... Remembering January 6th: The long memory of the law is aided by.......selfies.......

Definitely one of the stranger parts of this whole thing.

Evidently it didn't occur to most of these people that they were breaking the law AND actively trying to stop our presidential electoral process. The voices they listen to must have forgotten to say anything about that. Those folks were too busy checking their ratings and web traffic numbers, I guess.

And these rubes took and posted videos, photos and selfies for the authorities to use against them later. Amazing.

Funny, tragic, disturbing. These guys bought the con, the whole thing, and now they have to pay for it.
View attachment 508675

You're right which is why we need a Castle Doctrine Amendment to the United States Constitution. If our congresspersons can shoot down unarmed female protestors for breaking windows everyone should have the same right guaranteed by the US Constitution.

*****SMILE*****



:)

That wasn’t why she was shot....
 
The Washington Post is doing a pretty good job of informing America about who is being arrested for their roles in the Capitol attack and invasion on January 6th. As arrests or court appearances happen, the Post tells us the who and the what for. Yesterday's piece was specifically about the recent arrests (6 months after the event) of some of the rioters who attacked journalists.

I've made the point before ---- those who were there on January 6th, and did something wrong.....seriously wrong, like clubbing a cop, or breaking down a door, or in this case, assaulting journalist and destroying expensive equipment.....well, these 6 months must have a bit of a
Sword-of-Damocles vibe to it.

Meaning, 'oh shit, I know I f*cked up that day. I hope my mug ain't on somebody's video and it ends up with the FBI. I hope. I hope."
That sort of vibe.

Well, the waiting is over for these mokes that the Washington Post reports on: (my avatar underlined that one sentence at the bottom, for emphasis.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"FBI launches flurry of arrests over attacks on journalists during Capitol riot"

"Nearly six months after the U.S. Capitol riot, the Justice Department has begun arresting a new category of alleged criminals — those who attacked reporters or damaged their equipment as journalists documented the violence perpetrated by supporters of President Donald Trump.

There is no federal law specifically against attacking a journalist, so the Justice Department has charged those who went after reporters or their gear on Jan. 6 with committing violence in the restricted grounds of the Capitol, or destroying property on the Capitol grounds. More such arrests are expected, according to officials.


  • The first such charge came last week, when 43-year-old Shane Jason Woods of Illinois was charged with engaging in violence on the Capitol grounds Jan. 6, as well as assaulting a law enforcement officer. Authorities say Woods was caught on video knocking down a cameraman.

  • On Thursday, FBI agents arrested a Covington, Va., man for allegedly destroying journalists’ equipment. Joshua Dillon Haynes was charged with smashing their gear outside the Capitol and bragging about it in a text to a friend. “We attacked the CNN reporters and the fake news and destroyed tens of thousands of dollars of their video and television equipment here’s a picture behind me of the pile we made out of it,” he allegedly messaged the person, according to court papers.

  • Chase Kevin Allen, a 25-year-old man from Seekonk, Mass., was arrested this week on charges of engaging in violence and destroying property on the grounds of the Capitol. According to FBI papers filed in court against Allen, he was seen on video stomping on reporting equipment as a large group of individuals swarmed several reporters and drove them away.

  • Earlier in the week, the Justice Department charged a woman with disorderly conduct and trespassing after videos showed her egging on an attack on a New York Times photographer inside the Capitol during the rioting. Investigators say that in one of the videos, Sandra Pomeroy Weyer of Mechanicsburg, Pa., can be heard calling the photographer a traitor and urging others to “get her out” and “mace her.”

  • Separately, two men from Long Island were charged with destroying media equipment. According to court papers, much of the key evidence against Gabriel Brown and Zvonimir Jurlina was contained in videos they took of themselves that day. The FBI affidavit filed against Brown describes video of him denouncing the media as he and a group of others surround journalists’ television equipment and try to damage it. “Smash that [expletive],” Brown said in one video, according to the court papers.

