Saddam’s WMDs: The Left’s Iraq Lies Exposed

[Kosh]

Of course the far left forgets that is was Carter that got us involved with Saddam and that Saddam is an honorary citizen of Detroit.

Hey Kosh, tell me why blaming Bush for Iraq is bad but reaching back to Jimmy Carter is totes mcgoats

Once again the far left deflects from their involvement in Iraq as they still believe that the history of Iraq began in 2003.

 

[KNB]

Of course the far left forgets that is was Carter that got us involved with Saddam and that Saddam is an honorary citizen of Detroit.

Hey Kosh, tell me why blaming Bush for Iraq is bad but reaching back to Jimmy Carter is totes mcgoats

Once again the far left deflects from their involvement in Iraq as they still believe that the history of Iraq began in 2003.

No, Republican. Bush's "preemptive" invasion of Iraq began in 2003 which caused all of what we're seeing now. Bush's lies to justify his invasion began at least in October 2001, as declassified Bush government documents show. US involvement in Iraq (selling weapons to Iraq) began long before that.

 

[BlindBoo]

The claim was that Iraq had reconsituted his WMD program and was actively producing and stockpiling massing amounts of new WMD. Not the remnants of the ones he produced while under the protection of the USA and President Raygun.

Try again crime stopper.

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

The State Department and other U.S. government officials have revealed that ISIS now occupies the Al Muthanna Chemicals Weapons Complex. Al Muthanna was Saddam Hussein’s primary chemical weapons facility, and it is located less than 50 miles from Baghdad.

The Obama administration claims that the weapons in that facility, which include sarin, mustard gas, and nerve agent VX, manufactured to prosecute the war against Iran in the 1980s, do not pose a threat because they are old, contaminated and hard to move. “We do not believe that the complex contains CW materials of military value and it would be very difficult, if not impossible to safely move the materials,” said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

The administration’s dubious rationale is based on information provided by the Iraq Study Group, which was tasked with finding WMDs in the war’s aftermath. They found the chemical weapons at Al Muthanna, but they determined that both Iraq wars and inspections by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) had successfully dismantled the facility, and that the remaining chemical weapons were rendered useless and sealed in bunkers. The report called the weapons facility “a wasteland full of destroyed chemical munitions, razed structures, and unusable war-ravaged facilities,” the 2004 report stated.

Saddam’s weapons stockpile, now potentially in the hands of Sunni radicals.......

Yet other sections of the same report were hardly reassuring. “Stockpiles of chemical munitions are still stored there,” it stated. “The most dangerous ones have been declared to the UN and are sealed in bunkers. Although declared, the bunkers’ contents have yet to be confirmed.” It added, “These areas of the compound pose a hazard to civilians and potential black-marketers.”

Another report paints an even more disturbing picture of the Muthanna facility. It warned that the number and status of Saddam’s sarin-filled rockets was unknown because facilities were not able to be inspected, leaving investigators only able to surmise about the weapons’ condition. Even in degraded conditions, the report said, these rockets still posed a proliferation risk:

Although the damaged Bunker 13 at Muthanna contained thousands of sarin-filled rockets, the presence of leaking munitions and unstable propellant and explosive charges made it too hazardous for UNSCOM inspectors to enter. Because the rockets could not be recovered safely, Iraq declared the munitions in Bunker 13 as ‘destroyed in the Gulf War’ and they were not included in the inventory of chemical weapons eliminated under UNSCOM supervision......

Saddam?s WMDs: The Left?s Iraq Lies Exposed

 

[Kosh]

Hey Kosh, tell me why blaming Bush for Iraq is bad but reaching back to Jimmy Carter is totes mcgoats

Once again the far left deflects from their involvement in Iraq as they still believe that the history of Iraq began in 2003.

No, Republican. Bush's "preemptive" invasion of Iraq began in 2003 which caused all of what we're seeing now. Bush's lies to justify his invasion began at least in October 2001, as declassified Bush government documents show. US involvement in Iraq (selling weapons to Iraq) began long before that.

Once again the far left shows that the history of Iraq started in 2003.

More proof that they ruin on talking points and far left programmed responses.

 

[Kosh]

The claim was that Iraq had reconsituted his WMD program and was actively producing and stockpiling massing amounts of new WMD. Not the remnants of the ones he produced while under the protection of the USA and President Raygun.

Try again crime stopper.

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

The State Department and other U.S. government officials have revealed that ISIS now occupies the Al Muthanna Chemicals Weapons Complex. Al Muthanna was Saddam Hussein’s primary chemical weapons facility, and it is located less than 50 miles from Baghdad.

The Obama administration claims that the weapons in that facility, which include sarin, mustard gas, and nerve agent VX, manufactured to prosecute the war against Iran in the 1980s, do not pose a threat because they are old, contaminated and hard to move. “We do not believe that the complex contains CW materials of military value and it would be very difficult, if not impossible to safely move the materials,” said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

The administration’s dubious rationale is based on information provided by the Iraq Study Group, which was tasked with finding WMDs in the war’s aftermath. They found the chemical weapons at Al Muthanna, but they determined that both Iraq wars and inspections by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) had successfully dismantled the facility, and that the remaining chemical weapons were rendered useless and sealed in bunkers. The report called the weapons facility “a wasteland full of destroyed chemical munitions, razed structures, and unusable war-ravaged facilities,” the 2004 report stated.

Saddam’s weapons stockpile, now potentially in the hands of Sunni radicals.......

