Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
An example of another 'del' serious question.
del is a troll.
Nothing more to the story.
what part of intended baffles you?
What part of AQ Terrorist attack on 9/11 do you not understand?
i understand it just fine, frankie
now go try to make political points on a different set of cadavers
Rice: We didn't intend to mislead on Benghazi - POLITICO.com
"Neither I nor anyone else in the administration intended to mislead the American people at any stage in this process, and the administration updated Congress and the American people as our assessments evolved," Rice said.
Seems to me that a plain reading of what she is saying is that the DID mislead the country just like the right has been saying.
No, that's a twisted reading. The right said they intentionally misled the public and Rice was saying in a diplomatic way "it was all in their head".
DID NOT MEAN TO MISLEAD.......CAN NOT MEAN ANYTHING OTHER THEN THEY DID. It is just a matter of whom set them up.
But even trolls need to intermittenly be exposed.
I've held back on Del for a long time cause he is such an insignificant troll. But, yet, still an irksome one from time to time.
Del is getting close to reaching TM status..................
They did not intend to mislead. Let me give you an example of intending to mislead. When John Mitchell, head of the Nixon reelection campaign, denied any link to the Watergate burglars. Now no one can argue that that was an unintentional mislead!
sore losers are obvious
Hmm, having known you on mb pretty long, are you saying that no dots should be connected? That all opposition should cease. Cave on all?
Rice saying that 'best info at time' fails. The current timeline shows Petraeus saying al Queda, WH changing one word. Then going to Clapper.
Rice would have been in the loop before Clapper, which on the face of it, doesn't smell right.
But, if we are going with what appear to be the 'losers' shut up?
i didn't say shut up, i said you're obvious
if y'all want to be wingnuts, it's no big thing to me.
in fact, i'll buy more shares in alcoa
enjoy
i'm going to wait for the results of the investigation
crazy, innit?
But even trolls need to intermittenly be exposed.
I've held back on Del for a long time cause he is such an insignificant troll. But, yet, still an irksome one from time to time.
Del is getting close to reaching TM status..................
True, but del will never be as smart as TM.....
Rice: We didn't intend to mislead on Benghazi - POLITICO.com
"Neither I nor anyone else in the administration intended to mislead the American people at any stage in this process, and the administration updated Congress and the American people as our assessments evolved," Rice said.
Seems to me that a plain reading of what she is saying is that the DID mislead the country just like the right has been saying.
if they did not intend to mislead the American people..and they truly wanted to wait for "all of the information"...then why did she say it was "in fact" something...wiothout having all of the information?
No it is much better what they did. They incited riots over a video that no one watched. Obama went in front of the world and mislead the world it is exactly what Rice said.
Saying "we didn't intend to mislead the American public" basically admits that they mislead the American public. If they didn't intend to mislead the American public then how did the American public end up mislead?
The only other explanation in this instance is incompetence, either on the administration's part in explaining it or the American public's part in receiving it.
MS. RICE: So we’ll want to see the results of that [FBI] investigation to draw any definitive conclusions. But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy– –sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that– in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.
...
The information, the best information and the best assessment we have today...
But we don’t see at this point signs this was a coordinated plan, premeditated attack. Obviously, we will wait for the results of the investigation and we don’t want to jump to conclusions before then. But I do think it’s important for the American people to know our best current assessment
September 12 -- President Barack Obama:
"The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. ... No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation."
September 12 -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:
"We are working to determine the precise motivations and methods of those who carried out this assault. Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. America's commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear -- there is no justification for this, none."
September 13 -- State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland:
"Well, as we said yesterday when we were on background, we are very cautious about drawing any conclusions with regard to who the perpetrators were, what their motivations were, whether it was premeditated, whether they had any external contacts, whether there was any link, until we have a chance to investigate along with the Libyans. So I know that's going to be frustrating for you, but we really want to make sure that we do this right and we don't jump to conclusions. That said, obviously, there are plenty of people around the region citing this disgusting video as something that has been motivating."
Rice: We didn't intend to mislead on Benghazi - POLITICO.com
"Neither I nor anyone else in the administration intended to mislead the American people at any stage in this process, and the administration updated Congress and the American people as our assessments evolved," Rice said.
