Right Wing Warning???

[tigerbob]

How many times are you going to post this before one of you nuts admits that the same type of warnings were issued about left wing groups in January?

Oh, right...NEVER.

Yes, it's interesting that you posted this on the other thread but it appears that many have either ignored it or not read it. Most of the dismay about the right wing extremists report seems to revolve around the definition of potential extremists. However, the left wing report also has a definition, in Appendix U, which mentions "socialists" under the heading "anarchist extremists".

I'd have thought liberals have as much right to be upset as conservatives. On balance, I think the approach by the DOHS has been even handed.

 

[tigerbob]

http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2009/04/16/dhs-leftwing-extremists-cyber-attacks-26-january-2009.pdf

Thanks.

I wonder why our conservative friends don't know about this?

Or maybe it doesn't suit their paranoia agenda to portray the govt as doing anything but targeting them.

or maybe it wasnt covered by the majority of the media
so no one really knew about it

It was posted by Ravi on the other thread a couple days ago.

Does anyone know how much media coverage this got from the likes of MSNBC?

 

[Indiana Oracle]

This is likely to piss off some people, but putting a woman in charge of HS, the agency charged with securing the homeland, was a dumb idea. Men tend mostly respond to facts and logic and have a guarding instinct, women tend to respond more often to emotion and feelings and a negotiation instinct.

No man holding that job would have even allowed the kind of thinking expressed with this flap. If it happened anyway, the apology would have been phrased differently and he would have made it a point to speak directly to the men in uniform.

 

[tigerbob]

This is likely to piss off some people, but putting a woman in charge of HS, the agency charged with securing the homeland, was a dumb idea. Men tend mostly respond to facts and logic and have a guarding instinct, women tend to respond more often to emotion and feelings and a negotiation instinct.

No man holding that job would have even allowed the kind of thinking expressed with this flap. If it happened anyway, the apology would have been phrased differently and he would have made it a point to speak directly to the men in uniform.

i'd agree with you if every letter i was dotted with a little ♡

 

[Ravi]

This is likely to piss off some people, but putting a woman in charge of HS, the agency charged with securing the homeland, was a dumb idea. Men tend mostly respond to facts and logic and have a guarding instinct, women tend to respond more often to emotion and feelings and a negotiation instinct.

No man holding that job would have even allowed the kind of thinking expressed with this flap. If it happened anyway, the apology would have been phrased differently and he would have made it a point to speak directly to the men in uniform.

I'm sorry she apologized at all, she had no reason to...but she didn't because she is a woman, she did it because she's a Dem.

 

[WillowTree]

This is likely to piss off some people, but putting a woman in charge of HS, the agency charged with securing the homeland, was a dumb idea. Men tend mostly respond to facts and logic and have a guarding instinct, women tend to respond more often to emotion and feelings and a negotiation instinct.

No man holding that job would have even allowed the kind of thinking expressed with this flap. If it happened anyway, the apology would have been phrased differently and he would have made it a point to speak directly to the men in uniform.

I'm sorry she apologized at all, she had no reason to...but she didn't because she is a woman, she did it because she's a Dem.

That's right. She is a Dem. Republicans don't diss the vets.

 

[Harry Dresden]

what i would like to know is.....should not the person in charge of this Dept....have at least a background of some sort in SECURITY......so far i dont believe any of them have had any.....am i not seeing something here?

 

[eots]

How many times are you going to post this before one of you nuts admits that the same type of warnings were issued about left wing groups in January?

Oh, right...NEVER.

and somehow to you that ..what ? makes it alright ?...what a stuoid argument...how much more mindless could one be.?

 

[AllieBaba]

Ravi has pretty much cornered that market.

 

[DiveCon]

and the lame stream media plays everyone for fools again
they knew there were 2 reports and only really talked about this one so they could say "ooooh loook, SCARY conservative, be afraid"

 

[Immanuel]

And exactly how much was the Left Wing warning blown all out of proportion on MSNBC CNN and ABC doyathink. DF alert DF alert!

lol...the internet dweebs had a hysterical meltdown about the more recent report and brought it to the attention of the media.

This thread was the first I have seen or heard about the left wing extremist report.

I am not at all happy with either report. To me the Right Wing Extremist report was very offensive. First off, I don't consider myself an extremist, but I am pro-life... according to the report, that makes me damned near a terrorist. I find that offensive. I would assume that many people who defend animal rights and many environmentalists would feel much the same way as I do, but the Right Wing Report seemed like it went out of its way to tie anyone who opposed abortion rights or restrictions on the second amendment in with people like Paul Hill, Eric Rudolph and Tim McVeigh.

