Republicans 40 Year Refusal To Invest In Infrastructure Begins To Cripple US Economy

[danielpalos]

That was a previous administration. We are not comparing.

SINCE WHEN? For 8 years - 9 - we have heard nothing but snowflakes screeching about Bush 'THIS' and Bush 'THAT', comparing Obama to Bush while blaming Bush for everything wrong during the Obama administration.

Me thinks you just don't like to be reminded of

....the nearly $7 Trillion in new debt from Obama's 1st 4 years in office (Super majority Controlled Democratic Party Congress Bush's last 2 years and Obama's 1st 2 years)

...the neatly $1 trillion in debt from Obama's 1st economic legislative endeavor - the failed non-jobs 'jobs' bill, the Stimulus, which contained over 7,000 pieces of tax dollar-wasting, self/DNC-serving pork...that according to the CBO cost tax payers approx. $774,000 per job Obama claimed to have created / saved?

......Billions to Iran and Al Qaeda in Ransoms; Billions to the U.N.'s new Global Initiative (even though Obama said the money was for Zika Virus efforts in the US); Billions for funding/supplying/arming/training terrorists like Al Qaeda / the Muslim Brotherhood / Isis; Millions aiding Human Traffickers bring in Illegals; Millions to Hezbollah his last day in office - to help fund their terrorist-funding drug trade which he helped protect....

...and the $17 Million in tax dollars the Democrats secretly used to pay the victims of their criminal sexual misconduct....

Providing for the general welfare engenders a positive multiplier effect and is enumerated in our Constitution.

Along with paying our, right wing Debt.

Providing for the general warfare does not engender a positive multiplier and is not enumerated in our Constitution.

Providing for defense, however, is. Face it, you're going to have to get a job.

So is providing for the general welfare. You have to read the rest of the Constitution, to find it.

Sure, and we want to take care of those who are unable to work. You, OTOH, are capable of working a job. Go do it.

Only the right wing orders up a bunch of socialism on a national basis for our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and then refuse to pay for it.

Only Vandals, do that.

 

[easyt65]

we can resort to ad hominems all day; Promoting and providing for the general welfare is in the federal doctrine.

STRIKE TWO.....


Once again you completely ignored my questions ... probably because they are uncomfortable and almost impossible to answer without admitting that the Democrats who were in a super majority control of Congress, the WH, and the budget who were spending our tax dollars on terrorists, Mexican Drug Cartels, Human Traffickers, ransoms, alcoholic Chinese prostitutes, the victims of their sexual misconduct, and lining their own pockets with cash were fiscally (and morally, ethically, etc..) Pieces of Shit....

I doubt you will answer this 3rd time, either, but let's give it one last shot, shall we?



How were Obama and the Democrats 'providing for the general welfare' of American citizens by spending / adding:

...nearly $1 trillion in debt from Obama's 1st economic legislative endeavor - the failed non-jobs 'jobs' bill, the Stimulus, which contained over 7,000 pieces of tax dollar-wasting, self/DNC-serving pork...that according to the CBO cost tax payers approx. $774,000 per job Obama claimed to have created / saved?
--- How was spending U.S. Tax Dollars on a project to help alcoholic Chinese prostitutes drink less on duty (one of the Democrats' Pork Projects within the Stimulus Bill) 'providing for the general welfare' of U.S. citizens?

......Billions to Iran and Al Qaeda in Ransoms; Billions to the U.N.'s new Global Initiative (even though Obama said the money was for Zika Virus efforts in the US); Billions for funding/supplying/arming/training terrorists like Al Qaeda / the Muslim Brotherhood / Isis; Millions aiding Human Traffickers bring in Illegals; Millions to Hezbollah his last day in office - to help fund their terrorist-funding drug trade which he helped protect....

...and the $17 Million in tax dollars the Democrats secretly used to pay the victims of their criminal sexual misconduct....

????


...If you ever answer this, the answer ought to be good..... [/QUOTE]

 

[hadit]

SINCE WHEN? For 8 years - 9 - we have heard nothing but snowflakes screeching about Bush 'THIS' and Bush 'THAT', comparing Obama to Bush while blaming Bush for everything wrong during the Obama administration.

Me thinks you just don't like to be reminded of

....the nearly $7 Trillion in new debt from Obama's 1st 4 years in office (Super majority Controlled Democratic Party Congress Bush's last 2 years and Obama's 1st 2 years)

...the neatly $1 trillion in debt from Obama's 1st economic legislative endeavor - the failed non-jobs 'jobs' bill, the Stimulus, which contained over 7,000 pieces of tax dollar-wasting, self/DNC-serving pork...that according to the CBO cost tax payers approx. $774,000 per job Obama claimed to have created / saved?

