Ron Paul NOT what Republicans need

[Momanohedhunter]

Sure, not republicans, nor progressives for that matter.

Hes exactly what us libertarians need, and exactly what this country needs tho...

Ron Paul will bring us back to our roots and we need that...

America is about independence and self reliance - NOT dependence on government and reliance on the taxpayer...

I strongly suggest the following.

1. Cease and decsist use of public roads, highways, free ways, sidewalks, skateboard parks and public beaches - Tax Payer Money.

2. Do not call The Sheriffi's Office, Police Department or Fire Department in the event of an emergency - Tax Payer Money.

3. Refuse to fly- Tax Payer Money (Air Traffice Control).

4. Stop All Mail Service.

5. Enroll your children in Private School.

6. Grow your meat, veggies and fruit.

7. Do not go to a public library - Tax Payer Money.

You do not have a clue, and it is showing.

Few do, Or even care to look.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Sure, not republicans, nor progressives for that matter.

Hes exactly what us libertarians need, and exactly what this country needs tho...

Ron Paul will bring us back to our roots and we need that...

America is about independence and self reliance - NOT dependence on government and reliance on the taxpayer...

I strongly suggest the following.

1. Cease and decsist use of public roads, highways, free ways, sidewalks, skateboard parks and public beaches - Tax Payer Money.

2. Do not call The Sheriffi's Office, Police Department or Fire Department in the event of an emergency - Tax Payer Money.

3. Refuse to fly- Tax Payer Money (Air Traffice Control).

4. Stop All Mail Service.

5. Enroll your children in Private School.

6. Grow your meat, veggies and fruit.

7. Do not go to a public library - Tax Payer Money.

You do not have a clue, and it is showing.

So then you'd have us exempted from paying all taxes, right?

 

[Sunshine]

Sure, not republicans, nor progressives for that matter.

Hes exactly what us libertarians need, and exactly what this country needs tho...

Ron Paul will bring us back to our roots and we need that...

America is about independence and self reliance - NOT dependence on government and reliance on the taxpayer...

I strongly suggest the following.

1. Cease and decsist use of public roads, highways, free ways, sidewalks, skateboard parks and public beaches - Tax Payer Money.

2. Do not call The Sheriffi's Office, Police Department or Fire Department in the event of an emergency - Tax Payer Money.

3. Refuse to fly- Tax Payer Money (Air Traffice Control).

4. Stop All Mail Service.

5. Enroll your children in Private School.

6. Grow your meat, veggies and fruit.

7. Do not go to a public library - Tax Payer Money.

You do not have a clue, and it is showing.

Well, I DO love my beautiful federally funded TVA lake! Thanks y'all for such a great place to live!

 

[Momanohedhunter]

Sure, not republicans, nor progressives for that matter.

Hes exactly what us libertarians need, and exactly what this country needs tho...

Ron Paul will bring us back to our roots and we need that...

America is about independence and self reliance - NOT dependence on government and reliance on the taxpayer...

I strongly suggest the following.

1. Cease and decsist use of public roads, highways, free ways, sidewalks, skateboard parks and public beaches - Tax Payer Money.

2. Do not call The Sheriffi's Office, Police Department or Fire Department in the event of an emergency - Tax Payer Money.

3. Refuse to fly- Tax Payer Money (Air Traffice Control).

4. Stop All Mail Service.

5. Enroll your children in Private School.

6. Grow your meat, veggies and fruit.

7. Do not go to a public library - Tax Payer Money.

You do not have a clue, and it is showing.

Well, I DO love my beautiful federally funded TVA lake! Thanks y'all for such a great place to live!

Which on in that awsem chain of lakes do you live on or by ? I had a house om Boon Lake in Tennessee when we lived there, and I fished Watauga, and Ft Patric Henry and Cherokee. HUGE stripers in Boon lake.

 

[Sunshine]

I strongly suggest the following.

1. Cease and decsist use of public roads, highways, free ways, sidewalks, skateboard parks and public beaches - Tax Payer Money.

2. Do not call The Sheriffi's Office, Police Department or Fire Department in the event of an emergency - Tax Payer Money.

