Republican Blurts Out That Sick People Don’t Deserve Affordable Care

Republican Blurts Out That Sick People Don’t Deserve Affordable Care

Republican health care plan: stay healthy or die.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But everything he said was dead on right. Did you not listen to anything he said?

The people who refuse to buy their own health insurance, who then later become ill, are passing those costs onto the people who have been responsible, and paid for insurance.

The people who are acting responsibly, are being punished by those who did not.

That's not fair. The Republican, once again and as is always the case, is dead on right.
So basically, if you can't afford insurance, you deserve to die...cool...

All republicans have to do is be honest and campaign on it instead of lying like Trump did when he promised EVERYONE would have health care and it would the greatest most tremendous most affordable healthcare ever..believe me....

We don't

So basically, you are an irresponsible person, and everyone else should be forced to pay for your bad choices?

Besides you can't complain about Trump. You had Obama, you had the congress, you passed Obama care, and screwed up the system worse than it ever was before.

Every attempt to blame Trump, is just you admitting that you and everything you stand for, has been is will always be, an utter and total failure.
I have healthcare thru my employer -- but I am not a self centered narcissist...I don't have a "fuck you, I got mine" attitude...there is no reason for people to be too broke to live …..period.....

Again...why do you coward ass republicans not run on the bullshit you talking about now??

Why do you coward ass republicans do all in your power to take away affordable healthcare from people then turn around and campaign on protecting the very thing you were actively voting against?? Because they are cowards...

Republicans Fought Obamacare. Now They’re Campaigning to Save It

Only because you don't realize how much higher your insurance premiums are, because of people who have refused to get insurance through their employer or otherwise, and you are the one paying the bill.

If your pay stub had two line items "Health Insurance plan" and "Premium payment to cover those who refuse to get insurance".

I guarantee you, that you would be livid. I know for a fact you would be, because I have personally seen left-wingers like you, freak out when their premiums go up, because they employed people with tons of pre-existing conditions.

I was at a company, where a bunch of left-wing democrap women were standing around saying how insurance should cover everything. Then the company the ObamaCare laws change our insurance plans. The result was everyone's premiums drastically increased.... because the insurance companies were covering more. Everyone (except me, because I had private insurance outside the company), had a pay cut.

All these left-wingers screaming that insurance should cover everything, and no pre-existing conditions, you should have seen these left-wingers having a toddler temper tantrum after the premium hikes.

You people on the left, are real quick to play your fake-morality game, when you don't see any cost to yourself.

But the moment the bill lands in your lap, you all have a melt down.
Why do you keep avoidng what I asked you....

You can save yourself all of those paragraphs with your ramblings about everything but what I asked you...

Why does Trump and republicans in general keep trying to campaign on Obamacare??

its a very simple question.....
 
You idiot. I said They should pay more. I did Not say they should not be insured. You should pay more than me for example because you’re old and unhealthy.
If what insurance companies feel those people should pay is something that they can't afford (seeing as tho tons of families are going bankrupt due to medical bills) -- you are basically saying they shouldn't be insured.....


Everyone has access to health care, doesn't mean its affordable for them to access it....

First, what you said is just flat out not true.

People are simply not just going bankrupt left and right because of health care costs. It was a lie from the very start.

I personally read the report, where they made this claim. The research paper that this made up myth came from, was entirely flaws from the very start.

For example, they included any bankruptcy in which $500 or more was due to medical bills.
Further, they did not look at how much other debt the individual had.

Do you see someone filing bankruptcy on $500? Of course not. The cost of the bankruptcy itself, would be almost as much as the medical debt.

Additionally, even if you had $2,000 in medical debt, and you owned $100,000 in credit cards, and a car loan and other debts.... is that a medical bankruptcy? Were you really filing just because of the $2,000 in medical bills? Or was it the $100K in other debt?

Lastly, and most importantly, they included bankruptcy that was caused, not by medical bills, but because of missing work. So if you had insurance good enough to cover all your medical bills completely, but you missed 2 months of work, and ended up filing bankruptcy because you had no income..... that was also included as a medical bankruptcy.

The entire thing was ridiculous. The idea that millions of people are going bankrupt because of medical bills, is flat out false, and a myth.

Not true.
"The idea that millions of people are going bankrupt" <<-- nice strawman....

Half a million families file bankruptcy every year....66% of them cite medical bills as their chief reason for filing....

This is the real reason most Americans file for bankruptcy

in a country that can spend trillions on endless wars in the Middle east and not blink, not once ask "how are we going to pay for it" -- no fucking body should be going bankrupt for being sick......period....

