Rshermr
VIP Member
Frank certainly meets 1 through 9 above.
Frank certainly meets 1 through 9 above.
Yup. But he will never know. Cause the poor ignorant con troll can not count to nine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frank certainly meets 1 through 9 above.
Frank certainly meets 1 through 9 above.
Transference. What you do is in no way representative of what actual rational people do. Remember, you are a conspiracy theorist, others are rational folks. Soon, based on your propensity for conspiracy, you will be certain that Jake had a voodoo doll. Poor you. Just try to remember it is congenital Not your fault.Jake and his sock having a great conversation
typical violent viscous liberal, and substance free as always. If liberals had good arguments they'd love to use them, obviously.Transference. What you do is in no way representative of what actual rational people do. Remember, you are a conspiracy theorist, others are rational folks. Soon, based on your propensity for conspiracy, you will be certain that Jake had a voodoo doll. Poor you. Just try to remember it is congenital Not your fault.Jake and his sock having a great conversation
Too stupid. Rshemer completely crushed Frank with clear, objective stats, analysis, and conclusions. Do you understand now?typical violent viscous liberal, and substance free as always. If liberals had good arguments they'd love to use them, obviously.Transference. What you do is in no way representative of what actual rational people do. Remember, you are a conspiracy theorist, others are rational folks. Soon, based on your propensity for conspiracy, you will be certain that Jake had a voodoo doll. Poor you. Just try to remember it is congenital Not your fault.Jake and his sock having a great conversation
Ed b is the blog troll. No one really cares what he says. All he is here for is to end blogs. Cause no one wants to have to read his drivel.Too stupid. Rshemer completely crushed Frank with clear, objective stats, analysis, and conclusions. Do you understand now?typical violent viscous liberal, and substance free as always. If liberals had good arguments they'd love to use them, obviously.Transference. What you do is in no way representative of what actual rational people do. Remember, you are a conspiracy theorist, others are rational folks. Soon, based on your propensity for conspiracy, you will be certain that Jake had a voodoo doll. Poor you. Just try to remember it is congenital Not your fault.Jake and his sock having a great conversation
Ed has an unaccredited store front university doctoral degree in Economics. Thus he bores us to pieces with his silly philosophy of economics and finance. He gets old real quickly, just like Frank, because they can't learn.Ed b is the blog troll. No one really cares what he says. All he is here for is to end blogs. Cause no one wants to have to read his drivel.Too stupid. Rshemer completely crushed Frank with clear, objective stats, analysis, and conclusions. Do you understand now?typical violent viscous liberal, and substance free as always. If liberals had good arguments they'd love to use them, obviously.Transference. What you do is in no way representative of what actual rational people do. Remember, you are a conspiracy theorist, others are rational folks. Soon, based on your propensity for conspiracy, you will be certain that Jake had a voodoo doll. Poor you. Just try to remember it is congenital Not your fault.Jake and his sock having a great conversation
The only thing bankrupt is the thread premise.Ow! Oh! Ouch! Hey!
....no sooner do I post an informed, factual, supported critique of the Roosevelt hagiography, than the Rooseveltian running dog lackeys start nipping at my heels!
It's been said before: "Truth is the mother of hatred." Ausonius
Seems that an admission of Roosevelt's failures would be, to his devotees, an admission of their own.
Never one to knuckle under....I'm left with but one path: another undeniable exposé of the bankrupt, failed, counter-intuitive economic policies of the anti-American fraud, Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
The man was elected based on the basis of a national crisis...and on a web of lies. He proved to be a terrible manager of the economy.
Terrible.....he extended the Depression by years!
1. "At the Democratic national convention in June 1932, where FDR was nominated for president of the United States, the Democratic Party issued a platform promising a way out of the Great Depression. The party stated: “We believe that a party platform is a covenant with the people to be faithfully kept by the party entrusted with power.”"
Monetary Central Planning and the State Part 13 FDR s New Deal - The Future of Freedom Foundation
At the time, America was a more faith-based nation...and the word 'covenant' had a religious tone to it....
a. Covenant: A binding agreement; a compact.; In the Bible, a divine promise establishing or modifying God's relationship to humanity or to a particular group.
covenant - definition of covenant by The Free Dictionary
"...[a] month after accepting the Democratic Party’s nomination for the office of president of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt delivered a campaign radio address to the nation. He focused on the extravagant spending policies of Herbert Hoover’s administration and the federal budget deficits it had created: “Let us have the courage to stop borrowing to meet continuing deficits,” Roosevelt said. “Revenues must cover expenditures by one means or another. Any government, like any family, can, for a year, spend a little more than it earns. But you know and I know that a continuation of that habit means the poorhouse.”
