Saddam’s WMDs: The Left’s Iraq Lies Exposed

Hey, shit for brains, from the article you can't understand...

Although the damaged Bunker 13 at Muthanna contained thousands of sarin-filled rockets, the presence of leaking munitions and unstable propellant and explosive charges made it too hazardous for UNSCOM inspectors to enter. Because the rockets could not be recovered safely, Iraq declared the munitions in Bunker 13 as ‘destroyed in the Gulf War’ and they were not included in the inventory of chemical weapons eliminated under UNSCOM supervision...........Saddam LIED, and the UN went along with the lie, as it was TOO DANGEROUS to inspect!

So they were sealed in concrete since 1994.

Yes, and? They are still operational!

Bullshit
 
WHO GIVES A SHIITE!!!!:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:

Apparently you do.

The civil war between sunnis and shiites have been going on for over a 1000 years . For something reason you want the US to spend money and placing more GI's in harms way in order to support radical shiites who are aligned with Iran.


.

Did I say that, or are you too fucking stupid to realize that those words were written by the author of that NEWS STORY.... How typical subversive, try to deflect from finding out there really was WMD in Iraq.

There were NO WMD's in Iraq.

But even if there were do you know who gave them to him? Are you familiar with one Donald Rumfilled?

th


.
 
AHLERT062314.jpg

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

The State Department and other U.S. government officials have revealed that ISIS now occupies the Al Muthanna Chemicals Weapons Complex. Al Muthanna was Saddam Hussein’s primary chemical weapons facility, and it is located less than 50 miles from Baghdad.

The Obama administration claims that the weapons in that facility, which include sarin, mustard gas, and nerve agent VX, manufactured to prosecute the war against Iran in the 1980s, do not pose a threat because they are old, contaminated and hard to move. “We do not believe that the complex contains CW materials of military value and it would be very difficult, if not impossible to safely move the materials,” said State Department spokeswxzoman Jen Psaki.

The administration’s dubious rationale is based on information provided by the Iraq Study Group, which was tasked with finding WMDs in the war’s aftermath. They found the chemical weapons at Al Muthanna, but they determined that both Iraq wars and inspections by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) had successfully dismantled the facility, and that the remaining chemical weapons were rendered useless and sealed in bunkers. The report called the weapons facility “a wasteland full of destroyed chemical munitions, razed structures, and unusable war-ravaged facilities,” the 2004 report stated.

Saddam’s weapons stockpile, now potentially in the hands of Sunni radicals.......

Yet other sections of the same report were hardly reassuring. “Stockpiles of chemical munitions are still stored there,” it stated. “The most dangerous ones have been declared to the UN and are sealed in bunkers. Although declared, the bunkers’ contents have yet to be confirmed.” It added, “These areas of the compound pose a hazard to civilians and potential black-marketers.”

Another report paints an even more disturbing picture of the Muthanna facility. It warned that the number and status of Saddam’s sarin-filled rockets was unknown because facilities were not able to be inspected, leaving investigators only able to surmise about the weapons’ condition. Even in degraded conditions, the report said, these rockets still posed a proliferation risk:

Although the damaged Bunker 13 at Muthanna contained thousands of sarin-filled rockets, the presence of leaking munitions and unstable propellant and explosive charges made it too hazardous for UNSCOM inspectors to enter. Because the rockets could not be recovered safely, Iraq declared the munitions in Bunker 13 as ‘destroyed in the Gulf War’ and they were not included in the inventory of chemical weapons eliminated under UNSCOM supervision......

Saddam?s WMDs: The Left?s Iraq Lies Exposed

So, basically, you don' know anything.

And one we know there were no weapons. Because he. Didn't use any when we rolled into iraq,
 
AHLERT062314.jpg

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

The State Department and other U.S. government officials have revealed that ISIS now occupies the Al Muthanna Chemicals Weapons Complex. Al Muthanna was Saddam Hussein’s primary chemical weapons facility, and it is located less than 50 miles from Baghdad.

The Obama administration claims that the weapons in that facility, which include sarin, mustard gas, and nerve agent VX, manufactured to prosecute the war against Iran in the 1980s, do not pose a threat because they are old, contaminated and hard to move. “We do not believe that the complex contains CW materials of military value and it would be very difficult, if not impossible to safely move the materials,” said State Department spokeswxzoman Jen Psaki.

The administration’s dubious rationale is based on information provided by the Iraq Study Group, which was tasked with finding WMDs in the war’s aftermath. They found the chemical weapons at Al Muthanna, but they determined that both Iraq wars and inspections by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) had successfully dismantled the facility, and that the remaining chemical weapons were rendered useless and sealed in bunkers. The report called the weapons facility “a wasteland full of destroyed chemical munitions, razed structures, and unusable war-ravaged facilities,” the 2004 report stated.

Saddam’s weapons stockpile, now potentially in the hands of Sunni radicals.......

Yet other sections of the same report were hardly reassuring. “Stockpiles of chemical munitions are still stored there,” it stated. “The most dangerous ones have been declared to the UN and are sealed in bunkers. Although declared, the bunkers’ contents have yet to be confirmed.” It added, “These areas of the compound pose a hazard to civilians and potential black-marketers.”

