Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He created Isis.
So you’re just going to gloss over the years of conservatives praising Putin and demonizing the Syrian rebels? The years of defending Assad?Trump ran on patting that tyrant on the head and letting Russia and Iran decide what should happen in Syria. You voted for that.These threads are hilarious. Russia is stepping up their defense for a tyrant who uses chemical weapons on his own civilians, and the left is freaking out. Meanwhile the genocidal psychopathic leftists here keep murdering babies through abortion.
Maybe Trump should order some missile strikes on the abortion clinics too while we're at it. It's not like we're going to run out of cruise missiles.
Please keep believing that, would you? That's why you Democrats are destined to lose again in 2020.
Nobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Maybe we're just not trying hard enough. That seemed to work pretty well on the Kaiser, Hitler, and the Imperial Japanese.
What's changed since then?
Dude 6 years on the site and longer in real life I’ve been begging people to please stop thinking that somehow the U.S. needs to waste lives and money in the Middle East. I just can’t resist pointing out to a Trump sheep like the OP that they’re behaving like a retard.So you’re just going to gloss over the years of conservatives praising Putin and demonizing the Syrian rebels? The years of defending Assad?Trump ran on patting that tyrant on the head and letting Russia and Iran decide what should happen in Syria. You voted for that.These threads are hilarious. Russia is stepping up their defense for a tyrant who uses chemical weapons on his own civilians, and the left is freaking out. Meanwhile the genocidal psychopathic leftists here keep murdering babies through abortion.
Maybe Trump should order some missile strikes on the abortion clinics too while we're at it. It's not like we're going to run out of cruise missiles.
Please keep believing that, would you? That's why you Democrats are destined to lose again in 2020.
Nobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Dude 6 years on the site and longer in real life I’ve been begging people to please stop thinking that somehow the U.S. needs to waste lives and money in the Middle East. I just can’t resist pointing out to a Trump sheep like the OP that they’re behaving like a retard.So you’re just going to gloss over the years of conservatives praising Putin and demonizing the Syrian rebels? The years of defending Assad?Trump ran on patting that tyrant on the head and letting Russia and Iran decide what should happen in Syria. You voted for that.These threads are hilarious. Russia is stepping up their defense for a tyrant who uses chemical weapons on his own civilians, and the left is freaking out. Meanwhile the genocidal psychopathic leftists here keep murdering babies through abortion.
Maybe Trump should order some missile strikes on the abortion clinics too while we're at it. It's not like we're going to run out of cruise missiles.
Please keep believing that, would you? That's why you Democrats are destined to lose again in 2020.
Nobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Authorization of WHO to use force?
Bush trumped up phony Intelligence
Bush sent his doctored Intelligence to Congress
Congress authorized Bush to invade if HE felt it necessary
So you’re just going to gloss over the years of conservatives praising Putin and demonizing the Syrian rebels? The years of defending Assad?Trump ran on patting that tyrant on the head and letting Russia and Iran decide what should happen in Syria. You voted for that.
Please keep believing that, would you? That's why you Democrats are destined to lose again in 2020.
Nobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Maybe we're just not trying hard enough. That seemed to work pretty well on the Kaiser, Hitler, and the Imperial Japanese.
What's changed since then?
Which Arab country attacked us? And why would the goal be to "make them surrender"? Not really a good argument. Especially in regards to Libya, Syria, Somalia and OTHER similar mistakes.
Remember, when Iraq invaded Kuwait, Bush Sr. chased them back into Iraq. And rightfully so. We had treaties with Kuwait.
But he stopped at the border.
And you know, that being a former WWII officer and a hero, he didn't just walk away from Iraq. He left sanctions in place, a watchful military and satellites overhead to monitor Iraqi actions. PERIOD!
What the GOP did to the economy was bad enough, but the shambles they left the military and the Middle East were criminal. I have always felt Obama's big mistake was that he didn't bring Bush and Cheney and other members of that wicked cabal up on charges.
Obama was handed a wrecked economy and a Middle East debacle and from what I've seen, he actually did turn a sow's ear into a silk purse.
Instead of attacking Obama, certain members of the GOP should be happy he didn't bring them up on charges. Maybe if he had, they wouldn't be acting the fools they are today.
So you’re just going to gloss over the years of conservatives praising Putin and demonizing the Syrian rebels? The years of defending Assad?Please keep believing that, would you? That's why you Democrats are destined to lose again in 2020.
Nobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Maybe we're just not trying hard enough. That seemed to work pretty well on the Kaiser, Hitler, and the Imperial Japanese.
What's changed since then?
Which Arab country attacked us? And why would the goal be to "make them surrender"? Not really a good argument. Especially in regards to Libya, Syria, Somalia and OTHER similar mistakes.