Monetary Central Planning and the State Part 13 FDR s New Deal - The Future of Freedom Foundation
Of course, this was hardly the first lie that Roosevelt told.
Let's go over the platform just to prove that my OPs are undeniable:
"The platform of the Democratic Party, whose ticket Roosevelt headed, called for
.... a 25 percent reduction in federal spending,
...a balanced federal budget,
...a sound gold currency “to be preserved at all hazards,”
....the removal of government from areas that belonged more appropriately to private enterprise
...and an end to the “extravagance” of Hoover’s farm programs.
This is what candidate Roosevelt promised, but it bears no resemblance to what President Roosevelt actually delivered."
"Great Myths of the Great Depression," Lawrence W Reed
Focus on this one:" ....the removal of government from areas that belonged more appropriately to private enterprise..."
Had the Democrats actually fulfilled this promise.....and not created government-sponsored enterprises(GSEs) i.e., FannieMae andFreddieMac....
Get ready....
There would not have been a mortgage meltdown!
The mortgage meltdown, the 2008 recession: thanks to Franklin Roosevelt
Did Jake ever explain why he believes a 21% average unemployment over 7 years is great
The Great Depression StatisticsDid Jake ever explain why he believes a 21% average unemployment over 7 years is great
The Great Depression StatisticsDid Jake ever explain why he believes a 21% average unemployment over 7 years is great
Show where I said they were great. I can show you that Hoover's policies set up the worst damage and that the UE was coming down before conservative economic legislation crippled the recovery. GNP under Hoover almost fell by 50%, while GNP grew steadily for FDR other than one year where the conservative legislation really hurt it.
If you only understood the figures. Read them and weep.
1929 to 1933 Hoover 1933 to 1940 FDR
US Gross Domestic Product (current dollars)
The Great Crash, 1929-1933
in 1929: $103.6 billion
in 1930: $91.2
in 1931: $76.5
in 1932: $58.7
in 1933: $56.4
New Deal Recovery and Recession, 1934-39
in 1934: $66.0 billion
in 1935: $73.3
in 1936: $83.8
in 1937: $91.9
in 1938: $86.1
in 1939: $92.2
Government Expenditures and Investments (in current dollars)
Hoover Administration, 1929-1939
in 1929: $9.4 billion
in 1930: $10.0
in 1931: $9.9
in 1932: $8.7
Average government spending as percentage of GDP, 1929-32: 12.0%
Roosevelt's New Deal
in 1933: $8.7 billion
in 1934: $10.5
in 1935: $10.9
in 1936: $13.1
in 1937: $12.8
in 1938: $13.8
in 1939: $14.8
Average government spending as percentage of GDP, 1933-39: 15.4%
Average rate of unemployment underline is Jake's point
in 1929: 3.2%
in 1930: 8.9%
in 1931: 16.3% Hoover's failed policies do not help
in 1932: 24.1% Hoover's failed policies begin kicking in
in 1933: 24.9% Hoover's failed policies really kick in
in 1934: 21.7% Deficit spending begins working
in 1935: 20.1% Deficit spending working
in 1936: 16.9% Deficit spending working
in 1937: 14.3% Deficit spending working
in 1938: 19.0% failure conservative economic legislation
in 1939: 17.2%3 failure conservative economic legislation
Frank's revisionist history is a non-starter.Shortly after Coolidge left office, the stock market crashed and began the Great Depression in 1929. Coolidge was right about Hoover, but when the Democrat Roosevelt finally came into office he proved to know more than Coolidge or Hoover and immediately addressed the four-years long disaster that Coolidge and Hoover had created.Why won't you explain the differences between the two eras? Because if you did you would look the fool.Jake, I actually look things up for myself. That's how I realized your Hero FDR was the worst President in American History
I explained the difference many times. In 1920-21 you had real grown ups running the country who trusted free enterprise and stood back while assets, liabilities and wages repriced. From 1928 on we elected Progressives who KNEW, they just KNEW they were the smartest people on the planet and humanity would be better off if we let them run the economy.
