Ron Paul too old?

Ron doesn't stand a chance. The game is rigged and the machines are set.
Perry 2012.


The reason he doesn't stand a chance has nothing to do with 'rigged machines' or any other excuses the Paul zombies are preparing to whine about.
 
Once again Paul supporters prove 'realitiy-challenged'

Because I don't think that polling at third makes one "unelectable?" Under that line of thinking the only person who isn't unelectable is the person who ultimately wins.
 
That kind of irresponsible myopia is one reason he will never be elected.


The war machine marches on.

You're an anarcho-communist that supports Ron Paul?

I don't like the word "communist". I believe in voluntary socialism and minimal statehood.

While I disagree with Paul on numerous areas, I support him. Anarchist socialists have more in common with Ancaps than disagreements. If you want to flesh out the details, then I will be more than happy to engage you. However, your question implies that I don't find a lot of common ground with AnCaps and that is utter nonsense.

I more of a geo-libertarian than anything else since I subscribe to the Lockean Proviso.
 
Last edited:
Ron Paul's age is alright to some followers because they believe that he'll just rise from the dead three days later.

If you strike him down he'll become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

RonPaulJedi.jpg
 
The war machine marches on.

You're an anarcho-communist that supports Ron Paul?

I don't like the word "communist". I believe in voluntary socialism and minimal statehood.

While I disagree with Paul on numerous areas, I support him. Anarchist socialists have more in common with Ancaps than disagreements. If you want to flesh out the details, then I will be more than happy to engage you. However, your question implies that I don't find a lot of common ground with AnCaps and that is utter nonsense.

It's just interesting. Most socialists wouldn't be able to support Ron Paul based on his support for free markets, whatever else they may agree with him on.
 
You're an anarcho-communist that supports Ron Paul?

I don't like the word "communist". I believe in voluntary socialism and minimal statehood.

While I disagree with Paul on numerous areas, I support him. Anarchist socialists have more in common with Ancaps than disagreements. If you want to flesh out the details, then I will be more than happy to engage you. However, your question implies that I don't find a lot of common ground with AnCaps and that is utter nonsense.

It's just interesting. Most socialists wouldn't be able to support Ron Paul based on his support for free markets, whatever else they may agree with him on.

Socialism is not incongruent to the free market. You are confusing socialism with statism, particularly state capitalism.
 
I don't like the word "communist". I believe in voluntary socialism and minimal statehood.

While I disagree with Paul on numerous areas, I support him. Anarchist socialists have more in common with Ancaps than disagreements. If you want to flesh out the details, then I will be more than happy to engage you. However, your question implies that I don't find a lot of common ground with AnCaps and that is utter nonsense.

It's just interesting. Most socialists wouldn't be able to support Ron Paul based on his support for free markets, whatever else they may agree with him on.

Socialism is not incongruent to the free market. You are confusing socialism with statism, particularly state capitalism.

If you say so.
 
Ron Paul is not too old to be President but he's too fucking crazy. His sandwich doesn't have nearly enough peanut butter on it.
 
Ron Paul is not too old to be President but he's too fucking crazy. His sandwich doesn't have nearly enough peanut butter on it.

His sandwich has just the right amount of peanut butter, and the correct amount of jelly as well, thank you very much.
 

Forum List

Back
Top