Another report paints an even more disturbing picture of the Muthanna facility. It warned that the number and status of Saddam’s sarin-filled rockets was unknown because facilities were not able to be inspected, leaving investigators only able to surmise about the weapons’ condition. Even in degraded conditions, the report said, these rockets still posed a proliferation risk:

Although the damaged Bunker 13 at Muthanna contained thousands of sarin-filled rockets, the presence of leaking munitions and unstable propellant and explosive charges made it too hazardous for UNSCOM inspectors to enter. Because the rockets could not be recovered safely, Iraq declared the munitions in Bunker 13 as ‘destroyed in the Gulf War’ and they were not included in the inventory of chemical weapons eliminated under UNSCOM supervision......

Saddam?s WMDs: The Left?s Iraq Lies Exposed

So, basically, you don' know anything.

And one we know there were no weapons. Because he. Didn't use any when we rolled into iraq,

He ran like a BUG down a spider hole....how long did that take to find the little dick..tator?.... Yup, those are LOLLIPOPS in that picture, and you are the tooth fairy!
 
Of all the attacks against American soldiers in Iraq, how many of those attacks involved WMD? Zero. Why? Because there weren't any WMD in Iraq.

You lost. Bush lost. The GOP lost. All you can do is try to blame Obama.

Bush lost. You lost. Give up.
 
BUMP, for the FAGERALS to piss and moan after FINALLY being shown that there was WMD still left in Iraq, that were HIDDEN by Saddam and the feckless U.N. inspectors that didn't do their jobs!....And I must say, U.S. military FAILED to inspect EVERYTHING as they should have, but who would have expected the U.N. inspectors from FUCKING UP!
 
Why did Bush leave so many WMD in Iraq if that was the reason for invading?

How could Bush miss so many WMD for so long? Didn't anyone think to check in Saddam's old chemical weapons plants for chemical weapons? How much does Bush suck?

This is like looking for sugar and never looking in the big container labled "Sugar"...and giving that guy a pass :lol:
 
Why did Bush leave so many WMD in Iraq if that was the reason for invading?

How could Bush miss so many WMD for so long? Didn't anyone think to check in Saddam's old chemical weapons plants for chemical weapons? How much does Bush suck?

This is like looking for sugar and never looking in the big container labled "Sugar"...and giving that guy a pass :lol:

Never fails to amaze me the 2 digit IQ left NEVER gets the gist of the story, always spins, diverts, or admits that they were WRONG! Saddam lied, the U.N. inspectors FAILED to check, and the military continued to buy the lie UNTIL TERRORISTS now have FULL ACCESS to it.... You do belong to MENSA, don't you?:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:
 
This has to be the worst defense of the Bush administration ever.

The reason that those "WMD" were left in that bunker is because they are not WMD, but if those contaminated canisters are a threat to the public, and George W. Bush invaded Iraq to disarm WMD and still left those "WMD" there, then George W. Bush is even more incompetent than we had previously known.

"The military didn't know about them", my ass. George W. Bush was Commander-in-Chief of the US military. If the military didn't know about Saddam's WMD then George W. Bush didn't know, either. But we Donald Rumsfeld on video saying, "We know where they are. They're in the area around Baghdad and east, south, west and north somewhat."

Why didn't Donald Rumsfeld tell George W. Bush where Saddam's WMD were?

No one thought that the Bush administration could make themselves look even more incompetent, but here we are.
 
This has to be the worst defense of the Bush administration ever.

The reason that those "WMD" were left in that bunker is because they are not WMD, but if those contaminated canisters are a threat to the public, and George W. Bush invaded Iraq to disarm WMD and still left those "WMD" there, then George W. Bush is even more incompetent than we had previously known.

"The military didn't know about them", my ass. George W. Bush was Commander-in-Chief of the US military. If the military didn't know about Saddam's WMD then George W. Bush didn't know, either. But we Donald Rumsfeld on video saying, "We know where they are. They're in the area around Baghdad and east, south, west and north somewhat."

Why didn't Donald Rumsfeld tell George W. Bush where Saddam's WMD were?

No one thought that the Bush administration could make themselves look even more incompetent, but here we are.

I see you're still looking for a CLUE!

large_head_up_your_ass.jpg
 
Of course the far left forgets that is was Carter that got us involved with Saddam and that Saddam is an honorary citizen of Detroit.

Hey Kosh, tell me why blaming Bush for Iraq is bad but reaching back to Jimmy Carter is totes mcgoats :lol:
 
Canada Free Press? Holy shit...


apparently there's enough Canadian blood around here so why not? Canadians yapping about a President from another country ... leave that one to the imagination eh ?
 
Of all the attacks against American soldiers in Iraq, how many of those attacks involved WMD? Zero. Why? Because there weren't any WMD in Iraq.

You lost. Bush lost. The GOP lost. All you can do is try to blame Obama.

Bush lost. You lost. Give up.


you idiot lemming; 3 months went by while Bush TRIED to go through the UN
truckloads and trains were heading into Syria; the world's only other BAATHIST Party nation
 

Forum List

Back
Top