“Well, they’re going to elect that Superman Hoover, and he’s going to have some trouble. He’s going to have to spend money, but it won’t be enough. Then the Democrats will come in. But they don’t know anything about money." - Coolidge
Roosevelt finally came into office he proved to know more than Coolidge or Hoover and immediately addressed the four-years long disaster by adding on another 7 years to it, creating the worst economy in recorded history
The only thing bankrupt is the thread premise.Ow! Oh! Ouch! Hey!
....no sooner do I post an informed, factual, supported critique of the Roosevelt hagiography, than the Rooseveltian running dog lackeys start nipping at my heels!
It's been said before: "Truth is the mother of hatred." Ausonius
Seems that an admission of Roosevelt's failures would be, to his devotees, an admission of their own.
Never one to knuckle under....I'm left with but one path: another undeniable exposé of the bankrupt, failed, counter-intuitive economic policies of the anti-American fraud, Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
The man was elected based on the basis of a national crisis...and on a web of lies. He proved to be a terrible manager of the economy.
Terrible.....he extended the Depression by years!
1. "At the Democratic national convention in June 1932, where FDR was nominated for president of the United States, the Democratic Party issued a platform promising a way out of the Great Depression. The party stated: “We believe that a party platform is a covenant with the people to be faithfully kept by the party entrusted with power.”"
Monetary Central Planning and the State Part 13 FDR s New Deal - The Future of Freedom Foundation
At the time, America was a more faith-based nation...and the word 'covenant' had a religious tone to it....
a. Covenant: A binding agreement; a compact.; In the Bible, a divine promise establishing or modifying God's relationship to humanity or to a particular group.
covenant - definition of covenant by The Free Dictionary
"...[a] month after accepting the Democratic Party’s nomination for the office of president of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt delivered a campaign radio address to the nation. He focused on the extravagant spending policies of Herbert Hoover’s administration and the federal budget deficits it had created: “Let us have the courage to stop borrowing to meet continuing deficits,” Roosevelt said. “Revenues must cover expenditures by one means or another. Any government, like any family, can, for a year, spend a little more than it earns. But you know and I know that a continuation of that habit means the poorhouse.”
Monetary Central Planning and the State Part 13 FDR s New Deal - The Future of Freedom Foundation
Of course, this was hardly the first lie that Roosevelt told.
Let's go over the platform just to prove that my OPs are undeniable:
"The platform of the Democratic Party, whose ticket Roosevelt headed, called for
.... a 25 percent reduction in federal spending,
...a balanced federal budget,
...a sound gold currency “to be preserved at all hazards,”
....the removal of government from areas that belonged more appropriately to private enterprise
...and an end to the “extravagance” of Hoover’s farm programs.
This is what candidate Roosevelt promised, but it bears no resemblance to what President Roosevelt actually delivered."
"Great Myths of the Great Depression," Lawrence W Reed
Focus on this one:" ....the removal of government from areas that belonged more appropriately to private enterprise..."
Had the Democrats actually fulfilled this promise.....and not created government-sponsored enterprises(GSEs) i.e., FannieMae andFreddieMac....
Get ready....
There would not have been a mortgage meltdown!
The mortgage meltdown, the 2008 recession: thanks to Franklin Roosevelt
The only thing bankrupt is the thread premise.Ow! Oh! Ouch! Hey!
....no sooner do I post an informed, factual, supported critique of the Roosevelt hagiography, than the Rooseveltian running dog lackeys start nipping at my heels!
It's been said before: "Truth is the mother of hatred." Ausonius
Seems that an admission of Roosevelt's failures would be, to his devotees, an admission of their own.
Never one to knuckle under....I'm left with but one path: another undeniable exposé of the bankrupt, failed, counter-intuitive economic policies of the anti-American fraud, Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
The man was elected based on the basis of a national crisis...and on a web of lies. He proved to be a terrible manager of the economy.
Terrible.....he extended the Depression by years!
1. "At the Democratic national convention in June 1932, where FDR was nominated for president of the United States, the Democratic Party issued a platform promising a way out of the Great Depression. The party stated: “We believe that a party platform is a covenant with the people to be faithfully kept by the party entrusted with power.”"
