ThunderKiss1965
Platinum Member
Translation, you have no fucking answer. Thank you for playing have a nice day.What do see is that you
As soon as I find my Moron-to-English dictionary, I can better address the above "gem".....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Translation, you have no fucking answer. Thank you for playing have a nice day.What do see is that you
As soon as I find my Moron-to-English dictionary, I can better address the above "gem".....
So....not exactly the "total rejection" you claimed, eh?There's nothing wrong with my IQ as there is probably nothing wrong with yours. What I do see is that you have an comprehension problem. Some how you lefties can't comprehend that the President is not elected by popular vote and the office is certainly not filled at the whim of California and NY which is were Clinton got that popular vote win.If Trump is toxic what does that make Hillary ? Nah the Trump win was a total rejection of the left and the establishment Republicans.
Remember TWO important little factoids that may help your IQ improve
Hillary is NO LONGER in the picture (really, trust me as Trump would say)....
,,,,and when you talk about the Trump "win" ALWAYS remember that MORE people voted against him than voted for the orange clown.....
You can thank me later for helping with your IQ
There's nothing wrong with my IQ as there is probably nothing wrong with yours. What I do see is that you have an comprehension problem. Some how you lefties can't comprehend that the President is not elected by popular vote and the office is certainly not filled at the whim of California and NY which is were Clinton got that popular vote win.
Hillary did no such thing, you have been reading those right wing lies againTrump was a private citizen. Hillary paved the way for Russia to obtain lucrative uranium sites when she was secy/state. When are politicians going to call for an indictment against the Clinton Foundation?
Issa said yes in a hypothetical case a special prosecutor would be needed e.g. political appointees can't lead such an investigation, however he made clear congress will investigate, a special prosecutor will not be used. Swing and a miss OP.
Never. Total bs, for dupes only.Trump was a private citizen. Hillary paved the way for Russia to obtain lucrative uranium sites when she was secy/state. When are politicians going to call for an indictment against the Clinton Foundation?
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said on “Real Time With Bill Maher,” “You’re going to need to use the special prosecutor’s statute and office.”
“You cannot have somebody who was on the campaign and who is an appointee,” the GOP congressman says.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said during an interview on “Real Time With Bill Maher” on Friday night that the investigation into Russia’s ties to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and the U.S. election hacking needs a special prosecutor ― not Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
The conservative congressman, who supported Trump during his 2016 campaign, also seemed to agree with host Bill Maher that Sessions should recuse himself from the investigation.
Maher posed a question to Issa about the FBI’s investigation Trump-Russia by flipping the controversy on its head.
Maher asked Issa if, in 2012, he “would let it slide” had Russians hacked Mitt Romney’s campaign and been in talks with former President Barack Obama’s campaign.
“No,” Issa said quickly. When asked if he’d let it slide in Trump’s administration, Issa said again, just as quickly: “No.”
“We need an independent prosecutor,” Maher said later. “And Jeff Sessions should recuse himself, the same way Loretta Lynch recused herself, because he was a part of the Trump campaign, is that correct?” Maher asked, referring to former Attorney General Lynch andHillary Clinton’s email investigation.
That’s when Issa appeared to make his response more clear.
“You’re right that you cannot have somebody, a friend of mine, Jeff Sessions, who was on the campaign and who was an appointee,” Issa told Maher. “You’re going to need to use the special prosecutor’s statute and office.”
Then, Issa doubles down on his statement with a critical take on Russia.
More: Rep. Darrell Issa Suggests Trump-Russia Inquiry Needs Special Prosecutor, Not Jeff Sessions
Issa must really be afraid of being voted out of office - otherwise I can't imagine him making such a statement.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said on “Real Time With Bill Maher,” “You’re going to need to use the special prosecutor’s statute and office.”
“You cannot have somebody who was on the campaign and who is an appointee,” the GOP congressman says.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said during an interview on “Real Time With Bill Maher” on Friday night that the investigation into Russia’s ties to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and the U.S. election hacking needs a special prosecutor ― not Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
The conservative congressman, who supported Trump during his 2016 campaign, also seemed to agree with host Bill Maher that Sessions should recuse himself from the investigation.
Maher posed a question to Issa about the FBI’s investigation Trump-Russia by flipping the controversy on its head.
Maher asked Issa if, in 2012, he “would let it slide” had Russians hacked Mitt Romney’s campaign and been in talks with former President Barack Obama’s campaign.
“No,” Issa said quickly. When asked if he’d let it slide in Trump’s administration, Issa said again, just as quickly: “No.”
“We need an independent prosecutor,” Maher said later. “And Jeff Sessions should recuse himself, the same way Loretta Lynch recused herself, because he was a part of the Trump campaign, is that correct?” Maher asked, referring to former Attorney General Lynch andHillary Clinton’s email investigation.
That’s when Issa appeared to make his response more clear.
“You’re right that you cannot have somebody, a friend of mine, Jeff Sessions, who was on the campaign and who was an appointee,” Issa told Maher. “You’re going to need to use the special prosecutor’s statute and office.”
Then, Issa doubles down on his statement with a critical take on Russia.
More: Rep. Darrell Issa Suggests Trump-Russia Inquiry Needs Special Prosecutor, Not Jeff Sessions
Issa must really be afraid of being voted out of office - otherwise I can't imagine him making such a statement.
How did the Russians defeat Hillary for Trump....................
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said on “Real Time With Bill Maher,” “You’re going to need to use the special prosecutor’s statute and office.”
“You cannot have somebody who was on the campaign and who is an appointee,” the GOP congressman says.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said during an interview on “Real Time With Bill Maher” on Friday night that the investigation into Russia’s ties to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and the U.S. election hacking needs a special prosecutor ― not Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
The conservative congressman, who supported Trump during his 2016 campaign, also seemed to agree with host Bill Maher that Sessions should recuse himself from the investigation.
Maher posed a question to Issa about the FBI’s investigation Trump-Russia by flipping the controversy on its head.
Maher asked Issa if, in 2012, he “would let it slide” had Russians hacked Mitt Romney’s campaign and been in talks with former President Barack Obama’s campaign.
“No,” Issa said quickly. When asked if he’d let it slide in Trump’s administration, Issa said again, just as quickly: “No.”
“We need an independent prosecutor,” Maher said later. “And Jeff Sessions should recuse himself, the same way Loretta Lynch recused herself, because he was a part of the Trump campaign, is that correct?” Maher asked, referring to former Attorney General Lynch andHillary Clinton’s email investigation.
That’s when Issa appeared to make his response more clear.
“You’re right that you cannot have somebody, a friend of mine, Jeff Sessions, who was on the campaign and who was an appointee,” Issa told Maher. “You’re going to need to use the special prosecutor’s statute and office.”
Then, Issa doubles down on his statement with a critical take on Russia.
More: Rep. Darrell Issa Suggests Trump-Russia Inquiry Needs Special Prosecutor, Not Jeff Sessions
Issa must really be afraid of being voted out of office - otherwise I can't imagine him making such a statement.
How did the Russians defeat Hillary for Trump....................
That's too stupid to even dignify with a response.
The more investigations the better! After all of Trump's birther nonsense
. What part of the word Russian do you think that being a Russian means ? You can try to separate the Russians for the game you want to play, but a Russian will always be a Russian no matter what level of government they exist in.When you prosecute Obama for his comments with his Russian counterpart prior to being elected, then I will take your crap serious. You people got nothing, and yet you gave your guy a pass ?
Obama had loans with Russian oligarchs????? Amazing what you learn on here.....
Oh, you mean Obama chatting with Mevdevev ???? Are you comparing this Russian with the ex-KGB thug Putin???