After he was taken into custody Monday in Texas, Jurlina posted a video online in which he called himself a “political prisoner.” On the video, which has since been taken down, Jurlina said: Donald Trump, please pay for my legal fees because this all happened because of you . . . and I did nothing wrong.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These rioters taking selfies and posting them on social media are no different than the stupid criminal videos we all laugh at, and who then find themselves behind bars for their stupidity.

If you engage in violence, trespass and vandalism and then are dumb enough to post a video of it for all to see, you should not be allowed to procreate.
 
The Washington Post is doing a pretty good job of informing America about who is being arrested for their roles in the Capitol attack and invasion on January 6th. As arrests or court appearances happen, the Post tells us the who and the what for. Yesterday's piece was specifically about the recent arrests (6 months after the event) of some of the rioters who attacked journalists.

I've made the point before ---- those who were there on January 6th, and did something wrong.....seriously wrong, like clubbing a cop, or breaking down a door, or in this case, assaulting journalist and destroying expensive equipment.....well, these 6 months must have a bit of a
Sword-of-Damocles vibe to it.

Meaning, 'oh shit, I know I f*cked up that day. I hope my mug ain't on somebody's video and it ends up with the FBI. I hope. I hope."
That sort of vibe.

Well, the waiting is over for these mokes that the Washington Post reports on: (my avatar underlined that one sentence at the bottom, for emphasis.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"FBI launches flurry of arrests over attacks on journalists during Capitol riot"

"Nearly six months after the U.S. Capitol riot, the Justice Department has begun arresting a new category of alleged criminals — those who attacked reporters or damaged their equipment as journalists documented the violence perpetrated by supporters of President Donald Trump.

There is no federal law specifically against attacking a journalist, so the Justice Department has charged those who went after reporters or their gear on Jan. 6 with committing violence in the restricted grounds of the Capitol, or destroying property on the Capitol grounds. More such arrests are expected, according to officials.


  • The first such charge came last week, when 43-year-old Shane Jason Woods of Illinois was charged with engaging in violence on the Capitol grounds Jan. 6, as well as assaulting a law enforcement officer. Authorities say Woods was caught on video knocking down a cameraman.

  • On Thursday, FBI agents arrested a Covington, Va., man for allegedly destroying journalists’ equipment. Joshua Dillon Haynes was charged with smashing their gear outside the Capitol and bragging about it in a text to a friend. “We attacked the CNN reporters and the fake news and destroyed tens of thousands of dollars of their video and television equipment here’s a picture behind me of the pile we made out of it,” he allegedly messaged the person, according to court papers.

  • Chase Kevin Allen, a 25-year-old man from Seekonk, Mass., was arrested this week on charges of engaging in violence and destroying property on the grounds of the Capitol. According to FBI papers filed in court against Allen, he was seen on video stomping on reporting equipment as a large group of individuals swarmed several reporters and drove them away.

  • Earlier in the week, the Justice Department charged a woman with disorderly conduct and trespassing after videos showed her egging on an attack on a New York Times photographer inside the Capitol during the rioting. Investigators say that in one of the videos, Sandra Pomeroy Weyer of Mechanicsburg, Pa., can be heard calling the photographer a traitor and urging others to “get her out” and “mace her.”

  • Separately, two men from Long Island were charged with destroying media equipment. According to court papers, much of the key evidence against Gabriel Brown and Zvonimir Jurlina was contained in videos they took of themselves that day. The FBI affidavit filed against Brown describes video of him denouncing the media as he and a group of others surround journalists’ television equipment and try to damage it. “Smash that [expletive],” Brown said in one video, according to the court papers.

After he was taken into custody Monday in Texas, Jurlina posted a video online in which he called himself a “political prisoner.” On the video, which has since been taken down, Jurlina said: Donald Trump, please pay for my legal fees because this all happened because of you . . . and I did nothing wrong.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But the W Post couldn’t bring themselves to ask Obama to reconcile the claim of spontaneous riot in Benghazi while claiming he said it was terrorism from the outset.
 
