Rocketman

I really don't get why the lefties are so keen to let this little freak continue his weapons programs and hostility toward innocent civilians in S. Korea, Japan, and Guam. Its stunning in it's stupidity.

That said, keep it up lefties, you're driving your socialist party into the ground and I find that quite satisfying.
Nobody is "keen" on that, what a stupid statement. There are people, on all parts of the spectrum, that worry the cost of military action is too great.


You can hide behind your mama's skirt all you want, but that is not going to stop Kimmy from pushing for a war, nor will it prevent the need for a response from the US and the rest of the world. The US had zero interest in a war with NK, they were a nothing and a nobody; right up until Kimmy started testing nukes and launching missiles. His goal is to scare the world and /someone/ has to stand up to the little punk. We, the world, attempted to "ground him" and "put him in time out" through sanctions - his response was to fire at Japan.

The left's "idea" of handling this situation is like seeing someone shoot the window out on a store and deciding it's okay and letting them both keep the gun and also continue to recklessly throw bullets around on the street; it's a ridiculous position. If you saw a young kid with a gun you'd take it the fuck away from him - and that's roughly what we're dealing with here; an immature leader who needs a good swat on the ass before he turns into a nightmare for the entire world. It's not even America so much, because he's not hitting Guam, even if he shoots at it, but for largely helpless countries S. Korea and Japan - countries that /we/ the US have both a moral and "legal" obligation to protect.

Our options are:
A) attempt to bring Kimmy to heel (what we're doing with these sanctions and threats - which is also giving notice to China and Russia that we, the rest of the world, are done with Kimmy's bullshit.)

B) ignore it - aka let him have nukes and continue with his plan to both overrun and oppress S. Korea (and possibly Japan,) and also move forward on his plans to destroy America (which he's been saying since he took power in 2011, and his family has been saying for far longer)

C) Attack him first (which isn't even on the docket for the US, though might be for S. Korea or Japan)

What's your suggested D) option?
My suggested option is to keep tightening the economic screws for now and wait a little bit. China will come around.
 
I really don't get why the lefties are so keen to let this little freak continue his weapons programs and hostility toward innocent civilians in S. Korea, Japan, and Guam. Its stunning in it's stupidity.

That said, keep it up lefties, you're driving your socialist party into the ground and I find that quite satisfying.
Nobody is "keen" on that, what a stupid statement. There are people, on all parts of the spectrum, that worry the cost of military action is too great.


You can hide behind your mama's skirt all you want, but that is not going to stop Kimmy from pushing for a war, nor will it prevent the need for a response from the US and the rest of the world. The US had zero interest in a war with NK, they were a nothing and a nobody; right up until Kimmy started testing nukes and launching missiles. His goal is to scare the world and /someone/ has to stand up to the little punk. We, the world, attempted to "ground him" and "put him in time out" through sanctions - his response was to fire at Japan.

The left's "idea" of handling this situation is like seeing someone shoot the window out on a store and deciding it's okay and letting them both keep the gun and also continue to recklessly throw bullets around on the street; it's a ridiculous position. If you saw a young kid with a gun you'd take it the fuck away from him - and that's roughly what we're dealing with here; an immature leader who needs a good swat on the ass before he turns into a nightmare for the entire world. It's not even America so much, because he's not hitting Guam, even if he shoots at it, but for largely helpless countries S. Korea and Japan - countries that /we/ the US have both a moral and "legal" obligation to protect.

Our options are:
A) attempt to bring Kimmy to heel (what we're doing with these sanctions and threats - which is also giving notice to China and Russia that we, the rest of the world, are done with Kimmy's bullshit.)

B) ignore it - aka let him have nukes and continue with his plan to both overrun and oppress S. Korea (and possibly Japan,) and also move forward on his plans to destroy America (which he's been saying since he took power in 2011, and his family has been saying for far longer)

C) Attack him first (which isn't even on the docket for the US, though might be for S. Korea or Japan)

What's your suggested D) option?
My suggested option is to keep tightening the economic screws for now and wait a little bit. China will come around.

So option A, which is what we're doing. Cool.
 
I really don't get why the lefties are so keen to let this little freak continue his weapons programs and hostility toward innocent civilians in S. Korea, Japan, and Guam. Its stunning in it's stupidity.

That said, keep it up lefties, you're driving your socialist party into the ground and I find that quite satisfying.
Nobody is "keen" on that, what a stupid statement. There are people, on all parts of the spectrum, that worry the cost of military action is too great.


You can hide behind your mama's skirt all you want, but that is not going to stop Kimmy from pushing for a war, nor will it prevent the need for a response from the US and the rest of the world. The US had zero interest in a war with NK, they were a nothing and a nobody; right up until Kimmy started testing nukes and launching missiles. His goal is to scare the world and /someone/ has to stand up to the little punk. We, the world, attempted to "ground him" and "put him in time out" through sanctions - his response was to fire at Japan.