Again... saying that Medical bills are the reason, is ridiculous. If someone asks me why I'm filing bankruptcy, I'll list all my bills. If I have a medical bill for $100, I would list it.

Even your own article that you posted, said "Contributing factor". Right, every single bill, including that $200 TV I bought would be a "contributing factor".

In fact, your article continued with more things I directly said......

either because of high costs for care or time out of work​

Or time off work? So your insurance might cover 100%, but if you are forced into bankruptcy because of your 'time off work'.... that's a medical bankruptcy?

That is exactly what your article stated.

So you just validated my entire post, with your own link.

Thanks. Next time, read more, and talk less. Might learn something.
I am going to say this again...

Why don't republicans campaign on it??

Why are republicans campaigning on protecting Obamacare??

Because they are cowards.....

If whatever the republicans were proposing on healthcare was so great, they would share that plan with the rest of us.....

Majority of Republicans supports 'Medicare for all,' poll finds
Because neither party knows how to optimize healthcare. Politicians get it for free so they don’t care. They suck.
 
You idiot. I said They should pay more. I did Not say they should not be insured. You should pay more than me for example because you’re old and unhealthy.
If what insurance companies feel they should pay is something they can't afford (seeing as tho tons of families are going bankrupt due to medical bills) -- you are basically saying they shouldn't be insured.....


Everyone has access to health care, doesn't mean its affordable for them to access it....
No. I am saying if I am healthy, don’t take meds or smoke and you’re overweight, smoke and need pills for diabetes because you’re too lazy to workout and too stupid to eat right you should pay more for coverage.
If you think the majority of the people who are going bankrupt or flat out dying due to lack of access to affordable coverage are just people who are too lazy to be healthy, you are delusional.....
We are discussing mutually exclusive issues. My point is that fewer people would be sick if they took care of themselves proactively and perhaps they would do so knowing they would pay lower premiums. Win/win. You Leftists always use extreme cases to make your points.
Yea, I remember Michelle Obama triggering plenty of trumpers by saying the same thing....

I guess with you folks, you support something as long as it not attributed to the scary black person...

Maybe that is why states like Kentucky love their healthcare system as long as you don't tell them its Obamacare...

Kentuckians hate Obamacare but love it by another name
You’re dumb so I will reiterate that I am an Independent and do not belong to either party. I think both are deeply flawed. Democrat party is worse as it is run by idiot Leftists. You’re dumb, so let me explain. It would be the same as if the Republican Party were run by David Duke now.
 
You idiot. I said They should pay more. I did Not say they should not be insured. You should pay more than me for example because you’re old and unhealthy.
If what insurance companies feel those people should pay is something that they can't afford (seeing as tho tons of families are going bankrupt due to medical bills) -- you are basically saying they shouldn't be insured.....


Everyone has access to health care, doesn't mean its affordable for them to access it....

First, what you said is just flat out not true.

People are simply not just going bankrupt left and right because of health care costs. It was a lie from the very start.

I personally read the report, where they made this claim. The research paper that this made up myth came from, was entirely flaws from the very start.

For example, they included any bankruptcy in which $500 or more was due to medical bills.
Further, they did not look at how much other debt the individual had.

Do you see someone filing bankruptcy on $500? Of course not. The cost of the bankruptcy itself, would be almost as much as the medical debt.

Additionally, even if you had $2,000 in medical debt, and you owned $100,000 in credit cards, and a car loan and other debts.... is that a medical bankruptcy? Were you really filing just because of the $2,000 in medical bills? Or was it the $100K in other debt?

Lastly, and most importantly, they included bankruptcy that was caused, not by medical bills, but because of missing work. So if you had insurance good enough to cover all your medical bills completely, but you missed 2 months of work, and ended up filing bankruptcy because you had no income..... that was also included as a medical bankruptcy.

The entire thing was ridiculous. The idea that millions of people are going bankrupt because of medical bills, is flat out false, and a myth.

Not true.
"The idea that millions of people are going bankrupt" <<-- nice strawman....

Half a million families file bankruptcy every year....66% of them cite medical bills as their chief reason for filing....

This is the real reason most Americans file for bankruptcy

in a country that can spend trillions on endless wars in the Middle east and not blink, not once ask "how are we going to pay for it" -- no fucking body should be going bankrupt for being sick......period....

Again... saying that Medical bills are the reason, is ridiculous. If someone asks me why I'm filing bankruptcy, I'll list all my bills. If I have a medical bill for $100, I would list it.

Even your own article that you posted, said "Contributing factor". Right, every single bill, including that $200 TV I bought would be a "contributing factor".