......Billions to Iran and Al Qaeda in Ransoms; Billions to the U.N.'s new Global Initiative (even though Obama said the money was for Zika Virus efforts in the US); Billions for funding/supplying/arming/training terrorists like Al Qaeda / the Muslim Brotherhood / Isis; Millions aiding Human Traffickers bring in Illegals; Millions to Hezbollah his last day in office - to help fund their terrorist-funding drug trade which he helped protect....

...and the $17 Million in tax dollars the Democrats secretly used to pay the victims of their criminal sexual misconduct....

Providing for the general welfare engenders a positive multiplier effect and is enumerated in our Constitution.

Along with paying our, right wing Debt.

Providing for the general warfare does not engender a positive multiplier and is not enumerated in our Constitution.

Providing for defense, however, is. Face it, you're going to have to get a job.

So is providing for the general welfare. You have to read the rest of the Constitution, to find it.

Sure, and we want to take care of those who are unable to work. You, OTOH, are capable of working a job. Go do it.

Only the right wing orders up a bunch of socialism on a national basis for our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and then refuse to pay for it.

Only Vandals, do that.

Let me know when you're gainfully employed. Your perspective will change.

 

[danielpalos]

we can resort to ad hominems all day; Promoting and providing for the general welfare is in the federal doctrine.

STRIKE TWO.....


Once again you completely ignored my questions ... probably because they are uncomfortable and almost impossible to answer without admitting that the Democrats who were in a super majority control of Congress, the WH, and the budget who were spending our tax dollars on terrorists, Mexican Drug Cartels, Human Traffickers, ransoms, alcoholic Chinese prostitutes, the victims of their sexual misconduct, and lining their own pockets with cash were fiscally (and morally, ethically, etc..) Pieces of Shit....

I doubt you will answer this 3rd time, either, but let's give it one last shot, shall we?



How were Obama and the Democrats 'providing for the general welfare' of American citizens by spending / adding:

...nearly $1 trillion in debt from Obama's 1st economic legislative endeavor - the failed non-jobs 'jobs' bill, the Stimulus, which contained over 7,000 pieces of tax dollar-wasting, self/DNC-serving pork...that according to the CBO cost tax payers approx. $774,000 per job Obama claimed to have created / saved?
--- How was spending U.S. Tax Dollars on a project to help alcoholic Chinese prostitutes drink less on duty (one of the Democrats' Pork Projects within the Stimulus Bill) 'providing for the general welfare' of U.S. citizens?

......Billions to Iran and Al Qaeda in Ransoms; Billions to the U.N.'s new Global Initiative (even though Obama said the money was for Zika Virus efforts in the US); Billions for funding/supplying/arming/training terrorists like Al Qaeda / the Muslim Brotherhood / Isis; Millions aiding Human Traffickers bring in Illegals; Millions to Hezbollah his last day in office - to help fund their terrorist-funding drug trade which he helped protect....

...and the $17 Million in tax dollars the Democrats secretly used to pay the victims of their criminal sexual misconduct....

????


...If you ever answer this, the answer ought to be good.....

It means nothing; the power to provide for the general welfare is in our Constitution. The power to provide for the general warfare or common offense, is not. It really is that simple, for cost reduction purposes.

 

[danielpalos]

Providing for the general welfare engenders a positive multiplier effect and is enumerated in our Constitution.

Along with paying our, right wing Debt.

Providing for the general warfare does not engender a positive multiplier and is not enumerated in our Constitution.

Providing for defense, however, is. Face it, you're going to have to get a job.

So is providing for the general welfare. You have to read the rest of the Constitution, to find it.

Sure, and we want to take care of those who are unable to work. You, OTOH, are capable of working a job. Go do it.

Only the right wing orders up a bunch of socialism on a national basis for our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and then refuse to pay for it.

Only Vandals, do that.

Let me know when you're gainfully employed. Your perspective will change.

How do you think I got my perspective?

 

[rightwinger]

The ideological blinders that have guided the Republican party since the Reagan administration are slowly but surely crippling our economy. One area where that is most evident is in our transportation infrastructure where the Republican refusal to consider any federal investment as valid has led to the deterioration of the very pathways that fuel our economy.