Yet other sections of the same report were hardly reassuring. “Stockpiles of chemical munitions are still stored there,” it stated. “The most dangerous ones have been declared to the UN and are sealed in bunkers. Although declared, the bunkers’ contents have yet to be confirmed.” It added, “These areas of the compound pose a hazard to civilians and potential black-marketers.”

Another report paints an even more disturbing picture of the Muthanna facility. It warned that the number and status of Saddam’s sarin-filled rockets was unknown because facilities were not able to be inspected, leaving investigators only able to surmise about the weapons’ condition. Even in degraded conditions, the report said, these rockets still posed a proliferation risk:

Although the damaged Bunker 13 at Muthanna contained thousands of sarin-filled rockets, the presence of leaking munitions and unstable propellant and explosive charges made it too hazardous for UNSCOM inspectors to enter. Because the rockets could not be recovered safely, Iraq declared the munitions in Bunker 13 as ‘destroyed in the Gulf War’ and they were not included in the inventory of chemical weapons eliminated under UNSCOM supervision......

Saddam?s WMDs: The Left?s Iraq Lies Exposed

And the far left thinks that the WMD's was the only reason to go into Iraq.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Of course the far left forgets that is was Carter that got us involved with Saddam and that Saddam is an honorary citizen of Detroit.

Hey Kosh, tell me why blaming Bush for Iraq is bad but reaching back to Jimmy Carter is totes mcgoats

Once again the far left deflects from their involvement in Iraq as they still believe that the history of Iraq began in 2003.

Ok then tell me why you deflect from Bush's involvement again? Because Obama and stuff what now

 

[KNB]

All of Bush's reasons to go into Iraq were shit. Declassified government documents prove it.

 

[Bush92]

The article stated that the chemicals were useless by 2003-04. Saddam had to play a game that he had viable chemical weapons in order to preserve power in his country. Fear=power for Saddam.Now we have chaos and confusion where there once was order.

 

[KNB]

The article stated that the chemicals were useless by 2003-04. Saddam had to play a game that he had viable chemical weapons in order to preserve power in his country. Fear=power for Saddam.Now we have chaos and confusion where there once was order.

Blame your son. And all of your closest friends.

 

[BlindBoo]

The claim was that Iraq had reconsituted his WMD program and was actively producing and stockpiling massing amounts of new WMD. Not the remnants of the ones he produced while under the protection of the USA and President Raygun.

Try again crime stopper.

The recent turmoil in Iraq brought on by the rise of the Sunni extremist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has ironically struck a blow to the American Left’s endlessly repeated narrative that there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq prior to the war.

The State Department and other U.S. government officials have revealed that ISIS now occupies the Al Muthanna Chemicals Weapons Complex. Al Muthanna was Saddam Hussein’s primary chemical weapons facility, and it is located less than 50 miles from Baghdad.

The Obama administration claims that the weapons in that facility, which include sarin, mustard gas, and nerve agent VX, manufactured to prosecute the war against Iran in the 1980s, do not pose a threat because they are old, contaminated and hard to move. “We do not believe that the complex contains CW materials of military value and it would be very difficult, if not impossible to safely move the materials,” said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

The administration’s dubious rationale is based on information provided by the Iraq Study Group, which was tasked with finding WMDs in the war’s aftermath. They found the chemical weapons at Al Muthanna, but they determined that both Iraq wars and inspections by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) had successfully dismantled the facility, and that the remaining chemical weapons were rendered useless and sealed in bunkers. The report called the weapons facility “a wasteland full of destroyed chemical munitions, razed structures, and unusable war-ravaged facilities,” the 2004 report stated.

Saddam’s weapons stockpile, now potentially in the hands of Sunni radicals.......

Yet other sections of the same report were hardly reassuring. “Stockpiles of chemical munitions are still stored there,” it stated. “The most dangerous ones have been declared to the UN and are sealed in bunkers. Although declared, the bunkers’ contents have yet to be confirmed.” It added, “These areas of the compound pose a hazard to civilians and potential black-marketers.”

Another report paints an even more disturbing picture of the Muthanna facility. It warned that the number and status of Saddam’s sarin-filled rockets was unknown because facilities were not able to be inspected, leaving investigators only able to surmise about the weapons’ condition. Even in degraded conditions, the report said, these rockets still posed a proliferation risk:

Although the damaged Bunker 13 at Muthanna contained thousands of sarin-filled rockets, the presence of leaking munitions and unstable propellant and explosive charges made it too hazardous for UNSCOM inspectors to enter. Because the rockets could not be recovered safely, Iraq declared the munitions in Bunker 13 as ‘destroyed in the Gulf War’ and they were not included in the inventory of chemical weapons eliminated under UNSCOM supervision......

Saddam?s WMDs: The Left?s Iraq Lies Exposed

And the far left thinks that the WMD's was the only reason to go into Iraq.

Congress set up two reason President Bush could use to decide to use military force. One was the threat posed by Iraq. The other was his involvement in 9-11.

We know he was not involved in 9-11. Leaving only the threat. The only way he was a threat was with with WMD, because his military had not been rebuilt since the first war.

 

[Vigilante]

Oh please you fag liberals, here's your boy saying he has WMD!...NOTHING ABOUT NEWLY DEVELOPED WMD! Assholes!...Note 3:44!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iw_ocw2VP5I"]Bill Clinton Clear Evidence of Iraqi WMD's - YouTube[/ame]