Unlike a formal country like Germany or Japan, it was the perceived "Islamic State" who attacked us on September 11, 2001. We're not dealing with national entities any more, we're at war with an ideology, with a little old-school Soviet threat thrown in.
We either eradicate that ideology and those who support it, or we die. There is no coexistence
So you’re just going to gloss over the years of conservatives praising Putin and demonizing the Syrian rebels? The years of defending Assad?
Nobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Maybe we're just not trying hard enough. That seemed to work pretty well on the Kaiser, Hitler, and the Imperial Japanese.
What's changed since then?
Which Arab country attacked us? And why would the goal be to "make them surrender"? Not really a good argument. Especially in regards to Libya, Syria, Somalia and OTHER similar mistakes.
Unlike a formal country like Germany or Japan, it was the perceived "Islamic State" who attacked us on September 11, 2001. We're not dealing with national entities any more, we're at war with an ideology, with a little old-school Soviet threat thrown in.
We either eradicate that ideology and those who support it, or we die. There is no coexistence
And every time we bomb and destroy a country in that region, we created a PERFECT HABITAT for breeding more ideaologues. How many times do we have to repeat the madness?
Saddam didn't have a Jihadist problem. Until we got involved. Same with not COOPERATING with Assad to rid his country of them. We're asking for miracles in the attitude/strategy we use to CONQUER the problem.
Lol JGalt. So many threads, so little remembering who started what. My bad.Dude 6 years on the site and longer in real life I’ve been begging people to please stop thinking that somehow the U.S. needs to waste lives and money in the Middle East. I just can’t resist pointing out to a Trump sheep like the OP that they’re behaving like a retard.So you’re just going to gloss over the years of conservatives praising Putin and demonizing the Syrian rebels? The years of defending Assad?Trump ran on patting that tyrant on the head and letting Russia and Iran decide what should happen in Syria. You voted for that.
Please keep believing that, would you? That's why you Democrats are destined to lose again in 2020.
Nobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Wait !!! What was that? The OP Is a "Trump Sheep"??? DAMN.. I knew there was something fishy about Deany.. You in the right thread bro?
Who started the Nazi movement? Oops, people that radicalized themselvesNobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Maybe we're just not trying hard enough. That seemed to work pretty well on the Kaiser, Hitler, and the Imperial Japanese.
What's changed since then?
Which Arab country attacked us? And why would the goal be to "make them surrender"? Not really a good argument. Especially in regards to Libya, Syria, Somalia and OTHER similar mistakes.
Unlike a formal country like Germany or Japan, it was the perceived "Islamic State" who attacked us on September 11, 2001. We're not dealing with national entities any more, we're at war with an ideology, with a little old-school Soviet threat thrown in.
We either eradicate that ideology and those who support it, or we die. There is no coexistence
And every time we bomb and destroy a country in that region, we created a PERFECT HABITAT for breeding more ideaologues. How many times do we have to repeat the madness?
Saddam didn't have a Jihadist problem. Until we got involved. Same with not COOPERATING with Assad to rid his country of them. We're asking for miracles in the attitude/strategy we use to CONQUER the problem.
People don't radicalize themselves, no matter how much they hate America. Did we see secret underground movements of Nazis planning to strike us back after we won WW2?
There may have been a few, but their leaders were immediately dealt with, just as we need to deal with whatever radical types are spreading their toxic ideology.
Who started the Nazi movement? Oops, people that radicalized themselvesMaybe we're just not trying hard enough. That seemed to work pretty well on the Kaiser, Hitler, and the Imperial Japanese.
What's changed since then?
Which Arab country attacked us? And why would the goal be to "make them surrender"? Not really a good argument. Especially in regards to Libya, Syria, Somalia and OTHER similar mistakes.
Unlike a formal country like Germany or Japan, it was the perceived "Islamic State" who attacked us on September 11, 2001. We're not dealing with national entities any more, we're at war with an ideology, with a little old-school Soviet threat thrown in.
We either eradicate that ideology and those who support it, or we die. There is no coexistence
And every time we bomb and destroy a country in that region, we created a PERFECT HABITAT for breeding more ideaologues. How many times do we have to repeat the madness?
Saddam didn't have a Jihadist problem. Until we got involved. Same with not COOPERATING with Assad to rid his country of them. We're asking for miracles in the attitude/strategy we use to CONQUER the problem.
People don't radicalize themselves, no matter how much they hate America. Did we see secret underground movements of Nazis planning to strike us back after we won WW2?
There may have been a few, but their leaders were immediately dealt with, just as we need to deal with whatever radical types are spreading their toxic ideology.