In one of its last acts of stupidity for 2017, the Trump administration has cancelled the agreement that the federal government had with the states of New York and New Jersey to not only restore the badly damaged rail tunnels between those two states but also build a new, third tunnel as well to relieve the congestion at that critical rail hub. The agreement meant that the federal government would split the cost of that project with the two states.

This is the second time an agreement to restore this important rail link and the busiest transit hub in the entire country has been sabotaged by Republicans. In 2010, then New Jersey Governor Chris Christie backed out of a similar project, saying the state could not afford it. Instead, he funneled the money saved into the state’s own dwindling transportation so he would not have to raise the state’s gas tax and position himself for a presidential run.

Amtrak estimates that the two existing tunnels have less than 15 years left before they totally breakdown and there is no guarantee that one or both of these salt-ravaged tunnels might fail earlier. It is estimated that if just one tunnel failed, it would slow rail traffic through the Northeast by 75% and create a regional economic crisis.

The truly sick part of all this is that, if Christie had gone ahead with the plan in 2010, there was a possibility that the new tunnel would be coming into service this year. Instead, it will be another decade before this restoration project will be completed, if at all. It is thought that this current cancellation may be yet another political ploy by Trump and the Republicans and that this will be folded into the so-far mythical Trump infrastructure plan in order to woo Democratic votes. But even that might be a tough sell if Trump’s plan is just another corporate giveaway in the form of public-private partnerships.

This isn’t the only major rail project that the Trump administration has kiboshed. In July, the federal government backed out of an agreement with the state of Maryland and the rail company CSX to raise the height of the Howard Street Tunnel in Baltimore in order to allow double-stacked rail cars to easily access the Port of Baltimore. Double-stacked rail cars comprise over 75% of intermodal rail traffic in the country and this will only increase in the future. This will be especially true on the East Coast in both Baltimore and New York as shipping traffic from Asia increases with the opening of the expanded Panama Canal.

This refusal to recognize any valid investment by the federal government, which Republican have engaged in since the Reagan administration, has led to the slow but steady erosion of our transportation infrastructure, which was once the envy of the world. And that erosion will soon begin to cripple this country economically.

Republicans’ 40 Year Refusal To Invest In Infrastructure Begins to Cripple US Economy

Infrastructure deal if you democrats stop flooding the country with illegals who use BILLIONS in welfare deal?

Ridiculous myth

 

[iceberg]

The ideological blinders that have guided the Republican party since the Reagan administration are slowly but surely crippling our economy. One area where that is most evident is in our transportation infrastructure where the Republican refusal to consider any federal investment as valid has led to the deterioration of the very pathways that fuel our economy.

In one of its last acts of stupidity for 2017, the Trump administration has cancelled the agreement that the federal government had with the states of New York and New Jersey to not only restore the badly damaged rail tunnels between those two states but also build a new, third tunnel as well to relieve the congestion at that critical rail hub. The agreement meant that the federal government would split the cost of that project with the two states.

This is the second time an agreement to restore this important rail link and the busiest transit hub in the entire country has been sabotaged by Republicans. In 2010, then New Jersey Governor Chris Christie backed out of a similar project, saying the state could not afford it. Instead, he funneled the money saved into the state’s own dwindling transportation so he would not have to raise the state’s gas tax and position himself for a presidential run.

Amtrak estimates that the two existing tunnels have less than 15 years left before they totally breakdown and there is no guarantee that one or both of these salt-ravaged tunnels might fail earlier. It is estimated that if just one tunnel failed, it would slow rail traffic through the Northeast by 75% and create a regional economic crisis.

The truly sick part of all this is that, if Christie had gone ahead with the plan in 2010, there was a possibility that the new tunnel would be coming into service this year. Instead, it will be another decade before this restoration project will be completed, if at all. It is thought that this current cancellation may be yet another political ploy by Trump and the Republicans and that this will be folded into the so-far mythical Trump infrastructure plan in order to woo Democratic votes. But even that might be a tough sell if Trump’s plan is just another corporate giveaway in the form of public-private partnerships.

This isn’t the only major rail project that the Trump administration has kiboshed. In July, the federal government backed out of an agreement with the state of Maryland and the rail company CSX to raise the height of the Howard Street Tunnel in Baltimore in order to allow double-stacked rail cars to easily access the Port of Baltimore. Double-stacked rail cars comprise over 75% of intermodal rail traffic in the country and this will only increase in the future. This will be especially true on the East Coast in both Baltimore and New York as shipping traffic from Asia increases with the opening of the expanded Panama Canal.

