Real ID about to take a hit

Great.... An anarchist or a libertarian?


Dude is right on this one. We already had most of these guys on the radar before 9/11. It wasn't that our radar system wasn't good enough. Just that no one was paying attention to it at the right level. Hell, there are stacks and stacks of memos filed by "checkers" who had checked over these guys and reported them. We had reports to the White House that said "HEY!! SOMEONE IS TALKING ABOUT FLYING PLANES INTO TALL BUILDINGS".

We have plenty of checkers, checking on shit that needs to be checked. Now if you can concvince a politician to do a damn thing about it.



What we have/had Sweet Willy was "Failure to Communicate.


It was more of a failure to acknowledge. The documents and memos went to the highest levels and they were ignored. The threats were communicated, just that nothing was done about it. Half of these guys could have been picked up before 9/11 if someone would have just said "do it".
 
Dude is right on this one. We already had most of these guys on the radar before 9/11. It wasn't that our radar system wasn't good enough. Just that no one was paying attention to it at the right level. Hell, there are stacks and stacks of memos filed by "checkers" who had checked over these guys and reported them. We had reports to the White House that said "HEY!! SOMEONE IS TALKING ABOUT FLYING PLANES INTO TALL BUILDINGS".

We have plenty of checkers, checking on shit that needs to be checked. Now if you can concvince a politician to do a damn thing about it.

Which has what to do with the fact that they obtained the necessary documentation to enroll in a U. S. flight training school BEFORE they hyjacked the planes?
 
No, I asked you a question. Two in fact. No problem....
The questions are irrelevant to the fact that you're pimping for an authoritarian nanny state federal program, using the recycled arguments of leftist authoritarian nanny staters no less.

But if answers are what you want -and since we're doing some recycling here- I'll toss out an oldie but goodie from the ole "conservative" (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean anymore) hit parade.....

How about fully enforcing all the laws that were already on the books??
 
Dude is right on this one. We already had most of these guys on the radar before 9/11. It wasn't that our radar system wasn't good enough. Just that no one was paying attention to it at the right level. Hell, there are stacks and stacks of memos filed by "checkers" who had checked over these guys and reported them. We had reports to the White House that said "HEY!! SOMEONE IS TALKING ABOUT FLYING PLANES INTO TALL BUILDINGS".

We have plenty of checkers, checking on shit that needs to be checked. Now if you can concvince a politician to do a damn thing about it.



What we have/had Sweet Willy was "Failure to Communicate.


It was more of a failure to acknowledge. The documents and memos went to the highest levels and they were ignored. The threats were communicated, just that nothing was done about it. Half of these guys could have been picked up before 9/11 if someone would have just said "do it".

but wait,, somewhere in the recesses of me feeble mind I remember some lady congresscritter writing and passing legislation the prohibitied communication between FBI and CIA??? she ended up sitting on of all things the 9-11 commission.. I wish I could remember her name..her was a democwat.
 
Dude is right on this one. We already had most of these guys on the radar before 9/11. It wasn't that our radar system wasn't good enough. Just that no one was paying attention to it at the right level. Hell, there are stacks and stacks of memos filed by "checkers" who had checked over these guys and reported them. We had reports to the White House that said "HEY!! SOMEONE IS TALKING ABOUT FLYING PLANES INTO TALL BUILDINGS".

We have plenty of checkers, checking on shit that needs to be checked. Now if you can concvince a politician to do a damn thing about it.

Which has what to do with the fact that they obtained the necessary documentation to enroll in a U. S. flight training school BEFORE they hyjacked the planes?

You are talking about building yet another useless government cluster fuck. Are you actually basing your argument on the premise that after all of the failures, all of the ignoring of these guys, that somehow, they couldn't have enrolled into flight school? Are you claiming that we didn't know these guys were in flght school? Because we did. Our checkers had already checked that. We already knew some had trained and we knew that some had tried to enroll. We all but followed them onto the planes that morning.

You're of the mind that anyone with a computer couldn't get a flight simulator game and learn enough to do what these guys did? And you're ready to have the US government put a mandate on the states to perform a task which they have concluded they can not reasonably do in order to accomplish exactly what? To keep drivers license from people? To make an ID some supposed infallable means of identification? Forgetting that forgers will master these new IDs in a matter of days? Forgetting that we can't even satisfy people that the President has a birth certificate but somehow we are going to confirm every person in the US?

You sure are putting a lot of faith in a little piece of plastic.
 
but wait,, somewhere in the recesses of me feeble mind I remember some lady congresscritter writing and passing legislation the prohibitied communication between FBI and CIA??? she ended up sitting on of all things the 9-11 commission.. I wish I could remember her name..her was a democwat.
Doesn't matter...What the 9/11™ conspirators were doing was plainly against American laws and they could've been scooped up on that pretext, no communication with the CIA necessary.

In any case, what does that have to do with the dopey Real I.D. statute??
 