The left's "idea" of handling this situation is like seeing someone shoot the window out on a store and deciding it's okay and letting them both keep the gun and also continue to recklessly throw bullets around on the street; it's a ridiculous position. If you saw a young kid with a gun you'd take it the fuck away from him - and that's roughly what we're dealing with here; an immature leader who needs a good swat on the ass before he turns into a nightmare for the entire world. It's not even America so much, because he's not hitting Guam, even if he shoots at it, but for largely helpless countries S. Korea and Japan - countries that /we/ the US have both a moral and "legal" obligation to protect.

Our options are:
A) attempt to bring Kimmy to heel (what we're doing with these sanctions and threats - which is also giving notice to China and Russia that we, the rest of the world, are done with Kimmy's bullshit.)

B) ignore it - aka let him have nukes and continue with his plan to both overrun and oppress S. Korea (and possibly Japan,) and also move forward on his plans to destroy America (which he's been saying since he took power in 2011, and his family has been saying for far longer)

C) Attack him first (which isn't even on the docket for the US, though might be for S. Korea or Japan)

What's your suggested D) option?
My suggested option is to keep tightening the economic screws for now and wait a little bit. China will come around.

So option A, which is what we're doing. Cool.
Yeah, basically. Clearly nobody believes that North Korea is going to ensure their own destruction by nuking someone, or we would already have destroyed them. That's not really up for debate. So, instead of possibly catalyzing the deaths of millions of our allies, we will likely bide our time for a while.
 
And it's gonna be a long long tiiiime...
Yeah. I think it's gonna be a long, long time before other countries respect us again. Well, you're a self-loathing Canadian, so it's not your country.


When have any country respected us in Obama's time?

Putin was always bitch slapping Obama

China island building...
Putin bitch slapping obama was the best part of obama's presidency. I loved that look Putin would always give. The one that said "you contemptible worm, you will always be meaningless."
 
I really don't get why the lefties are so keen to let this little freak continue his weapons programs and hostility toward innocent civilians in S. Korea, Japan, and Guam. Its stunning in it's stupidity.

That said, keep it up lefties, you're driving your socialist party into the ground and I find that quite satisfying.
Nobody is "keen" on that, what a stupid statement. There are people, on all parts of the spectrum, that worry the cost of military action is too great.


You can hide behind your mama's skirt all you want, but that is not going to stop Kimmy from pushing for a war, nor will it prevent the need for a response from the US and the rest of the world. The US had zero interest in a war with NK, they were a nothing and a nobody; right up until Kimmy started testing nukes and launching missiles. His goal is to scare the world and /someone/ has to stand up to the little punk. We, the world, attempted to "ground him" and "put him in time out" through sanctions - his response was to fire at Japan.

The left's "idea" of handling this situation is like seeing someone shoot the window out on a store and deciding it's okay and letting them both keep the gun and also continue to recklessly throw bullets around on the street; it's a ridiculous position. If you saw a young kid with a gun you'd take it the fuck away from him - and that's roughly what we're dealing with here; an immature leader who needs a good swat on the ass before he turns into a nightmare for the entire world. It's not even America so much, because he's not hitting Guam, even if he shoots at it, but for largely helpless countries S. Korea and Japan - countries that /we/ the US have both a moral and "legal" obligation to protect.

Our options are:
A) attempt to bring Kimmy to heel (what we're doing with these sanctions and threats - which is also giving notice to China and Russia that we, the rest of the world, are done with Kimmy's bullshit.)

B) ignore it - aka let him have nukes and continue with his plan to both overrun and oppress S. Korea (and possibly Japan,) and also move forward on his plans to destroy America (which he's been saying since he took power in 2011, and his family has been saying for far longer)

C) Attack him first (which isn't even on the docket for the US, though might be for S. Korea or Japan)

What's your suggested D) option?
My suggested option is to keep tightening the economic screws for now and wait a little bit. China will come around.

So option A, which is what we're doing. Cool.
Yeah, basically. Clearly nobody believes that North Korea is going to ensure their own destruction by nuking someone, or we would already have destroyed them. That's not really up for debate. So, instead of possibly catalyzing the deaths of millions of our allies, we will likely bide our time for a while.

Interesting avatar, didn't think I'd see Robert Johnson on these forums hah. Nice.
 
And it's gonna be a long long tiiiime...
Yeah. I think it's gonna be a long, long time before other countries respect us again. Well, you're a self-loathing Canadian, so it's not your country.


When have any country respected us in Obama's time?

Putin was always bitch slapping Obama

China island building...
Putin bitch slapping obama was the best part of obama's presidency. I loved that look Putin would always give. The one that said "you contemptible worm, you will always be meaningless."
And yet Putin whined constantly about the Obama administration meddling in his affairs, and placing sanctions on them, and exposing his misdeeds, etc etc
 
Calling Kim "rocket man" was the only way John Kelly could figure out to explain anything about North Korea to Trump's toddler-like mind.
Wait until Kelly has to explain you!
Kelly during Trump's speech:

59c1621838d20d3c098b8010-640-427.jpg


The camera showed people laughing, making fun of trump.

pino trump -- a fat orange hot mess.