This refusal to recognize any valid investment by the federal government, which Republican have engaged in since the Reagan administration, has led to the slow but steady erosion of our transportation infrastructure, which was once the envy of the world. And that erosion will soon begin to cripple this country economically.

Republicans’ 40 Year Refusal To Invest In Infrastructure Begins to Cripple US Economy

what a load of complete and total partisan bullshit.

democrats have had control for a good portion of those 40 years but are somehow excused?

 

[hadit]

Providing for defense, however, is. Face it, you're going to have to get a job.

So is providing for the general welfare. You have to read the rest of the Constitution, to find it.

Sure, and we want to take care of those who are unable to work. You, OTOH, are capable of working a job. Go do it.

Only the right wing orders up a bunch of socialism on a national basis for our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and then refuse to pay for it.

Only Vandals, do that.

Let me know when you're gainfully employed. Your perspective will change.

How do you think I got my perspective?

Bong hits.

 

[danielpalos]

So is providing for the general welfare. You have to read the rest of the Constitution, to find it.

Sure, and we want to take care of those who are unable to work. You, OTOH, are capable of working a job. Go do it.

Only the right wing orders up a bunch of socialism on a national basis for our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and then refuse to pay for it.

Only Vandals, do that.

Let me know when you're gainfully employed. Your perspective will change.

How do you think I got my perspective?

Bong hits.

just means I may have to do it over again and not complain.

 

[easyt65]

It means nothing; the power to provide for the general welfare is in our Constitution.

Strike 3

Your acknowledgement of the FACT that

...nearly $1 trillion in debt from Obama's 1st economic legislative endeavor - the failed non-jobs 'jobs' bill, the Stimulus, which contained over 7,000 pieces of tax dollar-wasting, self/DNC-serving pork...that according to the CBO cost tax payers approx. $774,000 per job Obama claimed to have created / saved?
--- How was spending U.S. Tax Dollars on a project to help alcoholic Chinese prostitutes drink less on duty (one of the Democrats' Pork Projects within the Stimulus Bill) 'providing for the general welfare' of U.S. citizens?

......Billions to Iran and Al Qaeda in Ransoms; Billions to the U.N.'s new Global Initiative (even though Obama said the money was for Zika Virus efforts in the US); Billions for funding/supplying/arming/training terrorists like Al Qaeda / the Muslim Brotherhood / Isis; Millions aiding Human Traffickers bring in Illegals; Millions to Hezbollah his last day in office - to help fund their terrorist-funding drug trade which he helped protect....

...and the $17 Million in tax dollars the Democrats secretly used to pay the victims of their criminal sexual misconduct....

...by Democrats when in super majority control of the government were acts of criminal fiscal irresponsibility, greed, theft treason, betrayal of the American people's trust....and is nowhere covered under the Constitution's given authority to 'promote the general welfare'.
-- It does authorize spending to promote the general welfare of the AMERICAN PEOPLE, not the general welfare of terrorists, Mexican Drug Cartels, human traffickers, violent illegals, and enemies of the state. Maybe that's is what the Democrats are confused over and needs someone to explain it to them.

...is duly noted.

Thank you, and have a Happy New Year.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The ideological blinders that have guided the Republican party since the Reagan administration are slowly but surely crippling our economy. One area where that is most evident is in our transportation infrastructure where the Republican refusal to consider any federal investment as valid has led to the deterioration of the very pathways that fuel our economy.

In one of its last acts of stupidity for 2017, the Trump administration has cancelled the agreement that the federal government had with the states of New York and New Jersey to not only restore the badly damaged rail tunnels between those two states but also build a new, third tunnel as well to relieve the congestion at that critical rail hub. The agreement meant that the federal government would split the cost of that project with the two states.

This is the second time an agreement to restore this important rail link and the busiest transit hub in the entire country has been sabotaged by Republicans. In 2010, then New Jersey Governor Chris Christie backed out of a similar project, saying the state could not afford it. Instead, he funneled the money saved into the state’s own dwindling transportation so he would not have to raise the state’s gas tax and position himself for a presidential run.

Amtrak estimates that the two existing tunnels have less than 15 years left before they totally breakdown and there is no guarantee that one or both of these salt-ravaged tunnels might fail earlier. It is estimated that if just one tunnel failed, it would slow rail traffic through the Northeast by 75% and create a regional economic crisis.

The truly sick part of all this is that, if Christie had gone ahead with the plan in 2010, there was a possibility that the new tunnel would be coming into service this year. Instead, it will be another decade before this restoration project will be completed, if at all. It is thought that this current cancellation may be yet another political ploy by Trump and the Republicans and that this will be folded into the so-far mythical Trump infrastructure plan in order to woo Democratic votes. But even that might be a tough sell if Trump’s plan is just another corporate giveaway in the form of public-private partnerships.

