Rush: "Everything...the left is trying to do -- is related to sex."

[paperview]

Limbaugh, the four time marriage bouncer, heroin-based drug addict and Dominican Republic sex-tourist Viagra enthusiast -- is projecting.

What about Father Bill Donohue?

Is HE projecting as well?

Or are you just projecting the fact that you are full of shit?

Yup.

Up to his eyeballs.

Can't you see the brown stinky pileup in his eyes?J ust like Rush.

Don't have much more to say for the Catholic priest pedophile defender.

 

[g5000]

Rush "Viagra Man" Limbaugh said what?

Actually, if you read the post and the linked info, Rush was commenting on the Catholic Priest's comments.

Now, disparage the Catholic church.

Bill Donahue is not a Catholic priest. He's a divorced father of two.

But he is onto something. The Left trying to stop priests from molesting children...it's all about sex!

Or maybe not. Unless you can explain how gun control is about sex.

Pop quiz: Can you name the logical fallacy Rush and Donahue were committing?

 

[Clement]

Actually, if you read the post and the linked info, Rush was commenting on the Catholic Priest's comments.

Now, disparage the Catholic church.

Well actually you're OP had a rushbo rant fixating on sex. I'm not interested going to any link for more of rushbo's "wisdom" or interviews, but thanks anyway.

I included Rush's assertion because he concisely summarized the Father's assertion, which was linked in the OP.

Nothing to say about the Father's assertion?

I don't think Bill Donahue is a priest, but he does seem to have a point, doesn't he? Sex or money.

 

[g5000]

Cherry picking. Confirmation bias is one of Rush's favorite tools in his toolbox.

 

[Moonglow]

I have the same problem that I have always had, over sexed and under supplied....

 

[candycorn]

Limbaugh, the four time marriage bouncer, heroin-based drug addict and Dominican Republic sex-tourist Viagra enthusiast -- is projecting.

Mojo probably gives rush blow jobs so he takes that personally.

 

[Mojo2]

I included Rush's assertion because he concisely summarized the Father's assertion.

Nothing to say about the Father's assertion?

I'm not going to a Rushbo link. The very fact you post such bullshit is evidence you're looking to incite rather than discuss anything of substance.

DING! DING! DING!

You win!!

You prove the father's point.

Look at your response.

Pink = Feminism or Gay

Ding! Ding! Ding! = Only one step removed from, "Ding a Ling! Ding a Ling! Ding a Ling!"

And anyone familiar with Chuck Berry's classic novelty song knows good and well it is a euphemism for the male member.



I rest my case.

 

[Clement]

But he is onto something. The Left trying to stop priests from molesting children...it's all about sex!

You do know that the child molestation was homosexual in nature, don't you?

 

[g5000]

Medicaid expansion. It's all about sex!

Healthcare exchanges and federal subsidies for health insurance. It's all about sex!

Individual and employer mandates. It's all about sex!

Environmental regulations. It's all about sex!

Wall Street reform. It's all about sex!

Campaign finance reform. It's all about sex!

Gun control. It's all about sex!


Whoever said Rush and Donahue are projecting is exactly right. It is they who are obsessed with sex.

 

[bendog]

I'd have gone for argument from ignorance, but that is an informal fallacy, I think. Moreover, it seemed an invitation to go to the link, and I'm not going there.

 

[bendog]

But he is onto something. The Left trying to stop priests from molesting children...it's all about sex!

You do know that the child molestation was homosexual in nature, don't you?

wow, Clement can play too! LOL

 

[g5000]

But he is onto something. The Left trying to stop priests from molesting children...it's all about sex!

You do know that the child molestation was homosexual in nature, don't you?

So are you trying to say all homosexuals are child molestors?

Confirmation bias strikes again!

You're on a roll. No wonder you drink Rush's piss.

 

[g5000]

But he is onto something. The Left trying to stop priests from molesting children...it's all about sex!

You do know that the child molestation was homosexual in nature, don't you?

They were all priests, too. So what conclusion should I reach about all priests?

 

[paperview]

Rush Hudson Limbaugh III

Spouse(s) Roxy Maxine McNeely (1977–1980, div.)
Michelle Sixta (1983–1990, div.)
Marta Fitzgerald (1994–2004, div.)
Kathryn Rogers (2010–pres)

He dated Kathryn Rogers, a party planner from Florida, for three years[124] before he married her on June 5, 2010.[125][126]

During the wedding reception after the ceremony, Elton John entertained the wedding guests for a reported $1 million fee; however, Limbaugh himself denied that the $1 million figure was accurate on his September 7, 2010, radio show.[127][128]

Through a holding company, KARHL Holdings (KARHL meaning "Kathryn and Rush Hudson Limbaugh"), Limbaugh launched a line of bottled iced tea beverages, entitled "Two if by Tea"[129] a play on the line from Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's "Paul Revere's Ride "one if by land, two if by sea".[130]

Rush Limbaugh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So??

Are you advertising the scumbucket's Defense of Marriage?

 

[Clement]

But he is onto something. The Left trying to stop priests from molesting children...it's all about sex!

You do know that the child molestation was homosexual in nature, don't you?

They were all priests, too. So what conclusion should I reach about all priests?

You mean other than the one you have already posted? Following that logic I would have to conclude all homosexuals are child molesters.

 

[g5000]

You do know that the child molestation was homosexual in nature, don't you?

They were all priests, too. So what conclusion should I reach about all priests?

You mean other than the one you have already posted? Following that logic I would have to conclude all homosexuals are child molesters.

I made no conclusion about all priests.

Mojo2 asked for someone to disparage the Catholic church...in a topic about sex! Baaaaaaaad call.

 

[Mojo2]

Well actually you're OP had a rushbo rant fixating on sex. I'm not interested going to any link for more of rushbo's "wisdom" or interviews, but thanks anyway.

I included Rush's assertion because he concisely summarized the Father's assertion.

Nothing to say about the Father's assertion?

I'm not going to a Rushbo link. The very fact you post such bullshit is evidence you're looking to incite rather than discuss anything of substance.

The fact that you find nothing worthy of substantive discussion is evidence of your Liberal hardwiring.

You see the word sex and you can't think anymore. (Not like you could anyway, based on your posting history.)

Proof positive of what women say about men in general, that we 'think with our penises.'

Maybe they haven't had sex with any Conservatives.

 

[Mojo2]

They were all priests, too. So what conclusion should I reach about all priests?

You mean other than the one you have already posted? Following that logic I would have to conclude all homosexuals are child molesters.

I made no conclusion about all priests.

Mojo2 asked for someone to disparage the Catholic church...in a topic about sex! Baaaaaaaad call.

As if it wasn't going to happen anyway?

Come on, you know that wasn't likely!

 

[Mojo2]

But he is onto something. The Left trying to stop priests from molesting children...it's all about sex!

You do know that the child molestation was homosexual in nature, don't you?

So are you trying to say all homosexuals are child molestors?

Confirmation bias strikes again!

You're on a roll. No wonder you drink Rush's piss.

Sometimes drinking piss can mean salvation.

Bear Grylls drank piss to save his life.

I (figuratively) drink from the Fountain of Rush every day in order to help save America.

 

[Mojo2]

Does the OP think anyone cares what Donahue says?

Why would he think that?

You guys are so true to your stereotype.

The stereotype being Libs don't care about anything that doesn't agree with your own emotionally decided opinions.

You prove the point, once again, if there was any doubt in anyone's mind.