In fact, your article continued with more things I directly said......

either because of high costs for care or time out of work​

Or time off work? So your insurance might cover 100%, but if you are forced into bankruptcy because of your 'time off work'.... that's a medical bankruptcy?

That is exactly what your article stated.

So you just validated my entire post, with your own link.

Thanks. Next time, read more, and talk less. Might learn something.
I am going to say this again...

Why don't republicans campaign on it??

Why are republicans campaigning on protecting Obamacare??

Because they are cowards.....

If whatever the republicans were proposing on healthcare was so great, they would share that plan with the rest of us.....

Majority of Republicans supports 'Medicare for all,' poll finds

Of course they are cowards. They are politicians. Politicians are more interested in getting elected, and keeping their jobs, than doing what is best for the country.

Look at Greece. The Syrzia Party in Greece, the radical left-wing party, got elected by promising the public they would break the bailout deal. they all knew that doing so would cause Greece to default, cause millions in job loss, break the banking system, cause the shut down of hospitals, mass transit, and pensioners to not have pensions at all.

They knew all that. But it got them elected. They were elected to the highest positions of power and luxury in Greece, while the rest of the country was gathering sticks to burn in the winter, because the public couldn't even afford natural gas heating.

Bernie Sanders, Warren, Biden, the vast majority of all Democrats and Republicans, will do and say whatever they need to, to get you to elect them. If you are dumb enough to believe that a 'wealth tax' will work, even though it devastated France, then that is what they will push.

I am very open to the idea that a majority of Americans are in fact economically illiterate morons, who actually think socialism will work. And if you are stupid enough to believe what your brainless fools say, they'll tell you whatever lie you want to hear, so they can live in luxury, while you wait for ObamaCare to fix your life, and die waiting for it.
 
Last edited:
This is really interesting to read both sides on. It’s interesting to me to read how quickly people are to blame poor health for whatever ailment. I think everyone forgets how many things can happen to you that don’t involve being unhealthy.
Hernias, Rotator cuff tears, labrum tears, ACL tears, meniscal damage, cataracts, gallbladder disease (genetic factor), appendix removal, bunion repairs, carpal tunnel repairs...I could go on and on.
These are all things any one of us on this thread could get while living a perfectly active life. It’s crazy to me how ready people here are to think of the extremes. I do not think in a country as rich as our own we should have people who are hard workers struggling to pay for the costs of their healthcare. Yet I see it all the time...
 
This is really interesting to read both sides on. It’s interesting to me to read how quickly people are to blame poor health for whatever ailment. I think everyone forgets how many things can happen to you that don’t involve being unhealthy.
Hernias, Rotator cuff tears, labrum tears, ACL tears, meniscal damage, cataracts, gallbladder disease (genetic factor), appendix removal, bunion repairs, carpal tunnel repairs...I could go on and on.
These are all things any one of us on this thread could get while living a perfectly active life. It’s crazy to me how ready people here are to think of the extremes. I do not think in a country as rich as our own we should have people who are hard workers struggling to pay for the costs of their healthcare. Yet I see it all the time...

I think Democrats are misreading what Republicans are saying - or least what was cited in the OP - and deliberately so. It isn't about "blaming" people who are ill. Saying that people should be responsible for their own living expenses, rather forcing someone else to pay, isn't controversial. It's the way we deal with nearly all of life's expenses. For some reason, people think health care should be different. I don't get it.
 
No it shouldn’t be
This is people’s life

If your kid was born with a disability, or you have a heart condition, or god forbid you get pregnant

You should not be placed in a high risk pool that puts your financial future in jeopardy.

We should not punish people for being sick
I agree but if we are both healthy and you’re a smoker and I am not you should pay more. All things being equal. You keep using dramatic cases, which are less than 1% of most subscribers. Don’t be a dink.

In terms of life insurance I pay a lot less as I was deemed as such posts tests. Why can it not be the same for health insurance and again dont give me extreme examples. Don’t be a Leftist loser for once.
No they are not just one percent
It is each and every one of us
The overwhelming majority of our healthcare dollar is used by those 65 and older. We will all, hopefully, be there some day.

Thankfully, smokers are a small percentage of our society today. Whatever we are doing is working
Should they pay more for healthcare than nonsmoking people? Yes or no? Should fat asses pay more than those who eat better and exercise. Should those who abuse alcohol pay more? Yes or no? You Leftists just make excuses.

No
Sick people should be treated
Period

Healthcare is healthcare. You don’t open the door for insurers to cherry pick their clients. Insure one, you insure all.....no exceptions
You idiot. I said They should pay more. I did Not say they should not be insured. You should pay more than me for example because you’re old and unhealthy.

