WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 27,842
- 16,992
- 1,415
You posed a question based on your inability to read . Can’t help you thereTry answering the question with a straight face, cultist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You posed a question based on your inability to read . Can’t help you thereTry answering the question with a straight face, cultist.
You are the one having a hissy fit instead of meeting my rebuke. As usual. Grow up, son.Insult insult and never a rebuke or reply
Reality really troubles you.
No, you clearly want your orange God to get special treatment.You posed a question based on your inability to read . Can’t help you there
He's trying for the "boo hoo poor little me" defense. And yeah to be held in contempt. But the irony is that imo most people who saw his shinnangans back in the 80s and 90s knew he was guilty as hell over playing musical chairs with property values much more blatantly than did guys like Larry Silverstein, whose empires were larger. But after Trump did the Jan 6 limbo, an appetite to destroy him emergedHe is trying to get held in contempt of court.
I say: grant him his wish.
Sure it is. When those same agencies don't charge democrats for the same things they charge Trump for, it is a two tiered weaponized justice system. At least two of these prosecutors ran campaigns on getting Trump.Someone getting charged with crimes Is not proof of a two tier justice system.
You have to argue the charges have no merit. Which you could not do if your life depended on it.
And the irony here is that Trump not sitting in a jail Cell awaiting trial is the only evidence of a two tier justice system. Of course, unlike your unevidenced and unargued claims, I can actually show salient examples of people with similar charges who sat in jail awaiting trial.
In case you want to know what it looks like when a normal adult actually argues their claims.
Oops, you forgot you are supposed to argue claims, not just pull claims out of your ass. All you did was reiterate the same claim.Sure it is. When those same agencies don't charge democrats for the same things they charge Trump for
But he can chide and deride which you feelers wish was threatening.Former President cannot threaten the court or individuals: end of story.
Actually, he cannot, as spelled out in the gag order that was just upheld.But he can chide and deride which you feelers wish was threatening.
There is nothing to pay attention toActually, he cannot, as spelled out in the gag order that was just upheld.
Pay attention!
Actually, it has already been enforced.There is nothing to pay attention to
The rag order has no legal backing and no enforcement will ensue.
This isn't going to cover for what you just did to embarrass yourself.Man it’s gotta be tough residing in safe space non reality land, incessant demands for wishes and oozing self pity when not fulfilled
Where is your evidence that election officials have government funded security details?Yes they do. Our election officials dont require security though. That is pretty standard in the first world. It was in the US before the trump era.
Like this (whattaboutaryomighty):Man it’s gotta be tough residing in safe space non reality land, incessant demands for wishes and oozing self pity when not fulfilled
those same agencies don't charge democrats for the same things they charge Trump for, it is a two tiered weaponized justice system. At least two of these prosecutors ran campaigns on getting Trump.
No one cares about 'chide and deride', only about actually threatening people. Only mobster bosses act like that.But he can chide and deride which you feelers wish was threatening.
The judge does. As does the gag order.No one cares about 'chide and deride',
Not at all. He can bluster all he wants as long as he is not interfering with the court process or threatening witnesses, jurors, the court personnel, etc.The judge does. As does the gag order.
No.Not at all. He can bluster all he wants as long as he is not interfering with the court process or threatening witnesses, jurors, the court personnel, etc.
I do think he will be sanctioned with house arrest, and then the fat will hit the fire.
Yep, the Defendant has been warned.No.
"Forbidding all parties from posting, emailing, or speaking publicly about any members of my staff"