3. Refuse to fly- Tax Payer Money (Air Traffice Control).

4. Stop All Mail Service.

5. Enroll your children in Private School.

6. Grow your meat, veggies and fruit.

7. Do not go to a public library - Tax Payer Money.

You do not have a clue, and it is showing.

Well, I DO love my beautiful federally funded TVA lake! Thanks y'all for such a great place to live!

Which on in that awsem chain of lakes do you live on or by ? I had a house om Boon Lake in Tennessee when we lived there, and I fished Watauga, and Ft Patric Henry and Cherokee. HUGE stripers in Boon lake.

I live on beautiful Kentucky Lake. Barkley Lake is 15 miles or so down the road.

 

[Momanohedhunter]

Well, I DO love my beautiful federally funded TVA lake! Thanks y'all for such a great place to live!

Which on in that awsem chain of lakes do you live on or by ? I had a house om Boon Lake in Tennessee when we lived there, and I fished Watauga, and Ft Patric Henry and Cherokee. HUGE stripers in Boon lake.

I live on beautiful Kentucky Lake. Barkley Lake is 15 miles or so down the road.

Man that place was awesome. Great place to have fun with out blowing a million bucks. Whats work look like for painters? he he.

 

[cutter]

RON PAUL is the best we have in Congress. ALL his votes are based on the Constitution and what it allows the FEDERAL government to do. If all Congressmen were like RON PAUL still be a great country and not on a downward slide to Socialism. Do some people have a hard on for RON PAUL, yes? Do some people like the move to a Socialistic government? Yes. RON PAUL isn't for everyone. Just those of us that love our freedoms.

What are his "NO Votes based on" ?

If you can't understand it, it will do no good to explain it too you, But, Here is one last try. If RON PAUL votes YES it means this is something the Federal Government should be involved in and he approves of the bill. If he voted NO it means either this is a bad bill and he is voting no, OR this is something not delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution. You may be used to politicians that don't know the Constitution or don't care what it says but with RON PAUL you have a Congressman that KNOWS the Constitution and will not vote to approve a bill not authorized by the Constitution. It's called "LIMITED POWER" It's what the Government is supposed to have, Something a good Socialist will never understand, most of our Politicians don't understand it either.

 

[Momanohedhunter]

RON PAUL is the best we have in Congress. ALL his votes are based on the Constitution and what it allows the FEDERAL government to do. If all Congressmen were like RON PAUL still be a great country and not on a downward slide to Socialism. Do some people have a hard on for RON PAUL, yes? Do some people like the move to a Socialistic government? Yes. RON PAUL isn't for everyone. Just those of us that love our freedoms.

What are his "NO Votes based on" ?

If you can't understand it, it will do no good to explain it too you, But, Here is one last try. If RON PAUL votes YES it means this is something the Federal Government should be involved in and he approves of the bill. If he voted NO it means either this is a bad bill and he is voting no, OR this is something not delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution. You may be used to politicians that don't know the Constitution or don't care what it says but with RON PAUL you have a Congressman that KNOWS the Constitution and will not vote to approve a bill not authorized by the Constitution. It's called "LIMITED POWER" It's what the Government is supposed to have, Something a good Socialist will never understand, most of our Politicians don't understand it either.

More folks dont buy it then do. And I dont know that all of his no votes , some on issues he claims to oppose are very telling of the Man, as they were for Obama. Sorry, other then what he says in campaign ads and what is said the news, no one has nothing. Go look at his NO votes. Oh, yeah and the socialist thing is old. That is like the spelling thing, its all the straight ticket voters who refuse to educate them selves can say.

 

[dblack]

...I dont know..

YouTube - ‪HUAD Awareness‬‏

 

[cutter]

What are his "NO Votes based on" ?

If you can't understand it, it will do no good to explain it too you, But, Here is one last try. If RON PAUL votes YES it means this is something the Federal Government should be involved in and he approves of the bill. If he voted NO it means either this is a bad bill and he is voting no, OR this is something not delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution. You may be used to politicians that don't know the Constitution or don't care what it says but with RON PAUL you have a Congressman that KNOWS the Constitution and will not vote to approve a bill not authorized by the Constitution. It's called "LIMITED POWER" It's what the Government is supposed to have, Something a good Socialist will never understand, most of our Politicians don't understand it either.

