Lonestar_logic
Republic of Texas
- May 13, 2009
- 24,539
- 2,233
- 205
Beck was at the start of the birther movement. He and Limp Idiot.
Prove it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Beck was at the start of the birther movement. He and Limp Idiot.
Brokeback No Load, please don't take it personal.
Look at it this way........Blech is a birther, as well as someone who believes Obama is a Muslim. Now, you guys are supporters of Blech, so that means (generally) that you agree with him.
Blech thinks Obama isn't a US Citizen. Do you?
Blech thinks Obama is a Muslim. Do you?
Blech thinks Obama has no claim to the Presidency. Do you?
Just answer the questions dude.
Beck was at the start of the birther movement. He and Limp Idiot.
Beck was at the start of the birther movement. He and Limp Idiot.
Prove it.
Brokeback No Load, please don't take it personal.
Look at it this way........Blech is a birther, as well as someone who believes Obama is a Muslim. Now, you guys are supporters of Blech, so that means (generally) that you agree with him.
Blech thinks Obama isn't a US Citizen. Do you?
Blech thinks Obama is a Muslim. Do you?
Blech thinks Obama has no claim to the Presidency. Do you?
Just answer the questions dude.
Blech is a birther. What are you 10 years old? Beck is entitled to his opinion, sadly so are you.
I'll answer your childish questions as soon as you show me the quotes from Beck himself addressing each claim.
But first you should check out this link....GOP 12: Beck slams birther conspiracy: "Flat-earthers"
Make sure you click the link to his radio show where you can hear Beck in his own words.
What I find puzzling about Beck is the dumbing down of the republican party..
The party used to be represented by the likes of William F Buckley and George Will. Now the face of the party is Limbaugh, Beck and Hannity.
Sorry... but it seems you reach a point where you are defined by the company you keep
Beck was at the start of the birther movement. He and Limp Idiot.
Prove it.
No, they have to prove they weren't. Sorry, the accusation is already out there and we all know how that works.
What I find puzzling about Beck is the dumbing down of the republican party..
The party used to be represented by the likes of William F Buckley and George Will. Now the face of the party is Limbaugh, Beck and Hannity.
Sorry... but it seems you reach a point where you are defined by the company you keep
With this a bit laterWhat I find puzzling about Beck is the dumbing down of the republican party..
....
[Emphasis added]No, they have to prove they weren't. Sorry, the accusation is already out there and we all know how that works.
What I find puzzling about Beck is the dumbing down of the republican party..
The party used to be represented by the likes of William F Buckley and George Will. Now the face of the party is Limbaugh, Beck and Hannity.
Sorry... but it seems you reach a point where you are defined by the company you keep
Couldn't have been said better.
That glaring bullet seems to have been missedI don't get how people miss this.
You're calling it retarted that anyone is saying that Glen has to prove innocense, simply because he was accused.
No fucking shit it's retarted. He doesn't have to prove shit, simply because he was accused. That's the point you fuckin dummies.
GLEN accuses people of shit, AND THEN, states that since the accused don't re-but, they're guilty. Glen does this. That's the irony, that's the source of this being SATIRE.
Anyone in here calling people idiots for stating Glen needs to prove innocense totally missed it. Over their heads. Gone with the wind. All of that shit. Facepalm is right. wow.
I don't get how people miss this.
You're calling it retarted that anyone is saying that Glen has to prove innocense, simply because he was accused.
No fucking shit it's retarted. He doesn't have to prove shit, simply because he was accused. That's the point you fuckin dummies.
GLEN accuses people of shit, AND THEN, states that since the accused don't re-but, they're guilty. Glen does this. That's the irony, that's the source of this being SATIRE.
Anyone in here calling people idiots for stating Glen needs to prove innocense totally missed it. Over their heads. Gone with the wind. All of that shit. Facepalm is right. wow.
The irony is too sweet:With this a bit laterWhat I find puzzling about Beck is the dumbing down of the republican party..
....[Emphasis added]No, they have to prove they weren't. Sorry, the accusation is already out there and we all know how that works.
*facepalm*
Brokeback No Load, please don't take it personal.
Look at it this way........Blech is a birther, as well as someone who believes Obama is a Muslim. Now, you guys are supporters of Blech, so that means (generally) that you agree with him.
Blech thinks Obama isn't a US Citizen. Do you?
Blech thinks Obama is a Muslim. Do you?
Blech thinks Obama has no claim to the Presidency. Do you?
Just answer the questions dude.
Blech is a birther. What are you 10 years old? Beck is entitled to his opinion, sadly so are you.