Oh many alt-rightists in Germany paved the way for Hitler. Read a book one day.Who started the Nazi movement? Oops, people that radicalized themselvesWhich Arab country attacked us? And why would the goal be to "make them surrender"? Not really a good argument. Especially in regards to Libya, Syria, Somalia and OTHER similar mistakes.
Unlike a formal country like Germany or Japan, it was the perceived "Islamic State" who attacked us on September 11, 2001. We're not dealing with national entities any more, we're at war with an ideology, with a little old-school Soviet threat thrown in.
We either eradicate that ideology and those who support it, or we die. There is no coexistence
And every time we bomb and destroy a country in that region, we created a PERFECT HABITAT for breeding more ideaologues. How many times do we have to repeat the madness?
Saddam didn't have a Jihadist problem. Until we got involved. Same with not COOPERATING with Assad to rid his country of them. We're asking for miracles in the attitude/strategy we use to CONQUER the problem.
People don't radicalize themselves, no matter how much they hate America. Did we see secret underground movements of Nazis planning to strike us back after we won WW2?
There may have been a few, but their leaders were immediately dealt with, just as we need to deal with whatever radical types are spreading their toxic ideology.
No. Actually it was their "Imam" and spiritual leader, Adolf Hitler. Had he been snuffed from the start, it would have saved us alot of trouble.
Same thing with Karl Marx. That fucker should have been smothered with a pillow while he was a baby.
Oh many alt-rightists in Germany paved the way for Hitler. Read a book one day.Who started the Nazi movement? Oops, people that radicalized themselvesUnlike a formal country like Germany or Japan, it was the perceived "Islamic State" who attacked us on September 11, 2001. We're not dealing with national entities any more, we're at war with an ideology, with a little old-school Soviet threat thrown in.
We either eradicate that ideology and those who support it, or we die. There is no coexistence
And every time we bomb and destroy a country in that region, we created a PERFECT HABITAT for breeding more ideaologues. How many times do we have to repeat the madness?
Saddam didn't have a Jihadist problem. Until we got involved. Same with not COOPERATING with Assad to rid his country of them. We're asking for miracles in the attitude/strategy we use to CONQUER the problem.
People don't radicalize themselves, no matter how much they hate America. Did we see secret underground movements of Nazis planning to strike us back after we won WW2?
There may have been a few, but their leaders were immediately dealt with, just as we need to deal with whatever radical types are spreading their toxic ideology.
No. Actually it was their "Imam" and spiritual leader, Adolf Hitler. Had he been snuffed from the start, it would have saved us alot of trouble.
Same thing with Karl Marx. That fucker should have been smothered with a pillow while he was a baby.
Nobody I know is defending Assad.. We' ve TRIED to make democracy bloom and turn donkeys into Unicorns in about 4 or 5 Arab countries now by REMOVING or helping to remove dictators and thugs. How'd that work out? What's the fucking score on that?
They NEED shotgun waving deranged madmen to keep them from killing each other. We don't HAVE to like them. But we damn well need to stop JUDGING them and blowing up their countries just to make things worse.
Maybe we're just not trying hard enough. That seemed to work pretty well on the Kaiser, Hitler, and the Imperial Japanese.
What's changed since then?
Which Arab country attacked us? And why would the goal be to "make them surrender"? Not really a good argument. Especially in regards to Libya, Syria, Somalia and OTHER similar mistakes.
Unlike a formal country like Germany or Japan, it was the perceived "Islamic State" who attacked us on September 11, 2001. We're not dealing with national entities any more, we're at war with an ideology, with a little old-school Soviet threat thrown in.
We either eradicate that ideology and those who support it, or we die. There is no coexistence
And every time we bomb and destroy a country in that region, we created a PERFECT HABITAT for breeding more ideaologues. How many times do we have to repeat the madness?
Saddam didn't have a Jihadist problem. Until we got involved. Same with not COOPERATING with Assad to rid his country of them. We're asking for miracles in the attitude/strategy we use to CONQUER the problem.
People don't radicalize themselves, no matter how much they hate America. Did we see secret underground movements of Nazis planning to strike us back after we won WW2?
There may have been a few, but their leaders were immediately dealt with, just as we need to deal with whatever radical types are spreading their toxic ideology.
Remember, it was Bush and the GOP who tricked this country into invading Iraq. PERIOD!
They believed his lies. I did too, for a while.Authorization of WHO to use force?
Bush trumped up phony Intelligence
Bush sent his doctored Intelligence to Congress
Congress authorized Bush to invade if HE felt it necessary
Correct, a bipartisan Congress gave him the authorization.
Glad we cleared that up.