Again brings us to the haves and have nots
Making the sick pay more is just blaming the victim

Do you think sick people are in any way making out ?
 
I agree but if we are both healthy and you’re a smoker and I am not you should pay more. All things being equal. You keep using dramatic cases, which are less than 1% of most subscribers. Don’t be a dink.

In terms of life insurance I pay a lot less as I was deemed as such posts tests. Why can it not be the same for health insurance and again dont give me extreme examples. Don’t be a Leftist loser for once.
No they are not just one percent
It is each and every one of us
The overwhelming majority of our healthcare dollar is used by those 65 and older. We will all, hopefully, be there some day.

Thankfully, smokers are a small percentage of our society today. Whatever we are doing is working
Should they pay more for healthcare than nonsmoking people? Yes or no? Should fat asses pay more than those who eat better and exercise. Should those who abuse alcohol pay more? Yes or no? You Leftists just make excuses.

No
Sick people should be treated
Period

Healthcare is healthcare. You don’t open the door for insurers to cherry pick their clients. Insure one, you insure all.....no exceptions
You idiot. I said They should pay more. I did Not say they should not be insured. You should pay more than me for example because you’re old and unhealthy.

Again brings us to the haves and have nots
Making the sick pay more is just blaming the victim

Do you think sick people are in any way making out ?

Hold on so rich people cannot be fat and unhealthy? That doesn't make any sense. Why do you always go back to that, Leftist? If we both work for Amazon in Accounting and have the same comp. and you're fat and smoke and I am a healthy weight and do not, you should pay more. You're such an evil troll.
 
I think Democrats are misreading what Republicans are saying - or least what was cited in the OP - and deliberately so. It isn't about "blaming" people who are ill. Saying that people should be responsible for their own living expenses, rather forcing someone else to pay, isn't controversial. It's the way we deal with nearly all of life's expenses. For some reason, people think health care should be different. I don't get it.


Health care *is* different than other life expenses, say, rent.
For one, the price for the average person is astronomically different. Rent is typically less than a couple grand, depending on where you live. If I am to damage, say, my rotator cuff, without insurance it could cost me 6-12 thousand dollars to get it fixed. If I am in my early 20’s in college working a part time job making 10.00 how could I possibly afford that? I can make rent, I can make my car payment, phone bill, grocery bill...but I won’t be able to afford to fix my body without saving up for years.

Also, it can be much more serious. Say I miss my car payment. My credit gets dinged, worst case my car is taken. Don’t have health insurance? Can’t get into urgent care to see someone then my appendix explodes and I die of sepsis. Intense example sure, but if we are comparing the difference in expenses that is how I see it.

Another reason is it is often things we can’t control. I can chose whether I buy a Tesla or a Honda Civic. I have choices on where I live for rent, my phone carrier, where I shop for groceries. I didn’t get to chose having a history of breast cancer in my family or the cysts on my ovaries.

I don’t think either side has the right answer. We need to figure out a solution where we are not screwing the people who need help and really can’t afford it. I work in surgery so I see these sorts of situations all the time. Very recently I did the same procedure on two different women. One hadn’t worked in years and was collecting unemployment. She paid $0 out of pocket. The next lady? She was a teacher and had worked her whole life. She paid $3,000 out of pocket. She had insurance. There is huge inequality in our medical business and I personally think the issue goes farther. In terms of the medical business, our surgeon owned surgery center often gets screwed by insurance companies. If 3 people go in for the same surgery, with the same staff, and the same equipment...why should our center receive different amounts for the same amount of work and amount of equipment?

I am by no means an expert on the matter, I have just seen the situations first hand where I can see it from both sides.
 
Don’t you belive in abortion? But you care about someone dying? Lol what ?

I can see how that seems weird, but I also wonder it from the same but opposite perspective. So many people against abortion but then don’t care about the babies once they are born and alive and living. How can people who seemingly find so much value in life care so little about life after birth? I’d have much more respect for the pro life movement if they seemed to care about life after the birth.
 
Don’t you belive in abortion? But you care about someone dying? Lol what ?

I can see how that seems weird, but I also wonder it from the same but opposite perspective. So many people against abortion but then don’t care about the babies once they are born and alive and living. How can people who seemingly find so much value in life care so little about life after birth? I’d have much more respect for the pro life movement if they seemed to care about life after the birth.
Who doesn’t care about the child.. huh??
 
[[QUOTE="Jitss617, post: 23861737, member:

Who doesn’t care about the child.. huh??

It often seems like people who say they care about the kid don’t ever support things that would help them during their life. Health care; in this example. Our infant mortality rate could be improved by better access to care for the babies and mom. What would you say to an uninsured young woman who just found out she had an unexpected pregnancy working a minimum wage job with another child already?
 