I watched it and didn't see anyone laughing at our President, we're you drinking during the speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Calling Kim "rocket man" was the only way John Kelly could figure out to explain anything about North Korea to Trump's toddler-like mind.
Wait until Kelly has to explain you!
Kelly during Trump's speech:

59c1621838d20d3c098b8010-640-427.jpg


The camera showed people laughing, making fun of trump.

pino trump -- a fat orange hot mess.

I watched it and didn't see anyone laughing at our President, we're you drinking during the speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then no, you didnt watch it or listen to it. Yes, they were laughing at him.
 
Calling Kim "rocket man" was the only way John Kelly could figure out to explain anything about North Korea to Trump's toddler-like mind.
Wait until Kelly has to explain you!
Kelly during Trump's speech:

59c1621838d20d3c098b8010-640-427.jpg


The camera showed people laughing, making fun of trump.

pino trump -- a fat orange hot mess.

I watched it and didn't see anyone laughing at our President, we're you drinking during the speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then no, you didnt watch it or listen to it. Yes, they were laughing at him.

Then it should be easy for you to provide proof. If that is the case, why did the Lame Stream Media not say anything of the sort?
 
Wait until Kelly has to explain you!
Kelly during Trump's speech:

59c1621838d20d3c098b8010-640-427.jpg


The camera showed people laughing, making fun of trump.

pino trump -- a fat orange hot mess.

I watched it and didn't see anyone laughing at our President, we're you drinking during the speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then no, you didnt watch it or listen to it. Yes, they were laughing at him.

Then it should be easy for you to provide proof. If that is the case, why did the Lame Stream Media not say anything of the sort?
Yes, it would be easy. They laughed at his comments on socialism. The video is easy to find. Why are your panties in a twist? Just do what you always do when people laugh at Trump. I mean, you get practice every single day, right?
 
Putin bitch slapping obama was the best part of obama's presidency. I loved that look Putin would always give. The one that said "you contemptible worm, you will always be meaningless."
And old Vlad's using trump as his bitch as he publicly bends orange man over his desk, almost daily.
 
Kelly during Trump's speech:

59c1621838d20d3c098b8010-640-427.jpg


The camera showed people laughing, making fun of trump.

pino trump -- a fat orange hot mess.

I watched it and didn't see anyone laughing at our President, we're you drinking during the speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then no, you didnt watch it or listen to it. Yes, they were laughing at him.

Then it should be easy for you to provide proof. If that is the case, why did the Lame Stream Media not say anything of the sort?
Yes, it would be easy. They laughed at his comments on socialism. The video is easy to find. Why are your panties in a twist? Just do what you always do when people laugh at Trump. I mean, you get practice every single day, right?


If it so so easy, then you should be able to post it. You cannot prove a video does not exist, therefore it is your responsibility to prove it exists.

But since you would rather deflect from your claim, we will just put it in the round file where it belongs, along with most of your other posts.
 
The camera showed people laughing, making fun of trump.

pino trump -- a fat orange hot mess.

I watched it and didn't see anyone laughing at our President, we're you drinking during the speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then no, you didnt watch it or listen to it. Yes, they were laughing at him.

Then it should be easy for you to provide proof. If that is the case, why did the Lame Stream Media not say anything of the sort?
Yes, it would be easy. They laughed at his comments on socialism. The video is easy to find. Why are your panties in a twist? Just do what you always do when people laugh at Trump. I mean, you get practice every single day, right?


If it so so easy, then you should be able to post it. You cannot prove a video does not exist, therefore it is your responsibility to prove it exists.

But since you would rather deflect from your claim, we will just put it in the round file where it belongs, along with most of your other posts.
I am able to post it. I feel no responsibility to prove the existence of this video to you. Sorry. Now, declare victory and fellate yourself. You're welcome.
 
Yeah, basically. Clearly nobody believes that North Korea is going to ensure their own destruction by nuking someone, or we would already have destroyed them. That's not really up for debate. So, instead of possibly catalyzing the deaths of millions of our allies, we will likely bide our time for a while.
"Bide our time" while North Korea builds and stockpiles nuclear weapons as fast as their squinchy-eyed little scientists can build them.

Sounds like a plan.....(not).
 
I watched it and didn't see anyone laughing at our President, we're you drinking during the speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then no, you didnt watch it or listen to it. Yes, they were laughing at him.

Then it should be easy for you to provide proof. If that is the case, why did the Lame Stream Media not say anything of the sort?
Yes, it would be easy. They laughed at his comments on socialism. The video is easy to find. Why are your panties in a twist? Just do what you always do when people laugh at Trump. I mean, you get practice every single day, right?


If it so so easy, then you should be able to post it. You cannot prove a video does not exist, therefore it is your responsibility to prove it exists.

But since you would rather deflect from your claim, we will just put it in the round file where it belongs, along with most of your other posts.
I am able to post it. I feel no responsibility to prove the existence of this video to you. Sorry. Now, declare victory and fellate yourself. You're welcome.
Prove it or walk. Right now you just look like any other liberal liar here.
 

Forum List

Back
Top