nodoginnafight
No Party Affiliation
one out of a thousand. you're reallly rolling in there shit there aren't you.
And yet ..... you did the EXACT SAME thing .....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
one out of a thousand. you're reallly rolling in there shit there aren't you.
We do, you just don't like what we offered.Yeah they have nothing to offer this thread.I rest my case about RWers.That is just dressed-up socialism. Any real centered American would recognize that. What is called for and has been called for is tort reform. Change the laws that have allowed the lottery mentality to prevail and drive up health care costs in the first place.
I laugh at you and your ineffective response.And here we see the dishonest far right spin on moderate proposals.We already have these.A moderate view on gun control is the push for background checks
Background checks are based on the fallacy that you can enact a law that will prevent people from breaking the law, and therefore are a restriction on the rights of the law abiding without any discernible benefit - they SOUND good but can do nothing to prevent crime. You either do not know this, or do know it but do not care.
Thus, the argument for them is based on emotion, ignorance or dishonesty.
You may also mean universal background checks. These are unenforceable and therefore are a restriction on the rights of the law abiding without any discernible benefit - they SOUND good but can do nothing to prevent crime. You either do not know this, or do know it but do not care.
Thus the argument for them is based on emotion, ignorance or dishonesty.
Which does not exist. You either do not know this, or do know it but do not care.
Thus, the argument for them is based on emotion, ignorance or dishonesty.
As in magazine capacity?and, perhaps, limiting capacity.
This too is unenforceable and therefore are a restriction on the rights of the law abiding without any discernible benefit - it SOUNDS good but can do nothing to prevent crime.
Thus, the argument for them is based on emotion, ignorance or dishonesty.
As I said:
Moderate leftists don't present arguments for gun control based on emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty; I have yet to see a moderate-left argument to that effect.
Um...m14 entire schtick seems to be call everything emotion, ignorance or dishonesty instead of dealing with the argument he'd rather label them so they are easily dismissed
Things left wing nuts believe that I don't.
1. All whites are privileged and need to be treated like shit.
2. Males shouldn't be able to have a opinion when it comes to their own child. More a leftist female argument.
3. Women should always have the children with them. Men fuck you.
4. Businesses shouldn't be allowed to grow beyond small corner stores. This is stupid.
5. You shouldn't be able to ask a woman out on a date...That is sexual assault.
6. We should force the government to demand equal pay. Who gives a shit how long that employee has worked there or how good he is.
7. Let's demand diversity in business. Who cares about being capable. Having the colors of the rainbow is more important!
8. Let's install a 50/50 gender law(Eu) on business ceo's. Fuck the capable!
9. Let's erase the borders. Nations are old news!
10. Let's let out black thugs that do crimes because they've been wronged long ago!
11. Hispanics deserve the entire southwestern United states. This is why I fight for them to come here illegally.
12. All blacks should get reparations as whitey is evil.
Some things that separate a moderate like me from the extreme leftist.