FactFinder
VIP Member
- Mar 1, 2009
- 2,689
- 208
- 83
I read them both. Extremist groups that historically cause economic or bodily harm bear watching...do you agree or not?I think that some groups bear watching. If you don't, you're an idiot. Oh, wait.
can you be more specific than...some groups ..did you read the DHS description of what they considered a threat.?..no of course you cant.. and of course you don't....because you talk out your uninformed ass
anus [(ay-nuhs)]
The opening through which feces pass out of the body
anus definition | Dictionary.com
I do not agree. It is unconstitutional. Too much watching. Too much big brother.
Period. It is the very government intrusiveness that feeds the distrust. It is government protecting itself rather than the people. If people are being treated fairly then there is no threat. On the converse when you have the government intruding due to its own guilty conscience they will trample the common rights.