I'll answer your childish questions as soon as you show me the quotes from Beck himself addressing each claim.
But first you should check out this link....GOP 12: Beck slams birther conspiracy: "Flat-earthers"
Make sure you click the link to his radio show where you can hear Beck in his own words.
What I find puzzling about Beck is the dumbing down of the republican party..
The party used to be represented by the likes of William F Buckley and George Will. Now the face of the party is Limbaugh, Beck and Hannity.
Sorry... but it seems you reach a point where you are defined by the company you keep
Well cogratulations on making your tactics (and those in this thread) look entirely hypocritical and/or entirely stupid. Neither option is one I would be proud of, but to each his own, eh?I don't get how people miss this.
You're calling it retarted that anyone is saying that Glen has to prove innocense, simply because he was accused.
No fucking shit it's retarted. He doesn't have to prove shit, simply because he was accused. That's the point you fuckin dummies.
GLEN accuses people of shit, AND THEN, states that since the accused don't re-but, they're guilty. Glen does this. That's the irony, that's the source of this being SATIRE.
Anyone in here calling people idiots for stating Glen needs to prove innocense totally missed it. Over their heads. Gone with the wind. All of that shit. Facepalm is right. wow.
Well cogratulations on making your tactics (and those in this thread) look entirely hypocritical and/or entirely stupid. Neither option is one I would be proud of, but to each his own, eh?
Well cogratulations on making your tactics (and those in this thread) look entirely hypocritical and/or entirely stupid. Neither option is one I would be proud of, but to each his own, eh?
Not quite. Using the tactic to point out the irony of how dumb it is, to create what we call satire, is not the same as using the tactic. I won't mud-sling, but I don't believe you're too dumb to know that, so there's no need for you to be a dick really.
Well cogratulations on making your tactics (and those in this thread) look entirely hypocritical and/or entirely stupid. Neither option is one I would be proud of, but to each his own, eh?
Not quite. Using the tactic to point out the irony of how dumb it is, to create what we call satire, is not the same as using the tactic. I won't mud-sling, but I don't believe you're too dumb to know that, so there's no need for you to be a dick really.
See, I beleive that you are bright enough to see it that way. But there is no doubt in my mind that others take this quite seriously. Some are seriously stupid. And there are others in this thread who have clearly stated their intent on being hypocritical.
I realize that there are idiots in the world and I realize that there are idiots who lack integrity - it's a given in any significant population. And all have a right to be an idiot.
Just like all have a right to be an idiot on the other side of that fence - to listen to Beck, Limbaugh, whoever - and take that seriously, as satire, or somewhere in the middle.
So, as my point has always been, what IS the point? It seems to me that two actions cancel each other out, so I'm wondering what the point of any of it is. Just to show that each side can be petty? I honestly don't know. Maybe you have an idea as you seem not so caught up in the emotions of it all. I mean, it's TV.
Well cogratulations on making your tactics (and those in this thread) look entirely hypocritical and/or entirely stupid. Neither option is one I would be proud of, but to each his own, eh?
Not quite. Using the tactic to point out the irony of how dumb it is, to create what we call satire, is not the same as using the tactic. I won't mud-sling, but I don't believe you're too dumb to know that, so there's no need for you to be a dick really.
See, I beleive that you are bright enough to see it that way. But there is no doubt in my mind that others take this quite seriously. Some are seriously stupid. And there are others in this thread who have clearly stated their intent on being hypocritical.
I realize that there are idiots in the world and I realize that there are idiots who lack integrity - it's a given in any significant population. And all have a right to be an idiot.
Just like all have a right to be an idiot on the other side of that fence - to listen to Beck, Limbaugh, whoever - and take that seriously, as satire, or somewhere in the middle.
So, as my point has always been, what IS the point? It seems to me that two actions cancel each other out, so I'm wondering what the point of any of it is. Just to show that each side can be petty? I honestly don't know. Maybe you have an idea as you seem not so caught up in the emotions of it all. I mean, it's TV.
I don't get how people miss this.
You're calling it retarted that anyone is saying that Glen has to prove innocense, simply because he was accused.
No fucking shit it's retarted. He doesn't have to prove shit, simply because he was accused. That's the point you fuckin dummies.
GLEN accuses people of shit, AND THEN, states that since the accused don't re-but, they're guilty. Glen does this. That's the irony, that's the source of this being SATIRE.
Anyone in here calling people idiots for stating Glen needs to prove innocense totally missed it. Over their heads. Gone with the wind. All of that shit. Facepalm is right. wow.