[[QUOTE="Jitss617, post: 23861737, member:

Who doesn’t care about the child.. huh??

It often seems like people who say they care about the kid don’t ever support things that would help them during their life. Health care; in this example. Our infant mortality rate could be improved by better access to care for the babies and mom. What would you say to an uninsured young woman who just found out she had an unexpected pregnancy working a minimum wage job with another child already?
So just after birth you care about it ,, but just months ago you would have snipped it’s limbs off alive? Please save me you fake feelings lol
 
Republican Blurts Out That Sick People Don’t Deserve Affordable Care

Rather than increase government spending and control, we need to address the root causes of poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for his or her own health.

Republican health care plan: stay healthy or die.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don’t you belive in abortion? But you care about someone dying? Lol what ?

I don’t believe in abortion.

I believe in letting women decide for themselves what happens to their body.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Republican Blurts Out That Sick People Don’t Deserve Affordable Care

Rather than increase government spending and control, we need to address the root causes of poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for his or her own health.

Republican health care plan: stay healthy or die.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


"Republican health care plan: stay healthy or die."


Let's check:



a)Democrat Tom Daschle, original nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department, and says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them.
Bloomberg Politics - Bloomberg


b) Democrat Governor Dick Lamm once created a firestorm in Colorado (a few years after leaving the Governor’s office) when he said: “the elderly have a duty to die.”


c) A key administration figure committed to cost cutting is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a health policy advisor in the Office of Management and Budget and brother of Rahm Emanuel, the president's chief of staff wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their own patient and consider social justice. They should think about whether the money being spent on their patient could be better spent elsewhere.
Defend Your Health

http://spectator.org/articles/41471/downgrading-american-medical-care


d.) One troubling provision of the House bill compels seniors to submit to a counseling session every five years (and more often if they become sick or go into a nursing home) about alternatives for end-of-life care (House bill, p. 425-430). The sessions cover highly sensitive matters such as whether to receive antibiotics and "the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration."


e).Dr. David Blumenthal, a Harvard professor and key health advisor to President Obama, conceded that "government controls on health care spending are associated with longer waits for elective procedures and reduced availability of new and expensive treatments and devices." Could this mean angioplasty, bypass surgery, hip replacement, and knee replacement? Who could this be aimed at? How about ‘longer waits’ for cancer patients? Mammograms and MRI’s? Defend Your Health



f.) The RAND Corporation, a nonpartisan research organization, reported that Canada posts lower rates of cardiac procedures than the U.S. almost entirely by restricting their use for patients age 65 and older -- the time of life you're likely to need it. Defend Your Health


g.) slipped into the emergency stimulus legislation was substantial funding for a Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research, comparative effectiveness research is generally code for limiting care based on the patient's age.” The CER would identify (this is language from the draft report on the legislation) medical "items, procedures, and interventions" that it deems insufficiently effective or excessively expensive. They "will no longer be prescribed" by federal health programs.” Are you thinking ‘seniors’? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/28/AR2009012802939.html



See this article: http://spectator.org/articles/41471/downgrading-american-medical-care




Democrats are and have always been the party of death from their predecessors, the Bolsheviks, slaughtering over 100 million to the 60 million unborn human beings aborted under their doctrines.
 
No they are not just one percent
It is each and every one of us
The overwhelming majority of our healthcare dollar is used by those 65 and older. We will all, hopefully, be there some day.

Thankfully, smokers are a small percentage of our society today. Whatever we are doing is working
Should they pay more for healthcare than nonsmoking people? Yes or no? Should fat asses pay more than those who eat better and exercise. Should those who abuse alcohol pay more? Yes or no? You Leftists just make excuses.

No
Sick people should be treated
Period

Healthcare is healthcare. You don’t open the door for insurers to cherry pick their clients. Insure one, you insure all.....no exceptions
You idiot. I said They should pay more. I did Not say they should not be insured. You should pay more than me for example because you’re old and unhealthy.

Again brings us to the haves and have nots
Making the sick pay more is just blaming the victim

Do you think sick people are in any way making out ?

Hold on so rich people cannot be fat and unhealthy? That doesn't make any sense. Why do you always go back to that, Leftist? If we both work for Amazon in Accounting and have the same comp. and you're fat and smoke and I am a healthy weight and do not, you should pay more. You're such an evil troll.
That process allows insurance companies to divide and conquer
Come up with reasons you are not healthy and then use it as justification to price you out of the market

If you are sick, you get treatment. That is the way civilized nations do it
 

Forum List

Back
Top