And the 6 months of rioting, looting, burning, and attacks on law enforcement and government buildings in Dem cities?? Nothing to say? :45:
If you want to start a thread on that, then do it. This thread is about the insurrectionists filming their own crimes.
No this is about Dems having ZERO credibility to even speak on this topic after they did Jan 6th 100 fold over the summer and their faux rage over Jan 6th comparing it to the attack on Pearl Harbor. There I corrected you.
Well, no. You obviously don't understand how it works. The OP determines the subject for each thread, and that is all there is to it. Perhaps you think you can bully your way to changing the subject, but you are wrong. I understand your confusion, though. Anyone who model's that orange pig's ideals would think bullying is a valid way to get what you want.
Then perhaps asshole should like you should STFU instead of barging into every thread and attempting to derail it with your “but, but, TRUMP!!!” bullshit. The irony here is off the charts.....
I'm not the one who can't stay on subject dumb ass.
 
BluesLegend
So after two people died and threats of killing their very own Republican VP, hundreds of people charged and possibly going to jail, but it was a peaceful protest.
That puts the BLM riots into a completely different light doesn't it. Dickhead.
It's not our fault YOUR riots injured 2,000+ police officers and yes one Trump unarmed supporter woman and veteran was murdered by capital police and one police officer died of natural causes unrelated to the protest.
 
Damaged Eagle Why? Do you live somewhere, you can see someone breaking in on you, but are required to let it happen, even after telling them "Don't come in here."? Would that prevent you from defending your family or your life? Why did you buy a weapon in the first place, if you thought you really would not use it, because you are more afraid of having a bad life after a violent attack, than no life at all? All break-ins where you live are considered sporting event, with the best hand-to-hand self-defense opponent has the ultimate advantage? If you can't definitively stomp their ass, you are committed to possibly die in place, along with your family? Are you waiting for a "mother-may-I" ruling from on high, before you defend your home from attackers?

Just do what you gotta do, Eaglet. There is no constitutional amendment needed and the rest of us are not waiting for one.

1625457365824.png


Why do you think a person shouldn't be allowed to defend themselves and their property like our congresspersons expect to be protected?

They put their pants on the same way everyone else does so they're nothing special.

You might be surprised how many people are writing their congresspersons demanding this amendment to the Constitution because the supposed leaders are not doing their job. An amendment like this will bypass any state or local law on the books and deal a severe blow to the gun grabbers like you. If it happens you can blame me as the first person to propose the amendment also because I came up with it all on my little lonesome and it's catching on. Actions have consequences and shooting an unarmed female protestor while allowing others to burn, loot, and murder, spoke loudly to those that are now following my lead.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
Last edited:
"If our congresspersons can shoot down unarmed female protestors for breaking windows........"

Ummmm, wh-a-a-a-t?
You're gonna have to flesh than one out a bit Damaged Eagle.
I, for one, have never ever heard of that happening.....recently, or historically.
Just what sources to you utilize ......and willing to recommend .....to get your information?
Please don't confirm the common perception of Rightwingers as uninformed or misinformed.

1625457918319.png


1625457874709.png


There's nothing to flesh out.

Ashli Babbitt is dead because the Capitol police or a security guard shot her.

If it's good enough for them to shoot unarmed female protestors at the Capitol then it's good enough for everyone else across the nation.

We need a Castle Doctrine Amendment to the United States Constitution that legalizes castle doctrine, stand your ground, and concealed carry across then United States Of America.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
Last edited:
The Washington Post is doing a pretty good job of informing America about who is being arrested for their roles in the Capitol attack and invasion on January 6th. As arrests or court appearances happen, the Post tells us the who and the what for. Yesterday's piece was specifically about the recent arrests (6 months after the event) of some of the rioters who attacked journalists.

I've made the point before ---- those who were there on January 6th, and did something wrong.....seriously wrong, like clubbing a cop, or breaking down a door, or in this case, assaulting journalist and destroying expensive equipment.....well, these 6 months must have a bit of a
Sword-of-Damocles vibe to it.

