I call a spade a spade, and you're a spineless bigot. If you dont like the label, move the fuck on because there's no logical reason that someone minding their own business gives any fucks whatsoever that gays can marry.More deflecting, ^ dipping, ducking and dodging.It is avoidance.^ more avoidance, more inability to compel the state to prevent the inclusion
I asked a serious, open ended question about his post.
That is not avoidance.
You've been presented with arguments, and instead of addressing them you whine about reasons why you can't...and when you express these reasons, they're clearly born of your inability to grasp the argument to begin with.
Deflect to your corner, bigot.
Try again, kiddy corner:
P1. Gays have expressed the desire to re-visit the definition of Marriage, and amend it to include their relationships in the eyes of the State.
P2. Society is free to re-visit its institutions and amend them.
P3. There exists no compelling reason the State shouldn't grant their request.
C. Marriage has been changed to accommodate gay relationships.
You're not bringing up anything that me and prog didn't go over weeks ago.
AND you are still NEEDING to slander me as a bigot, before you even get to the supposed debate.
You are demonstrating my point, with nearly every post.
It's because you're a bigot, Correll. The lack of an argument is not an argument.
Here's what an argument looks like. Dip, duck and dodge bigot:
Try again, kiddy corner:
P1. Gays have expressed the desire to re-visit the definition of Marriage, and amend it to include their relationships in the eyes of the State.
P2. Society is free to re-visit its institutions and amend them.
P3. There exists no compelling reason the State shouldn't grant their request.
C. Marriage has been changed to accommodate gay relationships.
You don't get to try to pretend to be reasonable., when you open a debate with defining opposition to you, as bigotry.
That corrupts and invalidates the process.