This isn’t the only major rail project that the Trump administration has kiboshed. In July, the federal government backed out of an agreement with the state of Maryland and the rail company CSX to raise the height of the Howard Street Tunnel in Baltimore in order to allow double-stacked rail cars to easily access the Port of Baltimore. Double-stacked rail cars comprise over 75% of intermodal rail traffic in the country and this will only increase in the future. This will be especially true on the East Coast in both Baltimore and New York as shipping traffic from Asia increases with the opening of the expanded Panama Canal.

This refusal to recognize any valid investment by the federal government, which Republican have engaged in since the Reagan administration, has led to the slow but steady erosion of our transportation infrastructure, which was once the envy of the world. And that erosion will soon begin to cripple this country economically.

Republicans’ 40 Year Refusal To Invest In Infrastructure Begins to Cripple US Economy

Infrastructure deal if you democrats stop flooding the country with illegals who use BILLIONS in welfare deal?

Ridiculous myth

IRLI - Home

 

[danielpalos]

It means nothing; the power to provide for the general welfare is in our Constitution.

Strike 3

Your acknowledgement of the FACT that

...nearly $1 trillion in debt from Obama's 1st economic legislative endeavor - the failed non-jobs 'jobs' bill, the Stimulus, which contained over 7,000 pieces of tax dollar-wasting, self/DNC-serving pork...that according to the CBO cost tax payers approx. $774,000 per job Obama claimed to have created / saved?
--- How was spending U.S. Tax Dollars on a project to help alcoholic Chinese prostitutes drink less on duty (one of the Democrats' Pork Projects within the Stimulus Bill) 'providing for the general welfare' of U.S. citizens?

......Billions to Iran and Al Qaeda in Ransoms; Billions to the U.N.'s new Global Initiative (even though Obama said the money was for Zika Virus efforts in the US); Billions for funding/supplying/arming/training terrorists like Al Qaeda / the Muslim Brotherhood / Isis; Millions aiding Human Traffickers bring in Illegals; Millions to Hezbollah his last day in office - to help fund their terrorist-funding drug trade which he helped protect....

...and the $17 Million in tax dollars the Democrats secretly used to pay the victims of their criminal sexual misconduct....

...by Democrats when in super majority control of the government were acts of criminal fiscal irresponsibility, greed, theft treason, betrayal of the American people's trust....and is nowhere covered under the Constitution's given authority to 'promote the general welfare'.
-- It does authorize spending to promote the general welfare of the AMERICAN PEOPLE, not the general welfare of terrorists, Mexican Drug Cartels, human traffickers, violent illegals, and enemies of the state. Maybe that's is what the Democrats are confused over and needs someone to explain it to them.

...is duly noted.

Thank you, and have a Happy New Year.

The right wing is for our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and then refuse to raise taxes to pay for them; only Vandals, do that.

 

[danielpalos]

The ideological blinders that have guided the Republican party since the Reagan administration are slowly but surely crippling our economy. One area where that is most evident is in our transportation infrastructure where the Republican refusal to consider any federal investment as valid has led to the deterioration of the very pathways that fuel our economy.

In one of its last acts of stupidity for 2017, the Trump administration has cancelled the agreement that the federal government had with the states of New York and New Jersey to not only restore the badly damaged rail tunnels between those two states but also build a new, third tunnel as well to relieve the congestion at that critical rail hub. The agreement meant that the federal government would split the cost of that project with the two states.

This is the second time an agreement to restore this important rail link and the busiest transit hub in the entire country has been sabotaged by Republicans. In 2010, then New Jersey Governor Chris Christie backed out of a similar project, saying the state could not afford it. Instead, he funneled the money saved into the state’s own dwindling transportation so he would not have to raise the state’s gas tax and position himself for a presidential run.

Amtrak estimates that the two existing tunnels have less than 15 years left before they totally breakdown and there is no guarantee that one or both of these salt-ravaged tunnels might fail earlier. It is estimated that if just one tunnel failed, it would slow rail traffic through the Northeast by 75% and create a regional economic crisis.

The truly sick part of all this is that, if Christie had gone ahead with the plan in 2010, there was a possibility that the new tunnel would be coming into service this year. Instead, it will be another decade before this restoration project will be completed, if at all. It is thought that this current cancellation may be yet another political ploy by Trump and the Republicans and that this will be folded into the so-far mythical Trump infrastructure plan in order to woo Democratic votes. But even that might be a tough sell if Trump’s plan is just another corporate giveaway in the form of public-private partnerships.