Meaning, 'oh shit, I know I f*cked up that day. I hope my mug ain't on somebody's video and it ends up with the FBI. I hope. I hope."
That sort of vibe.

Well, the waiting is over for these mokes that the Washington Post reports on: (my avatar underlined that one sentence at the bottom, for emphasis.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"FBI launches flurry of arrests over attacks on journalists during Capitol riot"

"Nearly six months after the U.S. Capitol riot, the Justice Department has begun arresting a new category of alleged criminals — those who attacked reporters or damaged their equipment as journalists documented the violence perpetrated by supporters of President Donald Trump.

There is no federal law specifically against attacking a journalist, so the Justice Department has charged those who went after reporters or their gear on Jan. 6 with committing violence in the restricted grounds of the Capitol, or destroying property on the Capitol grounds. More such arrests are expected, according to officials.


  • The first such charge came last week, when 43-year-old Shane Jason Woods of Illinois was charged with engaging in violence on the Capitol grounds Jan. 6, as well as assaulting a law enforcement officer. Authorities say Woods was caught on video knocking down a cameraman.

  • On Thursday, FBI agents arrested a Covington, Va., man for allegedly destroying journalists’ equipment. Joshua Dillon Haynes was charged with smashing their gear outside the Capitol and bragging about it in a text to a friend. “We attacked the CNN reporters and the fake news and destroyed tens of thousands of dollars of their video and television equipment here’s a picture behind me of the pile we made out of it,” he allegedly messaged the person, according to court papers.

  • Chase Kevin Allen, a 25-year-old man from Seekonk, Mass., was arrested this week on charges of engaging in violence and destroying property on the grounds of the Capitol. According to FBI papers filed in court against Allen, he was seen on video stomping on reporting equipment as a large group of individuals swarmed several reporters and drove them away.

  • Earlier in the week, the Justice Department charged a woman with disorderly conduct and trespassing after videos showed her egging on an attack on a New York Times photographer inside the Capitol during the rioting. Investigators say that in one of the videos, Sandra Pomeroy Weyer of Mechanicsburg, Pa., can be heard calling the photographer a traitor and urging others to “get her out” and “mace her.”

  • Separately, two men from Long Island were charged with destroying media equipment. According to court papers, much of the key evidence against Gabriel Brown and Zvonimir Jurlina was contained in videos they took of themselves that day. The FBI affidavit filed against Brown describes video of him denouncing the media as he and a group of others surround journalists’ television equipment and try to damage it. “Smash that [expletive],” Brown said in one video, according to the court papers.

After he was taken into custody Monday in Texas, Jurlina posted a video online in which he called himself a “political prisoner.” On the video, which has since been taken down, Jurlina said: Donald Trump, please pay for my legal fees because this all happened because of you . . . and I did nothing wrong.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These rioters taking selfies and posting them on social media are no different than the stupid criminal videos we all laugh at, and who then find themselves behind bars for their stupidity.

If you engage in violence, trespass and vandalism and then are dumb enough to post a video of it for all to see, you should not be allowed to procreate.


Thanks,Jussie. No need to investigate. You were the victim of a hate crime by white men in MAGA outfits. No need to audit your attackers. If they wore MAGA hats, that is 100% proof they are not actor homo black roid heads who were paid by you and homO.....
 
Definitely one of the stranger parts of this whole thing.

Evidently it didn't occur to most of these people that they were breaking the law AND actively trying to stop our presidential electoral process. The voices they listen to must have forgotten to say anything about that. Those folks were too busy checking their ratings and web traffic numbers, I guess.

And these rubes took and posted videos, photos and selfies for the authorities to use against them later. Amazing.

Funny, tragic, disturbing. These guys bought the con, the whole thing, and now they have to pay for it.
View attachment 508675

You're right which is why we need a Castle Doctrine Amendment to the United States Constitution. If our congresspersons can shoot down unarmed female protestors for breaking windows everyone should have the same right guaranteed by the US Constitution.