Last edited:
More spoon fed reactionary crapola from the right. Remember the States? The 50 places that the right loves to blather on about their "rights"? Those states are the ones balking at this, not President Obama. They are refusing to conform to a federal mandate because they can't afford it.

You idiots should be celbrating a victory for state's rights.
Absolutely.
 
No, I asked you a question. Two in fact. No problem....
The questions are irrelevant to the fact that you're pimping for an authoritarian nanny state federal program, using the recycled arguments of leftist authoritarian nanny staters no less.

But if answers are what you want -and since we're doing some recycling here- I'll toss out an oldie but goodie from the ole "conservative" (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean anymore) hit parade.....

How about fully enforcing all the laws that were already on the books??

All for it. Were you aware that Vital Record were subject to OPRA prior to 9/11 and still are in some states? That would mean that a new law is in place SOMEWHERE that protects the record(s) from accessibility by any Tom, Dick, Harry or Jane Doe. Hmmm....
 
but wait,, somewhere in the recesses of me feeble mind I remember some lady congresscritter writing and passing legislation the prohibitied communication between FBI and CIA??? she ended up sitting on of all things the 9-11 commission.. I wish I could remember her name..her was a democwat.
Doesn't matter...What the 9/11™ conspirators were doing was plainly against American laws and they could've been scooped up on that pretext, no communication with the CIA necessary.

In any case, what does that have to do with the dopey Real I.D. statute??

They seem to think that if everyone had computer chips implanted it would not have happened ... :eusa_whistle:
 
All for it. Were you aware that Vital Record were subject to OPRA prior to 9/11 and still are in some states? That would mean that a new law is in place SOMEWHERE that protects the record(s) from accessibility by any Tom, Dick, Harry or Jane Doe. Hmmm....
Fine...Than pass that as a stand-alone, rather than pretending that yet another phone book sized piece of legislation is going to be the cure-all.
 
They seem to think that if everyone had computer chips implanted it would not have happened ... :eusa_whistle:

So... everyone needs a little KK and the world will be safe again? :eusa_eh:
No, all you have to do is turn you heart, soul and very life over to Big Daddy Big Gubmint, and all your problems will be solved.

Don't question....Don't doubt...Lest you be deemed an unpatriotic and uncompassionate cat-kicking anarchist.

It's the most popular refrain of demopublicratican tyrants everywhere.
 
Last edited:
All for it. Were you aware that Vital Record were subject to OPRA prior to 9/11 and still are in some states? That would mean that a new law is in place SOMEWHERE that protects the record(s) from accessibility by any Tom, Dick, Harry or Jane Doe. Hmmm....
Fine...Than pass that as a stand-alone, rather than pretending that yet another phone book sized piece of legislation is going to be the cure-all.

I didn't suggest that it's a "cure all". Could you tell me which of the provisions of the rider you disapprove of?

The Act is a rider to an act of the United States Congress titled Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005.

The REAL ID Act implements the following:

Changing visa limits for temporary workers, nurses, and Australian citizens.
Establishing new national standards for state-issued driver licenses and non-driver identification cards.
Funding some reports and pilot projects related to border security.
Introducing rules covering "delivery bonds" (rather like bail bonds but for aliens who have been released pending hearings).
Updating and tightening the laws on application for asylum and deportation of aliens for terrorist activity.
Waiving laws that interfere with construction of physical barriers at the borders.
 
I disapprove of all of it.

Your list only describes the reputed aims of that pile of crap, not how it's going about doing so.....Or paying for it.

Yet another tactic of the authoritarian left....Make a claim that nobody in their right mind could be against, then brand those who oppose the program because of how that program goes about doing business as aiding and abetting the "enemy".

For example: If I'm against socialized medicine, it's obvious that I want poor people to die in the streets.
 
I disapprove of all of it.

Your list only describes the reputed aims of that pile of crap, not how it's going about doing so.....Or paying for it.

Yet another tactic of the authoritarian left....Make a claim that nobody in their right mind could be against, then brand those who oppose the program because of how that program goes about doing business as aiding and abetting the "enemy".

For example: If I'm against socialized medicine, it's obvious that I want poor people to die in the streets.

If you've finished your rant, would you tell me where the cost is incurred in the first provision?
Changing visa limits for temporary workers, nurses, and Australian citizens.
 
You can't pick-n-choose favored provisions when the package is an all-or-nothing proposition.

In that case, gimmie nothing....I can't be any worse off than I already am.

It was an example for chrissakes. You made a general statement about no provision for paying for the provisions, and I, in an attempt to get you to have you support that statement, began selecting one -- from the top. You always this good at supporting your arguments?
 
When social security came into existance, the social security number was never intended to be used as a means of identification. We all know that didn't work out so well. Call me nuts, or anything else you'd like, but I'm all in favor of a National ID card. I'm also in favor of escorting people out of the country who don't qualify for a National ID card too. Prove you're an American or get the hell out...
 

Forum List

Back
Top