- May 20, 2009
- 144,587
- 67,031
- 2,330
It appears that JGalt and yourself missed this: "biology is not as straightforward as the proposal suggests. By some estimates, as many as one in 100 people have differences or disorders of sex development, such as hormonal conditions, genetic changes or anatomical ambiguities, some of which mean that their genitalia cannot clearly be classified as male or female."I wonder if this kind of stuff occurred in the last days of the Roman Empire too.
Science journal Nature finds assigning gender by the genitals one is born with 'has no foundation in science'
Now the editorial goes on and lists arguments other than scientific ones, which waters it all down. But facts matter
So men can say, "my uterus, my choice!" and decide they can bear a child.
This new learning amazes me!