Seems to me that a plain reading of what she is saying is that the DID mislead the country just like the right has been saying.
On September 13, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, said authorities "are very cautious about drawing any conclusions with regard to who the perpetrators were, what their motivations were, (and) whether it was premeditated" until they had completed an investigation.
MS. RICE: So well want to see the results of that [FBI] investigation to draw any definitive conclusions. But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.
...
The information, the best information and the best assessment we have today...
But we dont see at this point signs this was a coordinated plan, premeditated attack. Obviously, we will wait for the results of the investigation and we dont want to jump to conclusions before then. But I do think its important for the American people to know our best current assessment
LINK
September 12 -- President Barack Obama:
"The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. ... No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation."
September 12 -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:
"We are working to determine the precise motivations and methods of those who carried out this assault. Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. America's commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear -- there is no justification for this, none."
September 13 -- State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland:
"Well, as we said yesterday when we were on background, we are very cautious about drawing any conclusions with regard to who the perpetrators were, what their motivations were, whether it was premeditated, whether they had any external contacts, whether there was any link, until we have a chance to investigate along with the Libyans. So I know that's going to be frustrating for you, but we really want to make sure that we do this right and we don't jump to conclusions. That said, obviously, there are plenty of people around the region citing this disgusting video as something that has been motivating."
LINK
What republicans actually hear: "Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,...." What they repeat! These are lies, these are obstruction, these are coverups, these are communications from hell..."
An example of another 'del' serious question.
del is a troll.
Nothing more to the story.
But even trolls need to intermittenly be exposed.
I've held back on Del for a long time cause he is such an insignificant troll. But, yet, still an irksome one from time to time.
Del is getting close to reaching TM status..................
Hmm, having known you on mb pretty long, are you saying that no dots should be connected? That all opposition should cease. Cave on all?
Rice saying that 'best info at time' fails. The current timeline shows Petraeus saying al Queda, WH changing one word. Then going to Clapper.
Rice would have been in the loop before Clapper, which on the face of it, doesn't smell right.
But, if we are going with what appear to be the 'losers' shut up?
i didn't say shut up, i said you're obvious
if y'all want to be wingnuts, it's no big thing to me.
in fact, i'll buy more shares in alcoa
enjoy
i'm going to wait for the results of the investigation
crazy, innit?
Thanks for the reply.
i'm close to tears
srsly
On September 13, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, said authorities "are very cautious about drawing any conclusions with regard to who the perpetrators were, what their motivations were, (and) whether it was premeditated" until they had completed an investigation.
MS. RICE: So we’ll want to see the results of that [FBI] investigation to draw any definitive conclusions. But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy– –sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that– in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.
...
The information, the best information and the best assessment we have today...
But we don’t see at this point signs this was a coordinated plan, premeditated attack. Obviously, we will wait for the results of the investigation and we don’t want to jump to conclusions before then. But I do think it’s important for the American people to know our best current assessment
LINK
September 12 -- President Barack Obama:
"The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. ... No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation."
September 12 -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:
"We are working to determine the precise motivations and methods of those who carried out this assault. Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. America's commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear -- there is no justification for this, none."
September 13 -- State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland:
"Well, as we said yesterday when we were on background, we are very cautious about drawing any conclusions with regard to who the perpetrators were, what their motivations were, whether it was premeditated, whether they had any external contacts, whether there was any link, until we have a chance to investigate along with the Libyans. So I know that's going to be frustrating for you, but we really want to make sure that we do this right and we don't jump to conclusions. That said, obviously, there are plenty of people around the region citing this disgusting video as something that has been motivating."
LINK
What republicans actually hear: "Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,...." What they repeat! These are lies, these are obstruction, these are coverups, these are communications from hell..."
Apparently what you hear is blah blah blah. What in those statements make you think they exhonerate Rice and Obama? They were not caution in fixing blame they blamed the video right out of the gate. Thanks for the support.
This administration had to know early on that this was a terrorist attack.
5 days later she goes on all the Sunday shows and is adamant it was this video....
C'mon we are not buying into this BS any more...