Monetary Central Planning and the State Part 13 FDR s New Deal - The Future of Freedom Foundation
At the time, America was a more faith-based nation...and the word 'covenant' had a religious tone to it....
a. Covenant: A binding agreement; a compact.; In the Bible, a divine promise establishing or modifying God's relationship to humanity or to a particular group.
covenant - definition of covenant by The Free Dictionary
"...[a] month after accepting the Democratic Party’s nomination for the office of president of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt delivered a campaign radio address to the nation. He focused on the extravagant spending policies of Herbert Hoover’s administration and the federal budget deficits it had created: “Let us have the courage to stop borrowing to meet continuing deficits,” Roosevelt said. “Revenues must cover expenditures by one means or another. Any government, like any family, can, for a year, spend a little more than it earns. But you know and I know that a continuation of that habit means the poorhouse.”
Monetary Central Planning and the State Part 13 FDR s New Deal - The Future of Freedom Foundation
Of course, this was hardly the first lie that Roosevelt told.
Let's go over the platform just to prove that my OPs are undeniable:
"The platform of the Democratic Party, whose ticket Roosevelt headed, called for
.... a 25 percent reduction in federal spending,
...a balanced federal budget,
...a sound gold currency “to be preserved at all hazards,”
....the removal of government from areas that belonged more appropriately to private enterprise
...and an end to the “extravagance” of Hoover’s farm programs.
This is what candidate Roosevelt promised, but it bears no resemblance to what President Roosevelt actually delivered."
"Great Myths of the Great Depression," Lawrence W Reed
Focus on this one:" ....the removal of government from areas that belonged more appropriately to private enterprise..."
Had the Democrats actually fulfilled this promise.....and not created government-sponsored enterprises(GSEs) i.e., FannieMae andFreddieMac....
Get ready....
There would not have been a mortgage meltdown!
The mortgage meltdown, the 2008 recession: thanks to Franklin Roosevelt
Yet you you are unable to find a single error, mistake, faulty conclusion.
Why is that?
The Great Depression StatisticsDid Jake ever explain why he believes a 21% average unemployment over 7 years is great
Show where I said they were great. I can show you that Hoover's policies set up the worst damage and that the UE was coming down before conservative economic legislation crippled the recovery. GNP under Hoover almost fell by 50%, while GNP grew steadily for FDR other than one year where the conservative legislation really hurt it.
If you only understood the figures. Read them and weep.
1929 to 1933 Hoover 1933 to 1940 FDR
US Gross Domestic Product (current dollars)
The Great Crash, 1929-1933
in 1929: $103.6 billion
in 1930: $91.2
in 1931: $76.5
in 1932: $58.7
in 1933: $56.4
New Deal Recovery and Recession, 1934-39
in 1934: $66.0 billion
in 1935: $73.3
in 1936: $83.8
in 1937: $91.9
in 1938: $86.1
in 1939: $92.2
Government Expenditures and Investments (in current dollars)
Hoover Administration, 1929-1939
in 1929: $9.4 billion
in 1930: $10.0
in 1931: $9.9
in 1932: $8.7
Average government spending as percentage of GDP, 1929-32: 12.0%
Roosevelt's New Deal
in 1933: $8.7 billion
in 1934: $10.5
in 1935: $10.9
in 1936: $13.1
in 1937: $12.8
in 1938: $13.8
in 1939: $14.8
Average government spending as percentage of GDP, 1933-39: 15.4%
Average rate of unemployment underline is Jake's point
in 1929: 3.2%
in 1930: 8.9%
in 1931: 16.3% Hoover's failed policies do not help
in 1932: 24.1% Hoover's failed policies begin kicking in
in 1933: 24.9% Hoover's failed policies really kick in
in 1934: 21.7% Deficit spending begins working
in 1935: 20.1% Deficit spending working
in 1936: 16.9% Deficit spending working
in 1937: 14.3% Deficit spending working
in 1938: 19.0% failure conservative economic legislation
in 1939: 17.2%3 failure conservative economic legislation
Exactly my point!
There is no authorization in the Constitution, the law of the land, for the government to provide these 'emoluments.'
And...as I stated in the OP....
:" ....the removal of government from areas that belonged more appropriately to private enterprise..."
Had the Democrats actually fulfilled this promise.....and not created government-sponsored enterprises(GSEs) i.e., FannieMae andFreddieMac....
Get ready....
There would not have been a mortgage meltdown!
The mortgage meltdown, the 2008 recession: thanks to Franklin Roosevelt
And so.....once again...one of the dunces inadvertently prove the premise of the thread correct!
It's one more version of karma.