This isn’t the only major rail project that the Trump administration has kiboshed. In July, the federal government backed out of an agreement with the state of Maryland and the rail company CSX to raise the height of the Howard Street Tunnel in Baltimore in order to allow double-stacked rail cars to easily access the Port of Baltimore. Double-stacked rail cars comprise over 75% of intermodal rail traffic in the country and this will only increase in the future. This will be especially true on the East Coast in both Baltimore and New York as shipping traffic from Asia increases with the opening of the expanded Panama Canal.

This refusal to recognize any valid investment by the federal government, which Republican have engaged in since the Reagan administration, has led to the slow but steady erosion of our transportation infrastructure, which was once the envy of the world. And that erosion will soon begin to cripple this country economically.

Republicans’ 40 Year Refusal To Invest In Infrastructure Begins to Cripple US Economy

Infrastructure deal if you democrats stop flooding the country with illegals who use BILLIONS in welfare deal?

Ridiculous myth

IRLI - Home

How is illegal immigration impacting our economy? We have one of the largest economies in the world and Mexico is one of our top trading partners. And, the rich just got richer.

 

[easyt65]

The right wing is for our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and then refuse to raise taxes to pay for them; only Vandals, do that.

Our tax dollars would be better spend waging 'war' against the proven criminally fiscally irresponsible, seditious, and treasonous Democrats who have used our money to pay terrorists, Mexican Drug Cartels, Human Traffickers, sponsors of terror, violent illegals, victims of their criminal sexual misconduct, etc....

 

[danielpalos]

The right wing is for our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and then refuse to raise taxes to pay for them; only Vandals, do that.

Our tax dollars would be better spend waging 'war' against the proven criminally fiscally irresponsible, seditious, and treasonous Democrats who have used our money to pay terrorists, Mexican Drug Cartels, Human Traffickers, sponsors of terror, violent illegals, victims of their criminal sexual misconduct, etc....

Only in right wing fantasy. How long have we had our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror? Even the right wing refuses to raise taxes to pay for them; that is how unimportant they really are.

Both terms, to promote and provide apply to the general welfare but not the common defense.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

40 years?

The Republicans have held Congress for the last 40 years?

Yeah, my math might not be that great but I am sure in 1978 Jimmy Carter was President and Congress was Democrat at the time...

 

[easyt65]

Only in right wing fantasy.

Denial on Display.

Conyers' sexual misconduct exposed an entire criminal system created by Democrats of stealing tax dollars to pay their victims of sexual misconduct. Obama spent 8 years financing, supplying, arming, training, defending, protecting, aiding, and abetting terrorists, etc...

You can't re-write History, snowflake. Democrats' 'war on tax payers' have been going on for decades.

 

[danielpalos]

Only in right wing fantasy.

Denial on Display.

Conyers' sexual misconduct exposed an entire criminal system created by Democrats of stealing tax dollars to pay their victims of sexual misconduct. Obama spent 8 years financing, supplying, arming, training, defending, protecting, aiding, and abetting terrorists, etc...

You can't re-write History, snowflake. Democrats' 'war on tax payers' have been going on for decades.

right wing projection on display, when they run out of logic and reason.

How long have we had our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror? Even the right wing refuses to raise taxes to pay for them; that is how unimportant they really are.

Both terms, to promote and to provide apply to the general welfare but not the common defense.

 

[easyt65]

right wing projection on display, when they run out of logic and reason.

What 'projection', you nut job? Everything I have mentioned - such as Conyers and the Democrats' committee responsible for paying their criminal sexual misconduct victims with tax dollars, have all been PROVEN.

Seek help with that massive 'denial' problem. In the meantime, it makes no sense trying to discuss anything who does not accept reality. Have a nice day.

 

[danielpalos]

right wing projection on display, when they run out of logic and reason.

What 'projection', you nut job? Everything I have mentioned - such as Conyers and the Democrats' committee responsible for paying their criminal sexual misconduct victims with tax dollars, have all been PROVEN.

Seek help with that massive 'denial' problem. In the meantime, it makes no sense trying to discuss anything who does not accept reality. Have a nice day.

How long have we had our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror? Even the right wing refuses to raise taxes to pay for them; that is how unimportant they really are.

Both terms, to promote and to provide apply to the general welfare but not the common defense.