More folks dont buy it then do. And I dont know that all of his no votes , some on issues he claims to oppose are very telling of the Man, as they were for Obama. Sorry, other then what he says in campaign ads and what is said the news, no one has nothing. Go look at his NO votes. Oh, yeah and the socialist thing is old. That is like the spelling thing, its all the straight ticket voters who refuse to educate them selves can say.

?

 

[Momanohedhunter]

If you can't understand it, it will do no good to explain it too you, But, Here is one last try. If RON PAUL votes YES it means this is something the Federal Government should be involved in and he approves of the bill. If he voted NO it means either this is a bad bill and he is voting no, OR this is something not delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution. You may be used to politicians that don't know the Constitution or don't care what it says but with RON PAUL you have a Congressman that KNOWS the Constitution and will not vote to approve a bill not authorized by the Constitution. It's called "LIMITED POWER" It's what the Government is supposed to have, Something a good Socialist will never understand, most of our Politicians don't understand it either.

More folks dont buy it then do. And I dont know that all of his no votes , some on issues he claims to oppose are very telling of the Man, as they were for Obama. Sorry, other then what he says in campaign ads and what is said the news, no one has nothing. Go look at his NO votes. Oh, yeah and the socialist thing is old. That is like the spelling thing, its all the straight ticket voters who refuse to educate them selves can say.

?

?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If he voted NO it means either this is a bad bill and he is voting no, OR this is something not delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution.

What are Paul’s qualifications to make such a determination?

…but with RON PAUL you have a Congressman that KNOWS the Constitution and will not vote to approve a bill not authorized by the Constitution.

How do you know Paul ‘knows’ the Constitution? Only the Federal courts may determine what’s authorized by the Constitution.

The fact is Paul is merely expressing his subjective opinion, having no basis in Constitutional case law whatsoever.

 

[dblack]

How do you know Paul ‘knows’ the Constitution? Only the Federal courts may determine what’s authorized by the Constitution.

You're funny. You keep coming back to the "but mom said!!!" argument. I think you're probably smart enough to realize that most of us who support Ron Paul think the Supremes have erred and want to see their mistakes corrected. This can be effected by pressing the existing court to re-address previous decisions, or by reaffirming constitutional limits via legislation and amendment. Either way, we're not stuck with whatever the Supreme Court says. Things can change.

 

[Mr. Jones]

Ron Paul has crazy ideas like legalizing hard drugs and pulling back the military around the world. He can't see the dangers with those ideas because he has a short attention span.

Legalizing drugs with Obamacare would mean taxpayers would be paying for scumbags to get high or to recover from overdoses. Making drugs means more users thus more societal problems from drug usage.

The idea of just keeping our military in the USA would mean there would be more wars and more expensive wars because countries like Iran, China, Russia, etc would eventually attack their neighbors like 1940s Germany and Japan.

He is just plain stupid....

How many nations has Iran invaded lately? How many has China, and Russia? Sounds like you need to brush up on history and current affairs. Dr Paul is the stupid huh?
America needs to do something very radical, that most people will not want to accept.
Our government has to be run like it was designed to run, for the people by the people, not the Fascism and police state, and imperialistic policies for control of natural resources and Zionism, that has taken hold of it.
Some people have no idea, and to call a man like Dr. Paul is really ignorant. He was the only one and still is IMO that has predicted the financial collapse the nation is in, and the only one with the balls to talk about the real problems in this country.
Come to think of it I am for a totalitarian form of government, one that is TOTALLY adherent of the constitution it was founded upon, and one where NO ONE is allowed to deviate from it.

 

[Contumacious]

If he voted NO it means either this is a bad bill and he is voting no, OR this is something not delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution.

What are Paul’s qualifications to make such a determination?

…but with RON PAUL you have a Congressman that KNOWS the Constitution and will not vote to approve a bill not authorized by the Constitution.

How do you know Paul ‘knows’ the Constitution? Only the Federal courts may determine what’s authorized by the Constitution.

The fact is Paul is merely expressing his subjective opinion, having no basis in Constitutional case law whatsoever.