I wish that there had been some light given by the media about the left wing extremist report or maybe it came from the deep left and only the deep left... that being any media outlet besides Fox? j/k

But, I really had not heard about it.

Immie

 

[Ravi]

How many times are you going to post this before one of you nuts admits that the same type of warnings were issued about left wing groups in January?

Oh, right...NEVER.

and somehow to you that ..what ? makes it alright ?...what a stuoid argument...how much more mindless could one be.?

I think that some groups bear watching. If you don't, you're an idiot. Oh, wait.

 

[Ravi]

Ravi has pretty much cornered that market.

Shall we put you on record for not caring what left wing extremists do? I'll bookmark this page just in case you rail against PETA or some group that blows up businesses.

 

[Annie]

I like the comparison between McVeigh and Bin Laden. If McVeigh personifies the left, then bin Laden personifies Muslims.

 

[ItsFairmont]

Don't get too paranoid, right wingers. Obama was asked yesterday about re-banning assault rifles, and he said it wouldn't be pursued because it would be too difficult politically.

So you get to keep the AK47 for the End Times.

As a Christian, I won't be around to see it.

 

[FactFinder]

'Right-Wing Extremism' Report Issued Despite Objections - Presidential Politics | Political News - FOXNews.com

In the report, right-wing extremism was defined as hate-motivated groups and movements, such as hatred of certain religions, racial or ethnic groups. "It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration," the report said.

I'm opposed to abortion . . . does that make me a terrorist? Immigration?? Uh - - she left out the word 'illegal'. Oversight . . . or intentional?

"If there's one part of that report I would rewrite, in the word-smithing, Washington-ese that goes on after the fact, it would be that footnote," Napolitano said Thursday on FOX News.

The same definition was included in the agency's March 26 draft report on domestic extremism.

Both reports were marked "For Official Use Only." The department said the draft has been recalled and is being edited before it is sent to state and local law enforcement officials.

Doesn't matter that the wording is being changed now that the cat is out of the bag. You can't 'unhear' what has already been said.

Just A Man - good point about Ayres . . .

hey--what's the problem with profiling when you're spying on Americans.

Looks like Obama and company has found the Patriot Act pretty handy. After all the bitchin by the Dems you woulda thunk that would be one of the 1st things they would want to repeal. I guess not as long as Jant Reno (oh, I meant Napolina) finds it useful it is OK despite all the bitching about it.

 

[eots]

How many times are you going to post this before one of you nuts admits that the same type of warnings were issued about left wing groups in January?

Oh, right...NEVER.

and somehow to you that ..what ? makes it alright ?...what a stuoid argument...how much more mindless could one be.?

I think that some groups bear watching. If you don't, you're an idiot. Oh, wait.

can you be more specific than...some groups ..did you read the DHS description of what they considered a threat.?..no of course you cant.. and of course you don't....because you talk out your uninformed ass

anus [(ay-nuhs)]

The opening through which feces pass out of the body

anus definition | Dictionary.com

 

[FactFinder]

and somehow to you that ..what ? makes it alright ?...what a stuoid argument...how much more mindless could one be.?

I think that some groups bear watching. If you don't, you're an idiot. Oh, wait.

can you be more specific than...some groups ..did you read the DHS description of what they considered a threat.?..no of course you cant.. and of course you don't....because you talk out your uninformed ass

anus [(ay-nuhs)]

The opening through which feces pass out of the body

anus definition | Dictionary.com

A threat to what? Just what are they paranoid about and who are they protecting? The Status Quo? Well we have had enough of them already. The status quo is handing our grandkids' money to Wall St. Anyone see a problem with that?

 

[Ravi]

and somehow to you that ..what ? makes it alright ?...what a stuoid argument...how much more mindless could one be.?

I think that some groups bear watching. If you don't, you're an idiot. Oh, wait.

can you be more specific than...some groups ..did you read the DHS description of what they considered a threat.?..no of course you cant.. and of course you don't....because you talk out your uninformed ass

anus [(ay-nuhs)]

The opening through which feces pass out of the body

anus definition | Dictionary.com

I read them both. Extremist groups that historically cause economic or bodily harm bear watching...do you agree or not?

 

[eots]

I think that some groups bear watching. If you don't, you're an idiot. Oh, wait.

can you be more specific than...some groups ..did you read the DHS description of what they considered a threat.?..no of course you cant.. and of course you don't....because you talk out your uninformed ass

anus [(ay-nuhs)]

The opening through which feces pass out of the body

anus definition | Dictionary.com

I read them both. Extremist groups that historically cause economic or bodily harm bear watching...do you agree or not?

who's history ?..this is your idea of specific....how can i agree or disagree with a empty vague statement like this.....