*****SMILE*****



:)

That wasn’t why she was shot....

1625458614775.png


Oh do explain. Before you get all into how it was the Capitol and there were VIPs in the building... I don't care.

She was unarmed. Where was the police pepper spray or taser? No? Use of lethal force is authorized because of who and where?

My home and business is my castle and if the people in DC don't understand that and want to condone the burning, looting, and murdering, that has been going on for well over a year now then they don't deserve to be there.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
If it's good enough for them to shoot unarmed female protestors at the Capitol then it's good enough for everyone else across the nation.

Well, you bring up a thoughtful point, poster Damaged.

If a shrouded figure of undetermined gender.....smashes the window to a residence despite being loudly warned to stop multiple times, and even warned there is a gun aimed at that window....and wearing concealing garb that could obscure a 10-guage shotgun? a suicide vest?.......and that figure keeps on coming righto into the home through the smashed window......well, yearh, it seems the 'Castle Doctrine' could come into force. No?
 

Well, you bring up a thoughtful point, poster Damaged.

If a shrouded figure of undetermined gender.....smashes the window to a residence despite being loudly warned to stop multiple times, and even warned there is a gun aimed at that window....and wearing concealing garb that could obscure a 10-guage shotgun? a suicide vest?.......and that figure keeps on coming righto into the home through the smashed window......well, yearh, it seems the 'Castle Doctrine' could come into force. No?

1625460288985.png


Then you should write you congressperson demanding that a Castle Doctrine Amendment be added to the United States Constitution that makes castle doctrine, stand your ground, and concealed carry, the law of the land.

If it's good enough for our congresspersons then it's good enough for everyone.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
".....demanding that a Castle Doctrine Amendment be ........ the law of the land."

Well, poster Damaged, I lean a little bit more towards limited government and state's rights.
Mandating who can shoot who when they break through a barrier despite being warned not to....is, in my opinion, a state's responsibility.
Now you may desire an expanded Federal presence in such matters and increase the size and responsibility of our federal law enforcement.

But I'm quite a bit more conservative.
 
".....demanding that a Castle Doctrine Amendment be ........ the law of the land."

Well, poster Damaged, I lean a little bit more towards limited government and state's rights.
Mandating who can shoot who when they break through a barrier despite being warned not to....is, in my opinion, a state's responsibility.
Now you may desire an expanded Federal presence in such matters and increase the size and responsibility of our federal law enforcement.

But I'm quite a bit more conservative.

1625461731685.png


Where did I ask for an expanded federal presence?
ANSWER: No where.

This Amendment does just the opposite of what you're suggesting and will make it the right of every individual across the nation to defend themselves.

It takes the responsibility out of the hands of the federal, state, and local, authorities who obviously are not doing their jobs considering the billions of dollars of property damage and countless lives loss during the riots that have been going on for well over a year now.

Don't like it then the federal, state, and local, governments should have been doing their frakking jobs.

After this Amendment is made part of the United States Constitution you can go ahead and defund the police all you want.

Of course if there isn't any police anyway it won't matter because even my twelve year old granddaughter can take out a bad guy at a thousand yards with one shot.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
Last edited:
And the 6 months of rioting, looting, burning, and attacks on law enforcement and government buildings in Dem cities?? Nothing to say? :45:

What 6 months of rioting? Like this?


View attachment 508901

View attachment 508902

View attachment 508903

You mean this...
1625462103353.png


1625462140929.png


No smoke. No fires. Only one person shot and that was an unarmed female at the hands of the Capitol police.

It must be a peaceful protest and the officer who shot the unarmed female should be publicly prosecuted for murder with full media coverage.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
BluesLegend
I don't recall them in the capitol and trying to destroy democracy but I might be wrong.
You obviously know better but keep defending the most disgraceful act in the history of the country. And all promoted and conducted by Republicans.
That must make you proud. Well done traitor. Home of the brave my arse.
 

Forum List

Back
Top