That is correct.

After all the purpose of the Constitution is unknown and the same is written in Swahili.

.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

If he voted NO it means either this is a bad bill and he is voting no, OR this is something not delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution.

What are Paul’s qualifications to make such a determination?

…but with RON PAUL you have a Congressman that KNOWS the Constitution and will not vote to approve a bill not authorized by the Constitution.

How do you know Paul ‘knows’ the Constitution? Only the Federal courts may determine what’s authorized by the Constitution.

The fact is Paul is merely expressing his subjective opinion, having no basis in Constitutional case law whatsoever.

Here's how it should be said: Ron Paul votes based on his interpretation of the Constitution. Whether or not you agree with his interpretation that's how he votes.

 

[Momanohedhunter]

The machine that gives him his money ?

Heh... Seriously, do you have anything besides your own wild accusations on this? Just repeating bullshit over and over again doesn't make it true.

Do you have anything to offer other then complete, total, and blind adoration ? Thought so.

 

[Momanohedhunter]

Ron Paul has crazy ideas like legalizing hard drugs and pulling back the military around the world. He can't see the dangers with those ideas because he has a short attention span.

Legalizing drugs with Obamacare would mean taxpayers would be paying for scumbags to get high or to recover from overdoses. Making drugs means more users thus more societal problems from drug usage.

The idea of just keeping our military in the USA would mean there would be more wars and more expensive wars because countries like Iran, China, Russia, etc would eventually attack their neighbors like 1940s Germany and Japan.

He is just plain stupid....

How many nations has Iran invaded lately? How many has China, and Russia? Sounds like you need to brush up on history and current affairs. Dr Paul is the stupid huh?
America needs to do something very radical, that most people will not want to accept.
Our government has to be run like it was designed to run, for the people by the people, not the Fascism and police state, and imperialistic policies for control of natural resources and Zionism, that has taken hold of it.
Some people have no idea, and to call a man like Dr. Paul is really ignorant. He was the only one and still is IMO that has predicted the financial collapse the nation is in, and the only one with the balls to talk about the real problems in this country.
Come to think of it I am for a totalitarian form of government, one that is TOTALLY adherent of the constitution it was founded upon, and one where NO ONE is allowed to deviate from it.

Except for Jews right ? Nice storm front from avatar there. And by radical, do you mean something like health care reform ? I will say to you as I have to everyone else in the thread. Prove it.

 

[Momanohedhunter]

If he voted NO it means either this is a bad bill and he is voting no, OR this is something not delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution.

What are Paul’s qualifications to make such a determination?

…but with RON PAUL you have a Congressman that KNOWS the Constitution and will not vote to approve a bill not authorized by the Constitution.

How do you know Paul ‘knows’ the Constitution? Only the Federal courts may determine what’s authorized by the Constitution.

The fact is Paul is merely expressing his subjective opinion, having no basis in Constitutional case law whatsoever.

Here's how it should be said: Ron Paul votes based on his interpretation of the Constitution. Whether or not you agree with his interpretation that's how he votes.

That's what they all do, and that is really a different conversation if I understand you right. There are those who believe its a "living, breathing" document, and there are those who it is not applicable to day because it was written by old white slave owners. And finally, there are the politicians who's interpretation will change depending on how much money they get from special interest. Pauel votes his understanding, just like anyone else, so why does he get any mention for offering opinion ?

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

What are Paul’s qualifications to make such a determination?



How do you know Paul ‘knows’ the Constitution? Only the Federal courts may determine what’s authorized by the Constitution.

The fact is Paul is merely expressing his subjective opinion, having no basis in Constitutional case law whatsoever.

Here's how it should be said: Ron Paul votes based on his interpretation of the Constitution. Whether or not you agree with his interpretation that's how he votes.

That's what they all do, and that is really a different conversation if I understand you right. There are those who believe its a "living, breathing" document, and there are those who it is not applicable to day because it was written by old white slave owners. And finally, there are the politicians who's interpretation will change depending on how much money they get from special interest. Pauel votes his understanding, just like anyone else, so why does he get any mention for offering opinion ?

Probably because nobody believes for a second that the rest of them vote based on any interpretation of the Constitution at all.