in Russia was bad enough without the drastically overblown numbers you throw out. Really, how dishonest. Researchers are finding the first numbers were too high but most have stated that the actual deaths attributed to Stalin is around 9 million which includes German POWs.


False.

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000

#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium
 

Forum List

Back
Top